Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evolutionary analysis of the highly dynamic CHEK2duplicon in anthropoids

BMC Evolutionary Biology volume 8, Article number: 269 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Segmental duplications (SDs) are euchromatic portions of genomic DNA (≥ 1 kb) that occur at more than one site within the genome, and typically share a high level of sequence identity (>90%). Approximately 5% of the human genome is composed of such duplicated sequences. Here we report the detailed investigation of CHEK2 duplications. CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene encoding a cell cycle checkpoint kinase acting in the DNA-damage response signalling pathway. The continuous presence of the CHEK2 gene in all eukaryotes and its important role in maintaining genome stability prompted us to investigate the duplicative evolution and phylogeny of CHEK2 and its paralogs during anthropoid evolution.

Results

To study CHEK2 duplicon evolution in anthropoids we applied a combination of comparative FISH and in silico analyses. Our comparative FISH results with a CHEK2 fosmid probe revealed the single-copy status of CHEK2 in New World monkeys, Old World monkeys and gibbons. Whereas a single CHEK2 duplication was detected in orangutan, a multi-site signal pattern indicated a burst of duplication in African great apes and human. Phylogenetic analysis of paralogous and ancestral CHEK2 sequences in human, chimpanzee and rhesus macaque confirmed this burst of duplication, which occurred after the radiation of orangutan and African great apes. In addition, we used inter-species quantitative PCR to determine CHEK2 copy numbers. An amplification of CHEK2 was detected in African great apes and the highest CHEK2 copy number of all analysed species was observed in the human genome. Furthermore, we detected variation in CHEK2 copy numbers within the analysed set of human samples.

Conclusion

Our detailed analysis revealed the highly dynamic nature of CHEK2 duplication during anthropoid evolution. We determined a burst of CHEK2 duplication after the radiation of orangutan and African great apes and identified the highest CHEK2 copy number in human. In conclusion, our analysis of CHEK2 duplicon evolution revealed that SDs contribute to inter-species variation. Furthermore, our qPCR analysis led us to presume CHEK2 copy number variation in human, and molecular diagnostics of the cancer susceptibility gene CHEK2 inside the duplicated region might be hampered by the individual-specific set of duplicons.

Background

Segmental duplications (SDs) are euchromatic portions of genomic DNA (≥ 1 kb) that occur at more than one site within the genome and typically share a high level of sequence identity (>90%) [1]. Both in situ hybridization and in silico analyses have shown that ~5% of the human genome is composed of duplicated sequences [2–4]. Duplications that can be traced to an ancestral or donor location are named duplicons. Based on a neutral model of genome evolution [5], duplicons with approximately 10% sequence divergence correspond to duplication events that have occurred 30–40 million years ago (MYA), i.e. before the radiation of Old World monkey and hominoid species [6]. Furthermore, a conspicuous bias of interchromosomal SDs toward pericentromeric regions, or euchromatin/heterochromatin transition regions in general, was detected [7, 8]. Fine-scale analyses of pericentromeric regions disclosed a two-step model for the formation of such dynamic regions. An initial pericentromeric "seeding" event followed by subsequent exchange ("swapping") of duplicon blocks between pericentromeric regions has been proposed [9, 10]. Both homologous and non-homologous processes were shown to be involved in "seeding" and "swapping" of pericentromeric SDs in human and great ape genomes [9–13] (for review see [14]). The duplicative architecture of human and higher primate genomes has been shown to be a major force promoting rapid evolutionary turnover [15]. Although the predisposition to expansion of interspersed segmental duplication is common to human and great apes, it appears that many species-specific duplication events have taken place at different regions of their genomes. Interestingly, two independent approaches determined the fraction of species-specific SDs in chimpanzee and human to be ~30%, while ~66% of SDs seem to be shared between both species [16, 17]. Thus, species-specific SDs are thought to have contributed to a larger extent to the genetic difference between chimpanzee and human than single-base mutations [17]. Moreover, SDs seem to be sites of recurrent large-scale structural variations [18–20] and it has been estimated that ~20% of SDs are polymorphic within the human and chimpanzee genome [17].

Interestingly, among all human chromosomes the Y chromosome has the highest relative SD content [2, 6, 16, 21–23]. Recently, we have analyzed 866 kb of Y-chromosomal non-palindromic SDs delineating the four euchromatin/heterochromatin transition regions in Yp11.2/Yp11.1, Yq11.1/Yq11.21, Yq11.23/Yq12 and Yq12/YPAR2 [24, 25].

Here we report the detailed investigation of the CHEK2 duplicons, one of which is embedded within the analyzed Yq11.1/Yq11.21 SD cluster. The ancestral duplicated region, containing the proximal part of the functional CHEK2 gene (CHK2 checkpoint homolog S.pombe) and the distal part of TTC28 (tetratricopeptide repeat domain 28), is located in 22q12.1 [10, 25–27]. CHEK2 has been shown to be a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene [28]. Interestingly, CHK2, the protein encoded by CHEK2, is a cell cycle checkpoint kinase acting in the DNA-damage response signalling pathway [27]. Cell cycle checkpoints monitor the structural integrity of chromosomes before their progression through crucial cell cycle stages. CHK2 homologues were found in yeast and higher eukaryotes [29–33] indicating an important role throughout eukaryotic evolution in controlling the integrity of the genome. The continuous presence of the CHEK2 gene in all eukaryotes [34] and its important role in maintaining genome stability [27] prompted us to investigate the duplicative evolution and phylogeny of CHEK2 and its paralogs during anthropoid evolution. We applied a combination of comparative FISH and in silico analyses. In addition, we used inter-species quantitative PCR for further validation and for detection of intra-species specific CHEK2 copy number variations.

Methods

Y-chromosomal cosmid library screening

We screened the LLOYNC03 "M" (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Y-chromosomal library (5.5xY chromosome coverage) for CHEK2 duplicon containing cosmids using a Y-chromosomal probe generated by the following PCR-conditions: 95°C for 5 min, 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 62°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min and finally 72°C for 5 min. The following primers were used to generate a 575 bp probe: IP-cos-SD1-for 5'-ACCCCCTTAGTAGCGTCCTTAGCTC-3' and IP-cos-SD1-rev 5'-ACCACCGGAGTTTCACAAAGAAAGT-3'. The gel-purified probe was radioactively labelled according to the 'random priming' protocol [35]. Prehybridization and hybridization of the high density gridded filters were carried out for 18 hrs at 42°C according to the manufacturer's protocol. Final filter-washing was carried out in 1%SDS/2xSSC solution for 1 hr at 65°C. Primers located proximal and distal of the derivative Y-chromosomal CHEK2 duplicon were used for PCR (conditions see above) to identify cosmids containing the entire duplicon:

PB-cos-SD1-for 5'-AGCGCAAATTGCAGAATTACAAAGA-3', PB-cos-SD1-rev 5'-GGTTAGAGAGGATAAGCCGCATGTT-3', DB-cos-SD1-for 5'-GATCCCGCACATTTGTTCATTAGAG-3', DB-cos-SD1-rev 5'-CAAAAGCTTGAATTCTGTGCCTCAGT-3'

Detection of derived CAGGG repeat sequences in the Y-chromosomal cosmid LLOYNC03 "M" 22E01

We used RepeatMasker http://www.repeatmasker.org/ and Tandem Repeats Finder [36] to search for CAGGG repeat sequences within the Y-chromosomal CHEK2 duplicon containing cosmid LLOYNC03"M" 22E01. Both analyses failed to identify CAGGG repeat sequences in the derivative CHEK2 duplicon and in both adjacent derivative duplicons, which are the IGL@- (Immunoglobulin lambda@ locus-) and the NHEDC1- (Na+/H+ exchanger domain containing 1-) duplicons. Nevertheless, RepeatMasker and Tandem Repeats Finder analysis revealed the presence of extensive CAGGG repeat sequences within the ancestral IGL@ locus in 22q11.21 (NT_011520: 1994740–2060046). Subsequent pairwise alignment of both ancestral and the derivative Y-chromosomal IGL@ loci disclosed a more diverged CAGGG repeat like sequence. By using the DnaSP Ver.4.10.9 software 72% nucleotide sequence identity was detected between the CAGGG repeats present within the ancestral IGL@-duplicon (NT_011520: 2033670–2035327) and the derivative CAGGG repeats in Yq11.1/Yq11.21 (NT_113819: 398233–403886).

Blood samples and cell lines

The following blood samples from non-related individuals were used for qPCR analysis: blood samples from the chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes, PTR) Max (LN: 444) and Fritz (LN: 776, wild-born) were obtained from the Zoologisch-Botanischer Garten Wilhelma Stuttgart (Germany). The blood sample from chimpanzee Marcel (LN: 39) was obtained from TNO Primate Centre Rijswijk (Netherlands). Lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla, GGO) blood samples of Jangu (LN: 315), Gaidi (LN: 916, wild-born) and Fritz (LN: 673, wild-born) were obtained from the Zoo Wuppertal, the Zoo Leipzig and the Tiergarten Nürnberg, respectively. Two blood samples of the Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus, PPY) Thai (LN: 866) and Napoleon (LN: 1005) were obtained from the Zoo Duisburg (Germany) and the Zoo Studen (Switzerland), respectively. Blood samples from two rhesus macaque individuals (Macaca mulatta, MMU; LN: 1053 and 1054) and one hamadryas baboon individual (Papio hamadryas, PHA; LN: 496) were obtained from the Deutsches Primaten Zentrum Göttingen (Germany).

Skin tissue of a pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina, MNE) was provided by the Deutsches Primaten Zentrum Göttingen (Germany) and was used to establish a fibroblast cell line. For each species one of the above listed blood samples and the fibroblast cell line were used for FISH analysis. Lymphoblastoid cell lines of the white-cheeked crested gibbon (Nomascus leucogenys, NLE) and the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus, CJA) were kindly provided by S. Müller (Munich) and were used for FISH analysis.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

FISH analysis of metaphase spreads derived from lymphocytes or lymphoblastoid and fibroblast cell lines from non-related human (Homo sapiens, HSA) and non-human primate males was performed. Prior to FISH, the slides were treated with RNase followed by pepsin digestion as described [37]. FISH was carried out following the protocol described previously [38]. Chromosome in situ suppression was applied to clones from the human fosmid library WI-2 (WI2-1621D20, WI2-819H21) and from the Y chromosome specific cosmid library LLOYNCO3"M" (LLOYNCO3"M"22E01). Human whole-chromosome painting (WCP) libraries [39] were used to unequivocally assign hybridizing signals to orthologous regions in lesser apes, Old World monkeys and New World monkeys. pMR100, a mouse-derived rDNA-containing plasmid, was used to tag the Old World monkey marker chromosome. After FISH the slides were counterstained with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; 0.14 μg/ml) and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Preparations were evaluated using a Zeiss Axiophot epifluorescence microscope equipped with single-bandpass filters for excitation of red, green, and blue (Chroma Technologies, Brattleboro, VT). During exposures, only excitation filters were changed allowing for pixel-shift-free image recording. Images of high magnification and resolution were obtained using a black-and-white CCD camera (Photometrics Kodak KAF 1400; Kodak, Tucson, AZ) connected to the Axiophot. Camera control and digital image acquisition involved the use of an Apple Macintosh Quadra 950 computer.

Phylogenetic analysis

FASTA formatted sequence files used to generate phylogenetic trees were extracted from the corresponding GenBank accession numbers. Sequence alignments were built by using CLUSTALW (version 1.82) [40], and neighbor-joining phylograms created by using MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis) v4.0 http://www.megasoftware.net[41]. Neighbor-joining analysis was used with complete deletion parameters and bootstrap (1,000 iterations) to provide confidence of each branching point in the phylogenetic trees. Neighbor-joining methods were chosen as they are amenable to calculating divergence times between sequence taxa. We estimated the number of substitutions per site per year by correcting the divergence times for multiple substitutions using Kimura's two-parameter model [42]. As the rates of nucleotide substitution vary for pseudogenic sequences, the rate of nucleotide substitution was calibrated based on orthologous sequence comparisons using a divergence of 25 Mya for macaque-human divergence [43]. Duplication timing events were calculated by applying the equation r = k/2 T [44], where r is the rate of nucleotide changes per bp per yr, k is the distance calculated between the ancestral and paralogous sequences, and T is the time of divergence of the molecules.

Quantitative PCR

Interspecies quantitative PCR was carried out using primers specific for CHEK2 exon 14. Primers were designed with the assistance of the Promega Plexor Primer Design Software. The following primer sequences were used: CHEK2-exon14-F 5'-GGACCTTGTCAAGAAGTTGTTGGT-3', CHEK2-exon14-R 5'-GGTGTCTTAAGGCTTCTTCTGTCGTA-3', CFTR-F 5'-CGCGATTTATCTAGGCATAGGC-3' and CFTR-R 5'-TGTGATGAAGGCCAAAAATGG-3'

We used the ABI Prism 7900 HT system (Applied Biosystems) for real time detection. Reactions contained 0.25 μM of each primer and 5 μl of QuantiTec SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Quiagen) in a total of 10 μl. Assays included DNA standards at a final concentration of 5.0, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625 and 0.3125 ng/μl, a no-template control, or 1 ng/μl of the species DNA in two replicates. Cycling conditions were 50°C for two minutes, 95°C for 15 minutes, and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 58°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec.

To avoid the generation of non-specific products, a melting curve analysis of products was routinely undertaken following the amplification. A standard curve was constructed by plotting the cycle number (Ct), at which the amount of target in standard dilutions reaches a fixed threshold, against the log of the amount of starting target. For standard curve construction genomic DNA from the rhesus macaque MMU#13577 was used as a CHEK2 single copy reference. The CHEK2 single copy status in the rhesus macaque genome was verified by both FISH and in silico analysis. Absolute quantification of copy number in the different species was subsequently done by interpolation of the threshold cycle number (Ct) against the corresponding standard curve. Copy numbers of the test genes in primate samples were normalised to the copy number of the CFTR gene (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), which serves as a control representative of a single gene per haploid genome [45]. CFTR primers perfectly match the CFTR gene in all targeted species genomes. The ratio of the CHEK2 copy number to CFTR copy number in each sample normalised the results with respect to differing starting quantity and quality of the template DNA in each reaction [46]. Standard errors of the normalised CHEK2 copy numbers were calculated from the standard deviations of the values of the CFTR and CHEK2 genes using the formula provided by the user menu (ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System, User Bulletin no.2 1997, p.34). Comparisons between the mean values were performed using the Student unpaired t-test. A P-value <0.001 was considered significant.

Results and discussion

Identification and comparative FISH of a CHEK2duplicon containing Y-chromosomal cosmid probe

To investigate the evolution of the CHEK2 duplicon we screened a Y-chromosomal cosmid library (LLOYNC03"M") with a Y-derived CHEK2 duplicon probe (for detail see Methods). A total of 13 positive clones were detected. Probes bordering the Y-chromosomal CHEK2 duplicon were subsequently used to identify cosmids containing the entire derivative duplicon. Out of four positive clones cosmid LLOYNC03"M"22E01 (Figure 1A) was chosen for comparative FISH on human, great ape, Old World monkey (OWM) and New World monkey (NWM) metaphase chromosomes (Figure 1B, Table 1). In the human genome cosmid 22E01 hybridized to euchromatin/heterochromatin transition regions Yq11.1/Yq11.21 and Yq11.23/Yq12, and to additional 12 transition regions on 9 different autosomes. The only interstitial hybridization signal detected was assigned to the ancestral CHEK2 locus in 22q12.1. With only a few exceptions signals were detected in orthologous positions on chimpanzee and gorilla chromosomes (Figure 1B, Table 1). Signals on human and chimpanzee chromosomes 1 and 10 were missing on the orthologous gorilla chromosomes and species-specific signals were restricted to human chromosome 13, and to gorilla chromosomes 2B and 18. In contrast to the multi-site signal patterns found in all African great ape species, in the genomes of orangutan, the rhesus macaque and the common marmoset signals were detected at chromosomal sites orthologous to human 22q12.1. Additional signals with cosmid 22E01 were only detected in the proximal long arm (10qprox) on the NOR (nucleolus organizer region) – containing "marker-chromosome" 10 [47] of all three investigated OWM species (rhesus macaque, pig-tailed macaque and baboon). Sequences covered by cosmid 22E01 were subjected to repeat finding programs (for detail see Methods). These analyses suggested that the additional signal on the repeat-rich OWM "marker-chromosome" may be due to diverged CAGGG repeats within the Y-chromosomal cosmid probe. Such CAGGG repeats were previously identified as a single repeat block on the proximal long arm of the "marker-chromosome" of the crab-eating macaque [12] and were shown to have been distributed toward many pericentromeric regions during great ape evolution [12, 48]. In addition, preliminary analysis of other Y-chromosomal SDs indicate that there may be further diverged CAGGG repeat sequences located on the Y chromosome that remained undetected by repeat finding programs. These undetected CAGGG repeat sequences may be located in the Yq11.23/Yq12 transition region and in the proximal part of the Yq11.1/Yq11.21 transition region. FISH with large insert genomic clones from both regions showed signals on the proximal long arm of the OWM chromosome 10 [25].

Table 1 Comparative FISH results of cosmid clone LLNLYC03"M" 22E01 from Yq11.1/q11.21
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

FISH with a CHEK2 duplicon containing Y-chromosomal cosmid probe in anthropoids. (A): Schematic representation of the human Y chromosome with an enlarged view of the CHEK2 duplicon in Yq11.1/Yq11.21. Basepair positions within the Y-chromosomal contig NT_113819 are indicated for the CHEK2 duplicon boundaries, for all probes used to identify a CHEK2 duplicon containing cosmid and for the derivative CAGGG repeat sequences. Localization of FISH probe LLOYNC03'M'22E01 within the Y-chromosomal contig is shown below. (B) Comparative FISH of cosmid LLOYNC03'M'22E01 (labelled in red) covering the human Y-chromosomal derivative CHEK2 duplicon in Yq11.1/Yq11.21 on human (HSA), chimpanzee (PTR), gorilla (GGO), orangutan (PPY), rhesus macaque (MMU), pig-tailed macaque (MNE), baboon (PHA) and marmoset (CJA) metaphase chromosomes. The great ape chromosomal designations are given according to [65], for MMU, MNE and PHA according to [47] and for CJA according to [66]. White arrows indicate the ancestral CHEK2 locus.

Full size image

Comparative FISH with CHEK2fosmid probes from 22q12.1 in anthropoids

For unambiguous detection of CHEK2 duplicons in anthropoids we performed further FISH experiments with fosmid WI2-1621D20 (G248P81803F6; Figure 2A), which derives from human chromosome 22q12.1. This fosmid contains the complete duplicated portion of the ancestral CHEK2/TTC28 locus. No CAGGG repeat sequences are contained within this CHEK2 duplicon probe. Apart from the signal tagging the ancestral CHEK2 locus in 22q12.1 the probe showed the expected multi-site signal pattern in human (Figure 2B, Table 2). Signals were detected on 8 different chromosomes. On chromosomes 1, 2, 10, 13 and Y signals seemed to be restricted to one chromosomal location, whereas chromosomes 15, 16 and 22 showed a signal cluster, indicating the presence of at least two CHEK2 duplicons on each of these three chromosomes. In contrast to the Y-chromosomal cosmid probe no signals were detected with the fosmid on human chromosomes 9, 14 and Yq11.23/Yq12 (Table 1, Table 2; Figure 1B, Figure 2B). This observation might be explained by the absence of CAGGG repeat sequences in the fosmid probe. The fosmid WI2-1621D20 hybridized to 6 different autosomal chimpanzee chromosomes and the observed signal distribution was highly similar to the human pattern. Nevertheless, no signal was detected on chimpanzee chromosome 13 and only a single signal on chimpanzee chromosome 15. Substantial differences to the Y-chromosomal cosmid probe were detected in the gorilla genome. Only three gorilla chromosomes were tagged. Gorilla chromosome 16 showed two signals located in the proximal and distal transition regions of the heterochromatin block on the short arm (Additional File 1), indicating gorilla-specific reorganization or acquisition of CHEK2 duplicons on this chromosome. Gorilla chromosome 22 showed two distinct signal localizations. One signal mapped to the ancestral interstitial CHEK2 locus and one to the pericentromeric region of the long arm. As in the chimpanzee genome, this probe generated no signal on gorilla chromosome 13, favouring a human-specific CHEK2 duplication event towards the short arm of human chromosome 13. The orangutan genome revealed differences in the signal pattern between both probes, too. In contrast to the Y-chromosomal cosmid probe, two signals were detected on orangutan chromosomes 16 and 22. This observation indicates the occurrence of a first CHEK2 duplication event before the radiation of the great apes and, in addition, shows that sequences located on chromosome 16 are more related to the ancestral than to the derivative locus on the human Y chromosome. Furthermore, hybridization of fosmid WI2-1621D20 on metaphase chromosomes of the white-cheeked crested gibbon, the rhesus macaque, the pig-tailed macaque and the common marmoset revealed a single CHEK2 copy status. In all these species, only the chromosomal region orthologous to human chromosome 22q12 was labelled. This observation contrasts the signal location of the Y-chromosomal cosmid probe in the analysed OWM species, but can again be explained by the absence of CAGGG repeat sequences in the ancestral CHEK2 fosmid probe.

Table 2 Comparative FISH results of fosmid clone WI2-1621D20 from 22q12.1
Full size table
Figure 2
figure 2

FISH with a CHEK2 fosmid probe from 22q12.1 in anthropoids. (A): Schematic representation of human chromosome 22 with an enlarged view of the analysed CHEK2/TTC28- locus in 22q12.1. All CHEK2 exons and exon 1 of TTC28 are given. Basepair positions for the duplicated region within the chromosome 22 contig NT_011520 are indicated. Localisations of fosmids WI2-1621D20, covering the duplicated region, and WI2-819H21, covering the CHEK2 non-duplicated region are given below. (B) Comparative FISH of fosmid WI2-1621D20 (labelled in red) covering the ancestral duplicated CHEK2 locus in 22q12.1 on human (HSA), chimpanzee (PTR), gorilla (GGO), orangutan (PPY), white-cheeked crested gibbon (NLE), rhesus macaque (MMU), pig-tailed macaque (MNE) and marmoset (CJA) metaphase chromosomes. The great ape chromosomal designations are given according to [65], for NLE according to [67], for MMU, MNE and PHA according to [47] and for CJA according to [66]. White arrows indicate the ancestral CHEK2 locus.

Full size image

To verify the single-copy status of the non-duplicated portion of the CHEK2 locus, we performed FISH with the fosmid probe WI2-819H21 (G248P81285D11; Figure 2A). In all analysed primate species, including human, this probe hybridized to a single genomic localisation corresponding to the human 22q12.1 orthologous regions. In conclusion, our comparative FISH results with fosmid probe WI2-1621D20 (Figure 2B, Table 2) show the single-copy status of CHEK2 in all tested New World and Old World monkeys and in the white-cheeked crested gibbon. While a first CHEK2 duplication event was detected in the orangutan, a burst of duplication, giving rise to the complex signal pattern, occurred before the radiation of African great apes. Except for chromosomes 16 and Y all signals present in non-human primates were also detected in the orthologous human regions.

Comparative in silico analysis of CHEK2duplicons in anthropoids

We used the sequence from the human ancestral CHEK2 locus for megaBLAST analysis (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi) of the human genome. This analysis revealed the presence of 10 derivative CHEK2 duplicons in the current human reference genome assembly, while two additional duplicons were identified in the Celera whole genome assembly (Figure 3A). The largest CHEK2 duplicon is located in 16p11.2 (16p11.2a) and spans 20747 basepairs of the ancestral CHEK2 locus. This duplicon includes exons 12 to 16 of CHEK2 and exon 1 of TTC28. Furthermore, three additional smaller duplicons (16p11.2b-d) were detected on chromosome 16. Duplicons 16p11.2c and 16p11.2d are about 10 kb in size and share 99% sequence identity, indicating a recent duplication event. In addition, both duplicons terminate within an AluSq-element, which has been shown to be enriched within SD junctions [11]. Slightly shorter than duplicon 16p11.2a is the CHEK2 duplicon located in 15q11.2. A second CHEK2 duplicon on chromosome 15 was only detected in the Celera whole genome assembly and is assigned to chromosome band 15p13. Both chromosome 15 duplicons share 99% sequence identity. As our detailed FISH analysis also indicated the presence of at least two different CHEK2 duplicon copies on human chromosome 15, we conclude that these two duplicons are the result of a recent intrachromosomal duplication event or might reflect individual genomic variation. Furthermore, the 15q11.2 duplicon exhibits an internal 4.2 kb deletion not present in the 15p13 duplicon. Both deletion breakpoints reside in AluSq-elements, one of them being identical to the one terminating the duplicons 16p11.2c and 16p11.2d. This deletion was shown to be present in two different BAC libraries, RPCI-11 and RPCI-13, thus almost certainly ruling out individual variation. In summary, duplicons located at chromosomes 15 and 16 revealed a high intrachromosomal sequence identity. This observation is concordant with previous investigations showing that intrachromosomal duplications share higher sequence identity than interchromosomal duplications, thus pointing to a recent intrachromosomal expansion of the human genome [16, 49]. It should be mentioned that the high degree of sequence identity between intrachromosomal duplicons might also be due to nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) and/or gene conversion [50–53]. Additional CHEK2 duplicons, containing almost the entire CHEK2 duplicated portion, are located in 2p11.1/2p11.2, 10p11.1, 22q11.1 and Yq11.1/Yq11.21. Furthermore, one CHEK2 duplicon sequence in the human genome remains chromosomally unassigned (Chr_random), but may be located in the 1q12/1q21 euchromatin/heterochromatin transition region or on the short arm of chromosome 13. FISH signals within these two regions (Figure 2B) do not correspond to any chromosomally assigned CHEK2 duplicon in the current human whole genome assemblies. Interestingly, duplicons located in 2p11.1/2p11.2, 10p11.1, 22q11.1, Yq11.1/Yq11.21 and Chr_random share the same 3 kb LINE1 (long interspersed nuclear element 1) integration, thereby suggesting a common origin. The smallest CHEK2 duplicon was found in 10q11.21 and is about 4.6 kb in size.

Figure 3
figure 3

Comparative in silico analysis of CHEK2 duplicons in human and chimpanzee. Genomic structure of the CHEK2 duplicon family in the (A) human (NCBI Build36.2) and (B) chimpanzee (NCBI Build2) sequence assembly. The respective ancestral CHEK2 locus is depicted by the top horizontal red bar. Within each bar the corresponding accession numbers of the contigs and the position of the CHEK2 exons (green rectangles) and TTC28 exon (blue rectangle) are given. The precise genomic extension of the ancestral loci within each contig is shown beneath. The next two layers illustrate the common repeat and simple repeat content of the ancestral loci as black and grey boxes, respectively. All derivative duplicons are shown below using the indicated colour key. Precise positions of each derivative duplicon within the corresponding contig and the genomic extension of the sequence homology shared with the ancestral locus are indicated below and above each bar, respectively. Striped boxes represent LINE1 elements. LINE1 element integration-sites within the respective contigs are given below and the position of homology break within the ancestral locus is given above. Overall sequence identities between the paralogous human and chimpanzee CHEK2 duplicons and the respective ancestral CHEK2 sequences are given next to all CHEK2 duplicons.

Full size image

To elucidate the molecular evolution of the derivative CHEK2 duplicons we investigated their flanking paralogous sequences. All known CHEK2 duplicons extend into the same proximal duplicated sequence, indicating a single initial pericentromeric "seeding" event. Subsequent pericentromeric "swaps" of the larger duplicon cassette led to the CHEK2 duplicon distribution observed in the human genome. The ancestral location of the duplicon proximal to all CHEK2 duplicons resides within the IGL@ locus in 22q11.21. The duplicated sequences extending beyond the distal CHEK2 duplicon junctions are not identical for all derivative duplicons. While CHEK2 duplicons 16p11.2a and 15q11.2 show the same distal homology, duplicons 2q11.1/2q11.2, 10p11.1, 16p11.2b, 22q11.1, Yq11.1/Yq11.21 and Chr_random share a different distal duplicated sequence. Thus, the latter set of duplicons may have arisen by a duplication of the 16p11.2b duplicon, followed by a LINE1 element integration and successive pericentromeric exchange.

Subsequently, we used the same in silico approach to determine the CHEK2 duplicon architecture of the chimpanzee genome (build2). Chromosomally assigned duplicons in the chimpanzee genome showed chromosomal designations corresponding to the human genome locations. Duplicons were detected on chimpanzee chromosomes 10, 15, 16, 22 and Y (Figure 3B), but not on chromosome 2A. Two duplications containing almost the entire CHEK2 duplicon and 11 smaller duplicon fragments were not chromosomally assigned in the current chimpanzee whole genome assembly. Similar to the human genome the largest CHEK2 duplicon is assigned to chromosome 16 and a slightly shorter CHEK2 duplicon is located on chromosome 15. In contrast to the human genome the chromosome 15 duplicon contains no deletion, indicating that this deletion is human specific. In addition, duplicons on chimpanzee chromosomes 10 and 15 contained small internal duplications and chromosome 16 duplicons seemed to be more fragmented (Figure 3B). These findings might be explained by chimpanzee-specific rearrangements or, more likely, by the inherent problem of generating highly reliable contiguous sequence assemblies in regions enriched in SDs.

Comparative in silico analysis (BLAT search http://genome.ucsc.edu/ of the orangutan (ponAbe2) and rhesus macaque (rheMac2) whole genome assemblies using the human duplicated CHEK2 sequence yield just one copy in the respective genomes on their orthologous chromosome 22. No CHEK2 duplicon was found on orangutan chromosome 16 by this approach, but this may be due to the underrepresentation of segmentally duplicated sequences within pericentromeric regions in the whole genome assemblies [49]. The unduplicated status of CHEK2 in the rhesus macaque genome assembly is concordant with our FISH results obtained with fosmid WI2-1621D20.

Phylogenetic reconstruction of CHEK2duplicon events in anthropoids

To further delineate the evolution of the CHEK2 duplicons we performed phylogenetic analysis with non-coding and non-repetitive sequences using the MEGA4.0 [41] software (Figure 4A). The multi-sequence alignment was composed of 1951 basepairs derived from two loci within the CHEK2 duplicons. The proximal sequence is located upstream of exon 1 of TTC28 (NT_011520: 8465388–8465900) and the distal sequence is located in intron 14 of CHEK2 (NT_011520: 8478430–8480219). We aligned all human and chimpanzee derivative duplicons as well as the ancestral sequences of human, chimpanzee and rhesus macaque. Our phylogenetic analyses placed all chromosomally assigned chimpanzee CHEK2 duplicons next to the human CHEK2 duplicons showing the same chromosomal designations (Figure 4A). We therefore concluded the orthologous nature of the particular human and chimpanzee CHEK2 duplicons on chromosomes 10, 15, 16, 22 and Y. Based on an estimated divergence time of 25 million years between human and rhesus macaque lineages [43], we calculated the effective nucleotide substitution rates (r = K/2 T) (Additional File 2). Calculated times for pericentromeric "seed" and onset of "swaps", are ~22.3 MYA and ~15.9 MYA, respectively. Replacing the human lineage by the chimpanzee lineage, a pericentromeric seed of ~21.2 MYA and an onset of swaps of ~18.0 MYA was calculated. Both independent calculations placed the initial duplication event before the radiation of orangutan and African great apes about 15 MYA [43] thereby coinciding with our FISH results of fosmid clone WI2-1621D20 on orangutan metaphase chromosomes (Table 2; Figure 2B). No signs of duplication were detected on metaphase chromosomes of the white-cheeked crested gibbon, which is thought to have split from the great ape-human lineage about 18 MYA. Only one signal in 7qdist representing the orthologous region of human 22q12 was detected by FISH (Table 2; Figure 2B). This might either be explained by the loss of the primary CHEK2 duplicon in the gibbon lineage or the high degree of sequence divergence between the putative gibbon duplicon and the human ancestral CHEK2 locus. Such a high degree of sequence divergence is a very likely explanation supported by previous investigations, which detected an acceleration of substitution rates after the duplication event [54–56]. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the duplication events revealed that the largest human and chimpanzee duplicons located on chromosome 16 share the highest degree of sequence identity with the ancestral CHEK2 locus (Additional File 3). This indicates, in combination with our FISH results, that the first duplication event was a pericentromeric "seed" from the ancestral interstitial CHEK2 locus toward the pericentromeric region of chromosome 16 (Figure 4B). The duplicons located on chromosomes 15 of chimpanzee and human share the highest degree of sequence identity with the largest chromosome 16 duplicons of human and chimpanzee (Additional File 3) suggesting a pericentromeric "swapping" event from chromosome 16 towards chromosome 15. Phylogenetic reconstruction identifies the duplicons located in the pericentromeric regions of human chromosome 2 and human and chimpanzee chromosomes 10, 22 and Y as the most recent ones in the respective genomes. This finding concurs with the in silico results, which showed these duplicons to harbour a unique LINE1 element integration.

Figure 4
figure 4

Phylogenetic reconstruction of CHEK2 duplicon events in anthropoids. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of the CHEK2 duplicon family. A neighbor-joining phylogram was generated using MEGA 4.0 software [41] and rooted on the ancestral CHEK2 sequence of the rhesus macaque. We used 1951 bp of human and chimpanzee CHEK2 duplicons and ancestral CHEK2 sequences of human, chimpanzee and rhesus macaque. Ancestral loci are highlighted by a red box. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of nucleotide changes between taxa and are indicated below each respective branch (>0.001). Bootstrap values > 70 from 1000 replicates are indicated above each corresponding branch point. Red arrows indicate the LINE1 integration and the pericentromeric "seed" and onset of "swaps". (B) Corresponding FISH signals with fosmid WI2-1621D20 on chromosomes of human (HSA), chimpanzee (PTR), gorilla (GGO), orangutan (PPY), white-cheeked crested gibbon (NLE), rhesus macaque (MMU) and common marmoset (CJA). The left column represents all chromosomes, for which signals were unambiguously correlated to the respective sequences used for MEGA 4.0 analysis. Black arrows indicate the corresponding FISH signals on chromosomes 22. All other signal-containing chromosomes for which no corresponding sequence was used for MEGA4 analysis are arranged in the grey box. These chromosomes are ordered with respect to their human orthologous chromosomes. Chromosomes showing a signal for which no corresponding CHEK2 duplicon sequence was available are displayed on the top and are indicated by asterisks.

Full size image

Detection of inter-species copy number variations of CHEK2by quantitative PCR

The paralogous CHEK2 duplicons in human and African great apes are part of SDs. SDs are known to be frequently associated with copy number variation [57–60]. A robust approach to specifically target such variable regions is quantitative PCR (qPCR). To independently determine the CHEK2 duplicon numbers in the genomes of anthropoids we performed inter-species quantitative PCR with primers located in exon 14. The complete alignment of exonic sequences from all known CHEK2 duplicons of the human, chimpanzee, orangutan and rhesus macaque genome was used to determine the set of primers best matching the sequences. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out that these primers do not match perfectly to all CHEK2 duplicons in all analysed species. As FISH and in silico analyses consistently demonstrated the single copy status of CHEK2 in the rhesus macaque genome we used rhesus macaque genomic DNA as the reference DNA for CHEK2 copy number prediction in human, great ape and OWM species. We determined the copy numbers of five different human individuals, three chimpanzee and gorilla individuals each, two orangutan and rhesus macaque individuals each and one individual each of the pig-tailed macaque and baboon (Figure 5; Additional File 4). All analysed baboon, pig-tailed macaque, rhesus macaque and orangutan individuals revealed just one CHEK2 copy per haploid genome. A drastic increase in copy number was detected for the African great apes with seven and nine CHEK2 copies in the haploid genomes of gorilla and chimpanzee, respectively. The human genome presented the highest increase in CHEK2 copy number, with a variation between 13 to 16 CHEK2 copies per haploid human genome. Our results significantly demonstrate, that the analysed human individuals have a higher CHEK2 copy number than chimpanzee and gorilla (p < 0.0001) and a higher CHEK2 copy number than orangutan and all analysed OWMs (p < 0.0001). In addition, chimpanzee and gorilla have a significantly higher CHEK2 copy number than orangutan and OWMs (p < 0.0001). This observation confirms our FISH investigation and phylogenetic analysis, which placed the burst of CHEK2 duplication after the radiation of orangutan and African great apes. Furthermore, we detected different numbers of CHEK2 copies within the analysed human individuals. Taking into account the sample size, we can only presume whether there is CHEK2 copy number variation in the human population. As mentioned above, our qPCR approach revealed only one CHEK2 copy per haploid orangutan genome, whereas FISH detected two signals on orangutan chromosomes 16 and 22 (Figure 2B) and phylogenetic analyses indicated the occurrence of a first CHEK2 duplication event before the radiation of orangutan and African great apes (Figure 4). The failure to amplify the second CHEK2 copy in the orangutan genome might be explained either by primer mismatch or loss of exon 14 in the orangutan chromosome 16 copy. Therefore, real CHEK2 copy numbers in non-human primates may be even higher than were predicted by our approach.

Figure 5
figure 5

CHEK2 copy number prediction by inter-species quantitative PCR. Human (HSA, blue), chimpanzee (PTR, yellow), gorilla (GGO, red), orangutan (PPY, green), rhesus macaque (MMU, dark blue), pig-tailed macaque (MNE, light green) and baboon (PHA, purple) individuals were analysed. Calculated standard errors for each sample are indicated. Genomic DNA of the rhesus macaque MMU#13577 was used for standard curve construction.

Full size image

Conclusion

CHEK2, which is essential for genomic stability [27], is known to be a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene and is frequently analysed in tumour diagnostics, e.g. of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer [61, 62]. CHEK2 is one of a multitude of genes known to be part of SDs [10, 63]. Our detailed three-pronged approach clearly demonstrates that CHEK2 duplicons show a high degree of both copy number variation and sequence identity. Furthermore, there is strong evidence, that not all duplicons in the human genome have been sequenced yet. Thus, molecular diagnostics of CHEK2 inside the duplicated region might be hampered by the individual-specific set of CHEK2 duplicons. One previously published variant (1422delT) of the functional CHEK2 gene, was thought to predispose to Li-Fraumeni syndrome [64], but subsequently was shown to be the genomic sequence of a CHEK2 duplicon [63]. To avoid such diagnostic pitfalls in the analysis of duplicated disease related genes, it is essential to close the still existing gaps in the human genome sequence by closely examining segmentally duplicated regions. Additionally, copy number and sequence variation within SDs might require further efforts to adapt the diagnostic settings to different ethnic backgrounds.

Furthermore, our detailed CHEK2 analysis revealed its highly dynamic nature during anthropoid evolution. Both, FISH and phylogenetic analyses suggest the first duplication event to have occurred before the radiation of the great ape species. Extensive pericentromeric exchange and intrachromosomal duplication events led to a burst of CHEK2 duplications before the radiation of the African great apes followed by lineage specific rearrangements creating species-specific distribution patterns in great apes and human. In conclusion, our analysis of the CHEK2 duplicon evolution reveals, that SDs contribute to inter-species variation.

References

  1. Eichler EE: Recent duplication, domain accretion and the dynamic mutation of the human genome. Trends Genet. 2001, 17 (11): 661-669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey JA, Gu Z, Clark RA, Reinert K, Samonte RV, Schwartz S, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Eichler EE: Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science. 2002, 297 (5583): 1003-1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheung J, Estivill X, Khaja R, MacDonald JR, Lau K, Tsui LC, Scherer SW: Genome-wide detection of segmental duplications and potential assembly errors in the human genome sequence. Genome Biol. 2003, 4 (4): R25-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheung VG, Nowak N, Jang W, Kirsch IR, Zhao S, Chen XN, Furey TS, Kim UJ, Kuo WL, Olivier M, et al: Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome. Nature. 2001, 409 (6822): 953-958.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nei M: Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 2318-2342.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey JA, Eichler EE: Genome-wide detection and analysis of recent segmental duplications within mammalian organisms. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2003, 68: 115-124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Horvath JE, Schwartz S, Eichler EE: The mosaic structure of human pericentromeric DNA: a strategy for characterizing complex regions of the human genome. Genome Res. 2000, 10 (6): 839-852.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. She X, Horvath JE, Jiang Z, Liu G, Furey TS, Christ L, Clark R, Graves T, Gulden CL, Alkan C, et al: The structure and evolution of centromeric transition regions within the human genome. Nature. 2004, 430: 857-864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eichler EE, Budarf ML, Rocchi M, Deaven LL, Doggett NA, Baldini A, Nelson DL, Mohrenweiser HW: Interchromosomal duplications of the adrenoleukodystrophy locus: a phenomenon of pericentromeric plasticity. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6 (7): 991-1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horvath JE, Gulden CL, Vallente RU, Eichler MY, Ventura M, McPherson JD, Graves TA, Wilson RK, Schwartz S, Rocchi M, et al: Punctuated duplication seeding events during the evolution of human chromosome 2p11. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (7): 914-927.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey JA, Liu G, Eichler EE: An Alu transposition model for the origin and expansion of human segmental duplications. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 73 (4): 823-834.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eichler EE, Archidiacono N, Rocchi M: CAGGG repeats and the pericentromeric duplication of the hominoid genome. Genome Res. 1999, 9 (11): 1048-1058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Horvath JE, Bailey JA, Locke DP, Eichler EE: Lessons from the human genome: transitions between euchromatin and heterochromatin. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (20): 2215-2223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey JA, Eichler EE: Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7 (7): 552-564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stankiewicz P, Shaw CJ, Withers M, Inoue K, Lupski JR: Serial segmental duplications during primate evolution result in complex human genome architecture. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (11): 2209-2220.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. She X, Liu G, Ventura M, Zhao S, Misceo D, Roberto R, Cardone MF, Rocchi M, Green ED, Archidiacano N, et al: A preliminary comparative analysis of primate segmental duplications shows elevated substitution rates and a great ape expansion of intrachromosomal duplications. Genome Res. 2006, 16 (5): 576-583.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng Z, Ventura M, She X, Khaitovich P, Graves T, Osoegawa K, Church D, DeJong P, Wilson RK, Paabo S, et al: A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications. Nature. 2005, 437 (7055): 88-93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuzun E, Sharp AJ, Bailey JA, Kaul R, Morrison VA, Pertz LM, Haugen E, Hayden H, Albertson D, Pinkel D, et al: Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2005, 37 (7): 727-732.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goidts V, Cooper DN, Armengol L, Schempp W, Conroy J, Estivill X, Nowak N, Hameister H, Kehrer-Sawatzki H: Complex patterns of copy number variation at sites of segmental duplications: an important category of structural variation in the human genome. Hum Genet. 2006, 120 (2): 270-284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, Cheng Z, Bailey JA, Vallente RU, Pertz LM, Clark RA, Schwartz S, Segraves R, et al: Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 77 (1): 78-88.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Skaletsky H, Brown LG, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Waterston RH, Wilson RK, Silber S, Oates R, Rozen S, et al: The AZFc region of the Y chromosome features massive palindromes and uniform recurrent deletions in infertile men. Nat Genet. 2001, 29 (3): 279-286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozen S, Skaletsky H, Marszalek JD, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Waterston RH, Wilson RK, Page DC: Abundant gene conversion between arms of palindromes in human and ape Y chromosomes. Nature. 2003, 423 (6942): 873-876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Hillier L, Brown LG, Repping S, Pyntikova T, Ali J, Bieri T, et al: The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature. 2003, 423 (6942): 825-837.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirsch S, Weiss B, Miner TL, Waterston RH, Clark RA, Eichler EE, Münch C, Schempp W, Rappold G: Interchromosomal segmental duplications of the pericentromeric region on the human Y chromosome. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (2): 195-204.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirsch S, Münch C, Jiang Z, Cheng Z, Chen L, Batz C, Eichler EE, Schempp W: Evolutionary dynamics of segmental duplications from human Y-chromosomal euchromatin/heterochromatin transition regions. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (7): 1030-1042.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang Z, Tang H, Ventura M, Cardone MF, Marques-Bonet T, She X, Pevzner PA, Eichler EE: Ancestral reconstruction of segmental duplications reveals punctuated cores of human genome evolution. Nat Genet. 2007, 39 (11): 1361-1368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsuoka S, Huang M, Elledge SJ: Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science. 1998, 282 (5395): 1893-1897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cybulski C, Gorski B, Huzarski T, Masojc B, Mierzejewski M, Debniak T, Teodorczyk U, Byrski T, Gronwald J, Matyjasik J, et al: CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 75 (6): 1131-1135.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Allen JB, Zhou Z, Siede W, Friedberg EC, Elledge SJ: The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1994, 8 (20): 2401-2415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo Z, Dunphy WG: Response of Xenopus Cds1 in cell-free extracts to DNA templates with double-stranded ends. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11 (5): 1535-1546.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Higashitani A, Aoki H, Mori A, Sasagawa Y, Takanami T, Takahashi H: Caenorhabditis elegans Chk2-like gene is essential for meiosis but dispensable for DNA repair. FEBS Lett. 2000, 485 (1): 35-39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murakami H, Okayama H: A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase. Nature. 1995, 374 (6525): 817-819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oishi I, Sugiyama S, Otani H, Yamamura H, Nishida Y, Minami Y: A novel Drosophila nuclear protein serine/threonine kinase expressed in the germline during its establishment. Mech Dev. 1998, 71 (1–2): 49-63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bartek J, Falck J, Lukas J: CHK2 kinase–a busy messenger. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 2 (12): 877-886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B: A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983, 132 (1): 6-13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Benson G: Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27 (2): 573-580.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ried T, Baldini A, Rand TC, Ward DC: Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (4): 1388-1392.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schempp W, Binkele A, Arnemann J, Glaser B, Ma K, Taylor K, Toder R, Wolfe J, Zeitler S, Chandley AC: Comparative mapping of YRRM- and TSPY-related cosmids in man and hominoid apes. Chromosome Res. 1995, 3 (4): 227-234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jauch A, Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Arnold N, Tofanelli S, Ishida T, Cremer T: Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (18): 8611-8615.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Higgins DG, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ: Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol. 1996, 266: 383-402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980, 16 (2): 111-120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Goodman M, Grossman LI, Wildman DE: Moving primate genomics beyond the chimpanzee genome. Trends Genet. 2005, 21 (9): 511-517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Li W: Molecular evolution. 1997, Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rochette CF, Gilbert N, Simard LR: SMN gene duplication and the emergence of the SMN2 gene occurred in distinct hominids: SMN2 is unique to Homo sapiens. Hum Genet. 2001, 108 (3): 255-266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bieche I, Olivi M, Champeme MH, Vidaud D, Lidereau R, Vidaud M: Novel approach to quantitative polymerase chain reaction using real-time detection: application to the detection of gene amplification in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1998, 78 (5): 661-666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rogers J, Garcia R, Shelledy W, Kaplan J, Arya A, Johnson Z, Bergstrom M, Novakowski L, Nair P, Vinson A, et al: An initial genetic linkage map of the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) genome using human microsatellite loci. Genomics. 2006, 87 (1): 30-38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Eichler EE, Lu F, Shen Y, Antonacci R, Jurecic V, Doggett NA, Moyzis RK, Baldini A, Gibbs RA, Nelson DL: Duplication of a gene-rich cluster between 16p11.1 and Xq28: a novel pericentromeric-directed mechanism for paralogous genome evolution. Hum Mol Genet. 1996, 5 (7): 899-912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. She X, Jiang Z, Clark RA, Liu G, Cheng Z, Tuzun E, Church DM, Sutton G, Halpern AL, Eichler EE: Shotgun sequence assembly and recent segmental duplications within the human genome. Nature. 2004, 431 (7011): 927-930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bosch E, Hurles ME, Navarro A, Jobling MA: Dynamics of a human interparalog gene conversion hotspot. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (5): 835-844.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hallast P, Nagirnaja L, Margus T, Laan M: Segmental duplications and gene conversion: Human luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin beta gene cluster. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (11): 1535-1546.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pavlicek A, House R, Gentles AJ, Jurka J, Morrow BE: Traffic of genetic information between segmental duplications flanking the typical 22q11.2 deletion in velo-cardio-facial syndrome/DiGeorge syndrome. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (11): 1487-1495.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jackson MS, Oliver K, Loveland J, Humphray S, Dunham I, Rocchi M, Viggiano L, Park JP, Hurles ME, Santibanez-Koref M: Evidence for widespread reticulate evolution within human duplicons. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 77 (5): 824-840.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lynch M, Conery JS: The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000, 290 (5494): 1151-1155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kondrashov FA, Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Koonin EV: Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol. 2002, 3 (2): RESEARCH0008-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV: Duplicated genes evolve slower than singletons despite the initial rate increase. BMC Evol Biol. 2004, 4: 22-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, Listewnik ML, Donahoe PK, Qi Y, Scherer SW, Lee C: Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2004, 36 (9): 949-951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fredman D, White SJ, Potter S, Eichler EE, Den Dunnen JT, Brookes AJ: Complex SNP-related sequence variation in segmental genome duplications. Nat Genet. 2004, 36 (8): 861-866.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW: Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7 (2): 85-97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. de Stahl TD, Sandgren J, Piotrowski A, Nord H, Andersson R, Menzel U, Bogdan A, Thuresson AC, Poplawski A, von Tell D, et al: Profiling of copy number variations (CNVs) in healthy individuals from three ethnic groups using a human genome 32 K BAC-clone-based array. Hum Mutat. 2008, 29 (3): 398-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Dong X, Wang L, Taniguchi K, Wang X, Cunningham JM, McDonnell SK, Qian C, Marks AF, Slager SL, Peterson BJ, et al: Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72 (2): 270-280.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Meijers-Heijboer H, Wijnen J, Vasen H, Wasielewski M, Wagner A, Hollestelle A, Elstrodt F, Bos van den R, de Snoo A, Fat GT, et al: The CHEK2 1100delC mutation identifies families with a hereditary breast and colorectal cancer phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72 (5): 1308-1314.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sodha N, Williams R, Mangion J, Bullock SL, Yuille MR, Eeles RA: Screening hCHK2 for mutations. Science. 2000, 289 (5478): 359-

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bell DW, Varley JM, Szydlo TE, Kang DH, Wahrer DC, Shannon KE, Lubratovich M, Verselis SJ, Isselbacher KJ, Fraumeni JF, et al: Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science. 1999, 286 (5449): 2528-2531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. McConkey EH: Orthologous numbering of great ape and human chromosomes is essential for comparative genomics. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004, 105 (1): 157-158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sherlock JK, Griffin DK, Delhanty JD, Parrington JM: Homologies between human and marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) chromosomes revealed by comparative chromosome painting. Genomics. 1996, 33 (2): 214-219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Roberto R, Capozzi O, Wilson RK, Mardis ER, Lomiento M, Tuzun E, Cheng Z, Mootnick AR, Archidiacono N, Rocchi M, et al: Molecular refinement of gibbon genome rearrangements. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (2): 249-257.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Christine Hodler for technical assistance, and Alexander Craig for stylistic revisions of the manuscript. Supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sche 214/8-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 33, 79106, Freiburg, Germany

    Claudia Münch, Stefan Kirsch, António MG Fernandes & Werner Schempp

Authors
  1. Claudia Münch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Kirsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. António MG Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Werner Schempp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Schempp.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

CM designed as well as carried out the experiments of the study and drafted the manuscript. AMGF performed the statistical analyses and helped in finalising the corresponding sections of the manuscript. SK and WS participated in the design of the study and helped to finalise the manuscript. All authors proofread and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12862_2008_838_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Additional file 1: Chromosome 16 banding nomenclature and signal localization of clone WI2-1621D20 in anthropoids. Indicated are the FISH signal localizations of clone WI2-1621D20 (red) on chromosome 16 in great apes and human. Human chromosome 16 nomenclature according to ISCN (2005). Chromosome 16 banding pattern of great apes (PTR, GGO and PPY) according to Goidts et al. (2005). Chromosome 16 banding nomenclature of great apes according to ISCN (1985) and adjusted to the human chromosome 16 banding nomenclature. Black bars represent the evolutionary breakpoints as described by Goidts et al. (2005). References: ISCN (2005): An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Shaffer LG, Tommerup N (eds): S. Karger, Basel 2005. ISCN (1985): An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Harnden DG, Klinger HP (eds): S. Karger, Basel 1985. Goitds V, Szamalek JM, de Jong PJ, Cooper DN, Chuzhanova N, Hameister H, Kehrer-Sawatzki H.: Independent intrachromosomal recombination events underlie the pericentromeric inversion of chimpanzee and gorilla chromosomes homologous to human chromosome 16, Genome Res 2005, 15(9): 1232–42 (PDF 165 KB)

12862_2008_838_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional file 2: Evolutionary distances overview. Based on the Kimura two-parameter model the average number of nucleotide substitutions per site (K) were calculated for outgroup distances: all human sequences to macaque sequences (HSA to MMU), all human non-ancestral paralogs to the macaque outgroup (MMU to Para) and the human ancestral duplicon to the macaque outgroup (MMU to Anc). Comparison of these values with two human interparalog distances, i.e. human ancestral to all human paralogs (Anc to Para) and the average K of all human paralogs (all Para), provides information on the timing of the initial duplicationevent (Macaque Seed) and the onset of secondary duplications (Macaque Swaps). We calculated locus-specific effective nucleotide substitution rates (r = K/2 T) based on an estimated divergence time of 25 million years between the human and the Old World monkeys. In addition, all calculations were performed replacing the human lineage by the chimpanzee lineage. (PDF 6 KB)

12862_2008_838_MOESM3_ESM.pdf

Additional file 3: Sequence Identity Matrix of sequences used for the phylogenetic analysis. We created a sequence identity matrix of all sequences, which were used for our phylogenetic analysis. Multi-sequence alignments were composed of 1951 basepairs derived from two loci within the CHEK2 duplicons. The proximal sequence is located upstream of exon 1 of TTC28 (NT_011520: 8465388–8465900) and the distal sequence is located within intron 14 of CHEK2 (NT_011520: 8478430–8480219). The sequence identity matrix of these sequence alignments was generated with the BioEdit software (version 7.0.0). (PDF 5 KB)

12862_2008_838_MOESM4_ESM.pdf

Additional file 4: qPCR predicted CN calculations. qPCR reactions were performed in duplicate. Copy number mean, standard deviation (SD) and standard error (SE) were calculated for all analysed human (HSA), chimpanzee (PTR), gorilla (GGO), orangutan (PPY), rhesus macaque (MMU), pig-tailed macaque (MNE) and baboon (PHA) normalised samples. Standard errors of the normalised CHEK2 copy numbers were calculated from the standard deviations of the values of the CFTR and CHEK2 genes using the formula provided by the user menu (ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System, User Bulletin no.2 1997, p.34). P-values were calculated by a 2-tailed Student t-test. (PDF 7 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Münch, C., Kirsch, S., Fernandes, A.M. et al. Evolutionary analysis of the highly dynamic CHEK2duplicon in anthropoids. BMC Evol Biol 8, 269 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-269

Keywords

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us