Clutton-Brock TH: Sexual selection in males and females. Science. 2007, 318: 1882-1885. 10.1126/science.1133311.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Leonard JL, Córdoba-Aguilar A: The Evolution of Primary Sexual Characters in Animals. 2010, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
Google Scholar
Birkhead TR, Møller A: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. 1998, London: London Academic Press
Google Scholar
Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Wilson K: Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003, 270: 633-640. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2268.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Loyau A, Gomez D, Moureau B, Thery M, Hart NS, Saint Jalme M, Bennett ATD, Sorci G: Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock. Behav Ecol. 2007, 18: 1123-1131. 10.1093/beheco/arm088.
Article
Google Scholar
Parker GA: Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Edited by: Birkhead TR, Møller AP. 1998, London: London Academic Press
Google Scholar
Pizzari T, Parker GA: Sperm competition and sperm phenotype. Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective. Edited by: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S. 2009, London: London Academic Press
Google Scholar
Snook RR: Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005, 20: 46-53. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.011.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Møller AP: Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm production in mammals. Funct Ecol. 1989, 3: 91-96. 10.2307/2389679.
Article
Google Scholar
Hosken DJ: Sperm competition in bats. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997, 264: 385-392. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0055.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ramm SA, Parker GA, Stockley P: Sperm competition and the evolution of male reproductive anatomy in rodents. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005, 272: 949-955. 10.1098/rspb.2004.3048.
Article
Google Scholar
Malo AF, Martinez-Pastor F, Alaks G, Dubach J, Lacy RC: Effects of genetic captive- breeding protocols on sperm quality and fertility in the white-footed mouse. Biol Reprod. 2010, 83: 540-548. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085316.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Pitnick S: Investment in testes and the cost of making long sperm in Drosophila. Am Nat. 1996, 148: 57-80. 10.1086/285911.
Article
Google Scholar
Ramm SA, Stockley P: Sperm competition and sperm length influence the rate of mammalian spermatogenesis. Biol Lett. 2010, 6: 219-221. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0635.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zuk M, Kolluru GR: Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q Rev Biol. 1998, 73: 415-438. 10.1086/420412.
Article
Google Scholar
Simmons LW, Roberts B: Bacterial immunity traded for sperm viability in male crickets. Science. 2005, 309: 2031-2041. 10.1126/science.1114500.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Garvin JC, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Steeber DA, Hasselquist D: Do male ornaments signal immunity in the common yellowthroat?. Behav Ecol. 2008, 19: 54-60.
Article
Google Scholar
Parker GA, Lessells CM, Simmons LW: Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male-male competition. Evolution. 2013, 67: 95-109. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01741.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simmons LW, Emlen DJ: Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 16346-16351. 10.1073/pnas.0603474103.
Article
PubMed
CAS
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick JL, Almbro M, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Kolm N, Simmons LW: Male contest competition and the coevolution of weaponry and testes in Pinnipeds. Evolution. 2012, 66: 3595-3604. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01713.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Allen BJ, Levinton JS: Costs of bearing a sexually selected ornamental weapon in a fiddler crab. Funct Ecol. 2007, 21: 154-161.
Article
Google Scholar
Rowe M, Swaddle JP, Pruett-Jones S, Webster MS: Plumage coloration, ejaculate quality and reproductive phenotype in the red-backed fairy-wren. Anim Behav. 2010, 79: 1239-1246. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.020.
Article
Google Scholar
Bro-Jørgensen J: The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids. Evolution. 2007, 61: 1316-1326. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00111.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bro-Jørgensen J: Intra- and intersexual conflicts and cooperation in the evolution of mating strategies: lessons learnt from ungulates. Evol Biol. 2011, 38: 28-41. 10.1007/s11692-010-9105-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock TH: Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989, 236: 339-372. 10.1098/rspb.1989.0027.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Ginsberg JR, Rubenstein DI: Sperm competition and variation in zebra mating-behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1990, 26: 427-434.
Article
Google Scholar
Lemaître J-F, Ramm SA, Barton RA, Stockley P: Sperm competition and brain size evolution in mammals. J Evol Biol. 2009, 22: 2215-2221. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01837.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Malo AF, Garde JJ, Soler AJ, García AJ, Gomendio M, Roldan ERS: Male fertility in natural populations of red deer is determined by sperm velocity and the proportion of normal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2005, 72: 822-829.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Plard F, Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M: Revisiting the allometry of antlers among deer species: male-male sexual competition as a driver. Oikos. 2011, 120: 601-606. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18934.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Gomendio M, Tourmente M, Roldan ERS: Why mammalian lineages respond differently to sexual selection: metabolic rate constrains the evolution of sperm size. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011, 278: 3135-3141. 10.1098/rspb.2011.0275.
Article
Google Scholar
Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A: The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature. 2007, 446: 507-512. 10.1038/nature05634.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Agnarsson I, May-Collado LJ: The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: the importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008, 48: 964-998. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.046.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Gonzales RA, Honeycutt RL, Gee KL: Multiple paternity in white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus revealed by DNA microsatellites. J Mammal. 2002, 83: 884-892. 10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0884:MPIWTD>2.0.CO;2.
Article
Google Scholar
Tourmente M, Gomendio M, Roldan ERS: Sperm competition and the evolution of sperm design in mammals. BMC Evol Biol. 2011, 11: 12-10.1186/1471-2148-11-12.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mautz BS, Møller AP, Jennions MD: Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis. Biol Rev. 2013, 88: 669-682. 10.1111/brv.12022.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pitcher TE, Doucet SM, Beausoleil JMJ, Hanley D: Secondary sexual characters and sperm traits in coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. J Fish Biol. 2009, 74: 1450-1461. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02210.x.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Chargé R, Jalme MS, Lacroix F, Cadet A, Sorci G: Male health status, signalled courtship display, reveals ejaculate quality and hatching success in a lekking specis. J Anim Ecol. 2010, 79: 843-850.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simmons LW, Fitzpatrick JL: Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility. Reproduction. 2012, 144: 519-534. 10.1530/REP-12-0285.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Vahed K, Parker DJ: The evolution of large testes: sperm competition or male mating rate?. Ethology. 2012, 118: 107-117. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01991.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Gomendio M, Roldan ERS: Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility. Int J Dev Biol. 2008, 52: 439-447. 10.1387/ijdb.082595mg.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR: Sperm morphological diversity. Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective. Edited by: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S. 2009, London: London Academic Press
Google Scholar
Gage MJG: Continuous variation in reproductive strategy as an adaptive response to population density in the moth Plodia interpunctella. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995, 261: 25-30. 10.1098/rspb.1995.0112.
Article
Google Scholar
Owen-Smith N: Mortality rates of male and female kudus: the costs of sexual size dimorphism. J Anim Ecol. 1993, 62: 428-440. 10.2307/5192.
Article
Google Scholar
Lott DF: Intraspecific Variation in the Social Systems of Wild Vertebrates. 1991, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press
Google Scholar
Shutler D: Sexual selection: when to expect trade-offs. Biol Lett. 2011, 7: 101-104. 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0531.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Harvey PH, Pagel MD: The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. 1991, Oxford: Oxford Univ Press
Google Scholar
Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M: Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat. 2002, 160: 712-726. 10.1086/343873.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K: APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20: 289-290. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2012, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
Google Scholar
Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC: Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev. 2007, 82: 591-605. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar