Darwin C. Sexual selection and the descent of man. London: Murray; 1871.
Book
Google Scholar
Eberhard WG. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996.
Google Scholar
Andersson M, Simmons LW. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21(6):296–302.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arnqvist G. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature. 1998;393(6687):784–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Harcourt A, Purvis A, Liles L. Sperm competition: mating system, not breeding season, affects testes size of primates. Funct Ecol. 1995;9(3):468–476.
Article
Google Scholar
Eberhard WG, Huber BA, S. RLR, Briceño RD, Salas I, Rodriguez V. One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution. 1998;52(2):415–431.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmitz G, Reinhold K, Wagner P. Allometric relationship between genitalic size and body size in two species of mordellid beetles (Coleoptera: Mordellidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2000;93(3):637–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Uhl G, Vollrath F. Extreme body size variability in the golden silk spider (Nephila edulis) does not extend to genitalia. J Zool. 2000;251(1):7–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Bernstein S, Bernstein R, Noor M. Allometry of male genitalia in a species of soldier beetle: support for the one-size-fits-all hypothesis. Evolution. 2002;56(8):1707–10.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ramos M, Coddington JA, Christenson TE, Irschick DJ. Have male and female genitalia coevolved? A phylogenetic analysis of genitalic morphology and sexual size dimorphism in web‐building spiders (Araneae: Araneoidea). Evolution. 2005;59(9):1989–99.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cox RM, Butler MA, John-Alder HB. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in reptiles. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editors. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007:38–49.
Pietsch TW. Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes). Ichthyol Res. 2005;52(3):207–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuntner M, Elgar MA. Evolution and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism: Aligning phylogenetic and experimental evidence. Front Ecol Evol. 2014;2:26.
Article
Google Scholar
Pyron M. Sexual size dimorphism and phylogeny in North American minnows. Biol J Linn Soc. 1996;57(4):327–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Andersen NM. A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating systems in water striders (Hemiptera: Gerridae). Biol J Linn Soc. 1997;61(3):345–68.
Article
Google Scholar
Colwell RK. Rensch’s rule crosses the line: convergent allometry of sexual size dimorphism in hummingbirds and flower mites. Am Nat. 2000;156(5):495–510.
Article
Google Scholar
Cox RM, Skelly SL, John-Alder HB. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution. 2003;57(7):1653–69.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Teder T. Male-biased size dimorphism in ichneumonine wasps (Hymenoptera:Ichneumonidae) - the role of sexual selection for large male size. Ecol Entomol. 2005;30(3):342–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Liker A, Székely T. Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds. Evolution. 2005;59(4):890–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ah-King M, Barron AB, Herberstein ME. Genital evolution: why are females still understudied? PLoS Biol. 2014;12(5):e1001851.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Morand S, Hugot J-P. Sexual size dimorphism in parasitic oxyurid nematodes. Biol J Linn Soc. 1998;64(3):397–410.
Article
Google Scholar
Foellmer MW, Moya-Larano J. Sexual size dimorphism in spiders: patterns and processes. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T., editors. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007:71–81.
Fairbairn DJ, Preziosi RF. Sexual selection and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Evolution. 1996;50(4):1549–1559.
Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ. Lifetime selection on adult body size and components of body size in a waterstrider: opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism. Evolution. 2000;54(2):558–66.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng R-C, Kuntner M. Disentangling the size and shape components of sexual dimorphism. Evol Biol. 2015;42(2):223–34.
Article
Google Scholar
Hormiga G, Scharff N, Coddington JA. The phylogenetic basis of sexual size dimorphism in orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae). Syst Biol. 2000;49(3):435–62.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kuntner M, Agnarsson I, Li D. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders. Biol Rev. 2015;90(1):279–96.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Coddington JA, Hormiga G, Scharff N. Giant female or dwarf male spiders? 1997.
Google Scholar
Kuntner M, Coddington JA, Schneider JM. Intersexual arms race? Genital coevolution in nephilid spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae). Evolution. 2009;63(6):1451–63.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Andrade MC, Kasumovic MM. Terminal investment strategies and male mate choice: extreme tests of Bateman. Integr Comp Biol. 2005;45(5):838–47.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Elgar MA, Schneider JM, Herberstein ME. Female control of paternity in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope keyserlingi. Proc R Soc B. 2000;267(1460):2439–43.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schneider JM, Gilberg S, Fromhage L, Uhl G. Sexual conflict over copulation duration in a cannibalistic spider. Anim Behav. 2006;71(4):781–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider JM. Securing paternity in spiders? A review on occurrence and effects of mating plugs and male genital mutilation. Genetica. 2010;138(1):75–104.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arnqvist G, Rowe L. Sexual conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005.
Book
Google Scholar
Brennan PL, Prum RO. Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(7):a017749.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gage MJ. Influences of sex, size, and symmetry on ejaculate expenditure in a moth. Behav Ecol. 1998;9(6):592–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuntner M, Coddington JA, Hormiga G. Phylogeny of extant nephilid orb‐weaving spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae): testing morphological and ethological homologies. Cladistics. 2008;24(2):147–217.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuntner M, Coddington JA. Discovery of the largest orbweaving spider species: the evolution of gigantism in Nephila. PLoS One. 2009;4(10):e7516.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Higgins L, Coddington J, Goodnight C, Kuntner M. Testing ecological and developmental hypotheses of mean and variation in adult size in nephilid orb-weaving spiders. Evol Ecol. 2011;25(6):1289–306.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuntner M, Arnedo MA, Trontelj P, Lokovšek T, Agnarsson I. A molecular phylogeny of nephilid spiders: evolutionary history of a model lineage. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(3):961–79.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng R-C, Kuntner M. Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders. Evolution. 2014;68(10):2861–72.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schult J, Sellenschlo U. Morphologie und Funktion der Genitalstrukturen bei Nephila (Arach., Aran., Araneidae). Hamburg: Mitt Hambg Zool Mus Inst; 1983.
Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. 2001.
Google Scholar
Garland T, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst Biol. 1993;42(3):265–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Tregenza T, Wedell N. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature. 2002;415(6867):71–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harvey PH, Pagel MD. The comparative method in evolutionary biology, vol. 239. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.
Google Scholar
Budaev SV. Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: caveats and guidelines. Ethology. 2010;116(5):472–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Revelle W. psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston: Northwestern University; 2016.
Google Scholar
Sanabria-Urbán S, Song H, Oyama K, González-Rodríguez A, Serrano-Meneses MA, del Castillo RC. Body size adaptations to altitudinal climatic variation in neotropical grasshoppers of the genus Sphenarium (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphidae). PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145248.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
House CM, Jensen K, Rapkin J, Lane S, Okada K, Hosken DJ, Hunt J. Macronutrient balance mediates the growth of sexually selected weapons but not genitalia in male broad-horned beetles. Funct Ecol. 2016;30(5):769–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Hadfield JD. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(2):1–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Córdoba-Aguilar A, Uhía E, Rivera AC. Sperm competition in Odonata (Insecta): the evolution of female sperm storage and rivals’ sperm displacement. J Zool. 2003;261(04):381–98.
Article
Google Scholar
Simmons LW, Garcia-Gonzalez F. Experimental coevolution of male and female genital morphology. Nat Commun. 2011;2:374.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schneider J, Herberstein M, De Crespigny FC, Ramamurthy S, Elgar M. Sperm competition and small size advantage for males of the golden orb‐web spider Nephila edulis. J Evol Biol. 2000;13(6):939–46.
Article
Google Scholar
Elgar MA. Sexual cannibalism, size dimorphism, and courtship behavior in orb-weaving spiders (Araneidae). Evolution. 1991;45:444–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Danielson-François A, Hou C, Cole N, Tso I-M. Scramble competition for moulting females as a driving force for extreme male dwarfism in spiders. Anim Behav. 2012;84(4):937–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Elwood RW, Prenter J, Elwood RW, Prenter J. Aggression in spiders. In: Hardy I, Briffa M, editors. Animal Contests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 113–33. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139051248.008.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Vollrath F, Parker GA. Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders. Nature. 1992;360:156–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Moya-Laraño J, Halaj J, Wise DH. Climbing to reach females: Romeo should be small. Evolution. 2002;56(2):420–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Moya-Laraño J, Vinković D, Allard C, Foellmer M. Optimal climbing speed explains the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders. J Evol Biol. 2009;22(5):954–63.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Corcobado G, Rodríguez-Gironés MA, De Mas E, Moya-Laraño J. Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10(1):236.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schneider JM, Michalik P. One-shot genitalia are not an evolutionary dead end-Regained male polygamy in a sperm limited spider species. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11(1):1.
Article
Google Scholar
Bertin A, Fairbairn D. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. J Evol Biol. 2005;18(4):949–61.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rowe L, Arnqvist G. Sexual selection and the evolution of genital shape and complexity in water striders. Evolution. 2012;66(1):40–54.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eberhard WG. Static allometry and animal genitalia. Evolution. 2009;63(1):48–66.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Robinson MH, Robinson B. The ecology and behavior of Nephila maculata: a supplement. Oxford: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1976.
Kuntner M, Kralj-Fišer S, Schneider J, Li D. Mate plugging via genital mutilation in nephilid spiders: an evolutionary hypothesis. J Zool. 2009;277(4):257–66.
Article
Google Scholar