Owings D, Morton E. Animal vocal communication: a new approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Book
Google Scholar
Taylor AM, Reby D. The contribution of source-filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. J Zool. 2010;280:221–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Tibbetts EA, Curtis TR. Rearing conditions influence quality signals but not individual identity signals in Polistes wasps. Behav Ecol. 2007;18:6020607.
Article
Google Scholar
Briefer E, Vannoni E, McElligott AG. Quality prevails over identity in the sexually selected vocalisations of an ageing mammal. BMC Biol. 2010;8:35.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vannoni E, McElligott AG. Low frequency groans indicate larger and more dominant fallow deer (Dama dama) males. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:9.
Article
Google Scholar
Bro-Jorgensen J, Dabelsteen T. Knee-clicks and visual traits indicate fighting ability in eland antelopes: multiple messages and back-up signals. BMC Biol. 2008;6:47.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jansen DAWAM, Cant MA, Manser MB. Segmental concatenation of individual signatures and context cues in banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) close calls. BMC Biol. 2012;10:97.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dabbs JM, Mallinger A. High testosterone levels predict low voice pitch among men. Personal Individ Differ. 1999;27:801–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Evans S, Neave N, Wakelin D, Hamilton C. The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiol Behav. 2008;93:783–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cartei V, Bond R, Reby D. What makes a voice masculine: Physiological and acoustical correlates of women's ratings of men's vocal masculinity. Horm Behav. 2014;66:569–76.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Puts DA, Apicella CL, Cárdenas RA. Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies. Proc R Soc B. 2011;279:601–9.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Evans S, Neave N, Wakelin D. Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biol Psychol. 2006;72:160–3.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rendall D, Kollias S, Ney C, Lloyd P. Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117:944–55.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Greisbach R. Estimation of speaker height from formant frequencies. Int J Speech Lang Law. 1999;6:265–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Pisanski K, Fraccaro PJ, Tigue CC, O'Connor JJM, Röder S, Andrews PW, et al. Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav. 2014;95:89–99.
Article
Google Scholar
Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Anim Behav. 2005;69:561–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC. Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity. Evol Hum Behav. 2008;29:233–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Jones BC, Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Vukovic J. A domain-specific opporite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Anim Behav. 2010;79:57–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Puts DA, Gaulin SJC, Verdolini K. Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evol Hum Behav. 2006;27:283–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Fraccaro PJ, O'Connor JJM, Re DE, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Feinberg DR. Faking it: deliberately altered voice pitch and vocal attractiveness. Anim Behav. 2013;85:127–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Reby D, McComb K. Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Anim Behav. 2003;65:519–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Sanvito S, Galimberti F, Miller EH. Vocal signalling of male southern elephant seals is honest but imprecise. Anim Behav. 2007;73:287–99.
Article
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Zhihe Z, Snyder RJ. The information content of giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, bleats: acoustic cues to sex, age and size. Anim Behav. 2009;78:893–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Zhihe Z, Snyder RJ. Giant pandas perceive and attend to formant frequency variation in male bleats. Anim Behav. 2010;79:1221–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Ellis WAH, McKinnon AJ, Cowin GJ, Brumm J, Nilsson K, et al. Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: honesty in an exaggerated trait. J Exp Biol. 2011;214:3414–22.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fitch WT. Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102:1213–22.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fischer J, Kitchen D, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and relation to rank, age, and exhaustion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2004;56:140–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Neumann C, Assahad G, Hammerschmidt K, Perwitasari-Farajallah D, Engelhardt A. Loud calls in male crested macaques, Macaca nigra: a signal of dominance in a tolerant species. Anim Behav. 2010;79:187–93.
Article
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, Gammell MP, Harty HC, Paini DR, Murphy DT, Walsh JT, et al. Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2001;49:266–72.
Article
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, Hayden TJ. Lifetime mating success, sexual selection and life history of fallow bucks (Dama dama). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2000;48:203–10.
Article
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, O'Neill KP, Hayden TJ. Cumulative long-term investment in vocalization and mating success of fallow bucks, Dama dama. Anim Behav. 1999;57:1159–67.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vannoni E, McElligott AG. Individual acoustic variation in fallow deer (Dama dama) common and harsh groans: A source-filter theory perspective. Ethology. 2007;113:223–34.
Article
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, Birrer M, Vannoni E. Retraction of the mobile descended larynx during groaning enables fallow bucks (Dama dama) to lower their formant frequencies. J Zool. 2006;270:340–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Fletcher NH. A simple frequency-scaling rule for animal communication. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115:2334–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, Hayden TJ. Context-related vocalization rates of fallow bucks, Dama dama. Anim Behav. 1999;58:1095–104.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, Hayden TJ. Postcopulatory vocalizations of fallow bucks: who is listening? Behav Ecol. 2001;12:41–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Pitcher BJ, Briefer EF, Vannoni E, McElligott AG. Fallow bucks attend to vocal cues of motivation and fatigue. Behav Ecol. 2014;25:392–401.
Article
Google Scholar
Vannoni E, McElligott AG. Fallow bucks get hoarse: vocal fatigue as a possible signal to conspecifics. Anim Behav. 2009;78:3–10.
Article
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, Naulty F, Clarke WV, Hayden TJ. The somatic cost of reproduction: what determines reproductive effort in prime-aged fallow bucks? Evol Ecol Res. 2003;5:1239–50.
Google Scholar
Fitch WT, Hauser MD. Unpacking “Honesty”: Vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. In: Simmons A, Fay RR, Popper N, editors. Acoustic Communication. New York: Springer; 2003.
Google Scholar
Fitch WT, Reby D. The descended larynx is not uniquely human. Proc R Soc B. 2001;268:1669–75.
Article
CAS
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garcia M, Charlton BD, Wyman MT, Fitch WT, Reby D. Do Red Deer Stags (Cervus elaphus) Use Roar Fundamental Frequency (F0) to Assess Rivals? PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e83946.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reby D, Charlton BD, Locatelli Y, McComb K. Oestrus red deer hinds prefer male roars with higher fundamental frequencies. Proc R Soc B. 2010;277:2747–53.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kewley-Port D, Li X, Zheng Y, Neel AT. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996;100:2462–70.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rendall D, Vokey JR, Nemeth C. Lifting the curtain on the Wizard of Oz: Biased voice-based impressions of speaker size. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007;33:1208–19.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Taylor AM, Reby D. Are men better than women at acoustic size judgements? Biol Lett. 2013;9:20130270.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Puts DA, Hodges CR, Cárdenas RA, Gaulin SJC. Men's voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evol Hum Behav. 2007;28:340–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Folstad I, Karter J. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat. 1992;139:603–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Keating JL, Kersey D, Rengui L, Swaisgood RR. Vocal cues to male androgen levels in giant pandas. Biol Lett. 2011;7:71–4.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Swaisgood RR, Zhihe Z, Snyder RJ. Giant pandas attend to androgen-related variation in male bleats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012;66:969–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Barelli C, Mundry R, Heistermann M, Hammerschmidt K. Cues to androgens and quality in male gibbon songs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e82748.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pitra C, Fickel J, Meijaard E, Groves C. Evolution and phylogeny of old world deer. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004;33:880–95.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reby D, McComb K, Cargnelutti B, Darwin C, Fitch WT, Clutton-Brock TH. Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions. Proc R Soc B. 2005;272:941–7.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD. The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour. 1979;69:145–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Reby D. Context related acoustic variation in male fallow deer (Dama dama) groans. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21066.
Article
CAS
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock TH, Green D, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Albon SD. Passing the buck: resource defence, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1988;23:281–96.
Article
Google Scholar
ASAB. Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav. 2012;83:301–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.32. 2012 http://www.praat.org/.
Stachowicz JB, Vannoni E, Pitcher BJ, Briefer EF, Geffen E, McElligott AG. Acoustic divergence in the rut vocalisations of Persian and European fallow deer. J Zool. 2014;292:1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Farrell ME, Briefer E, Hayden T, McElligott AG. Assortative mating in fallow deer reduces the strength of sexual selection. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18533.
Article
CAS
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
McElligott AG, Mattiangeli V, Mattiello S, Verga M, Reynolds CA, Hayden TJ. Fighting tactics of fallow bucks (Dama dama, Cervidae): Reducing the risks of serious conflict. Ethology. 1998;104:789–803.
Article
Google Scholar
Charlton BD, Reby D, McComb K. Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males. Biol Lett. 2007;3:382–5.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Titze IR. Principles of Vocal Production. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1994.
Google Scholar