Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Emergence and evolution of the glycoprotein hormone and neurotrophin gene families in vertebrates



The three vertebrate pituitary glycoprotein hormones (GPH) are heterodimers of a common α and a specific β subunit. In human, they are located on different chromosomes but in a similar genomic environment. We took advantage of the availability of genomic and EST data from two cartilaginous fish species as well as from two lamprey species to identify their repertoire of neurotrophin, lin7 and KCNA gene family members which are in the close environment of gphβ. Gphα and gphβ are absent outside vertebrates but are related to two genes present in both protostomes and deuterostomes that were named gpa2 and gpb5. Genomic organization and functional characteristics of their protein products suggested that gphα and gphβ might have been generated concomitantly by a duplication of gpa2 and gpb5 just prior to the radiation of vertebrates. To have a better insight into this process we used new genomic resources and tools to characterize the ancestral environment before the duplication occurred.


An almost similar repertoire of genes was characterized in cartilaginous fishes as in tetrapods. Data in lampreys are either incomplete or the result of specific duplications and/or deletions but a scenario for the evolution of this genomic environment in vertebrates could be proposed. A number of genes were identified in the amphioxus genome that helped in reconstructing the ancestral environment of gpa2 and gpb5 and in describing the evolution of this environment in vertebrates.


Our model suggests that vertebrate gphα and gphβ were generated by a specific local duplication of the ancestral forms of gpa2 and gpb5, followed by a translocation of gphβ to a new environment whereas gphα was retained in the gpa2-gpb5 locus. The two rounds of whole genome duplication that occurred early in the evolution of vertebrates generated four paralogues of each gene but secondary gene losses or lineage specific duplications together with genomic rearrangements have resulted in the present organization of these genes, which differs between vertebrate lineages.


The pituitary gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), together with the pituitary thyrotropin (TSH) are the core members of the glycoprotein hormone (GPH) family. These hormones are heterodimers composed of a common α (GPHα) and a β subunit that confers biological specificity. Characterizations of the GPH family in a wide range of osteichthyes have clearly shown that the common α subunit and the three GPHβ subunit lineages were already present before the split between actinopterygians (the branch leading to teleosts) and sarcopterygians (including tetrapods) [1]. An unambiguous GPHα as well as two GPHβ subunits were also isolated from a chondrichthyan, the small spotted catshark Scyliorhinus canicula [2]. The latter appeared related in sequence to LHβ and FSHβ, the presence of a third, TSHβ-related form, remaining an unanswered issue. Finally, analyses of GPH in cyclostomes (extant jawless vertebrates or agnatha) have provided evidence for a unique gonadotropin (GtH), with the isolation of a single GPHβ-related cDNA in the lamprey Petromyzon marinus [3] and of one α and a single GPHβ-related cDNA in the hagfish Paramyxine atami [4].

To gain insight into their evolutionary process, the genomic environment of these genes needs to be further explored. Among the genes in synteny with the gph, the neurotrophin (NT) genes have already been submitted to an evolutionary investigation. NT are homodimeric growth factors that play important functions in neuronal development and survival [5]. There are four NT types in tetrapods: nerve growth factor (NGF), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin 3 (NTF3) and neurotrophin 4 (NTF4) (also named NTF5 or NTF6). The same set of NT is present in teleosts with an additional, NGF-related NT (NTF7) [6]. Two out of the four NT were evidenced from chondrichthyes, one characterized as BDNF, the other one being closer to NTF3 [7] and a single NT (NT1) has been isolated to date from the lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis [8]. Interestingly, three NT genes appeared located in the human genome in the direct vicinity of the three GPHβ subunit genes which prompted the authors to propose that GPHβ and NT genes may derive from successive duplications from a genomic segment bearing the ancestral NT and GPHβ subunit genes [8, 9]. It was tempting to assume that these duplications have taken place during the two rounds of whole genome duplication (WGD) that occurred between the divergence of urochordates (the sister group of vertebrates) and the radiation of gnathostomes (see [10] and references herein).

In order to test this hypothesis, we used BLAST analysis to exhaustively search the elephant shark Callorhinchus milii [11] and the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus genomic sequences for the presence of genes that are in the close genomic environment of gphβ and nt. These genomic data where enriched with data from an EST analysis from another cartilaginous fish, Scyliorhinus canicula and from another cyclostome, Lampetra fluviatilis. When necessary, PCR amplifications from genomic DNA were used to complete the data.

Unlike NT, which are present in both deuterostome and protostome representatives [12], canonical GPHα, LHβ, FSHβ and TSHβ cannot be identified outside vertebrates [13]. However, human genome survey unexpectedly pointed to the presence of two proteins sharing common structural characteristics with GPHα and β subunits, which were consequently termed glycoprotein α-2 (GPA2) and glycoprotein β-5 (GPB5) [14]. In addition to their structural likeness, the recombinant proteins were shown to form a heterodimer that was able to bind and activate a GPH receptor (GPHR), namely the TSHR, both in vitro [1517] and in vivo [16], giving an additional argument in support to a parental relationship between GPA2 and GPB5 and the GPHα and β subunits. Further genome explorations revealed the presence of gpa2 and gpb5-related genes (hereafter named gpa and gpb, respectively, when dealing with protostomes and pre-vertebrate deuterostomes) in most bilaterian groups [15, 1822]. Remarkably, the recombinant GPA and GPB proteins from the fruit fly were also shown to form a heterodimer able to activate the fruit fly receptor homologous to the vertebrate GPHR [18]. Interestingly, in Nasonia vitripennis at least, a hymenoptera in which gpa and gpb are not found in the genome [22, 23], the GPHR-related receptor gene is also missing [23]. The same observation was made in the leech Helobdella robusta [24], which suggests that the presence of the receptor is strongly linked to the presence of this heterodimeric potential ligand.

The GPHβ subunits have no known role either as monomer or homodimer except for the β subunit of the human chorionic gonadotropin, which is believed to interfere with the TGFβ apoptotic action in certain cancer cell lines [25]. All vertebrate GPHβ subunits share the α subunit as an exclusive dimerisation partner. It is then highly probable that the ancestral β subunit also had the α subunit as a partner. The GPHα and ancestral GPHβ must have then been generated concomitantly. When present, gpa and gpb are localized next to each other in most invertebrate genomes including the urochordate Ciona. It is also the case in teleosts where gpa2 and one of the two paralogous gpb5 forms have kept this organization [22]. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that gphα together with the ancestral gphβ, as well as gpa2 and gpb5 originated from the duplication of a locus containing the closely located gpa and gpb and that this event took place sometime after the emergence of urochordates.

In order to fill the gap between the gph subunit genes and their molecular ancestors, we took advantage of the growing availability of genomic data in chordates to extensively characterize the gpa-gpb environment in amphioxus as well as the vertebrate environments of gphα and gphβ subunits and of gpa2 and gpb5. By comparing the syntenic relationships of these environments, we were able to reconstitute the ancestral chordate and vertebrate gpa/gpb-related gene environment and to propose a model of evolution of these genes during vertebrate radiation, involving gene duplications, transpositions and secondary losses.


PCR amplification and molecular biology

Elephant shark Callorhinchus milii, smaller spotted catshark Scyliorhinus canicula, sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus or European river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis genomic DNA or cDNA were used for PCR amplifications. Callorhinchus milii pituitary RACE-ready cDNA were synthesized from total RNA using SMART RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, USA) according to manufacturer's protocol.

The list of oligonucleotide primers used for this study is available on request: they usually are 20-23 nucleotides long with a melting temperature (Tm) ranging from 60 to 68°C. Reactions were realized in a volume of 25 μl containing 10 ng of genomic DNA (or of a 1/1000th dilution of a primary PCR reaction or of a purified fragment), 0.5 units of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Eurogentec, Saraing, Belgium) with its appropriate 1× buffer supplemented with 0.25 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (when capillary tubes were used), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP and 0.2 μM of each primer. PCR reactions were either run on a 1605 Rapid Cycler (Idaho Technology, Idaho falls, ID) with a denaturation step of 1 min at 94°C followed by 35-40 cycles of 10 sec at 94°C, 10 sec at 5°C under the Tm of the oligonucleotide with the lowest Tm and 30 sec - 1 min at 72°C or on a BioRad C1000 thermal cycler using the same parameters except that 30 sec steps were used rather than 10 sec's. A 3' tailing was achieved by a 30 min additional incubation step at 72°C when subcloning of amplified fragments were to be performed. Amplified fragments were eluted from 1× TAE (40 mM Tris, 2 mM acetic acid, 1 mM EDTA) buffered agarose gel using MinElute Qiagen extraction kit (Qiagen AS, Oslo, Norway). They were then either used as template for nested PCR or subcloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) or pCRII-TOPO vector (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Ca) and sequenced (value read sequencing at MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany).

All sequences of C. milii have been submitted to GenBank (accession numbers HQ174782 to HQ174794). The EST sequences were obtained through high throughput sequencing of several tissue or stage specific cDNA libraries: a Lampetra fluviatilis embryonic-prolarval (stages 20-26) cDNA library (EMBL:FR693754], a Petromyzon marinus larval head cDNA library [26] (EMBL:FR693760; BN001520-BN001524) and a Scyliorhinus canicula embryonic cDNA library [27] (EMBL::FR693755-FR693759).

Database searches

Most sequences were obtained by BLAST analyses [28] on public databases on the NCBI website ( using nucleotide or protein sequences as query depending on the phylogenetic distance between the query and the target database. The elephant shark Callorhinchus milii and lamprey Petromyzon marinus sequences were first BLAST searched on Trace archives of the whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequence databases for these species on NCBI or on the Contig reconstructions available at the dedicated server ( for Callorhinchus genome or at the Genome Sequencing Center website of the Washington University in Saint Louis for Petromyzon genome (

Genomic clustering and synteny analysis

Genomic environments were analyzed using the NCBI Map viewer website ( for human (v36), zebrafish (Danio rerio: Zv9), chicken (Gallus gallus: built 2.1) and lizard (Anolis carolinensis: built 1.1) genomes, Ensembl website ( for lamprey (Petromyzon marinus: assembly WUSTL v3.0) genome and the JGI websites ( for amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae assembly v1.0) and the sea squirt (Ciona intestinalis assembly v2.0) genomes.

The paralogous gene sets were determined and refined by comparisons between the amphioxus and vertebrate genomes in a procedure including several successive steps. We first used the Genomicus [29] online genomic analysis tool ( to trace back amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae assembly version 2) homologues of genes found in the direct vicinity of gpa2, gpb5 and GPH subunit genes in human, chicken or zebrafish genomes. Analysis of their location showed that a large number of them were concentrated on a limited number of scaffolds of variable length in amphioxus. In a reverse approach and still using Genomicus, the second step consisted in determining the location in human genome of the homologues of all amphioxus genes carried by those of the scaffolds containing the higher concentration of homologues. The individual members of the corresponding human gene families appeared to be distributed among definite areas with synteny relationship with the amphioxus scaffolds. New areas were therefore identified that contained paralogues of genes located in the genomic environment of gph or gpa/gpb related genes. In a third step, we then systematically determined the location in the human genome of the paralogues of the genes present in each of these areas. Paralogous relationships at the vertebrate level were obtained a priori on the Ensembl server ( When the level of paralogy was not clearly determined, BLAST analyses were performed using human sequences against the amphioxus genome. If some related human sequences matched a single amphioxus gene, the target amphioxus gene was reverse-blasted against the human genome to verify that the initial human query genes were indeed the true homologues (ie they obtained the higher blast hit values). At the end of this third step, we were then able to better determine the size and gene composition of a number of paralogous regions in the human genome. In a fourth step and in order to ensure their grouping into four paralogous gene sets (ie, tetra-paralogons) the location of orthologues of representative (with regard to their position) genes identified in these paralogous regions were determined in chicken and lizard genomes on the Ensembl server. In a final step, we identified all the amphioxus homologues to the human genes that constituted the tetra-paralogons. This was done by using the search procedure on the JGI website ( of Branchiostoma floridae genomic version 1 then by checking that the best hit in human of the obtained gene model indeed corresponded to the gene with which the homologous relationship was looked for. The scaffold position was then obtained by blasting the gene model of version 1 on the amphioxus genome version 2 which was the version used for genome comparisons.

Phylogenetic reconstructions

Phylogenetic analyses were performed on protein sequences aligned using Se-AL software ( either by using a maximum likelihood method with PhyML 3.0 software [30] with WAG as substitution model and the default settings on the web server ( or by a maximum parsimony method with PAUP version 4.1beta (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony [31]). The robustness of the reconstructions was estimated by bootstrapping using (100 replicates for PhyML, 1000 for PAUP).

Results and Discussion

Conserved gene organization of GPHβ subunit gene loci in teleosts and tetrapods

As initially shown by Hallböök and his collaborators [8, 9], the three human GPHβ subunit genes lie on different chromosomes but share a synteny to NT genes, lhβ, fshβ and tshβ being located in the close proximity of ntf4, bdnf and ngf on human chromosome (chr.) 19, 11 and 1, respectively (Figure 1). A fourth NT gene (ntf3) is also present on human chr. 12 but no trace of another gphβ has been found in its surroundings. In order to assess the conservation of this synteny relationship in gnathostomes, we first analyzed the gphβ gene environment in zebrafish, chicken and human genomes (Figure 1). The association between gphβ and nt genes observed in human was found to be conserved in all three species, except for the lhβ subunit. In zebrafish, this subunit is located on chromosome 13 while ntf4 lies on chromosome 3. In chicken, although LHβ subunit cDNA was characterized years ago [32] and also cloned in more recent studies (GenBank:HQ872606), the corresponding gene remained undetectable by BLAST analysis in the current chicken genomic database. A further search of two other bird genome sequences (zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata and turkey Meleagris gallopavo) led us to the same disappointing result although LHβ cDNA (GenBank:L35519.1) has also been cloned from turkey. This will be further discussed below. The zebrafish ngf/tshβ environment on chr. 6 was found to be duplicated on chr. 23, which contains a teleost-specific ngf paralogue termed ntf7 [6], in the vicinity of a tshβ-related gene (tshβrp: GenBank:XM_001341527.1). The sequence of the latter was poorly conserved but still presents characteristics of a cystine-knot protein and contains a potential glycosylation site in a conserved position with other TSHβ subunits (Additional file 1: GPHβ subunit sequences) suggesting that it must be able to form a heterodimer with an α subunit and play a physiological role. Three additional potential glycosylation sites are even present, one in the same position as in FSHβ or LHβ, a second one, just after the 10th cysteine residue and a third one, less likely, just in-between cysteine residues 8 and 9. This duplication is related to the large-scale genomic duplication (Fish Specific Genomic Duplication or FSGD) known to have occurred early during the evolution of teleosts [33, 34].

Figure 1
figure 1

Comparative genomic environment of gphβ subunit genes in representative vertebrates. Human (Hs), chicken (Gg) and zebrafish (Dr) gphβ (lhβ, fshβ and tshβ) environment ([GPHβ]) are shown with their coordinates in megabase pairs from the p end of the relevant chromosome (chr.). [LHβ] is not found in chicken genomic databases but the existence of at least lhβ and lin7b is known from their cDNA product. A fish-specific genomic duplication (FSGD) generated specific duplicates in zebrafish. A paralogous environment devoid of any gphβ subunit gene is named [GPHβ-Ghost].

Searches for additional conserved synteny with the gphβ/nt environments (named after their gphβ type put in brackets, the ntf3 region devoid of any gphβ being named [GPHβ-Ghost]) showed that they also include the members of the Kv1 family of shaker-related voltage-gated potassium channels (KCNA) and all lin7 gene family members (Figure 1). These gene families were particularly important for our studies on the evolution of the gphβ subunit environment because kcna4 and kcna7 are next to fshβ on human chr. 11 and to ntf4 on chr. 19, respectively and because lin7c and lin7b are next to bdnf on chr. 11 and to tshβ on chr. 1, respectively, suggesting that the ancestors of all four gene families must have been neighbors in a tight locus in an ancestral genome. As expected, lin7a is conserved in [GPHβ-Ghost], lin7b in [LHβ] and lin7c in [FSHβ] (Figure 1). One single kcna gene is found conserved in [FSHβ] and [LHβ], whereas 3 sets of genes are clustered in [TSHβ] and [GPHβ-Ghost]. From the duplicated [GPHβ-Ghost] in zebrafish, only 2 kcna genes were maintained. As previously shown [35] the duplicated kcna5 gene was lost, so were the duplicated nt and lin7 genes. As for lhβ, no lin7b, ntf4, kcna7 sequences could be identified in the chicken genome (while a Lin7b cDNA is known to exist: [GenBank:CN234764.1]). Such discrepancies between cDNA and genomic data have been reported for a high number of chicken or turkey genes, whose orthologues are located on human chr. 19q [3638]. However, a locus including lin7b [Ensembl:ENSACAG00000013247], kcna7 [Ensembl:ENSACAT00000013329] and lhβ [Ensembl:ENSACAG00000013327] is found in the lizard Anolis carolinensis (chr. 6 at 80 Mb on AnoCar2.0 at Ensembl, see below), indicating that they were also grouped in the last common ancestor of diapsides.

Taken together, these data convincingly confirm the hypothesis [8] that expansion of the NT and GPHβ subunit genes derived from duplications of an ancestral locus that also contained a Lin7 gene and at least one KCNA gene. These duplications must have taken place before the split between tetrapod and teleost ancestors.

Characterization of the GPHβ, NT, Lin7, KCNA gene repertoire in chondrichthyes

In order to better assess the timing of the duplication events giving rise to the gphβ-nt-lin7-kcna regions, we conducted a systematic search for these genes in two chondrichthyes, the elephant shark C. milii and the dogfish S. canicula.

GPHβ. BLAST analysis of elephant shark genome survey sequence allowed us to identify the first and second coding exons of fshβ on separate genomic fragments and the first exon of tshβ (Additional file 1). No BLAST hit was obtained for lhβ possibly due to the low, 1.4 × coverage of the elephant shark genome since cDNA encoding LHβ and FSHβ subunits were cloned from another cartilaginous fish species, Scyliorhinus canicula [2]. However, genomic PCR using primers for the two elephant shark fsh exons confirmed that the two exon sequences corresponded to the same gene. The sequence of the first exon of tshβ was used to re-BLAST a Callorhinchus pituitary cDNA library and two different TSHβ cDNA were identified, one of which matched the first exon sequence (Additional file 1). These results, together with those previously reported [2], definitively demonstrated the presence of the three gphβ subunit gene lineages, lhβ, fshβ and tshβ, in chondrichthyes. The existence of two tshβ subunit genes in Callorhinchus is discussed below.

NT genes. Three complete NT coding sequences and two additional 5' and 3' non-overlapping fragments were identified by an initial BLAST search on elephant shark genomic data. The first three sequences were confidently identified as NTF4, BDNF and NGF by sequence similarity (Additional file 2: Neurotrophin sequences). Indeed, the N-terminal ends of NT proteins are quite specific and difficult to align between the different types whereas the cystine-knot coding regions are very conserved, hence not very helpful for reliable phylogenetic analyses. The 5' fragment was clearly part of the NTF3 as confirmed by its identity with the full-length sequence of the dogfish NTF3 cDNA obtained by BLAST search on the Scyliorhinus cDNA library. PCR was used to extend the 5' NTF3 fragment toward the 3' end and the newly generated sequence complemented the end of another genomic segment of the database, thus completing the coding region of elephant shark NTF3. Similarly, PCR experiment using degenerate oligonucleotides allowed us to extend the other, 3' fragment, toward the 5' end and to obtain a sequence that was used to BLAST search the genomic data library where an overlapping 5' fragment was found. The reconstituted full length fifth NT encoding sequence was checked by PCR cloning on shark genomic DNA. This fifth NT presented 61.5% identity with NTF4 at the nucleotide level but part of its N-terminal amino acid sequence was totally different. When aligned with NTF4, a deletion of two nucleotides was evidenced in the N-terminal part of the sequence, inducing a frame shift that was corrected by a single additional nucleotide deletion 78 nucleotides downstream, resuming the original reading frame (Additional file 3: Elephant shark NTF4 and NTF4rp). This sequence was thus named NTF4rp. NTF4 but not NTF4rp was identified in addition to NTF3 from the Scyliorhinus cDNA library (Additional file 2). NTF4, NTF4rp and NGF are described here for the first time in chondrichthyes.

LIN7 and KCNA. BLAST searches for lin7-related genes in S. canicula databases led to the identification of three different ESTs corresponding to lin7a, lin7b and lin7c and provided no evidence for an additional member of the lin7 family (Figure 2, Additional file 4: Lin7 sequences). Similarly, four different genomic fragments were found in C. milii draft genome sequence; the longest fragment encoded 4 of the 5 exons of what was clearly lin7c, two other genomic fragments included two additional 4th exons, the last one representing an additional exon 3 (Additional file 4). This sampling was compatible with the existence of three lin7-related sequences. Finally, eight members of the kcna family were identified in the elephant shark genomic database. Six of them were almost complete (Additional file 5: Elephant shark KCNA sequences). Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis showed that each of them could confidently be linked to one member of the family (Figure 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Phylogeny of Lin7b sequences. Phylogenetic reconstruction of chicken (Gallus), human (Homo), zebrafish (Danio) dogfish (Scyliorhinus), lamprey (Petromyzon) and amphioxus (Branchiostoma) lin7-related sequences was inferred using the maximum parsimony method (heuristic search). Bootstrapping (values at the nodes) was used over 1000 replicates. Lin7-A, -B and -C are clustered into monophyletic groups (bootstrap value in bold) that are highlighted in different colors.

Figure 3
figure 3

Phylogeny of KCNA sequences. Left panel: Xenopus, chicken (Gallus), zebrafish (Danio), elephant shark (Callorhinchus) and human (Homo) KCNA sequences. Phylogenetic reconstructions were inferred using the maximum parsimony method (heuristic search). Bootstrapping (values at the nodes) was used over 1000 replicates. The KCNA type is indicated by the number following the species name. The neurotrophin-type to which they are neighbor in human genomes is indicated in bold with the human sequence reference. All but KCNA6 were included into monophyletic groups (highlighted by alternate colors) that were supported by bootstrap values of 50% and over (values in bold). Right panel: amphioxus sequences are substituted to Xenopus sequences. None of the amphioxus sequence is closer to either vertebrate KCNA type. Lower bootstrap values were obtained when amphioxus sequences were included because only truncated sequences could reliably be aligned.

Identification of GPHβ, NT, Lin7 and KCNA genes in cyclostomes

Petromyzon marinus genomic DNA analysis revealed the presence of a single gphβ subunit gene. Like Sower and colleagues [39], we were unable to find a second gphβ sequence, either by BLAST search on genomic or EST data or by PCR on genomic DNA using primers designed from the most conserved regions. The GPHβ subunit was proposed to be related to FSHβ or LHβ and named GtHβ (for gonadotropin), based on sequence comparison and its ability to have its expression stimulated by GnRH [3]. Two GPH-type receptors were characterized in lamprey, GPHRI that binds GtH [40] and GPHRII, which appeared closer to a thyrotropin receptor [41]. It is then likely that a second, TSH-type ligand, also exists in lampreys. Three NT genes were characterized, referred to as NT1, NT2 and NTz (Additional file 2). NT1 had already been characterized from Lampetra fluviatilis [8]. Nt2, which we also characterized from Lampetra fluviatilis larval EST screened by BLAST, was on the same Contig1180 (42775nt long) as gthβ, suggesting that it may be related to NTF4 and/or bdnf. NT1 and NTz were quite dissimilar from each other and from the other NTs so that their assignment to either members of gnathostome NT family could not be determined. Two lin7 genes were found (Additional file 4) that could not be confidently assigned to any of the three Lin7a-b-c forms of gnathostomes by phylogenetic reconstruction (Figure. 2) and were thus named lin7_1 (EMBL:BN001523; genomic contig5027) and lin7_2 (EMBL:BN0015234; genomic contig34734 and several ESTs). Finally, a total of at least 12 members of KCNA-related sequences were also found (Additional file 6: Lamprey KCNA sequences). Their relationships with other vertebrate KCNA sequences could not be confidently determined.

Evolution of the GPHβ subunit gene environment in vertebrates

Taken together, these data show that the duplication events leading to the presence of four sets of NT, three sets of GPHβ subunits and Lin7 genes, as well as of the eight KCNA forms, has taken place prior to the gnathostome radiation. This chronology of duplications as well as the conserved synteny observed for these genes in osteichthyes (actinopterygians plus sarcopterygians) is consistent with the hypothesis that the corresponding duplication events may have been part of the two rounds of WGD known to have taken place prior to the split between chondrichthyes and osteichthyes (Figure 4). As already proposed [35], local duplications of one of the kcna genes issued from the first round of WGD gave rise to three copies of the gene in one of the sister loci. It is still a matter of debate whether the second round of WGD occurred before or after the emergence of cyclostomes [42, 43]. Depending on its timing, the cyclostomes would either have two or four sets of genes. However, our search led to the identification of one gphβ (but a tshβ is suspected to exist), two lin7, three nt and twelve or more kcna genes, which is inconsistent with either alternative and seems to indicate that some genomic data are missing (if the two WGD have already occurred) or that some of the genes were submitted to specific duplications in the lineage leading to Petromyzon. A higher quality genome coverage and assembly will be required to gain insight into the details of these genetic events. We also provide evidence for the occurrence of additional duplication events, giving rise to two NTF4 and two tshβ-related sequences in the elephant shark. Whether the latter two involved duplication of large chromosomal fragments remains an opened question in the absence of synteny arguments in chondrichthyes. In particular, an interesting possibility is that the second tshβ gene (tshβ2) may be part of the ntf3-lin7a-kcna1-6-5-containing region, as the fourth gphβ paralogue, possibly lost from the genome of osteichthyes (Figure 4). In other respects, of all the genomic environments generated by the fish-specific genome duplication it is noteworthy that only the one paraloguous to [TSHβ] remained unaltered in the zebrafish and still contains a tshβrp subunit, ntf7 and the three sets of kcna.

Figure 4
figure 4

Model for the evolution of gphβ/nt locus in vertebrates. Left panel: evolution of the ancestral locus with the first and second whole genome duplication (WGD). Right panel: resulting known genomic loci in sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus, elephant shark Callorhinchus milii and zebrafish Danio rerio. It is still to be established whether cyclostomes have been submitted to the two rounds of genome duplication or not. Duplicate loci resulting from WGD or the Fish Specific Genome Duplication (FSGD) are indicated by vertical brackets whereas horizontal brackets represent local gene duplications (LD). Crossed boxes represent genes that have been lost after duplication. Genes demonstrated to be gathered in a definite locus are linked by a horizontal bar. The origin of tshβ2 in Callorhinchus is uncertain, either resulting from the second round of WGD or from a local duplication of tshβ. A tshβ-type subunit gene is expected in lamprey but has not been characterized yet and is represented as an empty box. NTFt and NTFg are given symbols for ancestral NTs associated with TSH and GTH, respectively.

Origin of the vertebrate GPHβ subunit gene environment

If gph, nt, lin7 and kcna ancestors were neighbors in a tight locus in an ancestral genome (see above), numerous genomic rearrangements have occurred during the vertebrate radiation [44] and some descendant genes appear scattered in vertebrates (see on Figure 1 the position of lin7a relative to ntf3 or kcna genes on human chr. 12 and chicken chr. 1). In order to better characterize the ancestral composition of the GPHβ genomic environment, we needed to look at the genome of a species closer to the origin of vertebrates. The amphioxus genome was chosen over the highly rearranged genome of Ciona. We searched the amphioxus homologues of the genes found close to [LHβ], [FSHβ], [TSHβ] and [GPHβ-Ghost] in human, chicken and zebrafish genomes. Few amphioxus scaffolds contained homologues of genes from all four [GPHβ] environments. We then determined the location of the human homologues of all amphioxus genes carried by these scaffolds. Human homologous family members were distributed among definite genomic areas. The composition and boundaries of these areas were refined by determining the location of the paralogues of all their members, which were most often found within one or the other of these areas. At this stage, we had a number of scattered genomic areas, some of which including the previously characterized genomic environment of one or the other GPHβ gene, but their clustering into four paralogous sets of genes (ie tetra-paralogon) was not obvious. We therefore determined the position of zebrafish, chicken, and lizard orthologues of a number of human genes picked-up all along each of the regions. The zebrafish genome with the additional FSGD and numerous rearrangements turned out to be unsuitable for this task. However, some of the scattered regions in human were linked into a continuous segment in chicken and lizard genomes, allowing characterization of each of the four paralogous sets of genes (Figure 5, Table 1 and Additional file 7). For example, the paralogous gene set including [GPHβ-Ghost] appeared scattered among 4 chromosomes in human but was clustered on chicken chr. 1 and on lizard chr. 5 (Figure 6), indicating that its partitioning occurred sometime during the radiation of mammals. Also, the [TSHβ]-containing paralogous gene set that was divided between human chr. 1 and 6 was gathered on a definite segment of chr. 4 in lizard and of chr. 26 in chicken (Table 1 and Additional file 7). Almost none of the genes of the [LHβ]-containing paralogous gene set either from chr. 19 or chr. X was localized in the lizard genome or found in the chicken genome. However, as mentioned above about LHβ, and Lin7B, some of the products of these genes have been cloned in chicken (and other bird species): this is the case at least for GATA1 (GenBank:NM_205464), ALAS2 (GenBank:M24367), BCAP31 (Manchester chicken EST data base: ChEST959H20) and FLNA (GenBank:AB056474) that are located on human chr. X (see Additional file 7) and of GYS1 (GenBank:AB090806) the gene associated with lhβ and lin7b on human chr. 19. It has been hypothesized that the absence of these genes in the available genomic BAC libraries could result from bias in genomic cloning procedure [36] or, owing to the occurrence of specific repeats, to the difficulty in obtaining sequences from the smallest micro-chromosomes [37, 38].

Figure 5
figure 5

Gph -related gene-containing paralogous gene sets in human and amphioxus genomes. This figure is a schematic representation of the data presented in Additional files 7 and 9 that shows the genomic distribution of the paralogous gene sets (tetra-paralogons) containing the gph-related genes in the human genome and lists the most important scaffolds (genome version 2) where the amphioxus homologues are located. The scaffold V2_158 contains genes that are homologous to genes belonging to one or the other tetra-paralogon.

Table 1 Gph-related gene paralogous gene sets
Figure 6
figure 6

[GPHα] and [GPHβ -ghost]-containing paralogous gene sets in human, chicken and lizard genomes. Discrete gene locations are linked by dotted lines whereas more important loci are bordered by continuous lines (see Additional files 7 and 9 for details). The human chr. 1 was truncated for convenience. Hs: human; Gg: chicken; Ac: lizard.

The most compact paralogous gene set appeared to be the one including [TSHβ]. Despite its scattering into three separated regions in human, it was contained into a segment of 5 Mb in chicken and 35 Mb in the lizard genome. A total of 227 gene families were identified, 96 with paralogues associated with [LHβ], 130 with [TSHβ], 162 with [FSHβ] and 185 with [GPHβ-ghost]. Out of these 227 gene families, 199 were traced back to amphioxus (Additional file 7). Ten scaffolds contain 97 homologues of the vertebrate gene families, 20 of them being on scaffold V2_39, 13 on scaffold V2_158, 10 on scaffolds V2_140 and V2_186, 8 on scaffold V2_220, 8 on V2_122 and 7 on scaffolds V2_41, V2_62, V2_230 and V2_279.

Recently, the comparison of the chromosomal organization of amphioxus genome with those of different vertebrates led to a tentative reconstruction into 17 proto-chromosomes of the last common chordate ancestor genome [45] and to a partitioning of the human genome into segments that showed defined patterns of fourfold conserved synteny to those proto-chromosomes. Using a different approach, Nakatani and collaborators [44] proposed a reconstruction of 10 (out of circa 10-13) proto-chromosomes of the ancestral vertebrate karyotype and identified their resulting paralogous linkage blocks in the human genome. In the human genome, the segmentations and boundaries of the four paralogous gene sets identified in this study most often matched those that were given as resulting from the partitioning of the ancestral vertebrate proto-chromosome (proto-chr.) D [44] (Additional file 8: Human [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon and ancestral chordate and vertebrate proto-chromosome relics). Only the segments on chr. X from the [LHβ]-containing paralogous set and the one on chr. 22 from the [GPHβ-ghost] paralogous gene set were not predicted to be derived from this ancestral vertebrate proto-chromosome. Conversely, we did not find any gene on chr. 20 that undoubtedly belonged to either paralogous groups included in the paralogon. It was more difficult to map the paralogous gene sets obtained in this study to those resulting from the ancestral chordate reconstruction by Putnam and collaborators [45] (Additional file 8). It looks like they would comprise all the segments derived from both chordate proto-chr. 13 and 14 as if these two proto-chromosomes were indeed combined into a single proto-chromosome.

A lin7 homologue is present in amphioxus on scaffold V2_124 (fgenesh2_pg.scaffold_629000011) but no other genes were found in this scaffold that had orthologues in gphβ subunits environment. The ancestral lin7 gene might thus have been translocated to the gphβ subunit locus after the divergence of the amphioxus lineage. An alternative hypothesis would be that lin7 had been specifically translocated away from a nt/kcna locus sometime in the branch leading to amphioxus. Two types of NT genes were found in several ante-vertebrate chordates but a single one had the same genomic organization (the entire coding region restricted to a single exon) as in vertebrates [12]. It is located on scaffold V2_138 in amphioxus genome and is surrounded by other genes that have orthologues in the gphβ genomic environments. Several amphioxus kcna genes might potentially be homologous to the ancestral vertebrate kcna: the first one [JGI:gw94.169.1 or GenBank:XM_002597415] is located on scaffold V2_157, close to homologues of genes that are in the [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon (Additional file 7); another one, [JGI:gw.540.12.1 or GenBank:XM_002586434] is on scaffold V2_279, also located next to genes related to those in gphβ environments; the third one, [JGI:e-gw35.145.1 or GenBank:XM_002613506] is on scaffold V2_6 that has numerous homologues in the paralogons corresponding to the GPA2/GPB5 environment (see below). All of these amphioxus kcna genes were encoded by a single exon. None of them appeared to be closer than the others to the vertebrate kcna genes by our phylogenetic analysis (Figure 3). They may then represent specific duplicates of kcna genes in the amphioxus lineage. Another possibility, that seems less likely, is that vertebrate KCNAs would have derived from two (or more) KCNAs at the ancestral vertebrate level. A comparative analysis of the KCNA environments on several chordate representatives would be necessary to address this question.

Origin of GPA2 and GPB5 genomic environments

Gpa2 and gpb5-related genes have been reported in all vertebrate species analyzed so far with the exception of birds that seem to lack gpa2 [22]. Since GPH subunits are believed to originate from duplication of the ancestral form of these genes sometime before the radiation of vertebrates, it was important to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the environment. We followed a similar approach as for the gphβ subunits. This analysis allowed us to identify 4 paralogous sets of genes. The genomic environments were each part of one of gpa2 ([GPA2]), gpb5 ([GPB5]), gphα ([GPHα]) were each part one of these paralogous gene sets. The fourth one did not contain any of the GPH subunit-related gene and was referred to as [GP-Ghost] (Figure 5, Additional file 9: [GPHα-GPA2-GPB5] tetra-paralogon). The most compact paralogous gene set was the [GPA2]-containing one and was condensed into 6 Mb of human chr. 11. Most of the corresponding genes were however not placed in the current assembled genome of the lizard and, as for the [LHβ]-containing paralogous gene set and likely because of the same difficulties, not found in the current version of the chicken and turkey genomes. The [GPHα]-containing paralogous gene set which was scattered among 4 different chromosomes in the human genome was found gathered onto chr. 3 in chicken and most genes were spread over two regions of chr. 1 in lizard (Figure 6, Table 1, Additional file 9). Similarly, the [GPB5]-containing paralogous gene set distributed between chr. 14 and 15 in human was restricted to a short region of chr. 5 in chicken and of chr. 1 in lizard.

In the human genome, a total of 197 gene families were identified, 171 associated with [GPHα], 164 with [GPB5], 71 with [GPA2] and 80 with [GP-Ghost]. Among them 187 were recovered in amphioxus, 127 distributed among 6 scaffolds with 38 of them being gathered on scaffold V2_6, 25 on V2_28 and V2_25, 14 on V2_161, 13 on V2_158 and 12 on V2_96 (Figure 5 and Additional file 9). It is to be noted that one scaffold, scaffold 158, had genes that mapped to the two tetra-paralogons with 13 genes involved in each of them. They mostly came from scaffold 10 of version 1 of the amphioxus genome with one end (up to 2.4 Mb) mapping to one tetra-paralogon and the other one to the other tetra-paralogon. One of the genes (e_gw.10.14.1: V2_158 EFEMP/FBLN), appeared to be homologous to fbln-1 and 2 that are part of the [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon and also to efemp-1 and 2 and fbln5 that are within [GPHα-GPA2-GPB5] tetra-paralogon.

Boundaries of these paralogous gene sets corresponded quite accurately to those of the segments described as resulting from the chordate proto-chr. 11 and from the vertebrate proto-chr. G (Additional file 8).

Reconstruction of the gpa/gpbevolutionary history

The present study provides strong evidence that [GPHα], [GPA2] and [GPB5] environments derive from an ancestral vertebrate locus through the two rounds of WGD. The shared environment between gphα and gpa2 confirms the parental relationship previously suggested from their structural and biochemical properties. The shared environment between gpa2 and gpb5 confirms that ancestral gpa and gpb were on the same locus before the WGD strengthening the hypothesis that the ancestral gphß together with gphα and vertebrate gpa2 with gpb5 were created by the duplication of a locus containing the closely linked gpa and gpb. However, the fact that the [GPHβ] environments belong to a different tetra-paralogon, ie derive from a different ancestral vertebrate locus, indicates that the ancestral β subunit gene was transferred to a different locus before the two rounds of WGD occurred. Another gene, the one corresponding to e_gw.10.14.1 in amphioxus (V2_158 EFEMP/FBLN) might have been duplicated in the same duplication event as gpa and gpb. After the duplication of this gene prior to the WGD, one of the duplicated genes would have given rise to efemp-1 and 2 and fbln5 that are part of the [GPHα-GPA2-GPB5] tetra-paralogon. Its sister gene would have been transferred to a locus close to the newly created ancestral gphβ and would have given rise to fbln-1 and 2 that are part of the [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon. It is then likely that gpa-gpb were duplicated with a very limited number of genes among which could be the one homologous to V2_158 EFEMP/FBLN and that the ancestral gphβ was transferred via translocation or partition of the newly duplicated locus. Such a partition is indeed observed for the amphioxus locus present on V2_158 that has one part with homologues on the [GPHα-GPA2-GPB5] tetra-paralogon and the other on the [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon.

Earlier phylogenetic reconstructions indicated closer relationships between NTF4 and BDNF and between NTF3 and NGF [8, 46]. Sequence analysis of the GPHβ subunits led us to the same conclusion that LHβ (which is on the same environment as NTF4) was closer to FSHβ (BDNF environment) than either of them was to TSHβ (NGF environment) [2]. The same conclusions about the relationships between these environments where drawn when the history of the KCNA family was explored [35]. The relationships between individual genes in these loci must apply for the entire corresponding paralogous gene sets. Accordingly, [LHβ] and [FSHβ]-containing paralogous gene sets on the one hand and [TSHβ] and [GPHß-Ghost] paralogous gene sets must have been generated from the duplication associated with the 2nd WGD of two former paralogous gene sets which themselves derived from the ancestral vertebrate proto-chromosome with the 1st WGD. In order to establish similar type of relationships within the gpa2/gpb5 tetra-paralogon, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated human protein sequences of some of the genes that have all four paralogues in this paralogon (RTN(1-4), MAP3K(9-11), MAP4K(1-3/5), ACTN(1-4), MARK(1-4), SIPA(1/L1-3), KLC(1-4) and FOS(-/B/L1/L2)) using the amphioxus homologues as the outgroup. The paralogous relationship between [GPHα] and [GPA2] paralogous gene sets and between [GPB5] and [GP-Ghost] paralogous gene sets were supported by bootstrap values (Maximum likelihood, 100 replicates) of 100 and 99, respectively (Figure 7).

Figure 7
figure 7

Phylogenetic relationships between paralogous gene sets. Maximum Likelihood inferred relationships between concatenated protein sequences (1959 informative positions retained) of human RTN, MAP3K, MAP4K, ACTN, MARK, SIPA, KLC and FOS paralogues from the four ([GPHα], [GPB5], [GPA2] and [GP_Ghost]) paralogous gene sets with their homologue in amphioxus (Amphi) as the outgroup. Bootstrap values (100 replicates) are indicated in red.

The evolutionary scenario of the gpa2-gpb5 environment in Figure 8 was determined so as to match the relationships between the paralogous gene sets. First, gpa and gpb were located next to each other on the predicted ancestral chordate proto-chr. 11. Ancestral forms of NT, Lin7 and KCNA must have been on a chordate composite proto-chromosome 13/14. The gpa-gpb close environment was then submitted to a specific, local duplication, generating gphα and ancestral gphβ subunits. This event took place between the radiation of urochordates (that do not have gphα and gphβ but do have a gpa-gpb locus) and the first round of genomic duplication. The environment must have then been split into two loci, one located on vertebrate proto-chr. D, close to the ancestral lin7, kcna and nt genes, and the other one on vertebrate proto-chr. G. This locus was then submitted to the two rounds of WGD to generate the four [GPHβ] environments as illustrated in more details in Figure 4.

Figure 8
figure 8

Scenario for the evolution of the gph-related gene environments. The chordate gpa-gpb locus was duplicated prior to the first round of genomic duplication and the newly created gphβ was transferred to vertebrate proto-chr D whereas gpa2, gpb5 and gphα localized on vertebrate proto-chr. G. Paralogues of gpa2-gpb5-gphα and gphβ environments were then created through two whole genome duplications (WGD). Genes that have been lost are crossed out in red. Gpb5a is still present in teleosts in [GPA2] environment but was lost in tetrapods (see Figure 9).

After the first round of genomic duplication of the vertebrate proto-chr. G, one copy of both gpa2 and gphα was eliminated, leaving only one copy of each of them, whereas two copies of gpb5 were conserved, one of which still next to gpa2. The two loci were submitted to the second genomic duplication. One copy of gap2/gpb5 was lost on what was now the [GPHα]-containing paralogous gene set whereas the other copy of gphα was lost. A single copy of the gpa2-gpb5 linked genes was conserved in early vertebrates and is still present in teleosts (Figure 9 and Additional file 10: [GPA2] and [GPB5] environments in human and zebrafish). Indeed, most teleosts appear to have two copies of gpb5, one (gpb5a) next to gpa2, and the other one (gpb5b) in the same environment as tetrapod gpb5. In Xenopus, only one copy of gpb5 (e_gw1.491.6.1) is identified, located on a different scaffold as gpa2 (e_gw1.296.27.1). Both genes are in an environment syntenic with their mammalian counterparts (data not shown). It is worth noticing that two copies of gpb5, one complete ([EMBL:BN001271], [22]) and a fragment of the second encoding exon of another one (Petromyzon trace archives [GenBank:gnl|ti|1201055580, PMAC-akl10f02.b1]) showing 83% identity were detected in Petromyzon genomic data.

Figure 9
figure 9

Comparative genomic environment of gpa2 and gpb5. Genes are given with, underneath, their position in megabase pairs from the p end of each chromosome (chr.) in human and zebrafish (zebra) (see Additional file 10 for details and links to Ensembl website). Amphioxus (Amphi) homologues are given with the scaffold number (version 2) on which they are located. Names are after Ensembl in the human genome except for amphioxus homologues, which were reduced. Duplicated chromosome fragments in zebrafish are indicated with brackets. Due to rearrangements, the zebrafish gpb5b environment is scattered among chr. 13 and 17 whereas its FSGD driven duplicated environment is on chr. 20. Human GPB5 is orthologous to zebrafish GPB5b, whereas zebrafish GPB5a environment is orthologous to that of human GPA2.

As shown in this study, the genes in the direct environment of amphioxus gpa and gpb do not map to the gphβ environments as it was postulated by Kubokawa and collaborators [21]. The genes used for their study were actn, pcnx, map3k (9-11), and map4k whose homologues actually map to the [GPHα-GPA2-GPB5] tetra-paralogon (Additional file 9) and two other genes, kirrel and pou2f whose homologues are effectively located on human chr. 1 (156-172 Mb), chr. 11 (120-125 Mb) and chr. 19 (41-47 Mb) but outside the boundaries of the [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon. Only the klhl28 (chr. 11: 45 Mb) was actually within the boundaries of the [FSHβ-containing paralogous gene set but this gene does not seem to be paralogous at the vertebrate level to the two other mentioned klhl20 (chr. 1: 172 Mb) and keap1 (chr. 19: 10Mb) that, in any case, are both located outside the boundaries of any gphβ paralogous gene sets.

Our present study also differs from a previous report on the origin of neurotrophins by Hallböök and collaborators [9] in that they included in their neurotrophin-containing paralogous gene sets a number of genes that actually were part of the [GPHβ-GPA2-GPB5] tetra-paralogon. This was likely due to the juxtaposition in human of parts of the paralogous gene sets from the two tetra-paralogons on chr. 1 ([TSHβ: 200-210 Mb and [GPHα]: 210-245 Mb), chr. 19 ([LHβ:49-51 Mb and [GP-Ghost]: 36-49 Mb), and chr. 11 ([FSHβ:68-70 Mb and [GPA2]: 61-67 Mb) that could have been misleading at a time when most other vertebrate genomic data were not available. Indeed, these paralogous regions do not appear contiguous in lizard and chicken as exemplified by [TSHβ and [GPHα]-containing paralogous gene sets that are located on different chromosomes in lizard (chr. 4 and 1, respectively) and chicken (chr. 26 and 3, respectively) (Additional file 8).


In this paper, we first investigated the repertoire for gphβ-related genes in cartilaginous fishes and lampreys, and some genes that were kept in their genomic environment in teleosts and tetrapods. This analysis shows that cartilaginous fishes are provided with the same set of GPHβ subunits as tetrapods. An additional tshβ-related gene is also found in the elephant shark C. milii. In addition to four NT genes, a fifth, ntf4-related gene is present in elephant shark. In lampreys, the only observed gphβ-related gene was the already known gthβ. In contrast, in addition to the previously characterized NT1 we were able to identify two additional NT, NT2 and NTz in Petromyzon but their sequences were too divergent for a reliable relationship with their tetrapod counterparts to be established. These results are consistent with an evolution driven by two successive WGD of a genomic region that contained a unique ancestral form of each of gphβ, nt, lin7 and kcna genes. To better characterize this ancestral environment, we conducted an analysis of the amphioxus genome and identified two sets of scaffolds containing genes homologous to those present in the environments of the vertebrate gphβ and in the environments of gpa2, gpb5 and gphα, respectively. By looking in vertebrate genomes for the location of all the genes in these scaffolds, we identified chromosomal segments in human, chicken and lizard that constituted two different tetra-paralogons. This allowed us to propose a scenario for the evolution of the GPH and NT gene families within their environment in vertebrates. Vertebrate gphα and gphβ were generated by a local duplication of the ancestral forms of gpa2 and gpb5, followed by a relocation of gphβ into a new environment whereas gphα was retained in the gpa2-gpb5 environment. Two rounds of WGD generated four paralogues of each gene in the two ancestral environments but secondary gene losses or lineage-specific duplications together with genomic rearrangements altered the present, species-specific organization of these genes.



Basic local alignment search tool


Glycoprotein hormone


GPH receptor


Gonadotropin hormone




Glycoprotein hormone alpha 2 (GPHA2 according to Ensembl)


Glycoprotein hormone beta 5 (GPHB5 according to Ensembl)


Glycoprotein alpha (used to characterize pre-vertebrate GPA2)


Glycoprotein beta (used to characterize pre-vertebrate GPB5)


Kv1 family of shaker-related voltage-gated potassium channels


Whole genome duplication


Fish-specific genome duplication


  1. Quérat B, Sellouk A, Salmon C: Phylogenetic analysis of the vertebrate glycoprotein hormone family including new sequences of sturgeon Acipenser baeri, β-subunits of the two gonadotropins and the thyroid-stimulating hormone. Biol Reprod. 2000, 63: 222-228. 10.1095/biolreprod63.1.222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quérat B, Tonnerre-Doncarli C, Géniès F, Salmon C: Duality of gonadotropins in gnathostomes. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001, 124: 308-314. 10.1006/gcen.2001.7715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sower SA, Moriyama S, Kasahara M, Takahashi A, Nozaki M, Uchida K, Dahlstrom JM, Kawauchi K: Identification of sea lamprey GtHβ-like cDNA and its evolutionary implications. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2006, 148: 22-32. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.11.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Uchida K, Moriyama S, Chiba H, Shimotani T, Honda K, Miki M, Takahashi A, Sower SA, Nozaki M: Evolutionary origin of a functional gonadotropin in the pituitary of the most primitive vertebrate, hagfish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 15832-15837. 10.1073/pnas.1002208107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF: Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001, 24: 677-736. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dethleffsen K, Heinrich G, Lauth M, Knapik EW, Meyer M: Insert-containing neurotrophins in teleost fish and their relationship to nerve growth factor. Mol Cell Neuroscience. 2003, 24: 380-394. 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00195-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hallböök F, Ibàñez C, Persson H: Evolutionary studies of the nerve growth factor family reveal a novel member abundantly expressed in Xenopus ovary. Neuron. 1991, 6: 845-858. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90180-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallböök F, Lundin LG, Kullander K: Lampreta fluviatilis neurotrophin homolog, descendant of a neurotrophin ancestor, discloses the early molecular evolution of neurotrophins in the vertebrate subphylum. J Neuroscience. 1998, 18: 8700-8711.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hallböök F, Wilson K, Thorndyke M, Olinski RP: Formation and evolution of the chordate neurotrophin and Trk receptor genes. Brain Behav Evol. 2006, 68: 133-144. 10.1159/000094083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A: 2R or not 2R is not the question anymore. Nat Rev Genetics. 2010, 11: 166-

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Venkatesh B, Kirkness EF, Loh YH, Halpern AL, Lee AP, Johnson J, Dandona N, Viswanathan LD, Tay A, Venter JG, Strausberg RL, Brenner S: Survey Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of the Elephant Shark Callorhinchus milii, Genome. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5: e101-10.1371/journal.pbio.0050101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson KHS: The genome sequence of the protostome Daphnia pulex encodes respective orthologues of a neurotrophin, a Trk and a p75NTR: Evolution of neurotrophin signaling components and related proteins in the bilateria. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2009, 9: 243-10.1186/1471-2148-9-243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell RK, Satoh N, Degnan BM: Piecing together evolution of the vertebrate endocrine system. Trends Genet. 2004, 20: 359-366. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu SY, Nakabayashi K, Bhalla A: Evolution of Glycoprotein Hormone Subunit Genes in Bilateral Metazoa: Identification of Two Novel Human Glycoprotein Hormone Subunit Family Genes, GPA2 and GPB5. Mol Endocrinol. 2002, 16: 1538-1551. 10.1210/me.16.7.1538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakabayashi K, Matsumi H, Bhalla A, Bae J, Mosselman S, Hsu SY, Hsueh AJW: Thyrostimulin, a heterodimer of two new human glycoprotein hormone subunits, activates the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. J Clin Invest. 2002, 109: 1445-1452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Okada SL, Ellsworth JL, Durnam DM, Haugen HS, Holloway JL, Kelley ML, Lewis KE, Ren H, Sheppard PO, Storey HM, Waggie KS, Wolf AC, Yao LY, Webster PJ: A glycoprotein hormone expressed in corticotrophs exhibits unique binding properties on thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2006, 20: 414-425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okajima Y, Nagasaki H, Suzuki C, Suga H, Ozaki N, Arima H, Hamada Y, Civelli O, Oiso Y: Biochemical roles of the oligosaccharide chains in thyrostimulin, a heterodimeric hormone of glycoprotein hormone subunits_2 (GPA2) and _5 (GPB5). Regul Pept. 2008, 148: 62-67. 10.1016/j.regpep.2008.03.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sudo S, Kuwabara Y, Park JI, Hsu SY, Hsueh AJW: Heterodimeric fly glycoprotein hormone-2 GPA2, and glycoprotein hormone-5 GPB5, activate fly leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor-1 DLGR1, and stimulation of human thyrotropin receptors by chimeric fly GPA2 and human GPB5. Endocrinol. 2005, 146: 3596-360. 10.1210/en.2005-0317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Park JI, Semyonov J, Chang CL, Hsu SY: Conservation of the heterodimeric glycoprotein hormone subunit family proteins and the LGR signaling system from nematodes to humans. Endocrine. 2005, 26: 267-276. 10.1385/ENDO:26:3:267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tando Y, Kubokawa K: A homolog of the vertebrate thyrostimulin glycoprotein hormone α subunit (GPA2) is expressed in amphioxus neurons. Zool Science. 2009, 26: 409-414. 10.2108/zsj.26.409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tando Y, Kubokawa K: Expression of the gene for ancestral glycoprotein hormone β subunit in the nerve cord of amphioxus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009, 162: 329-339. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dos Santos S, Bardet C, Bertrand S, Escriva H, Habert D, Querat B: Distinct expression patterns of glycoprotein hormone-α2 and -β5 in a basal chordate suggest independent developmental functions. Endocrinology. 2009, 150: 3815-22. 10.1210/en.2008-1743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hauser F, Neupert S, Williamson M, Predel R, Tanaka Y, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP: Genomics and peptidomics of neuropeptides and protein hormones present in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. J Proteome Res. 2010, 9: 5296-5310. 10.1021/pr100570j.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Veenstra JA: Neuropeptide evolution: Neurohormones and neuropeptides predicted from the genomes of Capitella teleta and Helobdella robusta. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011, 171: 160-175. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.01.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iles RK, Delves PJ, Butler SA: Does hCG or hCGβ play a role in cancer cell biology?. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010, 329: 62-70. 10.1016/j.mce.2010.07.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guérin A, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Marrakchi E, Da Silva C, Wincker P, Mazan S, Rétaux S: Neurodevelopment Genes in Lampreys Reveal Trends for Forebrain Evolution in Craniates. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e5374-10.1371/journal.pone.0005374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Coolen M, Sauka-Spengler T, Nicolle D, Le-Mentec C, Lallemand Y, Da Silva C, Plouhinec JL, Robert B, Wincker P, Shi DL, Mazan S: Molecular Characterization of the Early Dogfish embryo: Evolutionary Implications on the Mechanisms of Early Head and Antero-posterior Specification in jawed Vertebrates. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e374-10.1371/journal.pone.0000374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Muffato M, Louis A, Poisnet CE, Crollius HR: Genomicus: a database and a brower to study gene synteny in modern and ancestral genomes. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 1119-1121. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard JF, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, Claverie JM, Gascuel O: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Web Server issue): W465-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ: Phylogy reconstruction. Edited by: Hillis DM, Moritz C. 1990, Molecular Systematics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 411-501.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Noce TH, Ando H, Ueda T, Kubokawa K, Higashinakagawa T, Ishii S: Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the putative cDNA for the precursor molecule of the chicken LHβ subunit. J. Mol Endocrinol. 1989, 3: 129-137. 10.1677/jme.0.0030129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Brunet F, Petit JL, Stange-Thomann N, Mauceli E, Bouneau L, Fischer C, Ozouf-Costaz C, Bernot A, Nicaud S, Jaffe D, Fisher S, Lutfalla G, Dossat C, Segurens B, Dasilva C, Salanoubat M, Levy M, Boudet N, Castellano S, Anthouard V, Jubin C, Castelli V, Katinka M, Vacherie B, Biémont C, Skalli Z, Cattolico L, Poulain J, de Berardinis V, Cruaud C, Duprat S, Brottier P, Coutanceau JP, Gouzy J, Parra G, Lardier G, Chapple C, McKernan KJ, McEwan P, Bosak S, Kellis M, Volff JN, Guigó R, Zody MC, Mesirov J, Lindblad-Toh K, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Kahn D, Robinson-Rechavi M, Laudet V, Schachter V, Quétier F, Saurin W, Scarpelli C, Wincker P, Lander ES, Weissenbach J, Roest Crollius H: Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature. 2004, 431: 946-957. 10.1038/nature03025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoegg S, Brinkmann H, Taylor JS, Meyer A: Phylogenetic timing of the fish-specific genome duplication correlates with the divesification of teleost fish. J Mol Evol. 2004, 59: 190-203. 10.1007/s00239-004-2613-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoegg S, Meyer A: Phylogenomic analyses of KCNA gene clusters in vertebrates: why do gene clusters stay intact?. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2007, 7: 139-10.1186/1471-2148-7-139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. International Chicken genome sequencing consortium: Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004, 432: 695-716. 10.1038/nature03154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dalloul RA, Long JA, Zimin AV, Aslam L, Beal K, et al: Multi-Platform Next-Generation Sequencing of the Domestic Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): Genome Assembly and Analysis. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8: e1000475-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000475.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ye L, Hillier LW, Minx P, Thane N, Locke DP, Martin JC, Chen L, Mitreva M, Miller JR, Haub KV, Dooling DJ, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Weinstock GM, Warren WC: A vertebrate case study of the quality of assemblies derived from next-generation sequences. Genome Biol. 2011, 12: R31-10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sower SA, Freamat M, Kavanaugh SI: The origins of the vertebrate hypothalamic- pituitary-gonadal HPG, and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid HPT, endocrine systems: new insights from lampreys. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009, 161: 20-29. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.11.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Freamat M, Kawauchi H, Nozaki M, Sowe SA: Identification and cloning of a GPH receptor from sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. J Mol Endocrinol. 2006, 37: 135-146. 10.1677/jme.1.02064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Freamat M, Sower SA: A sea lamprey glycoprotein hormone receptor similar with gnathostome thyrotropin hormone receptor. J Mol Endocrinol. 2008, 41: 219-228. 10.1677/JME-08-0030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kuraku S, Meyer A, Kuratani S: Timing of genome duplications relative to the origin of the vertebrates: did cyclostomes diverge before or after?. Mol Biol Evol. 2009, 26: 47-59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Escriva H, Manzon L, Youson J, Laudet V: Analysis of lamprey and hagfish genes reveals a complex history of gene duplications during early vertebrate evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19: 1440-1450. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nakatani Y, Takeda H, Kohara Y, Morishita S: Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res. 2007, 17: 1254-1267. 10.1101/gr.6316407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Putnam NH, Butts T, Ferrier DK, Furlong RF, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, Robinson-Rechavi M, Shoguchi E, Terry A, Yu K, Benito-Gutierrez E, Dubchak I, Garcia-Fernandez J, Gibson-Brown JJ, Grigoriev I, Horton AC, de Jong PJ, Jurka J, Kapitonov VK, Kohara Y, Kuroki Y, Lindquist E, Lucas S, Osoegawa K, Pennacchio LA, Salamov AA, Satou Y, Sauka-Spengler T, Schmutz J, Shin-I T, Toyoda A, Bronner-Fraser M, Fujiyama A, Holland LZ, Holland PWH, Satoh S, Rokhsar DS: The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature. 2008, 453: 1064-1072. 10.1038/nature06967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lanave C, Colangelo AM, Saccone C, Alberghina L: Molecular evolution of the neurotrophin family members and their Trk receptors. Gene. 2007, 394: 1-12. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.01.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Damien Habert for its technical assistance in clonings. We thank Corinne Da Silva and Patrick Wincker (CEA, Genoscope, France) and the Genoscope staff for producing high throughput EST databases of L. fluviatilis, P. marinus and S. canicula. Many thanks also to Hugues Roest-Crollius (Dyogen group, ENS) for his helpful advice. A special thank to an anonymous reviewer for the constructive comments and suggestions that greatly helped in improving the quality of this manuscript. The work in BV's lab was supported by the Biomedical Research Council of A*STAR, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Quérat.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

SDS and BQ participated in the design of the study, carried out lab work and wrote the manuscript. SM and BV provided materials, participated in the lab work and in the writing. JCT participated in the writing. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: GPHβ subunit sequences. Amino acid sequences of elephant shark Callorhinchus milii FSHβ, TSHβ and TSHβ2 subunits [GenBank:HQ174783-HQ174785] characterized in this study and of zebrafish Danio rerio TSHβ [GenBank:AY135147] on chr. 6 and TSHβrp [GenBank:XM_001341527.1] on chr. 23. Cysteine residues involved in the cystine knot structure are in red. Potential N-liked glycosylation sites are in bold red. (PDF 48 KB)


Additional file 2: Neurotrophin sequences. Amino-acid sequence of Callorhinchus milii (references from GeneBank), Scyliorhinus canicula, Petromyzon marinus and Lampetra fluviatilis (references from EMBL) NT encoding sequences characterized in this study aligned with Lampetra NT1 and human NT sequences for comparison (references from GeneBank). Cysteine residues involved in the cystine knot structure are in red. The amino acid sequence of the region of NTF4rp resulting from the shift in the open reading frame (see Additional file 3) is given in italic. (PDF 33 KB)


Additional file 3: Elephant shark NTF4 and NTF4rp. Comparison of NTF4 [Genebank:HQ174787] and NTF4rp [Genbank:HQ174788] sequences from Callorhinchus milii. Nucleotide deletions causing a shift in the open reading frame are indicated by red dashes and resulting amino acids given in italic. Other differences are highlighted in grey. (PDF 39 KB)


Additional file 4: Lin7 sequences. Alignment of Lin7-related encoding sequences of Scyliorhinus canicula, Callorhinchus milii (Callo) and Petromyzon marinus characterized in this study with the amphioxus Branchiostoma floridae homologue and sequences from human (Homo), chicken (Gallus) and zebrafish (Danio). Three paralogues are evidenced in Scyliorhinus and two in Petromyzon. References are from GeneBank except for Scyliorhinus sequences that are from EMBL. Positions specific to Lin7b sequences are highlighted in blue, those specific to Lin7a are in red and those to Lin7c are in green. Amino acids identical to Branchiostoma are given by dashes. Gaps are identified by dots. Unknown positions are indicated by interrogation marks. Exon boundaries are indicated in the bottom lines. (PDF 46 KB)


Additional file 5: Elephant shark KCNA sequences. Callorhinchus milii KCNA sequences. Complete sequences were deposited at GenBank and are given with their accession number. Other, partial sequences are given with their reference from the genome survey sequence at GenBank. Sequences were numbered according to their phylogenetic relationship with other members of the vertebrate KCNA family (see Figure 3). (PDF 29 KB)


Additional file 6: Lamprey KCNA sequences. Petromyzon marinus KCNA-related sequences extracted from their Contig sequences on the Washington University dedicated server (see Methods) and/or from the Traces archives deposited in GeneBank. The positions in the Contig or trace sequences in the sense or antisense strand (complement) are indicated. The underlined position corresponds to the first nucleotide of the 5' end ATG when appropriate. KCNA sequences were referenced by letters instead of numbers because their relationship with the different known KCNA-types could not be determined. (PDF 47 KB)


Additional file 7: [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon. Listing of genes identified as constituting the paralogous gene sets comprising GPHβ subunit gene environments ([GPHβ]) in human with some representative orthologues in chicken (Gallus gallus) and lizard (Anolis carolinensis) genomes and the homologous sequences in amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae). Amphioxus, chicken and lizard gene names are after the human orthologue names as in Ensembl release 62. Genes are given with their approximate location on the chromosome (chromosome number followed by the coordinate rounded up or down to the nearest in megabase pairs) or with their scaffold number (assembly version 2) for amphioxus gene. Each vertebrate gene has hyperlink to its dedicate Ensembl website and amphioxus gene to JGI website (assembly version 1). Genes that have paralogues in all four paralogous gene sets in the human genome are highlighted. nf: genes not found or for which the parental relationships did not appear reliable. Unplaced means that the position in the genome was not given on the Ensembl current release. * indicates chicken genes not found in the available genomic data (NCBI release 2.1) but for which a cDNA is known (see text). Genes may be sorted by columns in order to analyze specific paralogous gene sets. (XLSX 110 KB)


Additional file 8: Human GPH-related gene paralogous gene sets and ancestral chordate and vertebrate proto-chromosome relics. Observed boundaries of the paralogous gene sets comprising the GPH subunit-related genes in human compared to segments (S) or conserved vertebrate linkages (CVL) predicted to derive from the two whole genome duplication events of, respectively, ancestral chordate proto-chromosomes (proto-chr.) G and D, according to [45] and of ancestral vertebrate proto-chromosomes 11 and 13/14 according to [44]. [GPHβ] tetra-paralogon seems to correspond to the sum of the segments derived from proto-chr. 13 (given in red) and 14. (PDF 56 KB)


Additional file 9: [GPHα-GPA2-GPB5] tetra-paralogon. Listing of genes identified as constituting the paralogous gene sets comprising [GPHα], [GPA2], [GPB5] and [GP-Ghost] environments with their amphioxus homologues. See legend of Additional file 7. (XLSX 104 KB)


Additional file 10: [GPA2] and [GPB5] environments in human and zebrafish. Listing of representative genes in the environment of human and zebrafish gpa2 and gpb5 with their amphioxus homologues. See legend of Additional file 7. (XLSX 67 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dos Santos, S., Mazan, S., Venkatesh, B. et al. Emergence and evolution of the glycoprotein hormone and neurotrophin gene families in vertebrates. BMC Evol Biol 11, 332 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: