Skip to main content
Download PDF

Urinary creatinine varies with microenvironment and sex in hibernating Greater Horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in Korea

BMC Ecology and Evolution volume 21, Article number: 77 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In temperate regions many small mammals including bats hibernate during winter. During hibernation these small mammals occasionally wake up (arouse) to restore electrolyte and water balance. However, field data on water stress and concentration of bodily fluids during hibernation is scarce. Urinary creatinine concentration has long been used to calibrate urinary hormone concentration due to its close correlation with urine concentration. Therefore, by investigating urinary creatinine concentration, we can estimate bodily fluid concentration. In this study, we investigated changes in urinary creatinine from greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) hibernating in abandoned mineshafts in two regions in South Korea.

Results

We collected 74 urine samples from hibernating greater horseshoe bats from 2018 to 2019. We found that urinary creatinine concentration was higher in February and March and then declined in April. There were also indications of a sex difference in the pattern of change in creatinine concentration over the three months. Bats in the warmer and less humid mineshaft had higher urinary creatinine concentrations than bats in the colder and more humid mineshaft.

Conclusions

These results indicate that hibernating bats face water stress as urinary concentration increases during winter and that water stress may vary depending on the microenvironment. Sex differences in behaviour during hibernation may influence arousal frequency and result in sex differences in changes in urinary creatinine concentration as hibernation progresses. Although further behavioural and endocrinal investigations are needed, our study suggests that urinary creatinine concentration can be used as a proxy to estimate the hydration status of bats and the effect of sex and environmental factors on arousal patterns during hibernation.

Background

Many small mammals in the temperate zone hibernate during winter [1], which enables them to overcome the energetic bottleneck caused by scarcity of food items and freezing temperatures. However, hibernation is also challenging for small mammals in that they have to rely mostly on stored body fat or cached food to survive the winter [2]. In addition to the limited availability of nutrients, small mammals must manage the water balance of their body fluids to survive through hibernation [3, 4]. As metabolic water alone is not sufficient for rehydration for small mammals, including bats, they adopt various strategies to maintain proper hydration status. For example, thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus) reduce serum osmolality and suppress thirst, which helps them to maintain body fluid water balance during several months of hibernation [5]. Some bat species may form large clusters during hibernation to reduce evaporative water loss, and may also arouse to drink water inside or outside the hibernaculum [6,7,8]. Some bat species also feed on insects during winter, which will increase metabolic water formation and aid rehydration [9,10,11,12].

Small mammals also adopt various strategies to reduce evaporative water loss and energy expenditure [13, 14]. Among them, bats can provide a unique perspectives and information to the field of hibernation research [15, 16]. Their ability to fly allows bats to move between hibernacula, and can more freely select one with low ambient temperature (TA) and high relative humidity (RH) [17, 18], although such hibernacula are likely to be limited [19, 20]. Microclimatic constraints of a hibernaculum can be also counterbalanced by behavioural strategies, such as drinking and huddling so that sub-optimum hibernacula can be used for hibernation [7, 8]. As a result, the same bat species in different regions may differ in activity patterns and physiological parameters during hibernation depending upon the microclimate of the hibernaculum and the climate outside. Hibernating bats may also differ in activity patterns in relation to their sex and body condition (amount of fat storage). For example, male bats with more fat storage may engage in more mating activities during hibernation, which will cause shorter torpor bouts for those males [21]. Females may adjust torpor and arousal duration to save energy for foetal development after hibernation [22]. These differences in reproductive strategies between sexes may also result in individual variations in physiological parameters of hibernating bats.

Urine analysis has been used to estimate physiological conditions non-invasively, e.g., renal function and hormonal changes in primates [23]. Urinary creatinine is a by-product of metabolism and excreted through urine consistently [24]. Its concentration correlates with urine concentration, thus it has long been used to calibrate concentration of hormones and other components in urine [25]. High correlation between urinary creatinine and specific gravities has also been confirmed in flying foxes [26]. It is also known that urine concentration is correlated with blood concentration, probably reflecting the hydration status of bats [27]. Therefore, by investigating the urinary creatinine concentration, we can estimate urine concentration, and hydration status of hibernating bats [28]. Creatinine measurement is also cost-effective and requires only a small volume of urine (less than 10ul), which is crucial in the case of small insectivorous bats, as they expel only a small volume of urine (less than 40ul [28]). However, despite such advantages, creatinine measurement has rarely been applied in studies of bats, apart from flying foxes.

In this study, we analysed urinary creatinine in hibernating greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in South Korea to investigate urine concentration as an indicator of water stress during hibernation. We hypothesized that urinary creatinine concentration may vary in relation to hibernaculum environment and sex. If individual bats become dehydrated during torpor, they need to intake water by drinking or by renal water reabsorption. As drinking requires body movement, including flight, which increases energy expenditure, renal water reabsorption restored during arousal might be an adequate strategy for rehydration during hibernation. Renal water reabsorption will result in higher concentration of urine and urinary creatinine. We therefore predict that urinary creatinine concentration will be higher during winter than spring. In addition, water vapor pressure and other abiotic factors, such as TA and RH of the hibernaculum may result in different degree of water stress for hibernating bats. To compensate for environmentally induced water stress, hibernating greater horseshoe bats may adjust arousal frequency and/or duration. Therefore, bats in a hibernaculum with a higher TA and lower RH may have higher urinary creatinine concentration. In addition, if males and females behave differently to improve their reproductive success [22] it could result in sex differences in urine concentration because of differences in metabolic water production.

Greater horseshoe bats arouse once a week on average during hibernation in the UK [29]. This arousal may be related to the need for water or energy intake [29], movement between hibernacula [30], or mating behaviours [31, 32]. However, the reasons for arousal during hibernation have not yet been fully elucidated from a physiological perspective. This study presents a preliminary investigation into whether dehydration faced by hibernating bats can be traced through urinary creatinine concentrations. We predicted that greater horseshoe bats would face dehydration that causes higher urinary creatinine concentration during hibernation, as in other hibernating bats [3, 7]. We also predicted that the creatinine concentration would decrease in early spring because of decreasing torpor bout lengths alongside increases in ambient temperature [29]. If microenvironment or sex differences caused difference in energy expenditure or drinking frequency, creatinine concentration might vary between different hibernacula or between sexes.

Results

To investigate the effect of microenvironment variations of mineshafts, we compared daily mean TA and RH (measured hourly and averaged daily) in the two mineshafts in Anseong (A1) and Hampyeong (H1), (Fig. 1). Bats in A1 used hibernation locations between around 50 and 150 m in from the entrance. However, in H1 most bats hibernated at the point furthest from the entrance (ca. 30 m). Since TA and RH data were only available for January to April 18 2019, we could not compared TA and RH for 2018. The mean TA from January 1 to April 18, 2019 was 3.9 ± 2.0℃ (0.6 to 8.1℃) in A1 and 5.6 ± 3.4℃ (-3.3 to 10.5℃) in H1 (Fig. 2). The mean RH was 87.0 ± 4.0 % (78.9 to 94.5 %) for A1 and 82.3 ± 10.9 % (55.2 to 97.0 %) for H1 (Fig. 2). TA was higher in H1 than A1 (paired t-test; t = 9.00, p < 0.001), and RH was higher in A1 than H1 (paired t-test; t = 6.40, p < 0.001). A Levene’s test confirmed greater variance of TA (F1,214 = 18.48, p < 0.001) and RH (F1,214 = 60.51, p < 0.001) in H1 than A1 (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sampling locations in South Korea. The distance between mineshaft A1 (Anseong) and mineshaft H1 (Hampyeong) is around 210 km. Maps were extracted from google maps

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean daily TA and mean daily RH in the two mineshafts, A1 and H1. Error bars are standard deviations

Full size image

The TA in the two mineshafts was strongly correlated (Fig. 3a), even though they are over 210 km apart. The TA was also strongly correlated at each of the weather stations nearest to the mineshafts (CA and YG, Fig. 3b). In addition, the TA at each of the mineshafts was strongly correlated with the TA at the nearest weather stations (Fig. 3c and d). These results indicate that the TA inside the two mineshafts was influenced by the outside temperature. The RH was also highly correlated between the two mineshafts, and between the two weather stations (Fig. 4a and b). However, the RH of mineshaft A1 was not correlated with the RH at the nearest weather station CA, although the RH of H1 was weakly correlated with the RH at the nearest weather station YG (Fig. 4c and d). In contrast to the TA inside the mineshafts, RH was not correlated with the outside RH. These results indicate that the RH inside the mineshaft was more independent from the air flow from outside than the TA inside the mineshaft.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between TA and correlation coefficients: a between the daily TA of two mineshafts, A1 and H1; b between the nearest weather stations, CA and YG; c between A1 and CA; d between H1 and YG

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Relationship between RH and correlation coefficients: a between the daily RH of two mineshafts, A1 and H1; b between the nearest weather stations, CA and YG; c between A1 and CA; d between H1 and YG

Full size image

In total, we collected 74 urine samples from 33 males and 41 females (Table 1). The mean urinary creatinine concentrations (± SD) during the main hibernation (Feb to Mar) and early active period (Apr) were 0.65 ± 0.32 mg/ml (N = 47) and 0.13 ± 0.06 mg/ml (N = 27) respectively. To investigate changes in urinary creatinine concentration of bats in the two mineshafts, we ran a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM – see methods for further details). This showed that creatinine concentrations from the urine collected in H1 were higher than those collected in A1 (Fig. 5; Table 2). There was no sex difference in creatinine concentration. Urinary creatinine concentration was lower in April than in February and March. Although, there was an indication of a sex difference patterns of change (interaction term in the model) in urinary creatinine between February to March, the interaction term did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 5; Table 2).

Table 1 The number of urine samples and sampling locations
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Creatinine concentrations (natural log-transformed) between mineshafts A1 (left) and H1 (right). Lines in boxes: the median, the top and bottom of boxes: the first and third quartiles, vertical lines (whiskers): the maximum (or the minimum) value within 1.5 times interquartile range above 75th (or below 25th) percentiles, dots: natural log-transformed creatinine concentration of each urine from females (circle) and males (triangle)

Full size image
Table 2 The GLMM summary results that investigated the effect of sex, month, and the two mineshafts on urinary creatinine concentration (natural log-transformed)
Full size table

Discussion

Our study is the first to report changes in urinary creatinine in wild bats in hibernacula from late winter to early spring. As expected, creatinine concentration (urine concentration) was higher during the main hibernation (Feb to Mar) than in the early active period (Apr). The higher concentration of urinary creatinine during hibernation (5-times) than spring implies that hibernating greater horseshoe bats face dehydration (water stress) that may increase renal water reabsorption. By spending longer periods in torpor, hibernating bats can reduce the energy consumption required for arousal. But as the period in torpor gets longer, cumulative evaporative water-loss will increase the concentration of bodily fluids [3]. To compensate for water loss during longer torpor periods, hibernating bats can increase renal water reabsorption during arousal, as found in marmots and ground squirrels [13, 33]. This will then result in higher urinary creatinine in torpid bats during hibernation. Therefore, higher urinary creatinine concentration in hibernating bats in the current study may reflect high body fluid concentration from evaporative water loss that might be correlated with torpor duration. In contrast, lower creatinine in April, may indicate shorter torpor durations in April that are related to feeding activities that increase with the outside temperature [29].

Previous studies on Myotis velifer demonstrated that these bats do not produce hypertonic urine even during hibernation [28, 34]. This is different from our findings for greater horseshoe bats. If hibernating bats accumulate serum creatinine from metabolism (thermogenesis) during torpor, as in ground squirrels [35] and dormice [36], the accumulated serum creatinine will be secreted to urine during arousal when glomerular filtration rate becomes normal [13]. In such cases urinary creatinine concentration in the bladder will be high, but may not be correlated with the urine concentration (osmolality). If this is the case for greater horseshoe bats, torpor bout length and metabolism during torpor will be more important determining factors for higher urinary creatinine concentration than the evaporative water loss that causes dehydration. Further investigations on serum and urinary osmolality and creatinine concentration are necessary to clarify the relation between urinary concentration and urinary creatinine concentration during hibernation.

The creatinine difference between A1 and H1 may reflect differences in the microenvironment between the two mineshafts. Although data were only available for 2019, the mean and variance of daily TA of H1 were greater than A1 (Fig. 2). In contrast, the mean daily RH was lower and the variance was greater in H1 than A1. Given that these microenvironment parameters were consistent with a previous study conducted in the same place [30], the higher creatinine concentrations in H1 might be related with higher TA and lower RH in H1 that could cause higher evaporative water loss [37]. However, we could not rule out the possibility that the higher creatinine concentrations in H1 were related to frequent or longer arousal that can result in increase of glomerular filtration rate and an increase in the accumulation of urinary creatinine in bladder [13]. In addition, as hibernating greater horseshoe bats can shift their roosting location within and between hibernacula [30, 38], the urinary creatinine differences between A1 and H1 might not result solely from microenvironment differences. Further investigation on arousal frequency and metabolic rate between the two mineshafts will elucidate the reason for the creatinine differences between the two hibernacula.

Our results suggest that the creatinine concentration decrease may start earlier in males than females, with the interaction between sex and month in the GLMM approaching significance. The tendency was similar across the year as seen in Additional file 1: Figure S3. A sex difference in urinary creatinine changes over months may be related to activity differences at the end of the hibernation period (Mar) [31, 32]. Direct and indirect evidence suggests that mating during hibernation is common in small insectivorous bats, including greater horseshoe bats [31, 39, 40]. Males can even mate with torpid females [41]. Ovulation in female greater horseshoe bats in Korea probably occurs in April [42, 43]. Therefore, males may get extra benefit if they can mate with pre-ovulating females in March. Although we did not witness spring mating, if males could mate before the females ovulate in spring, they could increase their chances of siring offspring.

Although Park et al. in 2000 [29] reported no sex difference in winter activities of greater horseshoe bats in the UK, there were indications of monthly variations in activity patterns between sexes even in their study (see Fig. 1 of their study [29]). Therefore, lower creatinine concentration for males in March in the current study may indicate more frequent or longer arousal duration of males that entails an increase in body fat metabolism, and consequent increase in metabolic water generation. In addition, males may alter their arousal frequency or duration of arousal to save energy, or to increase energy intake, depending on their body condition [29]. For example, males with less fat storage at the end of hibernation periods need to arouse to find prey items, or remain in torpor alone in a colder area to decrease metabolic rate. Further behavioural and physiological monitoring and hormonal investigations are needed to examine these possibilities.

Differences in muscle mass were unlikely to have been the cause of the sex difference in creatinine changes over the months in this study. Although females were heavier than males during late winter (Feb to Mar) in our study population [Kim, unpublished data], as has been reported in a UK population [38], no sex-specific patterns in changes of body weight in February and March were found [Kim, unpublished data]. Also, as muscle mass decreases during hibernation in bats [44], it may even counter the increase of creatinine. Therefore, it is unlikely that the earlier decrease of creatinine among males resulted from a sex difference in body muscle mass. However, to clarify this issue there needs to be further investigation into the relationship between urinary creatinine concentration and body weight during hibernation. This will also allow us to understand better the relationship between body condition and energy expenditure that may reflect a trade-off between energy saving by decreasing basal metabolism rate (BMR) and metabolic water supply by increasing BMR [22, 45].

Conclusions

The current study presents a novel methodological technique for the quantification of physiological challenges, e.g., water stress, energy expenditure and metabolic wastes, during hibernation in bats. Although the sample size was small, this study has demonstrated the feasibility of urinary monitoring as a method to trace hydration status (water-stress). This study also provided evidence of higher urinary creatinine concentration that might reflect different water stress depending on hibernaculum environment in small insectivorous bats. Although not statistically significant, the sex difference in creatinine changes between months implies a behavioural or energy expenditure difference between sexes during hibernation. Further behavioural and endocrinological investigations will clarify the effect of the sex and behaviours on urinary creatinine concentration.

Methods

Study sites and subjects

We collected urine samples from greater horseshoe bats in two regions of South Korea in 2018 and 2019 (Fig. 1). Mineshaft A1 in Anseong is about 350 m long and running water is available throughout the winter. Mineshaft H1 in Hampyeong is only about 35 m long and has no running water inside from January to February [30]. We logged the ambient temperature (TA) and relative humidity (RH) in A1 and H1 every hour from January 1 to April 18, 2019 using EL-USB-2-LCD + dataloggers (Lascar Electronics, UK). We were not able to collect TA and RH in 2018. We calculated daily mean TA and RH, by averaging TA and RH of every hour of the day. The microenvironments of the three mineshafts in Hampyeong (H1, H2 and H3) are similar during winter and bats are known to switch between them [30]. February and March were categorized as the main hibernation period (late winter) and April as the early active period (spring), as mean daily temperature reached 10 ℃ in April in the study area (Additional file 1: Figure S3) and the number of moths and their activity increase rapidly in April in South Korea [46, 47].

Urine sampling and analysis

We conducted urine sampling just once a month to minimize disturbance to the bats. The numbers of urine samples were inconsistent between months and years because of fluctuating numbers of bats in the mineshafts. Most bats in A1 were out of hand’s reach in 2019, so we could only collect six samples in February, and none in March. We tried additional sampling in H1 in March 2019 to compensate for no sampling from A1. However, this was also not successful due to the small number of bats present, so we collected additional urine samples from H2 and H3. We could not collect urine in either of the two regions in April 2019 because most of the bats were roused by our presence.

To collect urine, one researcher took a hibernating or torpid bat gently in a gloved hand and held it for up to a few minutes until they urinated. If it had not urinated after 5 min, we put it back in the place it had been taken from. We banded sampled bats with a 35mm metal ring on the forearm, but this was done only in February and April 2018 (online repository data [48]) to keep the time we spent in the hibernacula to a minimum. When they urinated, we collected their urine directly from their genitalia using a 1.5ml micro-tube. We temporarily stored urine samples in an icebox at the field sites then stored them in a -80℃ deep-freezer until analysis. The maximum storage period in the deep-freezer before urinary analysis was 7 months. We used a creatinine kit (Abcam ab204537; Jaffe reaction based [49]) to measure urinary creatinine concentration. As the amount of urine was small (usually less than 25 µl), we diluted samples 20 times with deionized water. One particularly small sample was diluted 29.5 times. Before dilution, all samples were centrifuged 6000 rpm (3381rcf) for 1 min to remove any suspended matter. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of the creatinine analysis was 5.30 % (online repository data [48]).

Statistical analysis

We investigated microenvironment variations between A1 and H1, by comparing daily mean and variance of TA and RH using a paired t-test and Levene’s test respectively. To investigate the effect of microenvironment on urine concentration we compared creatinine concentration between mineshafts and sexes over months by building a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). In the model, urinary creatinine concentration (natural log-transformed) was the response variable. Sex (males and females), month (Feb, Mar, and Apr) and location of mineshafts (A1 and H1) were the explanatory variables in the model. Year of urine collected (2018 and 2019) was included as a random variable in the model given the strong correlations between the inside temperature and outside temperature (Figs. 3 and 4). We used the “summary” function in R to further investigate the model coefficients. To calculate confidence interval, we used the “confint” function in R. Samples were considered independent as individuals were very unlikely to have been sampled twice. This is because there were hundreds of bats were present in A1 (the only site that was sampled more than once) and all bats sampled in February and April were banded (online repository data [48]).

All statistical tests and graphics were done in R 4.0.2, using “lme4 [50]”, “lmerTest [51]”, “car [52]”, “ggplot2 [53]” packages. All assumptions of the GLMM were examined by using statistical tests (Shapiro-Wilk) and visual inspections (Q-Q plot) of the error (residuals) distribution. There was no violation of the assumptions. The maximum value of generalized variance inflation factor (GVIF) was 2.14 which indicates no serious multicollinearity between independent variables.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available at Figshare online repository [48]: https://figshare.com/s/3c0301e8fb689807b76d.

Abbreviations

TA:

Ambient temperature

RH:

Relative humidity

A1:

Mineshaft 1 in Anseong

H1, H2, H3:

Mineshaft 1, 2, 3 in Hampyeong

UK:

United Kingdom

GLMM:

Generalized Linear Mixed Model

BMR:

Basal metabolism rate

References

  1. Geiser F, Hibernation. Curr Biol. 2013;23:R188–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Humphries MM, Thomas DW, Kramer DL. The role of energy availability in mammalian hibernation: a cost-benefit approach. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2003;76:165–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas DW, Cloutier D. Evaporative water loss by hibernating little brown bats, Myotis lucifugus. Physiol Zool. 1992;65:443–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas DW, Geiser F. Periodic arousals in hibernating mammals: is evaporative water loss involved? Funct Ecol. 1997;11:585–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng NY, Junkins MS, Merriman DK, Bagriantsev SN, Gracheva EO. Osmolyte depletion and thirst suppression allow hibernators to survive for months without water. Curr Biol. 2019;29:3053–8.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Speakman JR, Racey PA. Hibernal ecology of the pipistrelle bat: energy expenditure, water requirements and mass loss, implications for survival and the function of winter emergence flights. J Anim Ecol. 1989;58:797–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ben-Hamo M, Muñoz-Garcia A, Williams JB, Korine C, Pinshow B. Waking to drink: rates of evaporative water loss determine arousal frequency in hibernating bats. J Exp Biol. 2013;216:573–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boratyński JS, Willis CKR, Jefimow M, Wojciechowski MS. Huddling reduces evaporative water loss in torpid Natterer’s bats, Myotis nattereri. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2015;179:125–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Avery MI. Winter activity of Pipistrelle bats. J Anim Ecol. 1985;54:721–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitaker JO, Rissler LJ. Do bats feed in winter? Am Midl Nat. 1993;129:200–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunbar MB, Whitaker JO, Robbins LW. Winter feeding by bats in Missouri. Acta Chiropterologica. 2007;9:305–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams C, Salter L, Jones G. The winter diet of the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus hipposideros) in Britain and Ireland. Hystrix Ital J Mammal. 2010. doi:https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-22.1-4498.

  13. Jani A, Martin SL, Jain S, Keys D, Edelstein CL. Renal adaptation during hibernation. Am J Physiol-Ren Physiol. 2013;305:F1521–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohr SM, Bagriantsev SN, Gracheva EO. Cellular, molecular, and physiological adaptations of hibernation: the solution to environmental challenges. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2020;36:315–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geiser F, Stawski C. Hibernation and torpor in tropical and subtropical bats in relation to energetics, extinctions, and the evolution of endothermy. Integr Comp Biol. 2011;51:337–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Humphries MM, Thomas DW, Speakman JR. Climate-mediated energetic constraints on the distribution of hibernating mammals. Nature. 2002;418:313–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Webb PI, Speakman JR, Racey PA. How hot is a hibernaculum? A review of the temperatures at which bats hibernate. Can J Zool. 1996;74:761–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perry RW. A review of factors affecting cave climates for hibernating bats in temperate North America. Environ Rev. 2012;21:28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tuttle MD, Stevenson DD. Variation in the cave environment and its biological implications. In: Zuber R, Chester J, Gilber S, Rhodes D, editors. National cave management symposium proceedings. Albuquerque, NM: Adobe Press; 1977. p. 108–21.

  20. Klüg-Baerwald BJ, Lausen CL, Willis CKR, Brigham RM. Home is where you hang your bat: winter roost selection by prairie-living big brown bats. J Mammal. 2017;98:752–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kunz TH, Wrazen JA, Burnett CD. Changes in body mass and fat reserves in prehibernating little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Écoscience. 1998;5:8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Czenze ZJ, Jonasson KA, Willis CKR. Thrifty females, frisky males: winter energetics of hibernating bats from a cold climate. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2017;90:502–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Behringer V, Deschner T. Non-invasive monitoring of physiological markers in primates. Horm Behav. 2017;91:3–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heymsfield SB, Arteaga C, McManus C, Smith J, Moffitt S. Measurement of muscle mass in humans: validity of the 24-hour urinary creatinine method. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;37:478–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boeniger MF, Lowry LK, Rosenberg J. Interpretation of urine results used to assess chemical exposure with emphasis on creatinine adjustments: a review. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993;54:615–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McMichael LA, Edson D, Field H. Measuring physiological stress in Australian flying-fox populations. EcoHealth. 2014;11:400–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Buffenstein R, Maloney SK, Bronner GN. Seasonal and daily variation in blood and urine concentrations of free-ranging Angolan free-tailed bats (Mops condylurus) in hot roosts in southern Africa. South Afr J Zool. 1999;34:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shackelford J, Caire W. Variation in pH, volume, osmolality, and sodium and calcium levels of the urine of hibernating Myotis velifer from western Oklahoma. Southwest Nat. 1993;38:159–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Park KJ, Jones G, Ransome RD. Torpor, arousal and activity of hibernating greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). Funct Ecol. 2000;14:580–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim S-S, Choi Y-S, Yoo J-C. Regional differences in winter activity of hibernating greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) from Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2019;43:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ransome RD. Greater horseshoe bat. In: Corbet GB, Harris S, editors. The Handbook of British Mammals. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. p. 88–94.

  32. Rossiter SJ, Ransome RD, Faulkes CG, Le Comber SC, Jones G. Mate fidelity and intra-lineage polygyny in greater horseshoe bats. Nature. 2005;437:408–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zatzman M, South F. Renal function of the awake and hibernating marmot Marmota flaviventris. Am J Physiol-Leg Content. 1972;222:1035–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Caire W, Haines H, McKenna TM. Osmolality and ion concentration in urine of hibernating Myotis velifer. J Mammal. 1982;63:688–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandovici M, Henning RH, Hut RA, Strijkstra AM, Epema AH, van Goor H, et al. Differential regulation of glomerular and interstitial endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression in the kidney of hibernating ground squirrel. Nitric Oxide. 2004;11:194–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zancanaro C, Malatesta M, Mannello F, Vogel P, Fakan S. The kidney during hibernation and arousal from hibernation. A natural model of organ preservation during cold ischaemia and reperfusion. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:1982–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kurta A. The misuse of relative humidity in ecological studies of hibernating bats. Acta Chiropterologica. 2014;16:249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ransome RD. The distribution of the greater horse-shoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, during hibernation, in relation to environmental factors. J Zool. 1968;154:77–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thomas DW, Brock Fenton M, Barclay RMR. Social behavior of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1979;6:129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson JS, Lacki MJ, Thomas SC, Grider JF. Frequent arousals from winter torpor in Rafinesque’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquii). PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e49754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wai-Ping V, Fenton MB. Nonselective mating in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). J Mammal. 1988;69:641–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Oh YK, Mōri T, Uchida TA. Prolonged survival of the Graafian follicle and fertilization in the Japanese greater horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon. Reproduction. 1985;73:121–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee J-H. Vaginal plug formation and release in female hibernating Korean greater horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum korai (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) during the annual reproductive cycle. Zoomorphology. 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-019-00467-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cotton CJ. Skeletal muscle mass and composition during mammalian hibernation. J Exp Biol. 2016;219:226–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Minnaar IA, Bennett NC, Chimimba CT, McKechnie AE. Summit metabolism and metabolic expansibility in Wahlberg’s epauletted fruit bats (Epomophorus wahlbergi): seasonal acclimatisation and effects of captivity. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:1363–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Choi S-W. Effects of weather factors on the abundance and diversity of moths in a temperate deciduous mixed forest of Korea. Zoolog Sci. 2008;25:53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. An J-S, Choi S-W. The role of winter weather in the population dynamics of spring moths in the southwest Korean peninsula. J Asia-Pac Entomol. 2013;16:49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ryu H, Kinoshita K, Joo S, Kim S-S. Data from: Urinary creatinine varies with microenvironment and sex in hibernating Greater Horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in Korea. Figshare online repository. 2021. https://figshare.com/s/3c0301e8fb689807b76d. Accessed 11 Mar 2021.

  49. Taussky HH. A microcolorimetric determination of creatine in urine by the Jaffe reaction. J Biol Chem. 1954;208:853–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82:1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fox J, Weisberg S. An R companion to applied regression. 3rd ed. Thousand Oak: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2019.

  53. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. 2nd ed. 2016 . New York: Springer; 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Susan Choi, Yu-seong Choi, Seunghae Choi, and Byeori Kim for their help with sample collection and Hyeongcheol Park of NIE for helping with urine analysis. We also thank David A. Hill for comments and English corrections and Yuri Kawaguchi, Mari Nishikawa and the members of the Department of Ecology and Social behaviour of KUPRI (Japan) for their valuable comments. Lastly, we thank the two reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on how to improve our manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute of Ecology in South Korea (NIE-C-2018-02 to Kim, NIE-C-2019-02 to Kim, NIE-C-2021-38 to Kim). The funding body played no role in the design of the study, data collection, data and sample analysis, interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript. However, the research evaluation committee of the funding body evaluated the progress of the project every year with three external investigators.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, UNIST- gil 50, 44919, Eonyang-eup, Ulju, Ulsan, Republic of Korea

    Heungjin Ryu

  2. National Institute of Ecology, Geumgang-ro 1210, Maseo-myeon, 33657, Seocheon, Chungnam, Republic of Korea

    Heungjin Ryu, Sungbae Joo & Sun-Sook Kim

  3. Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, 41-2 Kanrin, 484-8506, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan

    Heungjin Ryu

  4. Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, 2-24 Tanaka-Sekiden, 606-8203, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan

    Kodzue Kinoshita

Authors
  1. Heungjin Ryu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kodzue Kinoshita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sungbae Joo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sun-Sook Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HR, KK, SK conceived and designed the study. HR, KK performed the experiments, HR, SJ, SK collected samples. HR original writing, HR, KK, SJ, SK revision and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun-Sook Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The current project was a part of the Basic Ecological Study Programs (1105-1 to Kim) that was approved by the Research Planning Review Committee of the National Institute of Ecology. We declare that we adhered to the Wildlife Protection and Management Act of Korea and Institutional Research Ethics Regulations and Guidelines. All handling and sampling permission were approved by the two local governments (Anseong 2018-1 to Kim, Hampyeong 2018-1 to Kim).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Daily ambient temperature, TA (a) and relative humidity, RH (b) of A1 and H1 in 2019. Figure S2. Ambient temperature (top) and relative humidity (bottom) at the nearest weather stations in Cheonan (CA) and Yeonggwang (YG) in 2018 and 2019. The nearest weather station to A1 (Anseong) is 17.6km away in Cheonan (N36°45’45.576” E127°17’33.071), and for H1 (Hampyeong), it is 18.2km away in Yeonggwang (N35°17’1.932” E126°28’39.071”). Temperature data were collected by the automatic weather system (AWS) managed by the Korean Government (https://data.kma.go.kr/). Figure S3. Creatinine concentrations in 2018 and 2019 (N = 74). Lines in boxes: the median, the top and bottom of boxes: the first and third quartiles, dots: creatinine concentration of each urine from females (circle) and males (triangle).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryu, H., Kinoshita, K., Joo, S. et al. Urinary creatinine varies with microenvironment and sex in hibernating Greater Horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in Korea. BMC Ecol Evo 21, 77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01802-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01802-z

Keywords

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us