Skip to main content
Download PDF

The mite Acarus farris inducing defensive behaviors and reducing fitness of termite Coptotermes formosanus: implications for phoresy as a precursor to parasitism

BMC Ecology and Evolution volume 22, Article number: 80 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The ecology and evolution of phoretic mites and termites have not been well studied. In particular, it is unknown whether the specific relationship between mites and termites is commensal or parasitic. High phoretic mite densities have often been found to occur in weak termite colonies, suggesting that the relationship is closer to that of parasitism than commensalism.

Results

To examine this, Coptotermes formosanus was used as a carrier, and Acarus farris as the phoretic mite. We used video recordings to observe termite social immunity behaviors and bioassay to examine termite fitness. Our results showed that the attachment of the mite on the termite can enhance termite social immunity behaviors like alarm vibration and grooming frequency while decreasing the duration of individual grooming episodes in phoretic mites. Further, A. farris phoresy led to a 22.91% reduction in termite abdomen volume and a 3.31-fold increase in termite mortality.

Conclusions

When termites groom more frequently, the consequence is short duration of grooming bouts. This may be indicative of a trade-off which provides suggestive evidence that frequent social behaviors may cost termites energy. And this caused phoretic behavior hastened termites’ death, and helped propagate the population of mites feeding on dead termites. So, it provides a case for phoresy being a precursor to parasitism, and the specific relationship between A. farris and C. formosanus is closer to parasitism than to commensalism.

Background

Phoresy, or phoresis, is an interaction in which a phoretic organism (or phoront) attaches itself to a host organism for the purpose of travel [40]. Phoresy is a common form of dispersal behavior throughout Arthropoda [11, 14], for instance, many species of mites disperse by phoresy on social insects like ants, honeybees, and termites [5, 9, 18, 19, 26, 35, 39]. While phoresy is generally recognized to be a commensal interaction in which a phoretic animal is in an inactive/non-feeding stage and thereby does not negatively impact the host [8, 31], recent research has suggested that phoresy can be considered an intermediate precursor to the evolution of parasitism in arthropods [14, 40]. Consequently, this relationship has been viewed as more complex. Existing studies have focused on relationships between mites and honeybees, while there have been few studies on the relationships between phoretic mites and other social insects, or more specifically the evolution of these relationships [25].

Many termite species are pests, destroying houses and wooden structures [12, 34, 38], often living in densely populated colonies in high-humidity habitats [24, 27]. Limited studies on the relationships between mites and termites have been conducted, with most of them being observational in nature [5, 10, 13, 26, 39]. The ecology and evolution of phoretic mites and termites have not been well studied, and it is not known whether the specific relationship between mites and termites is commensal or parasitic in nature. High densities of phoretic mites have often been observed in weak termite colonies and their presence is typically characterized by individuals of the host species exhibiting reduced body weight and a flatter abdomen [30, 39]. Consequently, it is assumed that the relationship in these instances was closer to parasitism than to commensalism.

To investigate the nature of the interspecies relationship between termites and mites, this study observed Coptotermes formosanus, a highly destructive termite extant in China, Japan, and the USA, and a representative carrier of social insect mite Acarus farris. A. farris cause no direct damage to their carrier as the mouthpart is degenerate in the phoretic stage, making it a purely phoretic mite. While A. farris is known to be dispersed by the termite Reticulitermes flavipes [26], this study represents the first report of A. farris dispersal by C. formosanus. We aimed to explore whether the interspecies relationship between termites and mites was closer to parasitism than previously assumed. Termites’ social immunity behaviors respond to the presence of some parasites, as they do some pathogens [1, 37, 42]. Using investigations of phoresy based both in the field and laboratory, we observed termites’ social immunity behaviors in the form of grooming and vibration alarm behaviors and fitness costs in terms of abdomen volume and mortality.

Results

Termite grooming behavior

Mite phoresy was significantly associated with termite grooming frequency (χ2 = 42.10, p < 0.001) and the duration of each grooming episode (χ2 = 20.22, p < 0.001).

Termite grooming frequency in the high phoresy group was significantly higher than in the non-phoresy (z = 4.19, p < 0.001) and low phoresy (z = 6.11, p < 0.001) groups, by factors of 1.60 and 2.13, respectively. There were no significant differences between the low phoresy and non-phoresy groups (z = 2.09, p = 0.09) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean (\(\pm\) standard error) grooming frequency and grooming episode duration of termites in different mite phoretic conditions. Capital letters above bars indicate significant differences between phoretic treatments (Tukey’s HSD test p < 0.05)

Full size image

The high phoresy group exhibited significantly shorter duration grooming episodes than did the non-phoresy group (t = − 4.35, p < 0.001) by 40.26%. There were no significant differences between the high phoresy and low phoresy (t = − 2.09, p = 0.10), or low phoresy and non-phoresy (t = − 1.59, p = 0.25) groups (Fig. 1).

Termite vibration behavior

Mite phoresy was significantly associated with termite vibration alarm frequency (χ2 = 89.05, p < 0.001). Termite vibration alarm frequencies in high (z = 7.54, p < 0.001) and low (z = 9.37, p < 0.001) phoresy groups were significantly higher than in the non-phoresy group, by factors of 2.36 and 2.83, respectively. There was no significant difference between the high and low phoresy groups (z = 2.15, p = 0.079) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean (\(\pm\) standard error) vibration frequency of termites in different mite phoretic conditions. Capital letters above bars indicate significant differences between phoretic treatments (Tukey’s HSD test p < 0.05)

Full size image

Termite abdomen volume and mortality

Worker abdomen volume was significantly associated with phoresy group (χ2 = 42.68, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Compared with the control group (2.27 ± 0.07 mm3), the average worker abdomen volume in the phoresy group (1.75 ± 0.04 mm3) was 22.91% lower.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mean (\(\pm\) standard error) worker abdomen volume and mortality. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (α = 5%)

Full size image

Worker mortality was significantly associated with phoresy group (χ2 = 24.64, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Compared with the control group (6.98 ± 1.74%), the mortality of the phoresy group (23.08 ± 2.61%) increased by a factor of 3.31.

Mite phoresy in the field and laboratory

In the field, the phoresy proportion was significantly associated with termite caste (χ2 = 85.56, p < 0.001). The phoresy proportion in soldiers (0.39 ± 0.08) was significantly higher than in workers (0.06 ± 0.02) by a factor of 7.09 (z = 9.25, p < 0.001). The phoresy number was not significantly affected by termite caste (χ2 = 2.65, p = 0.10) (Fig. 4), and was 1.25 ± 0.24 in workers, and 1.72 ± 0.16 in soldiers.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mean (\(\pm\) standard error) phoresy proportion and number in C. formosanus in the field. Asterisks indicate a significant difference; ns indicates non-significance (α = 5%)

Full size image

In laboratory, the phoresy proportion was significantly affected by termite caste (χ2 = 23.92, p < 0.001), while not significantly affected by soldier proportion (χ2 = 0.39, p = 0.53). The interaction between termite caste and soldier proportion was also non-significant (χ2 = 0.17, p = 0.68). The phoresy proportion in soldiers (0.60 ± 0.08) was significantly higher than in workers (0.35 ± 0.06) by a factor of 7.09 (z = 3.36, p < 0.001). The phoresy number was not significantly affected by termite caste (χ2 = 0.58, p = 0.45), soldier proportion (χ2 = 0.09, p = 0.76) and the interaction was also non-significant (χ2 = 0.07, p = 0.80) (Fig. 5). The number of phoretic mites was 1.59 ± 0.15 on workers in the low-soldier condition, 1.67 ± 0.15 on workers in the high-soldier condition, 1.52 ± 0.22 on soldiers in the low-soldier condition, and 1.51 ± 0.16 on soldiers in the high-soldier condition.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Mean (\(\pm\) standard error) phoresy proportion and number in C. formosanus in the laboratory. Asterisks indicate a significant difference; ns indicates non-significance (α = 5%)

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, the social immunity behaviors of C. formosanus were enhanced when they were acting as hosts to A. farris. Termite grooming and vibration frequency were increased in the higher phoresy group. Termite vibration and grooming behaviors play a key role in social immunity. When termites are exposed to pathogens, they show distinct alarm behaviors, typically consisting of 2–7 s bursts of a rapid longitudinal vibration [6, 26, 33]. Following this, other termites approach and groom exposed nestmates to remove the pathogens from their bodies [42]. Changes in termite social immunity behaviors suggest that termites can recognize their phoretic status and use behavioral responses to remove mites and alert nestmates through high grooming and vibration frequency. The enhanced defensive behaviors were not an immediate state but an ongoing behavior, so we recorded termite behavior after 1 day. And the frequencies of their defensive behaviors were always high. It means the mite attached on termite very tightly and are difficult to remove, so it might not cost much time for the duration of each grooming episode. So, the frequency was increased, while the duration of each groom was decreased.

Phoretic mites show a preference for certain host attachment sites [3, 28, 32]. In the present study, there were only 1–2 mites attached to each termite (Figs. 4, 5.). Further supplementary research (Additional file 1: methods and results) found almost all A. farris attached to the head of the termite (Additional file 1: Table S1; Fig S1), and this phenomenon has also been observed among some Acaridae species and termites [39]. The head of C. formosanus is therefore considered a suitable site for A. farris attachment, and consequently, there is a limited amount of space available for mites to attach to. Differences in head shapes and microstructures between termite castes may lead to mites developing a preference for attaching to specific castes. Soldier termites, with drop-shaped, shiny, harder heads, may be more conducive to mite attachment, as mites are less likely to become dislodged during travel through various environments. Conversely, the oval-ellipsoidal shape and relatively soft texture of a worker’s head may limit the tightness with which mites can attach to the termite, causing them to be more easily removed (Additional file 1: Figs. S2, S3). This may explain the higher phoresy proportion in soldiers than workers (Figs. 4, 5). Further, workers feed themselves, while soldiers are fed by worker trophallaxis, potentially providing mites that attach to soldiers more opportunities for subsequently moving onto other termites.

Phoretic mites in the Acaridae hypopode stage are not generally believed to cause direct damage to the carrier, as their mouthparts are degenerate [15, 22, 29]. The mouthpart of the mite used in the present study is degenerate, and therefore the mite cannot feed on live C. formosanus. When frequency increases, duration decreases. This may be indicative of a trade-off, and hence a cost to grooming, i.e., grooming is costly so can only do it in short spurts, and when termites groom more frequently, the consequence is short duration of grooming bouts. Consequently, frequent social immunity behavior may cost higher energy and reduce termite fitness and hasten death. Thompson et al. [37] found termite social contact to be enhanced during exposure to stress, and energy loss was compensated by increasing trophallaxis after removing the stressor. In the present research, the enhanced defensive behaviors were not an immediate state but an ongoing behavior, so we recorded termite behavior after 1 day. And the frequencies of their defensive behaviors were always high. So, termites were under sustained stress, significantly increasing fitness costs may be one of many possible hypotheses and the flat abdomen of termites also provide evidence. The relationship between A. farris and C. formosanus was, therefore, closer to parasitism than to commensalism, suggestive of the phoretic mite being an intermediate precursor to the evolution of parasitism.

These findings provide direct evidence that mites reduced termite fitness. The findings of previous studies have also reported termite behavior to have been affected by mites, typically with negative effects on termites. Korb and Fuchs [20] reported that individuals were less active in termite colonies where mites were present. In a study by Phillipsen and Coppel [30], the hypopus of Acotyledon formosani was found to impede C. formosanus feeding. Wang et al. [39] found no significant increase in Reticulitermes flavipes mortality associated with phoresy by the mite Australhypopus sp., and the mite was not deemed to be a good candidate for the biological control of termites. The methodology used differed from the present study in several ways. Wang et al. [39] used feeding-stage mites, as opposed to hypopus-stage mites, so the effect observed was not phoretic. Further, while they did not report a significant increase in mortality, they observed that high mite densities occurred in weak termite colonies and that the termites exhibited lower body weights and flatter abdomens. As such, it could be inferred that high mite densities weaken termite colonies. The phoretic mite differs from predatory or typically parasitic organisms in that it indirectly disturbs the termites by attaching itself to their surface. Once the termite dies, the A. farris hypopus soon transforms into a tritonymph, a trophic developmental stage, and feeds on the body of the dead termite. Consequently, some mite species may be effective as indirect biological agents to control termite populations.

The present study found that in the field, A. farris was commonly attached to C. formosanus. In the laboratory, the phenomenon was more clearly observable, with phoresy proportions of 34.81% observed in workers and 60.41% in soldiers. Releasing mites into termite colonies has significant negative effects on termites. Chouvenc et al. [7] suggested that attempting the biological control of termites based only on small-scale laboratory experiments was unrealistically optimistic. However, the biological control agents they referred to were fungi and nematodes, which can be groomed away. The nature of mites is different from that of fungi and nematodes, having a greater potential to control termites as it cannot so easily be groomed away, therefore ensuring that it can bypass the social immunity defenses of termites. Further, A. farris can easily be propagated by being fed on cheese, stored rice, and wheat [16, 17, 23, 36], and so could potentially be mass-produced. As such, A. farris could provide a useful biological agent for the control of termite populations in specific circumstances such as the protection of ancient buildings and celebrated trees. Further research is necessary to determine its effectiveness and explore how to apply this technique in the field.

Conclusions

Observations have shown the relationship between A. farris and C. formosanus to be closer to parasitism than to commensalism. Frequent social immunity behaviors reduced termites’ fitness and enhanced mite populations by providing a food source in the form of dead termites. These energetic costs associated with the presence of A. farris are evidence for phoresy being a precursor to parasitism. Further, the use of A. farris in populations of C. formosanus has the potential to be an effective biological agent in the control of C. formosanus colonies to prevent building damage.

Materials and methods

Mite and termite collection and rearing

The colony of C. formosanus studied had no naturally occurring phoretic mites, was collected using a lure collection device from the South China University of Technology in Guangzhou, China, and was fed on pine. A. farris mites were collected from a separate C. formosanus colony with phoretic mites, from the South China University of Technology in Guangzhou, China. The presence of dead termites promotes the formation of enormous mite populations. As such, mites were propagated by mixing dead termites (that had been killed by freezing) with healthy termites [39]. Stock colonies of both species were maintained in a greenhouse (temperature 26 ± 1 ℃, 70–80% relative humidity, and a 0 h light/24 h dark photoperiod).

Termite behavior

To explore termite behavioral responses to phoretic mites, 64 workers were placed into a box containing mites to provide sufficient opportunity for mites to attach themselves to the termites (at a rate of approximately three mites per termite). Control termites comprised 128 workers without mites. Observations were conducted on combinations of host and control termites in 16 replications of each of 3 phoresy conditions: (1) a high phoresy group comprising 3 termites carrying mites and one termite not carrying mites; (2) a low phoresy group comprising one termite carrying mites and 3 termites not carrying mites, and (3) non-phoresy group comprising 4 termites not carrying mites. Each group of 4 termites was placed into a separate 5.5 cm diameter Petri dish padded with a piece of wet filter paper. To observe ongoing behavior, a video camera was used to record termite behavior for 20 min, after 1 day. The grooming frequency, duration of each grooming episode, and vibration (2–7-s bursts of rapid longitudinal oscillatory movement, the grooming and vibration video can be viewed in Additional file 2) frequency of each termite were counted and recorded.

Termite fitness

To determine the effect of phoresy on termite fitness, two phoresy conditions were compared: (1) a phoresy group comprising 1 soldier and 19 workers carrying mites (using the method described in 2.2), and (2) a control group comprising 1 soldier and 19 workers which were not carrying mites. Each group of termites was kept on wet filter paper in a 15 cm diameter Petri dish. There were 10 replications of each group. After 2 weeks, we counted the number of deceased termites and selected 5 workers randomly that were still alive from each dish. A stereomicroscope (Leica S9i) with bundled software (Leica X) was used to measure termite abdomen length (L) and height (W). Using the ellipsoid volume formula (V = π*L*W2/6, [2], the termite abdomen volume was obtained as an estimate of body size.

Phoretic mites in the field and laboratory

To explore the presence of mites in field colonies, 6 colonies were investigated in the fall of 2019, in Guangzhou, China. The phoresy proportion was measured using a binary variable to represent whether there was (a value of 1) or was not (a value of 0) a phoretic mite on each termite. The phoresy number represented the number of phoretic mites on each termite. This procedure was conducted for 40 soldiers and 60 workers from each colony.

As soldiers are not naturally numerous in wild colonies, soldier numbers were increased in the laboratory setting. To control for the effect of this increased proportion of soldiers, we compared the effect in laboratory colonies with two different soldier levels: (1) a low soldier group comprising 5 soldiers and 20 workers, and (2) a high soldier group comprising 10 soldiers and 20 workers. To recreate the conditions in the field, 5.0 g soil was placed in 5.5 cm diameter Petri dishes lined with wet filter paper. We placed 2 mites per termite (i.e., 50 mites in the low soldier group and 60 mites in the high soldier group) into each Petri dish. After 1 day, termites were transferred to the dishes. After 7 further days, the phoresy proportion and number in each dish were recorded. There were 10 replications of each group.

Data analysis

A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to investigate the phoresy number (Poisson error structure, log link function) and phoresy proportion (binomial error structure, log link function) in the field and the laboratory, with colonies used as random intercepts in the field and repeats used as random intercepts in the laboratory. The duration of each grooming episode was investigated using a general linear mixed-effects model, with group replications as random intercepts. Grooming frequency and vibration alarm frequency were investigated using generalized linear models (Poisson error structure, log link function). Termite mortality was investigated using a further generalized linear model (binomial error structure, log link function). Finally, termite abdomen volume was investigated using a general linear model, with the individual termites in each dish used as random intercepts. The R package lme4 was used to construct the mixed-effected models [4]. Visual inspection of residual plots did not reveal any obvious deviations from homoscedasticity or normality. After detecting a significant effect, the Tukey posthoc comparison procedure was used to make pairwise comparisons between treatments using the emmeans R package [21]. All data analyzes were conducted using R 4.0.2 statistical software (R Development Core Team, 2020), and figures were created using the R package ggplot2 [41].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Aguero CM, Eyer P-A, Martin JS, Bulmer MS, Vargo EL. Natural variation in colony inbreeding does not influence susceptibility to a fungal pathogen in a termite. Ecol Evol. 2021;11:3072–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson WD. A comparison of the reproductive strategies of domestic species of Drosophila. J Anim Ecol. 1979;48:53–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/4099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajerlein D, Błoszyk J. Phoresy of Uropoda orbicularis (Acari: Mesostigmata) by beetles (Coleoptera) associated with cattle dung in Poland. Eur J Entomol. 2004;101:185–8. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2004.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22747-4_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumann J, Ferragut F. Description and observations on morphology and biology of Imparipes clementis sp. nov, a new termite associated scutacarid mite species (Acari, Heterostigmatina: Scutacaridae; Insecta, Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Syst Appl Acarol UK. 2019;24:303–23. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.2.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulmer MS, Franco BA, Fields EG. Subterranean termite social alarm and hygienic responses to fungal pathogens. Insects. 2019;10:240. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10080240.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chouvenc T, Su NY, Grace JK. Fifty years of attempted biological control of termites—analysis of a failure. Biol Control. 2011;59:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.06.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clausen CP. Phoresy among entomophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1976;21:343–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.21.010176.002015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eickwort GC. Associations of mites with social insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1990;35:469–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.002345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ermilov SG, Hugo-Coetzee EA, Khaustov AA. Oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida) inhabiting nests of the termite Trinervitermes trinervoides (Sjöstedt) in the Franklin Game Reserve (Bloemfontein, South Africa), with description of a new species of the genus Ceratobates (Tegoribatidae). Syst Appl Acarol UK. 2017;22:1715–32. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.22.10.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farish DJ, Axtell RC. Phoresy redefined and examined in Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acarina: Macrochelidae). Acarologia. 1971;13:16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grace JK, Woodrow RJ, Yates JR. Distribution and management of termites in Hawaii. Sociobiology. 2002;40:87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halliday RB. New taxa of mites associated with Australian termites (Acari: Mesostigmata). Int J Acarol. 2006;32:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950608684440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Holte AE, Houck MA, Collie NL. Potential role of parasitism in the evolution of mutualism in astigmatid mites: Hemisarcoptes cooremani as a model. Exp Appl Acarol. 2001;25:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010655610575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong XY. Agricultural acarology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press; 2012. p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ismael SR, Pedro C. Effect of temperature on reproductive parameters and the longevity of Acarus farris (Acari: Acaridae). J Stored Prod Res. 2007;43:578–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2007.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ismael SR, Pedro C. Chemical and physical methods for the control of the mite Acarus farris on Cabrales cheese. J Stored Prod Res. 2009;45:61–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2008.09.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khaustov AA, Tolstikov AV. The diversity, mite communities, and host specificity of pygmephoroid mites (Acari: Pygmephoroidea) associated with ants in Western Siberia, Russia. Acarina. 2016;24:113–36. https://doi.org/10.21684/0132-8077-2016-24-2-113-136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirrane MJ, de Guzman LI, Rinderer TE, Frake AM, Wagnitz J, Whelan PM. Age and reproductive status of adult Varroa mites affect grooming success of honey bees. Exp Appl Acarol. 2012;58:423–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-012-9591-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Korb J, Fuchs A. Termites and mites-adaptive behavioural responses to infestation. Behaviour. 2006;143:891–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenth R. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means. R Package Version 1.2.3. 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.

  22. Li CP, Shen ZP. Introduction to Chinese mites. Beijing: Science Press; 2016a. p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li CP, Shen ZP. Introduction to Chinese mites. Beijing: Science Press; 2016b. p. 179–81.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lindquist EE. Associations between mites and other arthropods in forest floor habitats. Can Entomol. 1975;107(4):425–37. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent107425-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu S, Li J, Guo K, Qiao H, Xu R, Chen J, Xu C, Chen J. Seasonal phoresy as an overwintering strategy of a phytophagous mite. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25483. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Myles TG. Observations on mites (Acari) associated with the eastern subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes (Isoptera: rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology. 2002;40(2):277–80.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Okabe K. Ecological characteristics of insects that affect symbiontic relationships with mites. Entomol Sci. 2013;16(4):363–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Okabe K, Makino S. Life cycle and sexual mode adaptations of the parasitic mite Ensliniella parasitica (Acari: Winterschmidtiidae) to its host, the eumenine wasp Allodynerus delphinalis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Can J Zool. 2008;86:470–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z08-022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peter C. A note on the mites associated with the red palm weevil, Rhyncophorus ferrugineus Oliv. in Tamil Nadu. J Insect Sci. 1989;2:160–1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Phillipsen WJ, Coppel HC. Acotyledon formosani sp. N. associated with the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Acarina: Acaridae-Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc. 1977;50:399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Poinar GO, Curcic BPM, Cokendolpher JC. Arthropod phoresy involving Pseudoscorpions in the past and present. Acta Arachnol. 1998;47:79–96. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.47.79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rocha SL, Pozo-Velázquez E, Faroni LRD, Guedes RNC. Phoretic load of the parasitic mite Acarophenax lacunatus (Cross & Krantz) (Prostigmata: Acarophenacidae) affecting mobility and flight take-off of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). J Stored Prod Res. 2009;45:267–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2009.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosengaus RB, Jordan C, Lefebvre ML, Traniello JFA. Pathogen alarm behavior in a termite: a new form of communication in social insects. Naturwissenschaften. 1999;86:544–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rust MK, Su NY. Managing social insects of urban importance. Annu Rev Entomol. 2012;57:355–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100634.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sobhi M, Hajiqanbar H, Mortazavi A. Two new myrmecophilous species of the genus Scutacarus (Acari: Prostigmata: Scutacaridae) with world keys to related species groups. Entomol Sci. 2017;20:292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tao N, Guo JJ, Li CP. Acarus farris hypopus found in stored wheat. Chin J Schisto Control. 2017;29:778–9. https://doi.org/10.16250/j.32.1374.2017011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson FJ, Hunt KL, Wright K, Rosengaus RB, Cole EL, Birch G, Avery LM, Michael AC. Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite. Biol Lett. 2020;16:20200131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0131.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Vargo EL, Husseneder C, Grace JK. Colony and population genetic structure of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus, in Japan. Mol Ecol. 2003;12:2599–608. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01938.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang C, Powell JE, O’Connor BM. Mites and nematodes associated with three subterranean termite species (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Fla Entomol. 2002;85:499–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/3496259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. White PS, Morran L, de Phoresy RJ. Curr Biol. 2017;27:R578–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York. 2016. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.

  42. Yanagawa A, Fujiwara-Tsujii N, Akino T, Yoshimura T, Yanagawa T, Shimizu S. Odor aversion and pathogen-removal efficiency in grooming behavior of the termite Coptotermes formosanus. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Xiaofeng Xue (Nanjing Agriculture University) for identifying the mite species, Xiaoduan Fang (Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences) for providing biological information of mite propagation, and all the reviewers and editors who participated in the review.

Funding

This research was funded by GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development (2020GDASYL-20200103091), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (202102021018) and the Science and Technology Planning Key Project of Guangzhou (201904020002). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Haizhu District, 105 Xingangxi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Yong Chen, Lijun Zhang, Shijun Zhang, Bingrong Liu, Wenhui Zeng & Zhiqiang Li

  2. Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China

    Lijun Zhang

Authors
  1. Yong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lijun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shijun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bingrong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenhui Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhiqiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YC, WZ and ZL designed experiments. YC, LZ and SZ preformed experiments. YC and BL analyzed data and made the figures. YC, WZ and ZL wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenhui Zeng or Zhiqiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Table S1. Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chi-square tests). Fig S1. Mean (±SE) phoresy proportion in different part of C. formosanus. Fig S2. Mean (±SE) proportion and number of phoresy on two castes of C. formosanus. Fig S3. Location of A. farris attachment on the head of two C. formosanus castes (left: soldier; right: worker; red arrow: mite).

Additional file 2: Video of vibration and grooming of termites.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, S. et al. The mite Acarus farris inducing defensive behaviors and reducing fitness of termite Coptotermes formosanus: implications for phoresy as a precursor to parasitism. BMC Ecol Evo 22, 80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02036-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02036-3

Keywords

  • Astigmata
  • Isoptera
  • Interspecific relationship
  • Phoresy
  • Parasitism

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us