Skip to main content

Insights on long-term ecosystem changes from stable isotopes in historical squid beaks

Abstract

Background

Assessing the historical dynamics of key food web components is crucial to understand how climate change impacts the structure of Arctic marine ecosystems. Most retrospective stable isotopic studies to date assessed potential ecosystem shifts in the Arctic using vertebrate top predators and filter-feeding invertebrates as proxies. However, due to long life histories and specific ecologies, ecosystem shifts are not always detectable when using these taxa. Moreover, there are currently no retrospective stable isotopic studies on various other ecological and taxonomic groups of Arctic biota. To test whether climate-driven shifts in marine ecosystems are reflected in the ecology of short-living mesopredators, ontogenetic changes in stable isotope signatures in chitinous hard body structures were analysed in two abundant squids (Gonatus fabricii and Todarodes sagittatus) from the low latitude Arctic and adjacent waters, collected between 1844 and 2023.

Results

We detected a temporal increase in diet and habitat-use generalism (= opportunistic choice rather than specialization), trophic position and niche width in G. fabricii from the low latitude Arctic waters. These shifts in trophic ecology matched with the Atlantification of the Arctic ecosystems, which includes increased generalization of food webs and higher primary production, and the influx of boreal species from the North Atlantic as a result of climate change. The Atlantification is especially marked since the late 1990s/early 2000s. The temporal patterns we found in G. fabricii’s trophic ecology were largely unreported in previous Arctic retrospective isotopic ecology studies. Accordingly, T. sagittatus that occur nowadays in the high latitude North Atlantic have a more generalist diet than in the XIXth century.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that abundant opportunistic mesopredators with short life cycles (such as squids) are good candidates for retrospective ecology studies in the marine ecosystems, and to identify ecosystem shifts driven by climate change. Enhanced generalization of Arctic food webs is reflected in increased diet generalism and niche width in squids, while increased abundance of boreal piscivorous fishes is reflected in squids’ increased trophic position. These findings support opportunism and adaptability in squids, which renders them as potential winners of short-term shifts in Arctic ecosystems.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The Arctic is the Earth’s area currently most affected by climate change [1, 2]. Warming temperatures, melting sea-ice, reduction in snow cover, and changes in physical ocean dynamics are among the main changes observed to date [3, 4]. These changes impact all components of the Arctic marine food webs, including phyto- and zooplankton [5], sympagic algae and invertebrates [6], benthos [7], nekton [8, 9], fishes [10, 11], seabirds [12] and marine mammals [13, 14]. Monitoring of marine ecosystems’ structure and functioning and assessing changes on historical scale are among the priorities in Arctic science [15, 16]. However, logistical, financial and geopolitical challenges prevent the organization of a marine ecosystem monitoring program in the Pan-Arctic area [15, 16], hampering long-term observations and temporal analyses.

The North Atlantic is the main source of warm-water inflow to the Arctic [16]. Both modelled and observed mean annual temperatures in the Arctic continuously increase since the late 1990s/early 2000s [2, 17]. As a result, increasing environmental impact of warming in the Arctic has been especially noticeable since the late 1990s/early 2000s [2, 17]. Consequently, the Arctic marine ecosystems undergo an inflow of increasing numbers of Atlantic species occurring northwards [3,4,5, 7,8,9,10,11, 16, 18]. The influx of opportunistic, large, boreal fishes and invertebrates is leading to an increase of generalist species within the Arctic marine food webs (= ‘generalization’) and an increase in food web trophic complexity [3, 7, 10, 11, 18]. Furthermore, increased primary production [3, 19], as a result of temperature rise and sea-ice melting, drives an increase in abundance of newly arrived boreal species but is unfavorable for resident Arctic species [3, 7, 10, 11, 18]. Consequently, the Arctic marine ecosystems are becoming more similar to boreal Atlantic ecosystems over time (= ‘Atlantification’ sensu Ref [20]). where the pelagic food web component dominates over the benthic, and large fishes with generalist diets dominate over small fishes with specialist diet [3, 7, 10, 11, 18]. A major obstacle for understanding the ongoing changes in the contemporary Arctic Ocean is the lack of baseline retrospective data.

Stable isotope analysis (SIA) can potentially be used to back-track previous ecosystem state, and to obtain an insight of current changes [21, 22]. The most commonly applied stable isotopes in marine ecological studies are carbon δ13C, which is mainly used to assess the primary source of dietary carbon, and nitrogen δ15N, which is typically used to assess the trophic position (TP) [23, 24] (see Methods for δ definition). Isotopic values at the base of the food web (= baseline values) are needed to be taken into account to correctly interpret the meaning of isotopic values higher up the food web [23, 24]. Both δ13C and δ15N baseline values are highly variable in space and time [25,26,27]. For instance, baseline values and respectively bulk SIA values of detritivores and carnivores can differ significantly in close proximity to each other along the western Pacific coast [26, 28]. Without accounting for baseline differences, TPs of populations with similar diets would erroneously be estimated as different among these locations, while in fact their TPs are similar [28]. Additionally, long-term bulk SIA δ13C data need to be corrected for the Suess effect, which is the anthropogenic-induced decline in baseline δ13C values [29].

Metabolically inert but continuously growing tissues record stable isotope signatures during their formation, reflecting and preserving information on animals ecology through time without altering these signatures afterwards [30] (= archival tissues). The archival tissues with known growth patterns can be used to reconstruct individual life-long trophic ecology by analysing the SI composition per growth layer [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. This approach indirectly provides insights into the ecosystem structure back in time [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. In the Arctic and North Atlantic, retrospective ecological analyses were done for coral endoskeletons, bivalve shells and marine mammal teeth and tusks [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. However, all of these are long-living taxa, in which it can be difficult to disentangle ontogenetic signals from changes in the ecosystems, since the respective isotopic signal changes over time [33, 35]. In general, most of the long-term bulk SIA studies of marine mammals from the Arctic and North Atlantic published to date do not account for the Suess effect and baseline variation [22, 31, 34, 37, 39,40,41]. The use of compound-specific SIA (CSIA) does not require baseline corrections, since it uses differences in isotopic signatures of trophic and source amino acids to overcome baseline-related issues [42]. However, challenges of this method include unknown taxon-specific trophic discrimination factor and β values for many taxa, as well as the requirement for additional data collection for fingerprinting of δ13C and δ15N [42]. Overall, both bulk and CSIA retrospective studies on Arctic and North Atlantic marine mammals present either that δ13C and δ15N increase, decrease or stay the same of over time in the different areas and across species [22, 31, 34, 36, 37, 39,40,41, 43, 44] (Tables S1 & S2). This suggests that top predators’ trophic ecologies respond to ecosystem changes in diverse and inconsistent ways. Few studies have detected changes in the trophic ecology of Arctic top predators since the late 1990s/early 2000s [34, 39], which is the onset of increased environmental effects of climate change in the Arctic [2, 17]. Top predators are positioned the furthest away from the basal part of the food web, which may limit their direct response to certain ecosystem changes, potentially explaining the absence of clear retrospective stable isotopic patterns in relation to environmental change.

Retrospective SIA studies of abundant filter-feeding, long-living, sedentary, and slow moving invertebrates (= corals and bivalves, respectively) in the Arctic and adjacent parts of the North Atlantic largely focus on δ15N [32, 33, 35, 38]. Ontogenetic patterns were found in bivalves [35, 38], and temporal changes in baseline values were evident through both corals and bivalves [32, 33, 35, 38]. Filter feeders occupy the position directly above the basal part of the food web, which probably explains them being able to show temporal baseline changes. While the Arctic was subjected to major ecosystems changes [3,4,5, 7,8,9,10,11, 16, 18] since the late 1990s/early 2000s [2, 17], these changes were not reflected in the retrospective SIA studies of filter feeders [32, 35, 38]. Their proximity to the basal part of the food web is most likely the explanation. Longevity of over a hundred of years in a single bivalve shell or coral endoskeleton piece, coupled with low sample sizes, may limit the possibility to disentangle ontogenetic and temporal SIA patterns [32, 33, 35, 38]. In this sense, abundant mesopredators (= animals from mid-trophic levels) with short life cycles can be good candidates for retrospective studies. Changes in their relatively short life histories over time can provide additional parameters to compare among different years, offering a higher resolution view compared to long-living taxa. One such taxon of mesopredators is the Class of Cephalopoda.

Cephalopods (Phylum Mollusca) are abundant and important as prey and predators in the Arctic [9, 45]. They prey on crustaceans, cephalopods and fishes, and their main predators are fishes, sharks, seabirds and marine mammals [9, 46]. Cephalopods can be affected by climate change leading to shifts in their geographical distribution, potential habitat expansions, and increases in biomass [9, 28, 47, 48]. The relatively short lifespan, fast population turnover, short generation time and high biomass production [49] supposedly explain high adaptability of this group to a changing environment [9, 28, 47, 49]. As such, the ongoing changes in the Arctic environment and food webs (outlined above) [3, 7, 10, 11, 18] will most likely be reflected in the trophic ecology of cephalopods. And these changes in trophic ecology can be retrospectively tracked by SIA, as seen from other groups with suitable archival tissues [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Cephalopods have chitinous jaws (= beak) to cut their prey into smaller pieces [50, 51]. The beaks were successfully used as archival tissue for detailed SIA life history reconstructions of contemporary cephalopods in the Arctic and Antarctic [52,53,54]. However, there is only a single study from the Atlantic that involves historical squid, where the sample size (n = 4) is too small to assess potential ecosystem implications [55].

Our main study species is the Boreoatlantic armhook squid Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein, 1818). It is the most abundant cephalopod in the Arctic Ocean (standing biomass up to 8 million tonnes in the Nordic Seas alone), and is important as both prey and predator [9, 56, 57]. Gonatus fabricii has an ontogenetic descent from epi- to bathypelagic layers, and performs diel vertical migrations [58, 59]. Our second study species from the North Atlantic is the European flying squid Todarodes sagittatus (Lamarck, 1798), which is an abundant, ecologically relevant and commercially important squid in the North Atlantic [60, 61]. Todarodes sagittatus performs diel vertical and large scale seasonal horizontal feeding migrations, but no has ontogenetic descent [60, 61]. It was chosen as an abundant species of North Atlantic squid fauna, which occasionally enters low latitude Arctic ecosystems [60, 61]. Both species show ontogenetic dietary shifts from small to large crustaceans, and then to fishes and cephalopods, including cannibalism [54, 58, 60,61,62]. Early paralarvae of T. sagittatus are detritivorous [63].

We hypothesize that shifts in squids’ ecology in low latitude Arctic marine ecosystems will coincide with the climate-driven ecosystem changes in the area, especially notable since the late 1990s/early 2000s. Specifically, we expect that (a) increased biodiversity in and generalization of food webs, and high abundance of newly arrived boreal species will alter the diet and niche width of squid; and (b) high abundance of large, piscivorous, boreal fishes will result in changes of TP in squid. In order to test these hypotheses, we use δ13C and δ15N signatures in G. fabricii from the low latitude Arctic areas (the Baffin Bay and southern part of Nordic Seas), which were sampled between 1900 and 2019. Todarodes sagittatus from the high boreal Atlantic (Iceland and Faroe Islands) was sampled between 1844 and 2023. The data were corrected for baseline isoscapes from a global ocean biogeochemical model (see Methods) [26, 27, 64, 65] to adjust for the Suess effect and baseline variation. Our study provides evidence that archival tissues in an abundant and accessible taxon of short-living mesopredators can be used for retrospective isotopic ecology studies in the Arctic and beyond, offering insights into major ecosystem shifts.

Methods

Material used, measurements and squid size estimations

Nineteen G. fabricii beaks from the Nordic Seas and 28 beaks from the Baffin Bay and Davis Strait were analysed (Fig. 1; Table 1). Main time series are ‘1900s’, ‘1930s’, ‘1970s’, ‘2000s’ and ‘2010s’, while ‘late XIXth century’ with n = 2 were only used in some analyses (see below). Stable isotope data on ‘contemporary’ G. fabricii beaks, sampled in 2016, 2017 and 2019 in the Baffin Bay and Davis Strait were previously analysed in Ref [54]. We did not pool these beaks with the ‘2010s’ from this study (sampled in 2014) because the ‘2010s’ were from the Nordic Seas and δ13C values in G. fabricii were significantly different between the Nordic Seas and Baffin Bay [57]. Thirty one T. sagittatus beaks, forming the time series ‘1840s’, ‘1880s’, ‘1890s’ and ‘contemporary’ from Faroe Islands, Iceland and Ireland were analysed (Fig. 1; Table 1). The ‘contemporary’ T. sagittatus beaks were sampled in 2016–2018 and 2023 in Ireland. The majority of the samples were borrowed from Natural History Museum of Denmark (Copenhagen, Denmark). The only exceptions were: ‘2000s’ time series of G. fabricii were from GEOMAR (Kiel, Germany); and ‘contemporary’ T. sagittatus were caught as a bycatch during blue whitening stock assessment surveys by R/V ‘Tridens’, Wageningen Marine Research (IJmuiden, The Netherlands). Mantle length (ML in mm), mass (W in g), sample size, year and sampling method are provided in Table 1. Specimens obtained from the stomach contents of predators (n = 45) were allocated within a uncertainty radius around a predator’s suggested capture or stranding location, coinciding with the baseline model grid (see model description below) [26, 27, 64].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sampling locations and time series of Gonatus fabricii and Todarodes sagittatus. Contemporary time series represents 2016, 2017 and 2019 in G. fabricii (reused from Golikov et al. 2022 [54]) and 2016–2018 and 2023 in T. sagittatus; rationale behind the pooling is provided in Methods. Geographic objects used in the text are marked on the map

Table 1 Samples of Gonatus fabricii and Todarodes sagittatus used in this study. ML – mantle length, W – mass, n – sample size

Upper beaks were used for SIA, in line with previous ontogenetic SIA reconstructions for cephalopods [52, 54, 55]. Upper beak rostrum length (URL) and crest length (UCL) were measured following Ref [50]. Predator stomach contents-provided beaks’ measurements were used to estimate ML of the respective individuals. ML was estimated from URL, and ML at given subsection of the crest was estimated from UCL. W at given subsection was estimated from ML, as no reliable equation exist to estimate W directly from UCL. The equations are from Refs [54, 57]. for G. fabricii and Refs [62, 66]. for T. sagittatus.

Consecutive subsections of the upper beak from rostrum to the end of the crest were prepared following Ref [54]. (Fig. S1). Subsections in the anterior half of the beak sized as close as possible to 1 mm, and subsections in the posterior half of the beak sized as close as possible to 2 mm [54] (Fig. S1). First eight 1 mm subsections are common to all studied individuals, corresponding to G. fabricii ML 7–65 mm and T. sagittatus ML 9–81 mm. In the smallest beaks of G. fabricii, only these eight subsections were available to prepare, or in some cases, 1–3 of the posterior subsections were also prepared. In the largest beaks of T. sagittatus, the posterior subsections were larger than 2 mm. The largest beaks belong to the ‘contemporary’ time series. Transparent parts of the upper beaks were cut prior to subsections’ preparation, as they have significantly different isotopic values from the tanned parts of the beaks [67]. Transparent parts darken in predators’ stomach contents [51]. If the posterior-most part of the crest was not already broken out in the stomach, the posterior-most 3 to 4 mm were discarded. A total of 579 G. fabricii subsections and 474 T. sagittatus subsections were analysed.

Stable isotope analyses

All beak subsections were dried at 60 °C for 24–48 h, weighed (to the closest value to 0.3 mg) with a micro-balance and sterile-packed in tin containers. Stable isotopic signatures were determined by a continuous flow mass spectrometer (Delta V Plus with a Conflo IV Interface, Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) coupled to an elemental analyzer (Flash 2000 or EA Isolink, Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy) and expressed in ‰ as:

$${\delta ^{13}}{\text{C}}{\text{ }}{\text{and}}\,{\delta ^{15}}{\text{N}}{\text{ }} = {\text{ }}\left[ {\left( {{{\text{R}}_{\text{sample}}}/{{\text{R}}_{\text{standard}}}} \right)\, - \,1} \right]{\text{ }}*{\text{ }}1000$$

where R = 13C/12C and 15N/14N, respectively. The carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios were expressed in delta (δ) notation relative to Vienna-PeeDee Belemnite limestone (V-PDB) for δ13C and atmospheric nitrogen (AIR) for δ15N. Replicate measurements of internal laboratory standards (USGS-61 and USGS-63) in every batch (n = 20) indicated precision < 0.10 ‰ and < 0.15 ‰ for δ13C and δ15N values, respectively. Subsections with C: N ratio below 2.90 or above 3.99 were discarded [51], and C: N ratio was 2.91–3.99 in G. fabricii and 2.90–3.96 in T. sagittatus in the subsections used. The analyses were carried out at the Littoral Environnement et Sociétés, La Rochelle University (La Rochelle, France). Reused SIA data from Ref [54]. are based upon the analyses carried out at the Marine and Environmental Science Centre, University of Coimbra (Coimbra, Portugal). The analytical performance of these two laboratories has recently been compared with no differences found in δ13C and δ15N values [68].

Data analyses

Fixation- and chitin-induced corrections

Neither ethanol nor formalin fixation significantly affect δ13C or δ15N signatures of chitinous cephalopod beaks [69], thus, no corrections were performed due to fixation. Values of δ15N in cephalopod beaks, in contrast to δ13C values, are on average 4.8‰ lower than values in muscle tissue [69,70,71,72]. Therefore, we added 4.8‰ to raw beak δ15N values when estimating TP as proposed by e.g. Refs [28, 54, 57, 72, 73].

Trophic position and correction for the suess effect

‘Trophic position’ (TP) term was used instead of ‘trophic level’, as more appropriate for natural food webs where predators prey on many prey species with mixed diet [74]. The standard equation was used to estimate TP from δ15N values [75]. ‘Classical’ trophic enrichment factor (TEF) δ15N = 3.4 ‰[76] was used for T. sagittatus in the North Atlantic, and ‘Arctic’ TEF δ15N = 3.8 ‰[77] was used for G. fabricii in the Arctic. Baseline δ15N values of phytoplankton as TP = 1.0 from the locations and years from each data point in the euphotic zone average (0–130 m) on the model grid (1.8°x3.6° horizontal resolution), which were obtained from the Model of Ocean Biogeochemistry and Isotopes (MOBI) [26, 27, 64, 65] (see detailed model description below), and are available online (see Data availability). Trophic positions for reused δ15N data from Ref [54]. were recalculated here in the similar way to ensure comparability. Correction of δ13C values for the Suess effect were performed by adding the correction values to raw values following Refs [68, 78]. Correction values were obtained from the locations and years from each data point in the euphotic zone average (0–130 m) on the model grid (1.8°x3.6° horizontal resolution), which were obtained from MOBI [26, 27, 64, 65] (see detailed model description below) and are available online (see Data availability). The isotope-enabled global ocean biogeochemical model simulations in MOBI were forced with transient hindcast scenarios of observed increasing atmospheric CO2 and decreasing atmospheric δ13CO2 (see model description below) [26, 27, 64, 65]. The δ13C data from Ref [54]. were reanalyzed here using a similar correction method to ensure comparability.

Specialization index

A specialization index (s) was used to estimate the degree of individual specialization [79, 80] based on the variation within and among individuals of the same species from a given time series [54, 81]. The specialization index (s) was defined as:

$$s = {\text{ }} \frac{ \Delta {\delta ^{13}}\text{C}{\text{ }}\left( {\text{or}{\text{ }}\Delta {\text{ TP}}} \right){\text{ }}\text{along\,the\,crest\,of\,individual}{\text{ }}}{ {\text{ }} \left( \begin{aligned}&\Delta {\delta ^{13}}\text{C}{\text{ }}\left( {\text{or}{\text{ }}\Delta {\text{ }}\text{TP}} \right){\text{ }}\text{among\,studied}\\&{\text{ }}\text{individuals\,from\,this\,time\,series}{\text{ }} \\&+ {\text{ }} \Delta {\delta ^{13}}\text{C}{\text{ }}\left( {\text{or}{\text{ }}\Delta {\text{ }}\text{TP}} \right){\text{ }}\\&\text{along\,the\,crest\,of\,individual} \end{aligned}\right)},$$

where Δ = variance [54, 81]. Accordingly, s values range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing a complete overlap between the individual and the population (= extreme generalist individual) and lower s values representing higher degrees of specialization [54, 81]. The specialization index (s) was calculated separately for each individual using corrected δ13C values and TP.

Correlations, statistical tests, generalized additive and mixed effect models and niche analyses

Correlations between raw δ13C and δ15N values in each individual were assessed using a Spearman’s rank correlation [82]. However, for all other analyses, corrected δ13C values and TP were used. A Mann–Whitney U test [82] was used to compare between two groups, e.g., recalculating from Ref [22]. (Table S2) or comparing corrected δ13C values from 1900s to 2010s within the Nordic Seas. A Kruskal–Wallis H test with a post-hoc Dunn’s Z test [82] was used to compare among more than two groups, e.g., corrected δ13C values, TP and s among the time series. All the tests mentioned above were two-tailed [82]. Differences in corrected δ13C values and TP among beak subsections were tested using a Skillings–Mack test proceeded by the Nemenyi post hoc test [83]: only the subsections common to all the beaks within a given time series were tested. The packages PMCMR 4.4 [84] and Skillings.Mack 1.10 [85] in R 4.1.3 [86] were used for these analyses. Effect size (Cohen’s d) was calculated by standard procedures where applicable [87].

Generalized additive models (GAMs) [88] were used to assess the temporal trends of corrected δ13C values, TP and s, using data from a particular subsection through time (= 1st and 8th). Each variable was assessed independently against year as a smoother. To assess the ontogenetic trends of corrected δ13C values and TP in the first eight subsections within every time series, generalized additive mixed effect models (GAMMs) were used to account for a repetitive sampling from the same individual. Each variable was assessed independently against subsection as a smoother with individual # as a factor. The smoothed term (k) to avoid overfitting and oversimplification was adapted for each GAM and GAMM based on the lowest Akaike’s Information Criterion adjusted for small sample sizes [88] (Table S3). The package mgcv 1.8–42 [89] in R 4.1.3 [86] was used for these analyses, and also to check the GAM and GAMM assumptions by the residual analyses (Table S4).

Sequential subsections of the same beak do not comply with the assumption of sample independence. Due to that, the package nicheROVER 1.1.0 [90] in R 4.1.3 [86] was chosen over the commonly used package SIBER [91] for isotopic niche analyses. Moreover, SIBER is known to be biased by low sample size [92], while we have no more than 13 beaks per time series (Table 1). Default Markov chain Monte Carlo settings from nicheROVER 1.1.0 [90] were employed (1,000 iterations and α = 0.95). The overlap interpretation among the isotopic niches followed Ref [93]. where overlap ranging from 0 to 0.29 indicated no overlap, from 0.30 to 0.60 indicated medium overlap, and from 0.61 to 1 indicated large overlap, with only the large overlap considered significant [54, 73]. Trophic positions were used instead of δ15N values (y axis) in niche estimations. This approach improves the ecological meaning of isotopic data when comparing across different years and areas, as it is a mean to counter high δ15N baseline variation [26, 27]. This approach has been repeatedly applied to cephalopods [28, 54, 73].

Statistical analyses and calculations were performed in R 4.1.3 [86] and PAST 4.12b [94]. The sample size is given wherever statistical results are reported, preferably as n of individuals and subsections. The value of α = 0.05 was considered significant in this study.

Description of model of ocean biogeochemistry and isotopes (MOBI)

The Model of Ocean Biogeochemistry and Isotopes (MOBI) is coupled within the global three dimensional ocean circulation component of the UVic Earth System Climate Model, version 2.9 [95]. MOBI predicts δ13C and δ15N isotope concentrations in all respective model tracers including baseline dissolved inorganic nutrients, phytoplankton and zooplankton trophic levels [26, 27, 65]. The model is comprehensively described in Refs [26, 27, 64, 65] and here we provide a brief description.

The two stable carbon isotopes, δ12C and δ13C, are included for dissolved inorganic carbon and organic carbon including phytoplankton, zooplankton, sinking particulate organic matter, and dissolved organic carbon. The most relevant processes determining the δ13C distribution in the model include air-sea gas exchange, physical ocean transport, biological uptake and remineralization of organic carbon [64]. To account for the Suess effect, a hindcast simulation with increasing atmospheric CO2 and decreasing δ13CO2 from atmospheric observations were applied to the model forcing, which results in a spatially varying Suess effect depending on the local ocean dynamics and biogeochemistry. The baseline phytoplankton δ13C decline averaged over our study region (35°N–75°N, 75°W–0°) from year 1850 to 2023 is 3.2 ‰, of which 0.78 ‰ is due to the Suess effect and 2.3 ‰ is due to increased phytoplankton fractionation under higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the model.

The two stable nitrogen isotopes, δ14N and δ15N, are included in nitrate and organic nitrogen including phytoplankton, zooplankton, sinking particulate organic matter, and dissolved organic nitrogen. The processes in the model that fractionate the nitrogen isotopes (i.e., preferentially incorporate δ14N into the product) are phytoplankton NO3 assimilation (6 ‰), zooplankton excretion (4 ‰), N2 fixation (-1 ‰), water column denitrification (22 ‰) and benthic denitrification (6 ‰), in which the respective fractionation factor yields the δ15N difference between substrate and product [65]. In the high latitude North Atlantic, water column denitrification and N2 fixation occur at insufficient rates to significantly affect the δ15N distribution. Therefore, the nitrate utilization by phytoplankton drives the major meridional gradient of decreasing δ15N values by 2.2 ‰ from 35°N to the nitrate maximum at 60°N, with this trend reversing towards even higher latitudes due to lower nitrate availability there. The transient change from 1850 to 2023 averaged over the region is relatively small (0.05 ‰).

Results

Temporal trends

Gonatus fabricii

Only subsections 1st and 8th (= the last common to all beaks) were used to study temporal trends, which represented squid with mantle length (ML) 6.6–7.5 mm (small) and 54.9–64.5 mm (large), respectively. Significant differences were found for δ13C values among the time series in both small and large squid, and in both Baffin Bay and Nordic Seas (Figs. 2 & 3; Tables 2 & S5). Different δ13C values in G. fabricii from these areas [57] precluded the comparison between them in temporal analyses of δ13C values. Generalized additive models (GAMs) suggested more substantial differences among the time series earlier in ontogeny (Fig. 2; Table 2). Moreover, GAM for small squid explained more variation (Table 2). Overall, the significant temporal trend from the available time series highlighted by both GAMs and Kruskal–Wallis H test was: (a) small decrease from 1930s to 1960s; (b) increase from 1960s to 1990s/2000s; and (c) ongoing decrease since 1990s/2000s (Fig. 2; Tables 2 & S5).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Long-term trends in δ13C values (a, b) between 1930 and 2019, and estimated trophic position (c, d) and specialization index (e, f) of Gonatus fabricii between 1900 and 2019. a, c. Squid with mantle length (ML) 6.6–7.5 mm (= beak subsection 1). b, d. Squid ML 54.9–64.5 mm (= beak subsection 8). e. Specialization index of δ13C, entire beaks. f. Specialization index of trophic position, entire beaks. Blue line represents generalized additive model and grey area represents confidence intervals. All individual data points are shown

Fig. 3
figure 3

Differences in δ13C values (ad), estimated trophic position (eh) and specialization index of δ13C (i, k) and trophic position (j, l) among different time series of Gonatus fabricii and Todarodes sagittatus between 1844 and 2023. a, e. Gonatus fabricii with mantle length (ML) 6.6–7.5 mm (= beak subsection 1). b, f. Gonatus fabricii ML 54.9–64.5 mm (= beak subsection 8). c, g. Todarodes sagittatus ML 9.1–10.0 mm (= beak subsection 1). d, h. Todarodes sagittatus ML 72.7–80.4 mm (= beak subsection 8). i. Specialization index of δ13C, entire beaks of G. fabricii. j. Specialization index of trophic position, entire beaks of G. fabricii. k. Specialization index of δ13C, entire beaks of T. sagittatus. l. Specialization index of trophic position, entire beaks of T. sagittatus. Boxplots indicate mean values (midlines), upper and lower quartiles (box limits) and standard errors (whiskers). All individual data points are shown. Figures from subsection 1 are labelled as small squid, and figures from subsection 8 are labelled as large squid

Significant differences in TP among the time series were found in both small and large squid (Figs. 2 & 3; Tables 2 & S5). Differences were more substantial in large squid (Fig. 2; Table 2). GAM for large squid explained much more variation (Table 2). The significant temporal trend in large squid from the available time series, again highlighted by both GAMs and Kruskal–Wallis H test, was: (a) small increase from 1900s to 1930s; (b) decrease from 1930s to 1990s; and (c) ongoing small increase since 1990s (Fig. 2; Tables 2 & S5).

Table 2 Outputs of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) of long-term trends in δ13C values, Trophic Position (TP) and Specialization index (s) of Gonatus fabricii. In GAMs, k indicates the number of knots and s represents the smoother (year), where values are effective degrees of freedom. n – sample size. Significant p-values are in bold

Both δ13C values’ and TP’s specialization indices (s) showed a significant temporal change (Figs. 2 & 3; Tables 2 & S5). For s of δ13C values the significant temporal trend from the available time series was: (a) increase from 1900s to 1950s; (b) decrease from 1950s to 1990s; and (c) ongoing increase since 1990s (Fig. 2; Tables 2 & S5). For s of TP, the significant temporal trend from the available time series was: (a) no changes from 1900s to 1960s; (b) decrease from 1960s to 2000s; and (c) ongoing increase since 2000s (Fig. 2; Tables 3 & S5). GAM of TP’s s explained more variation, than that of δ13C values (Table 2). Overall, GAMs did not coincide in temporal patterns, except for the last time series: there was an increase of δ13C values’ s, TP’s s and TP and decrease of δ13C values starting from 1990s/2000s (Fig. 2).

Table 3 Ontogenetic changes in δ13C values and Trophic Position (TP) of Gonatus fabricii. n – sample size, GAMM – generalized additive mixed effect model, n/a – not applicable. Significant p-values are in bold

Niches after 2000s were wider than those of previous time series in both small and large squid (Fig. S2; Table S6). Niches from historical time series overlapped more with contemporary (= 2016, 2017 and 2019 in G. fabricii, see Methods) ones in both small and large squid, than vice versa (Fig. S2; Table S7).

Within-individual correlation between δ13C and δ15N values only presented in substantial proportion in 2010s and contemporary squid, being completely absent prior to 2000s (Table S8). The reasons for that are outlined in ontogenetic trends section, below.

Todarodes sagittatus

Similar to G. fabricii, only subsections 1st (small; ML 9.1–10.0 mm) and 8th (large; ML 72.7–80.4 mm) were used. Significant differences in both δ13C values and TP among the time series were found in both small and large squid with both GAMs and Kruskal–Wallis H test (Fig. 3 & S3; Tables S9 & S10). GAMs suggested more substantial differences for both δ13C values and TP among the time series later in ontogeny (Fig. S3; Table S10). GAMs for large squid explained more variation (Table S10). Specialization indices (s) of δ13C values and TP both showed significant differences among the time series (Figs. 3 & S3; Tables S9 & S10). GAM of TP’s explained more variation, than that of δ13C values (Table S10). We did not rely entirely on the temporal trends from GAMs (Fig. S3), because we only had samples from the XIXth and XXIst centuries (see Methods). Other methods of analyses, however, rendered similar results (Fig. 3; Table S9).

Niches from the XIXth century were narrower than contemporary (= 2016–2018 and 2023 in T. sagittatus, see Methods) in small squid (Fig. S2; Table S6). In the large squid, niches from the contemporary and 1890s were wider than those from 1840s to 1880s (Fig. S2; Table S6). Niches from the XIXth century overlapped more with contemporary ones in small squid (Fig. S2; Table S7). In large squid, this temporal overlap was similar (Fig. S2; Table S7).

Within-individual correlation between δ13C and δ15N values presented in substantial proportion in all the time series (Table S8).

Ontogenetic trends

Gonatus fabricii

Significant ontogenetic increase of δ13C values and TP was found within all the time series (Figs. S4 & S5; Tables 3, S11 & S12). The main increase of δ13C values took place in squid from ML 6.6–7.5 mm to 23.4–27.5 mm in all but contemporary time series. In the latter, it took place from ML 7.0–7.4 mm to 30.9–35.2 mm (Fig. S4; Table 3). Slight decrease after the subsection 4 (ML 23.4–27.5 mm) was well-pronounced in all the time series prior to 2000s. The rate of change in δ13C values suggests it was only absent in the contemporary time series (Fig. S4; Table 3). The main ontogenetic increase of TP varied among time series, but always ended at ML 46.3–54.4 mm. Afterwards the TP increase continued at a 4–15 times slower rate throughout ontogeny (Fig. S5; Table 3). GAMs of ontogenetic changes in TP always explained more variation than in δ13C values (Table 3). GAMs of ontogenetic changes in δ13C values and TP suggested smoother changes after 2000s than in the previous time series (Figs. S4 & S5; Table 3).

No pattern of ontogenetic changes in niche width was found (Table S6). The narrowest niches were frequently found in beak subsections 2 and 10 (= ML 11.5–12.8 and 76.0–109.3 mm), and the widest in subsections 4, 3 and 9 (= ML 23.4–27.5, 17.1–19.7 and 65.0–85.6 mm). Finally, the medium-sized niches were most frequently in beak subsections 5, 2 and 14 (= ML 30.5–35.9, 11.5–12.8 and 133.0–190.3 mm) (Table S6). Thus, ontogenetic patterns of niche width are not further discussed in this study.

Niche overlap pattern was used to classify the history of niche changes of the species to four consecutive periods (Figs. S6 & S7, Tables S13 & S14). The initial period had a limited overlap with other beak subsections (Fig. S7). The 1st stable period followed with an increased overlap between the subsections (Fig. S7). The change period followed where the main shifts of overlap occurred (Fig. S7). Finally, the main stable period was the last one, and it exhibited large overlap among all beak subsections (Fig. S7). A decrease in overlap was observed in every time series prior to 2000s during the change period (Figs. S6 & S7, Tables S13 & S14). The onset of the main stable period after ML 38.1–64.5 mm means squid have bypassed the main shifts in its diet and habitat. However, both δ13C values and TP continue to change throughout ontogeny, albeit at smaller rates (Fig. S6, Tables 3, S11, S12, S13 & S14). As a result, occasional secondary shifts occurred during the main stable period, as evident in 1930s and 2010s (Tables S13 & S14). Prolonged initial periods and shortened change periods occasionally occurred in the time series after 2000s (Tables S13 & S14).

Todarodes sagittatus

Significant ontogenetic increase of δ13C values and TP was present within all the time series (Fig. S8; Tables S15, S16 & S17). The main ontogenetic increase of δ13C values took place in squid from ML 9.1–10.0 mm to 45.6–50.2 mm in all but 1890s time series. In 1890s, it took place from ML 9.1–10.0 mm to 27.9–30.0 mm (Fig. S8; Table S15). The main ontogenetic increase of TP varied among time series, but always over at ML 63.9–70.3 mm (= beak subsection 7). Afterwards, the TP increase continued with a slower rate throughout ontogeny (Fig. S8; Table S15). GAMs of ontogenetic changes in TP always explained more variation than in δ13C values, except for the contemporary time series (Table S15).

Niches from small squid (ML 9.1–40.1 mm; = beak subsections 1–4) were most frequently the widest (Fig. S9; Table S6). The narrowest and most frequently medium-sized niches strongly varied among the time series (Table S6). Squid with ML larger than 46.6 mm had their niches completely overlapped in the contemporary time series (Fig. S9; Table S18). All of the XIXth century squid showed overlap shrinkage in mid- to late ontogeny (Fig. S9; Table S18).

Discussion

Increased environmental effects of climate change in the Arctic are especially marked since the late 1990s/early 2000s, following the continuous increase in mean annual temperatures [2, 17]. In turn, temperature increase causes sea-ice melting, reduction in snow cover, and changes in physical ocean dynamics [3, 4]. These environmental effects lead to changes in the ecosystems, which mainly include increased generalization of the food webs, higher primary production, and inflow of boreal species into the Arctic marine ecosystems [3,4,5, 7,8,9,10,11, 16, 18, 19]. The retrospective SIA studies from the Arctic and North Atlantic to date use basal (= filter feeders) and top (= marine mammal top predators) food web components [21, 22, 31, 32, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41, 43, 44]. Shifts in their trophic ecology, which would coincide in time with the mentioned increased environmental impact of climate change since the late 1990s/early 2000s, were only evident in narwhals and ringed seals from East and West Greenland [21, 22, 31, 32, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41, 43, 44]. Ontogenetic changes and different timing of temporal changes in trophic ecology, however, were often found [21, 22, 31, 32, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41, 43, 44]. Our study showed that in an abundant short-living invertebrate mesopredator, the Arctic squid G. fabricii, the changes in trophic ecology were observed since 1990s/2000s. Specifically, we observed an increase of trophic position (TP), specialization indices (s) in TP and δ13C values, niche width, and a decrease of δ13C values. These trends were generally more evident in large squid (see below for reasons).

The main climate-driven shifts in the Arctic marine ecosystems are increased generalization of the food webs, higher primary production, and inflow of boreal species [3,4,5, 7,8,9,10,11, 16, 18, 19]. These shifts may explain temporal trends of TP, s of TP and niche width, which on their turn reflect changes in diet of G. fabricii over time. Trophic position and niche width of herbivorous fishes and piscivorous seabirds decrease with increasing primary production (= food availability), as they specialize on particular targeted prey sources when they become abundant [96, 97]. Top predators can either decrease or increase TP with increasing primary production, either specializing on a particular food source or broadening their food spectra [21]. Opportunistic invertebrates, such as copepods and Ommastrephidae squids, have only demonstrated increase of TP and niche size with increasing primary production (i.e., they broaden their food spectra with increasing food availability [98,99,100]). Increasing TP in contemporary G. fabricii suggests that they hunt larger fishes or cephalopods. Capture of large prey has been documented by in situ observations and stomach contents analyses in other gonatid squids [101, 102]. As a result of Atlantification there is a migration of large, boreal, piscivorous fishes with a generalist diet into the Arctic ecosystems [10, 11, 18]. Gonatus fabricii change their crustacean diet to piscivorous and cannibalistic as they grow [54, 57, 58]. Therefore, large piscivorous fishes arriving from the boreal Atlantic and becoming abundant in the Arctic [10, 11, 18] may now be the dominant prey for large G. fabricii, which can explain the more pronounced temporal change in TP in large G. fabricii, than in small G. fabricii.

Increased niche width in G. fabricii after 2000s denotes a more generalist diet, as observed in copepods, other squids, fishes and seabirds in tropical and temperate areas [96,97,98,99,100]. This supports increased generalism of G. fabricii diet shown by specialization index (s). Temporal trends of s (both TP and δ13C values) explain more variation than TP and δ13C values. Both δ13C values and s of δ13C are more temporally variable, than their TP counterparts. Before 1960s, in times of fewer temperature anomalies [2] and lower fisheries pressure [103, 104] in the Arctic, s of TP in G. fabricii was the highest over the study period. It indicates very broad generalist diet in less disturbed ecosystems, in line with dietary opportunistic generalism known for squids [9, 57, 60, 61, 99,100,101]. Decrease in diet generalism from 1960s, in this case, suggests increase in ecosystem disturbance by more frequent temperature anomalies [2] and increasing fisheries pressure [103, 104]. Cephalopods are known to adapt well and eventually can adapt to short-term climate change impact [9, 28, 47, 48, 73]. Increase of TP and diet generalism (shown by both niche width and s) after 1990s/2000s suggests that G. fabricii in the low latitude Arctic is well adapted to cope with the ecosystems’ Atlantification. The degree of generalism in G. fabricii, however, still did not reach the values associated with the relatively less disturbed ecosystems of before the 1960s. Contemporary T. sagittatus in the high latitude North Atlantic also demonstrate increase niche width of contemporary vs. the XIXth century squid, which is the same indirect evidence of a more generalist diet, as in G. fabricii. However, (a) T. sagittatus is under fisheries’ pressure [60, 61]; (b) climate change impact in the area is not as strong as in the Arctic [1, 2]; and (c) we only have samples of this species from the XIXth and XXIst centuries. As such, a link to climate change is not evident in T. sagittatus, unlike in G. fabricii from the low latitude Arctic.

Ontogenetic changes in δ13C values and TP in G. fabricii are less pronounced in 2000s, 2010s and contemporary time series, than in all of the earlier time series. This pattern matches with increased climate change effects in the Arctic [2, 17]. The consecutive ontogenetic isotopic niches in this species became more similar over time. These observations indicate less abrupt changes in diet and habitat throughout the species’ ontogeny in contemporary individuals compared to historical individuals. The reason for this difference may be that during the climate-driven alteration of the marine ecosystems, biodiversity, primary production and food web generalism also increase [3,4,5, 7,8,9,10,11, 16, 18, 19]. As such, the spectra of available prey for squid can increase in both diversity and abundance.

Previous SIA studies in contemporary G. fabricii support our results on ontogenetic changes in δ13C values and TP [54, 57, 105]. In T. sagittatus, ontogenetic increase of δ13C values and TP is reported for the first time. Small squids (ML 6.6–7.5 mm in G. fabricii and ML 9.1–10.0 mm in T. sagittatus) feed largely on copepods [54, 58, 60,61,62]. This may explain why almost all trophic ecology characters we assessed through SIA in G. fabricii, and all such characters in T. sagittatus were better expressed in large squids. Early paralarvae of T. sagittatus are detritivorous [63], which is reflected in lowered TP of small T. sagittatus in comparison to small G. fabricii. Large squids have almost similar TPs. The early paralarval stage, however, does not constitute more than 10% of the subsection 1 of the beak in any of the species, judging by size of early paralarvae beaks in other Ommastrephidae [106]. It means small T. sagittatus feed on lower TP prey, than small G. fabricii.

One of the common limitations of retrospective ecology studies is sample availability (e.g., Refs [35, 38, 68, 78]). This leads to non-selective use of all available material, and consecutive comparisons of individuals of different sizes among different periods. While we had no control over the availability of the historical samples, we addressed the latter issue by using large beaks, which were cut into subsections. The common subsections among all studied beaks were used for ontogenetic GAMMs, and similar subsections (1st and 8th) were used for temporal trend GAMs among the time series. This allowed us to compare squid of similar sizes through time. Moreover, it allows the more effective application of techniques that are not sensitive to sample size [52, 54] (see Methods), and allows to test for specialization [54, 81]. The specialization index (s) shows the degree of generalism/specialism based on within- and among-individual variation [54, 81]. Analyzing beaks by subsections also allowed us to find ontogenetic trends in δ13C values and TP. It would be impossible to achieve these comparisons if using whole beaks due to sample variations and different beak sizes. Furthermore, the mixing of different SI signatures along ontogeny would result in averaged values, potentially masking any discernible trend. Another common caveat of retrospective isotopic ecology studies is related to high baseline variation of δ13C and δ15N values in space and time [25,26,27], and the Suess effect [29]. To overcome this issue, we used baseline and correction values the Model of Ocean Biogeochemistry and Isotopes (MOBI) [26, 27, 64, 65]; these values together with raw data are available online (see Data availability). The MOBI is a global model capable of hindcast simulations from the preindustrial era [26, 27, 64, 65], and a data-constrained isotope model [26, 27, 64, 65], that has been successfully applied to large-scale stable isotope ecological studies (e.g., Refs [107,108,109]).

Conclusion

Our study highlights a shift in the trophic ecology of an Arctic squid species in the late 1990s/early 2000s over the low latitude Arctic areas. Specifically, G. fabricii demonstrates an increase in diet and habitat use generalism (= opportunistic choice rather than specialization), TP and niche width. These temporal changes coincide with the increase of environmental impact of climate change in the Arctic (warming temperatures, sea-ice melting, reduction in snow cover, and changes in physical ocean dynamics) [2, 17]. The climate-driven shifts in the Arctic ecosystems (i.e., generalization and Atlantification of food webs, increased presence of boreal species new to the area and increased primary production [3,4,5, 7,8,9,10,11, 16, 18, 19]) potentially explain the observed shifts in the trophic ecology of the Arctic squid species. Specifically, increased generalization of food webs coincides with increased diet generalism and niche width of this squid, while increased abundance of boreal piscivorous fishes may be responsible for the squid’s increased TP. We suggest that abundant and ecologically important opportunistic mesopredatory invertebrates are good model organisms to study marine ecosystem changes via retrospective analysis. Moreover, the high degree of opportunism and adaptability of squids enables them to adjust their trophic ecology, and as such makes them potential winners of short-term shifts in Arctic ecosystems.

Data availability

All relevant data are included in the paper and/or in the supplementary materials; raw data and primary analysis results, δ13C correction values for the Suess effect and δ15N baseline values used to estimate TP are available from Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/record/11108528 and https://zenodo.org/record/8256576), and PANGAEA (https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.968467); reused data from Golikov et al. (2022) [54] are available in the respective paper and its supplementary materials, and from Zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/record/7113726); MOBI-UVic model code is publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/chrissomes/UVic2.9).

References

  1. Lind S, Ingvaldsen RB, Furevik T. Arctic warming hotspot in the northern Barents Sea linked to declining sea-ice import. Nat Clim Change. 2018;8:634–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rantanen M, et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun Earth Environ. 2022;3:168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt S, Wassmann P, Piepenburg D. Revisiting the footprints of climate change in Arctic Marine food webs: an assessment of knowledge gained since 2010. Front Mar Sci. 2023;10:1096222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wassmann P, Duarte CM, Agusti S, Sejr MK. Footprints of climate change in the Arctic Marine ecosystem. Glob Change Biol. 2011;17:1235–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalpadado P, et al. Climate effects on temporal and spatial dynamics of phytoplankton and zooplankton in the Barents Sea. Prog Oceanogr. 2020;185:102320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Søreide JE, et al. Sympagic-pelagic-benthic coupling in Arctic and Atlantic waters around Svalbard revealed by stable isotopic and fatty acid tracers. Mar Biol Res. 2013;9:831–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Renaud PE, Sejr MK, Bluhm BA, Sirenko B, Ellingsen IH. The future of Arctic benthos: expansion, invasion, and biodiversity. Prog Oceanogr. 2015;139:244–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Golikov AV, Sabirov RM, Lubin PA, Jørgensen LL. Changes in distribution and range structure of Arctic cephalopods due to climatic changes of the last decades. Biodiversity. 2013;14:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xavier JC, et al. A review on the biodiversity, distribution and trophic role of cephalopods in the Arctic and Antarctic Marine ecosystems under a changing ocean. Mar Biol. 2018;165:93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fossheim M, et al. Recent warming leads to a rapid borealization of fish communities in the Arctic. Nat Clim Change. 2015;5:673–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frainer A, et al. Climate-driven changes in functional biogeography of Arctic marine fish communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:12202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallory ML, Gilchrist HG, Braune BM, Gaston AJ. Marine birds as indicators of Arctic Marine ecosystem health: linking the northern ecosystem initiative to long-term studies. Environ Monit Assess. 2006;113:31–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laidre KL, et al. Arctic Marine mammal population status, sea ice habitat loss, and conservation recommendations for the 21st century. Conserv Biol. 2015;29:724–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamilton CD, et al. Contrasting changes in space use induced by climate change in two Arctic Marine mammal species. Biol Lett. 2019;15:20180834.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Werner K, et al. Arctic in rapid transition: priorities for the future of marine and coastal research in the Arctic. Polar Sci. 2016;10:364–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wassmann P, et al. Towards a unifying pan-arctic perspective: a conceptual modelling toolkit. Prog Oceanogr. 2020;189:102455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Swart NC, Fyfe JC, Hawkins E, Kay JE, Jahn A. Influence of internal variability on Arctic sea-ice trends. Nat Clim Change. 2015;5:86–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kortsch S, et al. Food-web structure varies along environmental gradients in a high-latitude marine ecosystem. Ecography. 2018;41:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arrigo KB, Dijken GL. v. continued increases in Arctic Ocean primary production. Prog Oceanogr. 2015;136:60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jørgensen LL, et al. Arctic Marine biodiversity. Chapter 36G. In: Inniss L, Simcock A, editors. First Global Integrated Marine Assessment, World Ocean Assessment I. New York: United Nations; 2016. pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bode A, et al. Trophic position of dolphins tracks recent changes in the pelagic ecosystem of the macaronesian region (NE Atlantic). Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2023;699:167–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yurkowski DJ, Hussey NE, Ferguson SH, Fisk. A. T. A temporal shift in trophic diversity among a predator assemblage in a warming Arctic. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5:180259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Boecklen WJ, Yarnes CT, Cook BA, James AC. On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2011;42:411–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Layman CA, et al. Applying stable isotopes to examine food-web structure: an overview of analytical tools. Biol Rev. 2012;87:545–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Magozzi S, Yool A, Vander Zanden HB, Wunder MB, Trueman CN. Using ocean models to predict spatial and temporal variation in marine carbon isotopes. Ecosphere. 2017;8:e01763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Somes CJ, Schmittner A, Muglia J, Oschlies A. A three-dimensional model of the marine nitrogen cycle during the last glacial Maximum constrained by sedimentary isotopes. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Somes CJ et al. Constraining global marine iron sources and ligand-mediated scavenging fluxes with GEOTRACES dissolved iron measurements in an ocean biogeochemical model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2021GB006948 (2021).

  28. Golikov AV, et al. The first global deep-sea stable isotope assessment reveals the unique trophic ecology of vampire squid Vampyroteuthis infernalis (Cephalopoda). Sci Rep. 2019;9:19099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Keeling CD. The Suess effect: 13Carbon-14Carbon interrelations. Environ Int. 1979;2:229–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Newsome SD, Clementz MT, Koch PL. Using stable isotope biogeochemistry to study marine mammal ecology. Mar Mammal Sci. 2010;26:509–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Matthews CJD, Ferguson SH. Validation of dentine deposition rates in beluga whales by interspecies cross dating of temporal δ13C trends in teeth. NAMMCO Sci Publ. 2014;10:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sherwood OA, Lehmann MF, Schubert CJ, Scott DB, McCarthy MD. Nutrient regime shift in the western North Atlantic indicated by compound-specific δ15N of deep-sea gorgonian corals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 108, 1011–1015 (2015).

  33. Steinhardt J, Butler PG, Carroll ML, Hartley J. The application of long-lived bivalve sclerochronology in environmental baseline monitoring. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dietz R, et al. Analysis of narwhal tusks reveals lifelong feeding ecology and mercury exposure. Curr Biol. 2021;31:2012–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schöne BR, Huang Q. Ontogenetic δ15N trends and multidecadal variability in shells of the bivalve mollusk, Arctica islandica. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8:748593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. de la Vega C, et al. Multi-decadal environmental change in the Barents Sea recorded by seal teeth. Glob Change Biol. 2022;28:3054–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao S, Davoren GK, Matthews CJD, Ferguson SH, Watt CA. Isotopic (δ15N and δ13C) profiles in dentine indicate sex differences and individual variability in resource use among narwhals (Monodon monoceros). Mar Mammal Sci. 2022;38:1182–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang Q, Wu H, Schöne BR. A novel trophic archive: practical considerations of compound-specific amino acid δ15N analysis of carbonate-bound organic matter in bivalve shells (Arctica islandica). Chem Geol. 2023;615:121220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Aubail A, Dietz R, Rigét F, Simon-Bouhet B, Caurant F. An evaluation of teeth of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from Greenland as a matrix to monitor spatial and temporal trends of mercury and stable isotopes. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:5137–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Aubail A, et al. Temporal trend of mercury in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Svalbard using teeth as a biomonitoring tissue. J Environ Monit. 2012;14:56–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dietz R, et al. Temporal trends and future predictions of mercury concentrations in Northwest Greenland polar bear (Ursus maritimus) hair. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:1458–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whiteman J, Elliott Smith E, Besser A, Newsome S. A guide to using compound-specific stable isotope analysis to study the fates of molecules in organisms and ecosystems. Diversity. 2019;11:8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. de la Vega C, et al. Biomarkers in ringed seals reveal recent onset of borealization in the high- compared to the mid-latitude Canadian Arctic. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8:700687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yurkowski DJ, Brown TA, Blanchfield PJ, Ferguson SH. Atlantic walrus signal latitudinal differences in the long-term decline of sea ice-derived carbon to benthic fauna in the Canadian Arctic. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 287, 20202126 (2020).

  45. Nesis KN. Cephalopod molluscs of the Arctic Ocean and its seas. in Fauna and distribution of molluscs: North Pacifc and Arctic Basin (ed. Kafanov, A. I.) 115–136USSR Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, (1987). [in Russian].

  46. Gardiner K, Dick TA. Arctic cephalopod distributions and their associated predators. Polar Res. 2010;29:209–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Doubleday ZA, et al. Global proliferation of cephalopods. Curr Biol. 2016;26:R406–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Oesterwind D, et al. Climate change-related changes in cephalopod biodiversity on the North East Atlantic Shelf. Biodivers Conserv. 2022;31:1491–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Boyle PR, Rodhouse PG. Cephalopods: ecology and fisheries. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Clarke MR. A handbook for the identification of cephalopod beaks. Oxford: Claredon; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xavier JC, et al. The significance of cephalopod beaks as a research tool: an update. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1038064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Queirós JP, et al. Ontogenetic changes in habitat and trophic ecology of the giant Antarctic octopus Megaleledone setebos inferred from stable isotope analyses in beaks. Mar Biol. 2020;167:56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. van Tonder A, et al. Ecology of Moroteuthopsis longimana at the sub-antarctic Prince Edward Islands, revealed through stable isotope analysis of squid beaks. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2021;658:105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Golikov AV, et al. Life history of the arctic squid Gonatus fabricii (Cephalopoda: Oegopsida) reconstructed by analysis of individual ontogenetic stable isotopic trajectories. Animals. 2022;12:3548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Guerra Á, et al. Life-history traits of the giant squid Architeuthis dux revealed from stable isotope signatures recorded in beaks. ICES J Mar Sci. 2010;67:1425–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bjørke H, Gjøsaeter H. Who eats the larger Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein) in the Norwegian sea? ICES CM Pap Rep. 1998;M10:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Golikov A, et al. Ontogenetic changes in stable isotope (δ13C and δ15N) values in squid Gonatus fabricii (Cephalopoda) reveal its important ecological role in the Arctic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2018;606:65–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kristensen TK. Biology of Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein, 1818) from West Greenland waters. Meddelelser Om Grønl Biosci. 1984;13:3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Arkhipkin AI, Bjørke H. Ontogenetic changes in morphometric and reproductive indices of the squid Gonatus fabricii (Oegopsida, Gonatidae) in the Norwegian sea. Polar Biol. 1999;22:357–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Roper CFE, Nigmatulin C, Jereb P. Family Ommastrephidae. In: Jereb P, Roper, editors. Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species known to date. Volume 2. Myopsid and oegopsid squids. Volume 2. Rome: FAO; 2010. pp. 269–347. C. F. E.).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Piatkowski U et al. 16. Todarodes sagittatus (Lamarck, 1798). in Cephalopod biology and fisheries in Europe: II. Species accounts (eds. Jereb, P. ICES, Copenhagen, vol. 325 194–206 (2015).

  62. Wiborg KF. Akkar (Todarodes sagittatus (Lamarck)). Innsig Og Forekomst Ved norskekysten og tilstøtende havområder høsten 1979 - våren 1980. Fisk Og Havet. 1980;3:13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fernández-Álvarez FÁ, Machordom A, García-Jiménez R, Salinas-Zavala CA, Villanueva R. Predatory flying squids are detritivores during their early planktonic life. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3440.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Schmittner A, et al. Biology and air-sea gas exchange controls on the distribution of carbon isotope ratios (δ13C) in the ocean. Biogeosciences. 2013;10:5793–816.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Somes CJ, et al. Simulating the global distribution of nitrogen isotopes in the ocean. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2010;24:GB4019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hernańdez-García V, Piatkowski U, Clarke MR. Development of the darkening of Todarodes sagittatus beaks and its relation to growth and reproduction. South Afr J Mar Sci. 1998;20:363–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Cherel Y, Fontaine C, Jackson GD, Jackson CH, Richard P. Tissue, ontogenic and sex-related differences in δ13C and δ15N values of the oceanic squid Todarodes filippovae (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae). Mar Biol. 2009;156:699–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Cusset F, et al. A century of mercury: ecosystem-wide changes drive increasing contamination of a tropical seabird species in the South Atlantic Ocean. Environ Pollut. 2023;323:121187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ruiz-Cooley RI, Garcia KY, Hetherington ED. Effects of lipid removal and preservatives on carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios of squid tissues: implications for ecological studies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2011;407:101–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Cherel Y, Hobson KA. Stable isotopes, beaks and predators: a new tool to study the trophic ecology of cephalopods, including giant and colossal squids. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 272, 1601–1607 (2005).

  71. Hobson KA, Cherel Y. Isotopic reconstruction of marine food webs using cephalopod beaks: new insight from captively raised Sepia officinalis. Can J Zool. 2006;84:766–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Cherel Y, Ducatez S, Fontaine C, Richard P, Guinet C. Stable isotopes reveal the trophic position and mesopelagic fish diet of female southern elephant seals breeding on the Kerguelen Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2008;370:239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Golikov AV, et al. Diet and life history reduce interspecific and intraspecific competition among three sympatric Arctic cephalopods. Sci Rep. 2020;10:21506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Herendeen RA. Ecological network analysis, energy analysis. In: Jörgensen SE, Fath BD, editors. Encyclopedia of ecology. Oxford: Academic; 2008. pp. 1072–83.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  75. Vander-Zanden MJ, Cabana G, Rasmussen JB. Comparing trophic position of freshwater fish calculated using stable nitrogen isotope ratios (δ15N) and literature dietary data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1997;54:1142–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Post DM. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods and assumptions. Ecology. 2002;83:703–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Hobson KA, et al. A stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N) model for the North Water food web: implications for evaluating trophodynamics and the flow of energy and contaminants. Deep-Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 2002;49:5131–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Jaeger A, Cherel Y. Isotopic investigation of contemporary and historic changes in penguin trophic niches and carrying capacity of the Southern Indian Ocean. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16484.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Rougharden J. Evolution of niche width. Am Nat. 1972;106:683–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bolnick DL, Yang LH, Fordyce JA, Davis JM, Svanbäck R. Measuring individual-level resource specialization. Ecology. 2002;83:2936–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Riverón S, et al. Pelagic and benthic ecosystems drive differences in population and individual specializations in marine predators. Oecologia. 2021;196:891–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Chatfield M, Mander A. The Skillings–Mack test (Friedman test when there are missing data). Stata J. 2009;9:299–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Pohlert TPMCMR. Calculate pairwise multiple comparisons of Mean Rank sums. Version 4.4. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PMCMR/ (2021).

  85. Srisuradetchai P. Skillings.Mack: the Skillings-Mack Test Statistic for Block designs with missing observations. Version 1.10. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Skillings.Mack/ (2015).

  86. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 4.1.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/ (2022).

  87. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wood SN. Generalized additive models. An introduction with R, second edition. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  89. Wood SN. Mgcv: mixed GAM computation vehicle with automatic smoothness estimation. Version 1.8–42. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mgcv/ (2023).

  90. Swanson HK, et al. A new probabilistic method for quantifying n -dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap. Ecology. 2015;96:318–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER – stable isotope bayesian ellipses in R: bayesian isotopic niche metrics. J Anim Ecol. 2011;80:595–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Syväranta J, Lensu A, Marjomäki TJ, Oksanen S, Jones R. I. An empirical evaluation of the utility of convex hull and standard ellipse areas for assessing population niche widths from stable isotope data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Langton RW. Diet overlap between Atlantic Cod, Gadus Morphua, silver hake, Merluccius bilinearis, and fifteen other northwest Atlantic finfish. Fish Bull. 1982;80:745–59.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontol Electron. 2001;4:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Eby M, et al. Lifetime of anthropogenic climate change: millennial time scales of potential CO2 and surface temperature perturbations. J Clim. 2009;22:2501–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Lesser JS, James WR, Stallings CD, Wilson RM, Nelson JA. Trophic niche size and overlap decreases with increasing ecosystem productivity. Oikos. 2020;129:1303–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Ciancio JE, Yorio P, Buratti C, Colombo GA, Frere E. Isotopic niche plasticity in a marine top predator as indicator of a large marine ecosystem food web status. Ecol Indic. 2021;126:107687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Kozak ER, Franco-Gordo C, Godinez-Dominguez E, Suarez-Morales E. Ambriz-Arreola, I. Seasonal variability of stable isotope values and niche size in tropical calanoid copepods and zooplankton size fractions. Mar Biol. 2020;167:37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Hu G, Boenish R, Zhao Z, Li J, Chen X. Ontogenetic and spatiotemporal changes in isotopic niche of jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) in the Southeastern Pacific. Front Mar Sci. 2022;9:806847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Wang Y, Han P, Chen X, Fang Z. Interannual and ontogenetic stage differences on trophic ecology of neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii inferred from stable isotope analyses in beaks. Fish Res. 2022;249:106252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Hunsicker M, Essington T, Aydin K, Ishida B. Predatory role of the commander squid Berryteuthis magister in the eastern Bering Sea: insights from stable isotopes and food habits. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;415:91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Hoving HJT, Robison BH. Deep-sea in situ observations of gonatid squid and their prey reveal high occurrence of cannibalism. Deep-Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2016;116:94–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. McBride MM, et al. Krill, climate, and contrasting future scenarios for Arctic and Antarctic fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci. 2014;71:1934–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Fauchald P, et al. Poleward shifts in marine fisheries under Arctic warming. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16:074057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Lischka A, Lacoue-Labarthe T, Bustamante P, Piatkowski U, Hoving H. J. T. Trace element analysis reveals bioaccumulation in the squid Gonatus fabricii from polar regions of the Atlantic Ocean. Environ Pollut. 2020;256:113389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Franco-Santos RM, Vidal EAG. Tied hands: synchronism between beak development and feeding-related morphological changes in ommastrephid squid paralarvae. Hydrobiologia. 2020;847:1943–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Navarro J, Coll M, Somes CJ, Olson RJ. Trophic niche of squids: insights from isotopic data in marine systems worldwide. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 2013;95:93–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Pethybridge H, et al. A global meta-analysis of marine predator nitrogen stable isotopes: relationships between trophic structure and environmental conditions. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2018;27:1043–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Derville S et al. Long-term stability in the circumpolar foraging range of a Southern Ocean predator between the eras of whaling and rapid climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 120, e2214035120 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Tom Schiøtte and Abdi Hedayat for providing historical samples from Natural History Museum of Denmark, and Tom Schiøtte for otherwise helping a lot in NHMD; Martin E. Blicher (GINR, now NIRAS A/S), Reinhardt M. Kristensen and Martin V. Sørensen (NHMD) for directing us to and within NHMD; the scientific groups and crews of blue whiting stock assessment cruises by R/V ‘Tridens’, where recent Todarodes sagittatus were caught as a bycatch; Jan Dierking, Julia Stefanschitz and the Central Lab for Chemical Analysis ZLCA (GEOMAR) for technical assistance; and Marco Scotti (GEOMAR) for modelling advices. P.B. is the honorary member of the UIF (Institut Universitaire de France).

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement № 101065960 (A.V.G.). Additionally: this project had the support of national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I. P. (FCT-Portugal), under the projects UIDB/04292/2020, UIDP/04292/2020, granted to MARE, and LA/P/0069/2020, granted to the Associate Laboratory ARNET (J.C.X., F.R.C. and J.P.Q.); J.C.X. was supported by FCT; F.R.C. was supported by the transitory norm contract DL57/2016 (DL57/2016/CP1370/CT90) from FCT and the European Social Fund, POPH, EU; J.P.Q. was supported by FCT PhD Scholarship co-financed by FSE under the grant SFRH/BD/144320/2019; C.J.S was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project number 445549720); and H.J.H. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under the grant HO 5569/2–1 and by Helmholtz POF IV.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: A.V.G., J.C.X. and H.J.H.; Formal analysis: A.V.G., F.R.C., J.P.Q., P.B. and A.M.L.; Funding acquisition: A.V.G., J.C.X., F.R.C., J.P.Q., C.J.S. and H.J.H.; Investigation: A.V.G., F.R.C., J.P.Q., P.B., G.G. and A.M.L.; Methodology: A.V.G., J.C.X., P.B., C.J.S. and H.J.H.; Resources: A.V.G., J.C.X., P.B., B.C., G.G. and H.J.H.; Visualization: A.V.G. and R.M.S.; Writing – original draft: A.V.G., J.C.X., F.R.C., J.P.Q., P.B. and H.J.H.; Writing – review & editing: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexey V. Golikov.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golikov, A.V., Xavier, J.C., Ceia, F.R. et al. Insights on long-term ecosystem changes from stable isotopes in historical squid beaks. BMC Ecol Evo 24, 90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02274-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02274-7

Keywords