Skip to main content

Urban mosquitoes and filamentous green algae: their biomonitoring role in heavy metal pollution in open drainage channels in Nairobi industrial area, Kenya

Abstract

Background

Industrial wastewater is a human health hazard upon exposure. Aquatic organisms in contaminated wastewater may accumulate the toxic elements with time. Human population living in informal settlements in Nairobi industrial area risk exposure to such toxic elements. Biomonitoring using aquatic organisms in open drainage channels can be key in metal exposure assessment. Levels of Mercury (Hg), Lead (Pb), Chromium (Cr), Cadmium (Cd), Thallium (Tl), and Nickel (Ni) were established in samples of wastewater, filamentous green algae (Spirogyra) and mosquitoes obtained from open drainage channels in Nairobi industrial area, Kenya.

Results

Pb, Cr, & Ni levels ranged from 3.08 to 15.31 µg/l while Tl, Hg, & Cd ranged from 0.05 to 0.12 µg/l in wastewater. The Pb, Cr, Ni, & Cd levels were above WHO, Kenya & US EPA limits for wastewater but Hg was not. Pb, Cr, Tl, & Ni levels in assorted field mosquitoes were 1.3–2.4 times higher than in assorted laboratory-reared mosquitoes. Hg & Cd concentrations in laboratory-reared mosquitoes (0.26 mg/kg & 1.8 mg/kg respectively) were higher than in field mosquitoes (0.048 mg/kg & 0.12 mg/kg respectively). The levels of Pb, Cr, & Ni were distinctively higher in field mosquito samples than in wastewater samples from the same site. Pb, Cr, Ni, Cd & Hg levels in green filamentous Spirogyra algae were 110.62, 29.75, 14.45, 0.44, & 0.057 mg/kg respectively. Correlation for Pb & Hg (r (2) = 0.957; P < 0.05); Cd & Cr (r (2) = 0.985; P < 0.05) in algae samples was noted. The metal concentrations in the samples analyzed were highest in filamentous green algae and least in wastewater.

Conclusion

Wastewater, mosquitoes, and filamentous green algae from open drainage channels and immediate vicinity, in Nairobi industrial area (Kenya) contained Hg, Pb, Cr, Cd, Tl, and Ni. Mosquitoes in urban areas and filamentous green algae in open drainage channels can play a role of metal biomonitoring in wastewater. The potential of urban mosquitoes transferring heavy metals to human population from the contaminated wastewater should be investigated.

Background

The wide application of heavy metals has raised concerns over their potential harmful effects on human health and environmental modification [1]. Environmental pollution by heavy metals has been associated with mining, foundries, smelters, and other metal-based industrial operations [2]. Harmful health effects associated with heavy metals in exposed humans and animals range from cancer, systems disorders, developmental anomalies, neurologic and neuro-behavioral disorders, hematologic disorders, DNA damage, cellular and tissue damage, and gastrointestinal toxicity [3,4,5,6,7]. According to Tchounwou et al. [1], heavy metals toxicity depends on their dose, route of exposure, chemical property as well as age, gender, genetics, and nutritional status of the exposed individuals.

Biological monitoring of water quality involves use of aquatic organisms to measure level of exposure to various pollutants [8]. For instance, heavy metals have previously been reported in mosquito larvae [9]. Biomonitoring of aquatic pollutants using Culex mosquito larvae is advantageous because their larvae are able to survive in polluted water and secondly, the Culex larvae proliferate fast and have a sufficient developmental interval which gives time for heavy metal uptake [10,11,12]. Previous survey of mosquitoes in Nairobi industrial area, showed that 95% of the trapped adult mosquitoes were of the species Culex pipiens [13]. Mosquitoes found in urban areas have been reported to adapt to changing environments by being able to breed in polluted waters. The adaptation requires the continuous substitution of new beneficial alleles at a rate that is proportional to the rate of environmental change [14].

According to Kitvatanachai et al. [12], the routine collection of urban mosquitoes for medical research can also avail appropriate samples for monitoring environmental pollution by heavy metals. The uptake of pollutant metals by the mosquito larvae inhabiting contaminated water may occur through direct body absorption or indirectly through ingesting heavy metals contaminated materials. While adult mosquitoes suck nectar, honey and animal blood, their larvae filter algae and other plant materials from the water. According to Tuno et al. [15], algae are important food resources of the African mosquito larvae. However, the larvae of Toxorhynchites mosquitoes are predacious and feed on the larvae of other mosquito species, but in absence of a suitable prey they may feed on detritus or exhibit cannibalism [16].

According to Marten [17], abundance of algae usually provides favorable conditions for mosquito proliferation. Spirogyra filamentous algae which usually forms mats in the water serve as mosquito larvae food [18,19,20]. Some species of algae however, including those in the order Chlorococcales and the blue green algae (Cyanobacteria) have larvicidal effect because they are indigestible and toxic to mosquito larvae respectively [17]. There are about 200 species of green algae that cannot be digested by mosquito larvae [21]. Hexane and chloroform extracts from marine Phaeophyta algae (Padina gymnospora) have been reported to display larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti [22].

Certain species of algae have been reported to take up heavy metals from contaminated water through biosorption and bioaccumulation [23]. Such species can therefore be used as indicators of the extent of water pollution and in removing pollutants from the wastewater, a process known as phytoremediation. Phytoremediation has emerged as a desirable technology which uses plants for removal of contaminants from water or soil [24]. Both micro and macro algae have been shown to take up heavy metals from contaminated water naturally and from experimental solutions in the laboratory [25, 26]. Aquatic organisms in the lower trophic levels are better tools for natural biomonitoring of metal since they are among the first in the food chain to be exposed to the pollutants [27]. The heavy metals taken up by the aquatic producers flow into the consumers in a food web through the various aquatic food chains. Use of algae for environmental biomonitoring can be advantageous because they are relatively common and develop spatially dense populations and are easy to sample [28].

Drainage channels with wastewater create aquatic ecosystems which supports populations of different organisms that may include filamentous organisms, insects, arachnids, microorganisms, higher plants, amphibians, fish, among others. Slow flowing wastewater tend to support diverse species of organisms. Wastewaters in industrial areas are often contaminated with toxic heavy metals [29]. Therefore, there is a possibility of the toxic heavy metals accumulating in the tissues of the aquatic organisms with time. The aquatic green plants in open drainage channels may absorb the contaminants present in the wastewater directly through their surfaces and roots, while the consumers may do so through direct surface absorption and feeding processes. Establishing the levels of contaminants in the wastewater, algae (producers) and mosquitoes (consumers) can validate the possibility of a biomonitoring role of the organisms.

The current study was therefore designed to establish the levels of selected heavy metals in samples of wastewater, filamentous algae (Order Zygnematales: Genus Spirogyra) and mosquitoes (Order Diptera: Family Culicidae) both larvae and adults, that were obtained from open drainage channels and the immediate vicinity in Nairobi industrial area, Kenya. The metallic elements studied were chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), nickel (Ni), and thallium (Tl). The metals selected for the current study have a high degree of toxicity and rank among priority metals that are of public health concern [1] and that some of the selected metals including Cd, Cr, Pb and Ni are commonly found in contaminated wastewater [30].

Methods

Study area and sampling sites

Nairobi River is a tributary of Athi River, which then flows into the Indian Ocean [31]. One of the tributaries of Nairobi River, is Ngong River that passes through Nairobi industrial area, where the current study was undertaken (Fig. 1). Along the Ngong river are the Mukuru and Viwandani slums and the many villages that constitute them. These villages spread within and on the periphery of Nairobi industrial area. Samples of wastewater, filamentous algae and mosquito larvae were obtained from main open drainage channels that were directly or indirectly draining into the Ngong river. The sampling sites were randomly selected near the main roads for easy accessibility. Adult mosquitoes were trapped at night from the factory premises (for the security of the traps) near the open drainage channels selected for the current study. The sampling was carried out over a period of 30 days in the month of August, which is a relatively dry period that extends from June to October [32]. Samples were collected from eight different sampling sites that were coded A to H, at Nairobi industrial area, Kenya. The sites included Tetrapak (A); Chief’s Camp at Land Mawe (B); Two sites at Railways near Enterprise/Lunga Lunga roads junction (C & D); Davis & Shirtliff along Dondori road (E); Kartasi Industries (F); Rok Industries near Sinai village in Viwandani slum (G); and Donholm Swamp/Kenya Power & Lighting Station (H) as shown in Fig. 1. The permit to carry out the current research was awarded by the National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI) through a Research Clearance Permit No. NACOSTI/P/15/8787/5184. Further authorization was awarded by Nairobi County Commissioner, Nairobi County Director of Education, Deputy County Commissioner in Starehe Sub-County, Deputy County Commissioner for Makadara Sub-County, and from Daystar University (CRPCPB/14/7/0015).

Fig. 1
figure1

Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS); The map was drawn using Software ArcMap Version 10.61)

The study area and the sampling sites in Nairobi industrial area in Kenya (

Collection and preparation of wastewater samples

A standard 350 mL dipper was used to collect the wastewater samples from the open channels and placed into clean reagent plastic bottles. The samples were collected in triplicates in equal portions. Two separate portions were separately acidified with concentrated hydrochloric (HCL) acid and concentrated nitric (HNO3) acid respectively by adding three drops of the respective acid per 100 ml of wastewater sample. Acidification was meant to inhibit adsorption of dissolved elements onto the interior walls of the plastic bottles as well as preventing microbial reactions [33]. A third portion of wastewater was not acidified to act as a control. All the samples were labeled appropriately, packaged, and stored in low temperature.

Measuring the physico-chemical parameters of water samples

The physico-chemical parameters of the wastewater samples including temperature, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and total dissolved solids (TDS) were measured immediately after collection of wastewater samples at the site using a digital electronic device (HANNA Instruments, H1991300, Romania) and recorded appropriately.

Collecting samples of filamentous green algae

Filamentous green algae (Fig. 2) were collected in triplicates from wastewater in open drainage channels using a large plastic strainer and packaged in well labeled brown paper bags. The strainer was then rinsed in deionized water before being used again. All the samples collected were transferred to Kenyatta University Biochemistry laboratory for identification and further processing. The genus Spirogyra of the filamentous green algae (Fig. 2) was morphologically identified by the authors and support researchers based on the algae’s notable spiral chloroplasts and unbranched filamentous strands.

Fig. 2
figure2

Filamentous green algae (Genus Spirogyra) collected from wastewater in open drainage channels near Kartasi industries, Nairobi

Preparation of green algae samples for heavy metal analysis

The filamentous green algae samples were divided into two parts. One part was air dried at room temperature for several days while the remaining part was lyophilized (freeze dried). Both air dried and lyophilized algae samples were ground and sieved to obtain a fine powder as described by Ngure and Kinuthia [34]. The powder was then weighed and packaged in well labeled brown small envelops to await metal analysis. Briefly, lyophilization involved extracting the algae samples using de-ionized water for 36 h on an electrical shaker, followed by filtering the extract obtained using clean muslin cloth on a water pump. About 200 ml of the filtrate was then put on clean stainless-steel tray and placed in the deep freezer for 24 h at negative 45 °C. The samples were then retrieved and placed in a freeze-drier for a further 24 h at negative 50 °C to complete lyophilization.

Outdoor trapping of adult mosquitoes

Adult mosquitoes were trapped using surveillance standard Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) light traps as described by Mweya et al. [35] using carbonated dry ice as the bait. The traps were set in potential breeding sites and amidst the vegetation where applicable (Fig. 3) within the factory premise. The trapping commenced from 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM each day. The average number of CDC traps set per sampling site per night was seven depending on the size of the compound. The mosquito trapping activity was carried out daily for 2 weeks. The field mosquitoes were trapped near the sites where wastewater and algae samples had been collected from.

Fig. 3
figure3

CDC mosquito trap on a tree branch in the premise of Kartasi Industries, Nairobi

Collection of mosquito larvae from wastewater

Mosquito larvae were collected during the day preferably midmorning, from wastewater in open drainage channels. Three dips (triplicate) were taken to obtain the larvae from the wastewater, using the standard 350 mL dipper. If less than ten mosquito larvae were captured in the first three attempts, additional two dips were done to obtain a sizable number. The dipper contents were then transferred onto a white plastic tray. The mosquito larvae were sorted, counted and their number per dip per site recorded. The larvae were then placed in plastic Whirl–Pak® bags (Bio Quip, Rancho Dominguez, CA) which were approximately half full of the same wastewater from which the larvae were collected. The Whirl–Pak bags containing the larvae were then tightly closed to retain air before transporting to the laboratory as described by Rueda et al. [36], where they were identified and preserved.

Preservation of adult mosquitoes and mosquito larvae

The trapped mosquitoes were processed as described by Tchouassi et al. [37]. The trapped mosquitoes were anaesthetized and killed using triethylamine while still in the trap. The mosquitoes were then sorted, counted, and put in Nunc tubes. The adult mosquitoes were then preserved in liquid nitrogen until when they were required for identification at Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), before processing them further for metal analysis. Similarly, the mosquito larvae were preserved as described by James-Pirri et al. [38]. Briefly, the mosquito larvae were retrieved from the Whirl–Pak bags and placed in hot water at a temperature of 87 °C for 50 s after which they were removed using a strainer. The larvae were then preserved in Dietrich’s solution and later transferred into 75% ethanol for further preservation until when they were required for identification and processing for metal analysis.

Morphological identification of the trapped field mosquitoes

Both mosquito larvae and adults were identified using morphological features up to species level under a stereomicroscope. Appropriate mosquito taxonomic keys for the Sub-Sahara Africa and the East African region [39,40,41] were used.

Laboratory rearing of mosquitoes

Anopheles gambiae s.s., Kisumu strain and Aedes aegypti, Mombasa strain laboratory colonized mosquitoes were reared in the laboratory at KEMRI, following the protocol described by Das et al. [42]. Mosquito rearing was carried out in the insectary that was maintained at a temperature ranging from 27 to 28 °C and approximately 80% humidity on a 12 h/12 h light and darkness cycle. Optimal larval concentrations were maintained to avoid possible effects of competition. Mosquito larvae were fed on finely ground Sera Vipan staple diet ™ (Sera, Germany) while adults were offered a fresh 10% (w/v) glucose solution meal daily and fed on hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) as a source of blood meals for egg production. Mosquito larvae were reared in de-chlorinated tap water. De-chlorination of the tap water was achieved by allowing the tap water in a bucket to stand in the insectary chamber for at least 24 h. These laboratory-reared mosquitoes obtained served as a control in the current study to enable us to compare the levels of heavy metals in field trapped and laboratory mosquitoes.

Preparation of the mosquito samples for metal analysis

Both the field and laboratory-reared mosquitoes were separately dried from an open room on brown papers, ground and then sieved to obtain a fine powder. The mosquito powder was then weighed, packaged in small new brown envelops and labeled appropriately to await metal analysis.

Analysis of heavy metals for the different samples

The analysis of heavy metals was carried out at Mineral Laboratories, Bureau Veritas Commodities Ltd, Vancouver, Canada. The protocols included aqua regia digestion ultra-trace inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) for algae and mosquito samples; and ICP-MS (solutions > 0.1% TDS (total dissolved solids) for water samples as described by the American Herbal Products Association [43]. The digest solution was nebulized, and sample aerosols transferred to argon plasma. The high temperature plasma then produced ions, which were then introduced into the mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer then sorted out the ions according to their mass-to-charge ration and finally, the ions were quantified with an electron multiplier detector. Certificates of analysis and quality control reports for all the samples analyzed were awarded by the Bureau Veritas, Canada.

Data analysis

The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 20 for Windows at 5% level of significance was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics involved computing mean, standard error (SE), and standard deviation (SD) for the different variables measured in wastewater, algae, and mosquito samples. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, and Tukey’s & Games-Howell Post hoc tests were carried out to separate the means in the case of significant differences. Correlation analysis was carried out to establish the nature of relationship, and level of significance between concentrations of heavy metals in different samples. Pairwise correlation coefficients for the levels of selected heavy metals in wastewater, algae, and mosquito samples were also computed as described by Björklund et al. [44] and Benson et al. [45].

Results

Physico-chemical parameters of wastewater samples

The range for pH, temperature, total dissolved solids (TDS) and electrical conductivity (EC) of the wastewater samples were 7.28–8.78, 16.75–26.05 °C, 160.33–544.67 ppm, and 336.67–1134.33 µS/cm respectively (Table 1). All the wastewater samples obtained from the study area were alkaline, with those from Chief’s camp (B-1), Kartasi industries (F) and Sinai (G) sites being more alkaline at pH 8.13, 8.59 and 8.78, respectively. Samples of wastewater from open, shallow, and exposed drainage channel at Sinai (G) site had a temperature of 26.05 °C compared to samples from shaded channels and with a vegetation cover at Davis & Shirtliff sampling site (E) that had a temperature of 16.75 °C. Increased TDS corresponded to increased EC and vice versa. The TDS (ppm) of wastewater samples at sampling sites, Railways lower (C), Railways upper (D), and Sinai (G) were 562.00, 535.33 and 544.67 ppm; while the EC (µS/cm) of the wastewater samples in the same sites were 1134.33, 1072.33, and 1074.33 µS/cm respectively. Both TDS and EC recorded were above the recommended limits by WHO (Table 1).

Table 1 Range of variables measured compared to WHO standard limits for wastewater (effluent)

Levels of heavy metals in samples of wastewater

The Pb levels were the highest ranging from 13.62 to 15.31 ppb or µg/l, followed by Ni (4.96–6.91 ppb or µg/l) and the lowest was Tl at 0.05 ppb or µg/l. The mean concentrations of the heavy metals in acidified wastewater samples were lowest for thallium and highest for lead in the order Tl < Hg < Cd < Cr < Ni < Pb (Table 2). Mean concentration of Cr (7.49 ± 2.12 ppb or µg/l) in wastewater samples that were not acidified was relatively higher than for the other elements studied (Table 2). The mean concentrations of Pb and Cr in acidified wastewater samples were above the limits set by WHO, US EPA and Kenya. The levels of Hg, Cd, and Ni in acidified wastewater samples were below the limits set by WHO and Kenya. The level of Hg in wastewater samples was above the US EPA limit which is set at 0.00003 ppm (0.03 ppb or µg/l). The mean concentration of thallium in wastewater samples was 0.04 ppb or µg/l.

Table 2 Mean concentration (ppb) of heavy metals in acidified and plain wastewater samples

Levels of the selected heavy metals in filamentous green algae

Filamentous green algae were sampled from 4 out of 8 (50%) sampling sites (Table 3). The difference in mean concentration of heavy metals in samples of wastewater and filamentous green algae collected from the same site was significant, F (11, 24) = 4.33, P < 0.05 (Table 4) at Kartasi site. Tukey post hoc test showed that the difference between the mean concentration of Cr in algae and concentrations of Hg, Pb, Cr, Cd, Tl and Ni in wastewater samples was significant (P = 0.006) at Kartasi site. The average heavy metal concentrations in filamentous green algae samples were between 500 to 5000 times more than the mean concentration of the same metals in wastewater samples in the same sampling site (Tables 2, 3, and 4). The mean concentrations of heavy metal in filamentous green algae were lowest for Hg and highest for Pb in the order Hg < Tl < Cd < Ni < Cr < Pb and ranged from 0.057 to 110.62 mg/kg (Table 3). The algae samples obtained from Railways Lower (D) and Davis & Shirtliff (E) sampling sites had a relatively higher level of heavy metals compared to those collected from Kartasi (F1a & Flb) sampling sites (Table 3). Concentrations of Hg, Pb, Cr, Cd and Tl were 1.93–2.75 times higher in room temperature dried algae samples than in lyophilized algae samples (Table 3). The Ni level was however higher in lyophilized algae samples than in the room temperature dried algae samples (Table 3).

Table 3 Concentration of heavy metal (mg/kg) in filamentous algae samples in three out of eight sites
Table 4 Statistical comparison of levels of heavy metals in filamentous algae and wastewater at Kartasi sampling site

Levels of heavy metals in mosquito samples

Adult mosquitoes were trapped from sampling sites A, B, D, E, F, G and H while the mosquito larvae were collected from sites A, C, D, E and G. Assorted field mosquito samples were prepared from adult mosquitoes from sites A, B, D, E and G which were combined with mosquito larvae from sites A, C, D and E. Combining the field mosquito samples was necessary to meet the minimum sample weight of 0.5 g required for metal analysis protocol (VG 101-EXT) at Mineral Laboratories, Bureau Veritas Commodities Ltd, Vancouver, Canada. Similarly, assorted laboratory mosquito samples were made up of a mixture of laboratory reared adult Anopheles and Aedes mosquitoes and their larvae (Table 5). Concentrations of Hg, Pb, Cr, Cd, and Ni in adult Culex mosquitoes’ samples collected from Donholm site (H) was relatively higher than the means for the same elements at Kartasi site (F) as shown in Table 5. Similarly, the mean concentrations of Hg, Pb, Cr, Cd, Tl, and Ni in mosquito larvae samples collected from Sinai site (G) were relatively higher compared to the means of the same elements in adult mosquitoes trapped at Kartasi and Donholm sites (Table 5). The mean concentration of heavy metals in field mosquitoes’ samples was lowest for Tl and highest for Cr giving the order Tl < Hg < Cd < Ni < Pb < Cr while that for the laboratory reared mosquito samples was Tl < Hg < Cd & Ni < Cr < Pb (Table 5). The mean concentration of Pb, Cr, Tl, and Ni in assorted field mosquito samples were 1.3–2.4 times more than the mean concentration in the assorted laboratory reared mosquito samples. The mean concentrations for Hg (0.26 mg/kg) and Cd (1.8 mg/kg) in assorted laboratory-reared field mosquitoes were 4.4 and 20 times more respectively than in assorted field mosquitoes which were at 0.059 mg/kg (Hg) and 0.09 mg/kg (Cd) as shown in Fig. 4a and Table 5. The mean concentration of Pb, Cr, Cd, Tl, and Ni at Kartasi sampling site, in filamentous algae samples was 3–29 times higher than in assorted field mosquito samples (Tables 3 and 5). The level of Tl was below the method detectable level which was set at 0.02 mg/kg in both the assorted field and laboratory reared mosquito samples (Table 5).

Table 5 Comparison of heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg) in laboratory- reared and field mosquitoes
Fig. 4
figure4

a Comparison of heavy metal concentration (mg/kg) in assorted field and assorted laboratory-reared mosquito samples. b Levels of metals in wastewater (mg/l) and field mosquito larvae (mg/kg) at Sinai sampling site. c Levels of metals in wastewater (mg/l) and field adult mosquitoes (mg/kg) at Donholm sampling site. d Levels of metals in wastewater (mg/l) and field adult mosquitoes (mg/kg) at Kartasi sampling site

The mean concentration of Pb, Cr, and Ni in both assorted field and assorted laboratory-reared mosquitoes’ samples ranged from 2.33 to 10.53 ppm or mg/kg. (Table 5). The level of Hg in both assorted field and assorted laboratory-reared mosquitoes’ samples ranged from 0.06 to 0.26 mg/kg. Similarly, the mean concentration of Cd in assorted laboratory-reared mosquito samples was 1.8 mg/kg. While the mean Cd level in assorted field mosquito samples was 0.09 mg/kg (Table 5).

Levels of metal pollutants in the wastewater samples were compared with the same elements in field mosquito samples at the same sampling site. It was established that the concentration of Pb, Cr, and Ni was distinctively higher in mosquito samples than in wastewater samples obtained from the same sampling site (Fig. 4b–d).

Correlation of the heavy metal levels in wastewater, algae, and mosquito samples

A positive correlation was noted between Pb & Hg (r (2) = 0.957, p = 0.043); Cd & Cr (r (2) = 0.985, p = 0.015); and Tl & Hg (r (2) = 0.946, p = 0.054) in algae samples (Table 6). Similarly, Tl & Cd in wastewater samples correlated positively (r (7) = 0.631, p = 0.069) (Table 6). The strong positive correlations between specific pairs of elements may have suggested uniformity of the elements in wastewater and filamentous algae in terms of their source and accumulation behavior [52]. Strong negative correlations were noted for Pb (wastewater) & Hg (algae) where r (2) = − 0.921, p = 0.079; and for Pb (algae) & Pb (wastewater) where r (2) = − 0.974, p = 0.026 (Table 6).

Table 6 Inter-elemental correlation of heavy metal concentrations in samples of wastewater and filamentous green algae

Table 7 shows inter-elemental correlation of the mean concentration of pairs of heavy metals in wastewater samples obtained from Sinai site (G). Pairs of elements such as Cd & Pb; and Ni & Pb correlated positively and significantly (P < 0.05) in wastewater. Similarly, Cd & Pb; and Tl & Pb in samples of mosquito larvae (Table 7) trapped from wastewater at Sinai showed strong negative significant correlation (P < 0.01) while Tl & Cd showed positive significant correlation (P < 0.01) as shown in Table 7.

Table 7 Correlation (r values) of heavy metal concentrations in wastewater and mosquito larvae samples from Sinai site

Discussion

The mean concentration of Pb (14.47 ppm) and Cr (5.6 ppm) in acidified wastewater samples from Nairobi industrial area were above the limits set by WHO, US EPA and Kenya for wastewater (effluent). This observation was in line with a study carried out by Kaluli et al. [53] who observed low levels (below WHO, US EPA, and Kenyan limits for wastewater) of Pb and Cr in wastewater samples obtained outside Nairobi industrial area at Kibera informal settlements. In the current study, the industrial effluents which often contain heavy metals, may have found their way into the open drainage channels hence contributing to the increased levels of Pb and Cr in the samples of wastewater analyzed. This agreed with a study carried out by Njuguna and his colleagues [31] who linked the high concentration of Pb, Cr and Ni in Ngong river (Fig. 1) to industrial effluent in Nairobi industrial area. The average levels of Pb, Cr, Cd, and Ni in assorted field mosquito samples in our study ranged from 0.09 to 10.53 mg/kg. This was in line with an observation made by Kitvatanachai et al. [12] in their study, whereby Culex mosquito larvae trapped from larval habitats near a Lead factory in Thailand, had a high Pb mean concentration of 11.76 µg/g. The concentration of the elements studied were relatively higher in the filamentous algae and least in the wastewater. Environmental contaminants bioaccumulate and bio magnify in the food chains, increasing their concentration along a food chain [54]. This was not the case in the current study because the concentration of heavy metals was higher in filamentous green algae than in mosquitoes, which were presumed to be the consumers of these algae. Further investigation on the factors that influence bioaccumulation of heavy metals in mosquitoes in aquatic ecosystems is therefore necessary.

According to Azam et al. [55], insects are the dominant invertebrate faunal group that has been used in biomonitoring and bio assessment studies. This is because insects are highly diverse and able to adapt to a wide range of habitats, hence accomplishing many ecological roles in the ecosystems [56]. Insects are abundant and they possess diverse morphologies and functions which enable them to display unique biochemical and genetical responses after their exposure to environmental changes including pollutions. In the current study, field urban mosquitoes were evaluated for their possible role of bio-indication for heavy metal pollution in wastewater since they frequently encounter such water in open drainage channels when accomplishing their life processes including feeding and reproducing. The results from our study showed that the field urban mosquito samples, majority of which belonged to Culex species as previously reported [13], had high levels of Pb and Cr compared to the laboratory-reared Anopheles and Aedes control mosquitoes that were reared in KEMRI—Nairobi, Kenya. Similarly, concentration of Pb, Cr, and Ni was distinctively higher in mosquito samples than in wastewater samples from the same site. This may have implied that the mosquitoes that bred in contaminated wastewater may have absorbed and accumulated the elements into their body tissues. Previous studies have shown that Culex mosquito larvae can be tools for natural biomonitoring of heavy metals since they are among the first in the food chain to be exposed to the heavy metal pollutants [27, 57]. It was also observed in the current study that the laboratory-reared mosquito samples had a slightly higher level of metals including Hg, Cd & Ni when compared to the field mosquito samples (Table 5). This could have been probably attributed to the rearing processes, equipment used, insectary, insect feed, and routine procedures in the rooms adjacent to the insectary where the rearing of mosquitoes took place. According to van der Fels-Klerx et al. [58], insects can become exposed to chemical hazards from the substrate used to grow them. Some of the heavy metals are known to escape into the air as tiny particulates [59] which would then easily contaminate the insectary and the mosquitoes being reared. Laboratories have been associated with increased concentration of specific pollutants depending on the nature of experiments that are being conducted [60]. In a study on indoor air quality in research laboratories, Valavanidis and Vatista [61] established that respirable suspended particulates (RSP) reached 700 µg/m3 in spring and summer period. Similarly, Rumchev et al. [62] in their study on indoor air quality in 15 university laboratories established that the particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) were significantly high in Chemistry, Engineering and Biology laboratories. Suspended particulates in the air may include black carbon, heavy metals, spores, dust, pollen grains, liquid aerosols among others, and they tend to be in large quantities in heavily polluted areas and premises.

The mean concentration of heavy metals in the samples studied were generally higher in filamentous algae, followed by mosquito, and least in wastewater. For instance, at Kartasi sampling site, the mean concentration of Pb, Cr, Cd, Tl, and Ni in filamentous algae samples was 3–29 times higher than in assorted field mosquito samples. This observation was in line with a previous study carried out by Kitvatanachai et al. [12] which showed that the levels of Pb was higher in Cx. quinquefasciatus than in wastewater from the factories and the areas close to the factories. Aquatic insects accumulate heavy metals in their bodies from contaminated aquatic ecosystems because they become exposed during their vital developmental stages and processes including embryogenesis, larval development, and pupation [63, 64]. The emerging and surviving imagoes of the aquatic insects are therefore likely to have elevated levels of heavy metals in their bodies after exposure. In our current studies, field assorted mosquitoes had high concentration of Pb and Cr when compared to the assorted laboratory-reared mosquitoes. The sampled field mosquitoes may have gained heavy metals from the contaminated wastewaters through diffusion or by feeding on contaminated materials. Environmental pollution, a human activity, may therefore compel the mosquitoes to undergo evolution and make them to survive in modified habitats [65]. According to Brooks et al. [66], evolutionary success of an organism is its capacity to cope up with environmental changes over short and long periods, hence extending its survival. It is worth noting though, from previous studies that the process of metamorphosis can be a survival challenge for aquatic insects in metal contaminated aquatic ecosystems because the larvae become exposed to extra stress that enhance the mortality of the imagoes [67]. The mosquitoes in urban areas, majority of which are Culex pipiens [13] can however breed in polluted wastewater, although when exposed to increased specific heavy metal concentration, their breeding potential is reduced [68]. According to Dom et al. [69], the Aedes mosquitoes, the key dengue vectors appear to develop adaptations to cope with increased heavy metal concentration in polluted waters. The mosquitoes from urban areas that can breed and survive in polluted waters especially in crowded areas are therefore a health hazard because they can serve as vectors of infectious diseases as well as pollutants contaminated insects. In a previous study, the potential of Culex mosquitoes in transferring pollutants in the environment has been demonstrated [70]. The current study established that the mean levels of Pb, Cr, and Ni were higher in assorted field mosquito samples than in assorted laboratory mosquito samples. This was in line with a previous study that reported an increased Pb levels in Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquito larvae that were obtained from Pb-contaminated wastewater [12].

From previous studies, algae belonging to the genus Spirogyra have a potential of absorbing heavy metal from contaminated water [71, 72]. Our current study established that the mean concentration of heavy metals analysed in filamentous green algae ranged from 0.057 to 110.62 mg/kg, and this concentration was 500–5000 times more than the mean concentration of the same metals in the wastewater samples collected from the same site. The green algae Spirogyra species have the potential of adsorbing 10–40 mg/g of Pb2+ ions from aqueous solutions containing the ions [73]. Vetrivel et al. [72] in their study observed that algae of the genus Spirogyra are efficient biosorbent material for heavy metal removal in coal mine water. According to Sunish and Reuben [74], filamentous algae in the mosquito breeding water have nutritive value necessary for mosquito development and adult emergence. In a study that involved the examination of the gut contents in mosquito larvae, Charles et al. [75], were able to identify Spirogyra algae in the gut of Anopheles stephensi. Tuno et al. [15] established that the presence of filamentous green algae (Spirogyra sp.) was significantly correlated with animal (which included mosquito larvae) assemblage in the water. Therefore, when the mosquito larvae feed on heavy metal contaminated filamentous algae, the heavy metals may get transferred into their tissues. Feeding process is one of the main pathways through which aquatic invertebrates obtain metals from their surroundings [76, 77]. Our study clearly illustrates occurrence of bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the mosquitoes and aquatic filamentous algae inhabiting contaminated wastewater in open drainage channels in Nairobi industrial area, Kenya. Previous studies have established that contaminated wastewater could lead to a build-up of heavy metals in soils, food crops and macrophytes [31, 78]. According to Hamidian et al. [79], the algae of the genus Spirogyra are suitable for biomonitoring purposes because they are capable of accumulating heavy metals from polluted water. Use of algae for environmental biomonitoring can be advantageous and suitable because algae are spatially dense, easy to sample where available and store [28]. Similarly, mosquitoes are advantageous in biomonitoring because they can breed rapidly in stagnant water and are easy to sample, especially the larvae.

Inter-elemental analysis of the metals in the algae samples revealed statistical correlations of Pb & Hg, Cd & Cr, and Tl & Hg. These correlations suggested that the pairs of the metals may have had a common source, most likely the industries whose wastes were draining into the open drainage channels in the study area. It was observed in the current study that the wastewater in the open drainage channels were finally flowing into Ngong river which flows through Nairobi industrial area. Such industries probably were releasing specific wastes that were rich in certain elements that had a similar accumulation behavior, hence a positive correlation of such elements. This may require further investigation to verify. This explanation was in line with previous studies carried out in South Africa, Nigeria, and Pakistan [52, 80, 81]. The significant correlation coefficients between pairs of metals in samples of wastewater, filamentous algae and mosquito larvae may have suggested that the sources of the heavy metal pollution in the study area was mainly anthropogenic. Strong and significant negative correlations of specific elements including Pb (wastewater) and Hg (Algae); Pb (algae) and Pb (wastewater), may require further investigation on the factors that influence their uptake by aquatic algae and mosquito larvae in wastewater. Previous reports attributes negative correlation of elements in aquatic ecosystem to their solubility behavior [31].

Our current study raises a few public health concerns such as, people can easily become exposed to heavy metal pollutants when clearing and unblocking the open drainage channels when they clog in the study area. Prolonged heavy metal exposure can lead to serious toxicity and exposure to potential carcinogenic agents in humans [82]. The heavy metal contaminated wastewater pollutes the surface runoffs after the rains, which then spread the pollutants into the residential areas, soils, crops, and public places. Contaminated wastewater in the drainage channels may overflow and spread onto the highways during the heavy rains hence exposing the road users to the pollutants. The mosquitoes that breed successfully from contaminated wastewater may accumulate heavy metals in their bodies with time through direct diffusion of such metals into their bodies or by ingesting heavy metal contaminated plant materials that includes algae. Such mosquitoes may therefore serve as both disease vectors as well as insects contaminated with pollutants. Studies to verify whether mosquitoes with elevated heavy metals in their tissues can spread such elements to their hosts are however lacking. Such a study can involve comparing the levels of heavy metals in salivary glands of mosquitoes that are exposed and those not exposed to heavy metals. Previous reports indicate that use of microalgae in wastewater treatment and biofuel production is on the rise [83, 84]. The current study has shown that algae present in contaminated raw wastewater absorbs and accumulates the pollutants, in this case heavy metals. This observation was in line with a previous report which highlighted on the use of algae in absorption of contaminants like ammonium compounds, nitrates, and heavy metals present in raw wastewater [85]. In the current study, the levels of heavy metals in algae were higher than in wastewater due to bioaccumulation. Therefore, use of appropriate and effective methods is key when harvesting microalgae grown during wastewater treatment, for eventual post-harvest processes that include biofuel and animal feed production among other uses [85,86,87].

Conclusion

The samples of wastewater, filamentous green algae and mosquitoes obtained from open drainage channels in Nairobi industrial area contained heavy metals. The mean concentration of Pb, Cr, and Ni were relatively higher than those of Tl, Hg, and Cd in all the samples analyzed. The concentration of Pb, Cr, Ni, and Cd in wastewater were above the limits set by WHO, Kenya and US EPA for wastewater (effluents) however, the level of Hg in wastewater was not. Further investigation to identify the specific factory discharges that contaminate the drainage channels with heavy metals may be necessary. The levels of Pb, Cr, Tl, and Ni in assorted field mosquito samples was relatively higher than in assorted laboratory-reared mosquito samples. The mean concentration of heavy metals in field mosquito samples followed an ascending order of Tl < Hg < Cd < Ni < Pb < Cr. The concentration of Pb, Cr, and Ni was distinctively higher in field mosquito samples than in wastewater samples at the same site. Positive correlations were noted for Pb & Hg (r = 0.957), Cd & Cr (r = 0.985) and Tl and Hg (r = 0.946) in algae samples suggesting a probable association of the elements in terms of their source and accumulation behavior. Similarly negative correlations were noted for Pb (wastewater) & Hg (algae), r = − 0.921, among others and which may require further investigation on factors that influence their uptake by algae and mosquito larvae in wastewater. Both filamentous algae and urban mosquitoes growing and breeding respectively in contaminated wastewater in open drainage channels were bio-accumulating the heavy metals and therefore have the potential of being used for heavy metal pollution biomonitoring. However, there is need to establish evidence to support that the mosquitoes breeding in the open drainage channels were feeding on the filamentous algae to verify the flow of the elements in the aquatic food chains. In addition, there is need for efficient wastewater management and treatment in Nairobi industrial area to minimize exposure of the vulnerable population living in the neighborhood to the hazardous contaminants. Strict environmental and public health policies should be formulated, adopted, and made to work to manage industrial effluents effectively. Public awareness on the health risks associated with untreated wastewater should be done to the residents living in the informal settlements in the study area. Safety measures, equipment and apparatus should be availed whenever the municipal workers and youth groups are unclogging and cleaning up the open drainage channels in the study area. The possibility of urban mosquitoes transferring the heavy metals to the urban population from the contaminated wastewater should be investigated further. Since this study was carried out during the dry period in Nairobi, we recommend the collection of the same samples be repeated during the long and short rains periods, and their heavy metal contents determined.

Limitations

We acknowledge the limitations of the current study which included: limited samples of filamentous green algae from the sampling sites and the challenge faced in obtaining adequate powdered mosquito samples for adults and larvae separately for metal analysis, hence forcing us to prepare assorted (mixed) mosquito samples for metal analysis.

Availability of data and materials

All the datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of Variance

AHPA:

The American Herbal Products Association

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

EC:

Electrical conductivity

EMCA:

Environmental Management and Coordination Act

ICP-MS:

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy

KEMRI:

Kenya Medical Research Institute

MDL:

Method detection limit

NACOSTI:

National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation

RSP:

Respirable suspended particulates

SD:

Standard deviation

SE:

Standard error

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

TDS:

Total dissolved solids

US EPA:

United States Environmental Protection Agency

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp Suppl. 2012;101:133–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    He ZL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;19(2–3):125–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Duruibe JO, Ogwuegbu MOC, Egwurugwu JN. Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects. Int J Phys Sci. 2007;2(5):112–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arora M, Kiran B, Rani S, Rani A, Kaur B, Mittal N. Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables irrigated with water from different sources. Food Chem. 2008;111(4):811–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Farsang A, Puskas I, Szolnoki Z. Human Health Risk Assessment: a case study of heavy metal contamination of garden soil in Szeged. AGD Landsc Environ. 2009;3:11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alissa EM, Ferns GA. Heavy metal poisoning and cardiovascular disease: a review. J Toxicol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/870125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN. Toxicity mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2014;7(2):60–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Afify A. Potential role of mosquito larvae Culex pipiens as a biological indicator of environmental water pollution in Egypt. J Mosq Res. 2017;7(22):184–93.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mireji PO, Keating J, Hassanali A, Mbogo CM, Nyambaka H, Kahindi S, et al. Heavy metals in mosquito larval habitats in urban Kisumu and Malindi, Kenya, and their impact. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008;70(1):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.03.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Whealan P, Hayes G, Carter J, Wilson A, Haigh B. Detection of the exotic mosquito Culex gelidus in the Northern territory. Commun Dis Intell. 2000;24:74–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mulla MS, Thavara U, Tawatsin A, Kong-Ngamsuk W, Chompoosri J. Mosquito burden and impact on the poor: measures and costs for personal protection in some communities in Thailand. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2001;17:153–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kitvatanachai S, Apiwathnasorn C, Leemingsawat S, Wongwit W, Overgaard HJ. Lead levels of Culex mosquito larvae inhabiting lead utilizing factory. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(1):64–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kinuthia GK, Ngure V, Kamau L, Beti D, Lugalia R, Wangila A, et al. Survey of urban mosquitoes’ species (Diptera: Culicidae) with focus on wastewater channels as larval habitats in Nairobi industrial area, Kenya. Afr J Health Sci. 2017;30(2):120–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nunney L. Adapting to a changing environment: modeling the interaction of directional selection and plasticity. J Hered. 2016;107(1):15–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tuno N, Githeko A, Nakayama T, Minakawa N, Takagi M, Yan G. The association between the phytoplankton, Rhopalosolen species (Chlorophyta; Chlorophyceae), and Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (Diptera: Culicidae) larval abundance in western Kenya. Ecol Res. 2006;21:476–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Collins LE, Blackwell A. The biology of Toxorhynchites mosquitoes and their potential as bio-control agents. Bio-control News Inf. 2000;21(4):105–16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Marten GG. Larvicidal algae. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23(sp2):177–84.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hamlyn-Harris R. The relations of certain algae to breeding places of mosquitoes in Queensland. Bull Entomol Res. 1928;18:377–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bond JG, Rojas JC, Arrendond-Jimenez JI, Quiroz-Martinez H, Valle J, Williams T. Population control of the malaria vector Anopheles pseudopunctipennis by habitat manipulation. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2004;271:2161–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Charles V, Vijayan VA, Ashraf AA, Hosmani SP. Feeding habitats of mosquito larvae and their gut flora at Mysore. Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2011;10(2):219–24.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Marten GG. The potential of mosquito—indigestible phytoplankton for mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1987;3(1):105–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Guedes EAC, de Carvalho CM, Ribeiro LKA Jr, Ribeiro TFL, de Barros LD, de Lima MRF, et al. Larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti and molluscicidal activity against Biomphalaria glabrata of Brazilian marine algae. J Parasitol Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/501328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jahan K, Mosto P, Mattson C, Frey E, Derchak L. Metal uptake by Algae. In: Popov V, Itoh H, Brebbia CA, Kungolos S, editors. Waste management and the environment II. Boston: WIT Press; 2004. p. 224–232. ISBN 1-85312-738-8.

  24. 24.

    Soma H. Bioremediation of heavy metals through freshwater microalgae: a review. Scholars Acad J Biosci. 2014;2(11):825–30.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kaplan D. Absorption and adsorption of heavy metals by microalgae. In: Richmond A, Hu Q, editors. Handbook of microalgal culture: applied phycology and biotechnology. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013. p. 602–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118567166.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Shamshad I, Khan S, Waqas M, Asma M, Nawab J, Gul N, et al. Heavy metal uptake capacity of freshwater algae (Oedogonium westti) from aqueous solution: a mesocosm research. Int J Phytoremediat. 2016;18(4):393–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Anderson RL, Walbridge CT, Fiandt JT. Survival and growth of Tanytarsus dissimilis (Chironomodae) exposed to copper, cadmium, zinc and lead. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1980;9:329–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gokce D. Algae as an indicator of water quality. Intech Open Science; 2016. p. 81–101. https://doi.org/10.5772/62916.

  29. 29.

    Kinuthia GK, Ngure V, Beti D, Lugalia R, Wangila A, Kamau L. Levels of heavy metals in wastewater and soil samples from open drainage channels in Nairobi, Kenya: community health implication. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65359-5.Erratum.In:SciRep.2020Jul7;10(1):11439.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lambert M, Leven BA, Green RM. New methods of cleaning up heavy metal in soils and water; Environmental science and technology briefs for citizens. Manhattan: Kansas State University; 2000. p. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Njuguna SM, Yan X, Gituru RW, Wang QF, Wang J. Assessment of macrophyte, heavy metal and nutrient concentration in the water of the Nairobi River, Kenya. Environ Monit Assess. 2017;189(9):454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-917-6159-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Urban Africa Risk Knowledge. Nairobi climate profile: full technical version; University of Cape Town; 2017. p. 1–36. https://www.urbanark.org/sites/default/files/resources/Nairobi_climate_profile_full_technical_v2_0.pdf.

  33. 33.

    Ngure V, Davies T, Kinuthia G, Sitati N, Shisia S, Oyoo-Okoth E. Concentration levels of potentially harmful elements from gold mining in Lake Victoria region of Kenya: environmental and health implication. J Geochem Explor. 2014;144:511–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.04.004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ngure V, Kinuthia G. Health risk implications of lead, cadmium, zinc, and nickel for consumers of food items in Migori gold mines, Kenya. J Geochem Explor. 2020;209:106430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.106430.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mweya CN, Kimera SI, Karimuribo ED, Mboera LEG. Comparison of sampling techniques for Rift Valley Fever virus potential vectors, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens complex, in Ngorongoro District in northern Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2013;15(3):158–64. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v15i3.2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rueda LM, Brown TL, Kim HC, Chong ST, Klein TA, Foley DH, et al. Species composition, larval habitats, seasonal occurrence and distribution of potential malaria vectors and associated species of anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) from the Republic of Korea. Malar J. 2010;9:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-55.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tchouassi DP, Sang R, Sole CL, Bastos ADS, Mithoefer K, Torto B. Sheep skin odor improves trap captures of mosquito vectors of Rift Valley Fever. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(11):e1879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001879.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    James-Pirri MJ, Roman CT, Erwin RM. Field methods Manual: US fish and wildlife service (region 5) Salt Marsh Study (version 2). USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Coastal Research Field Station, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882, 2002.

  39. 39.

    Edwards FW. Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region III. Culicine adults and pupae. London: British Museum (Nat. Hist.); 1941.

  40. 40.

    Gillies MT, DeMeillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Ethiopian Zoo-geographical region). Johannesburg: South African Institute of Medical Research; 1968.

  41. 41.

    Jupp PG. Mosquitoes of Southern Africa: culicinae and toxorhynchitinae. Hartebeespoort: Ekogilde Publishers; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Das S, Garver L, Dimopoulos G. Protocol for mosquito rearing (A. gambiae). J Vis Exp. 2007;5:221. https://doi.org/10.3791/221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    American Herbal Products Association (AHPA). Heavy metal analysis and interim recommended limits for botanical dietary supplements: white paper. Silver Spring, MD: AHPA; 2009. p. 1–37.

  44. 44.

    Björklund KL, Vahter M, Palm B, Grander M, Lignel S, Berglund M. Metals and trace element concentrations in breast milk of first-time healthy mothers: a biological monitoring study. Environ Health. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Benson NU, Asuquo FE, Williams AB, Essien JP, Ekong CI, Akpabio O, et al. Source evaluation and trace metal contamination in benthic sediments from equatorial ecosystems using multivariate statistical techniques. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6): e0156485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156485.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nazir R, Khans M, Masab M, Ur Rehman H, Ur Rauf N, Shahab S, et al. Accumulation of heavy metals (Ni, Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn, Fe) in the soil, water and water collected from Tanda Dam Kohat. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;7(3):89–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Onuegbu TU, Umoh ET, Onwuekwe LT. Physico-chemical analysis of effluents from Jachon chemical industries limited, makers of Bonalux emulsion and gloss paints. IJST. 2013;2(2):169–73.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ayeni O. Assessment of heavy metals in wastewater obtained from an industrial area in Ibadan, Nigeria. RMZ–M&G. 2014;61:19–24.

  49. 49.

    Aneyo IA, Doharty FV, Adebesin OA, Hammed MO. Biodegradation of pollutants in wastewater from pharmaceutical, textile and local dye effluent in Lagos, Nigeria. J Health Popul. 2016;6(12):34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Babel S, Kurniawan TA. Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2003;97(1–3):219–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA). Water quality regulations: first schedule on quality standards for sources of domestic water; Third schedule on standards for effluent discharge into the environment; Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 67; 2006.

  52. 52.

    Agoro MA, Adeniji AO, Adefisoye MA, Okoh OO. Heavy metals in wastewater and sewage sludge from selected municipal treatment plants in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Water. 2020;12:1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102746.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kaluli JW, Home PG, Githuku C. The heavy metal content of crops irrigated with untreated wastewater: a case study of Nairobi, Kenya. JAGST. 2014;16(2):122–39.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Menezes-Sousa D, Kasper D, Cavalcanti E, Torres J, Bonecker S, Malm O. The plankton role in pollutants dynamics as a tool for ecotoxicological studies. Orbital Electron J Chem. 2018;10(4):346–54.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Azam I, Afsheen S, Zia A, Javed M, Saeed R, Sarwar KS, et al. Evaluating insects as bioindicators of heavy metal contamination and accumulation near industrial area of Gujarat, Pakistan. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/942751.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sildanchandra W, Crane M. Influence of sexual dimorphism in Chironomus riparius Meigen on toxic effects of cadmium. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19(9):2309–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lu PY, Metcalf RL, Vogel FR, Hasset J. Model ecosystem studies of lead and cadmium and of urban sewage sludge containing these elements. J Environ Qual. 1975;4(4):505–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Van der Fels-Klerx HJ, Camenzuli L, Belluco S, Meijer N, Ricci A. Food safety issues related to uses of insects for feeds and foods. Compr Rev Food Sci. 2018;17:1172–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541.4337.12385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Oucher N, Kerbachi R, Ghezloun A, Merabet H. Magnitude of Air pollution by heavy metals associated with aerosols particles in Algiers. Energy Procedia. 2015;74:51–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Park J, Lee L, Byun H, Ham S, Lee I, Park J, et al. A study of the volatile organic compound emissions at the stacks of laboratory fume hoods in a university campus. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:10–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.024.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Valavanidis A, Vatista M. Indoor air quality measurements in the chemistry department building of the University of Athens. Indoor Built Environ. 2006;15(6):595–605.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Rumchev K, van den Broeck V, Spickett J. Indoor air quality in university laboratories. Environ Health. 2003;3(3):11–9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hare L. Aquatic insects and trace metals: bioavailability, bioaccumulation, and toxicity. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol. 1992;22(5–6):327–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Rayms-Keller A, Olson KE, McGaw M, Oray C, Carlson JO, Beaty BJ. Effect of heavy metals on Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1998;39(1):41–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Oliver S. How higher temperatures and pollution are affecting mosquitoes. The Conversation Africa, Inc. April 2019. https://theconversation.com/how-higher-temperatures-and-pollution-are-affecting-mosquitoes-114768. Accessed 15 June 2021.

  66. 66.

    Brooks AN, Turkarslan S, Beer KD, Lo FY, Baliga NS. Adaptation of cells to new environments. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2011;3(5):544–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.136.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wesner JS, Kraus JM, Schmidt TS, Walters DM, Clements WH. Metamorphosis enhances the effects of metal exposure on the Mayfly, Centroptilum triangulifer. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(17):10415–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/es501914y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    El-Sheikh TMY, Fouda MA, Hassan MI, Abdi-Elghaphar AA, Hasaballah AI. Toxicological effects of some heavy metal ions on Culex pipiens L. (Diptera Culicidae). Egypt Acad J Biol Sci. 2010;2(1):63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Dom CN, Ahmad P, Mokhtar MAM, Rajan S. Assessment of heavy metal concentration on Aedes mosquito breeding sites in urban area, Malaysia. Int J Mosq Res. 2017;4(2):12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Al-Jaibachi R, Cuthbert RN, Callaghan A. Up and away: ontogenic transference as a pathway for aerial dispersal of microplastics. Biol Lett. 2018;14:20180479. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0479.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Gupta VK, Shrivastava AK, Jain N. Biosorption of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions by green algae Spirogyra species. Water Resour. 2001;35(17):4079–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Vetrivel SA, Diptanghui M, Ebhin MR, Sydavalli S, Gaurav N, Tiger KP. Green algae of the genus Spirogyra: a potential absorbent for heavy metal from coal mine. Remediat J. 2017;27:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Lee YC, Chang SP. The biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solution by Spirogyra and Cladophora filamentous macroalgae. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:5297–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sunish IP, Reuben R. Factors influencing the abundance of Japanese encephalitis vectors in rice fields in India. II. Biotic. Med Vet Entomol. 2002;16(1):1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Charles V, Vijayan VA, Ali Ashraf A, Hosmani SP. Feeding habitats of mosquito larvae and their gut flora at Mysore. Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2011;10(2):219–24.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Hammerschmidt CR, Fitzgerald WF. Methylmercury in mosquitoes related to atmospheric mercury deposition and contamination. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(9):3034–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Wang WX. Interactions of trace metals and different marine food chains. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002;243:295–309.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Khan S, Cao Q, Zheng YM, Huang YZ, Zhu YG. Health risks of heavy metal in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut. 2008;152(3):686–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Hamidian AH, Zareh M, Poorbagher H, Vaziri L, Ashrafi S. Heavy metal bioaccumulation in sediment, common reed, algae, and blood worm from the Shoor river, Iran. Toxicol Ind Health. 2016;32(3):398–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233713500835.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Laniyan TA, Kehinde-Phillips OO, Elasha L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination on the groundwater around a municipal dumpsite in Lagos, southwestern Nigeria. Int J Eng Technol. 2011;11(5):53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nawab J, Khan S, Shah MT, Khan K, Huang Q, Ali R. Quantification of heavy metals in mining affected soil and their bioaccumulation in native plant species. Int J Phytoremediat. 2015;17:801–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Kim HS, Kim YJ, Seo YR. An overview of carcinogenic heavy metal: molecular toxicity mechanism and prevention. J Cancer Prev. 2015;20(4):232–40. https://doi.org/10.15430/jcp.2015.20.4.232.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Umamaheswari J, Shanthakumar S. Efficacy of microalgae for industrial wastewater treatment: a review on operating conditions, treatment efficiency and biomass productivity. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2016;15:265–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-016-9397-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Dineshkumar R, Sampathkumar P, Dran N. Cultivation and harvesting of micro-algae for bio-fuel production—a review. Indian J Mar Sci. 2017;46(9):1731–42.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Randrianarison G, Ashraf MA. Microalgae: a potential plant for energy production. Geol Ecol Landsc. 2017;1(2):104–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2017.1332853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Mukabane BG, Gathitu BB, Mutwiwa U, Njogu P, Ondimu S. Microalgae cultivation systems for biodiesel production: a review. J Sustain Res Eng. 2018;4(4):144–51.

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Moejes FW, Moejes KB. Algae for Africa: microalgae as a source of food, feed, and fuel in Kenya. Afr J Biotechnol. 2017;16(7):288–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Reuben Lugalia, Dunstone Beti, Agnes Wangila and other technicians and technologists from KEMRI (Nairobi) and Kenyatta University for their technical input in trapping & rearing mosquitoes, and in preparing samples for metal analysis. This study formed part of the postdoctoral research project for the first author. The research funding was awarded by Daystar University, courtesy of the Directorate of Research, Publication & Consultancy. We are grateful to the National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI) in Kenya and Nairobi County Government for authorizing and granting us the research permits.

Funding

The funding for this project was from Daystar University in Kenya, under the program of encouraging the faculty members to carry out research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GK—designed the proposal, sourced for funding, collected samples from the field and was involved in data analysis; VN—oversaw heavy metals analysis of the samples, collection of samples from the field and their preparation for metal analysis; and assisted in data analysis; LK—reviewed the proposal; oversaw rearing of the Anopheles and Aedes mosquitoes in the laboratory for control experiments; and advised on data analysis. All the authors reviewed and corrected the manuscript before it was submitted for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Kariuki Kinuthia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent of publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests, both financial and non-financial competing interests, associated with this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kinuthia, G.K., Ngure, V. & Kamau, L. Urban mosquitoes and filamentous green algae: their biomonitoring role in heavy metal pollution in open drainage channels in Nairobi industrial area, Kenya. BMC Ecol Evo 21, 188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01913-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Heavy metals
  • Wastewater
  • Open channels
  • Urban mosquitoes
  • Filamentous algae
  • Biomonitoring