Tokita M, Yano W, James HF, Abzhanov A. Cranial shape evolution in adaptive radiations of birds: comparative morphometrics of Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2017;372:20150481.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Losos JB. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles, vol. 10. Oakland: University of California Press; 2011.
Google Scholar
Klingenberg CP. Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Dev Genes Evol. 2016;226:1–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Klingenberg CP. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol Rev. 1998;73:79–123.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Klingenberg CP. Multivariate allometry. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, editors. Advances in morphometrics. Boston: Springer US; 1996. p. 23–49.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Klingenberg CP, Marugán-Lobón J. Evolutionary covariation in geometric morphometric data: analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context. Syst Biol. 2013;62:591–610.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gould S. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev. 1966;41:587–640.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gould SJ. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1977.
Google Scholar
Huxley JS, Teissier G. Terminology of relative growth. Nature. 1936;114:895–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Nelson G. Outgroups and ontogeny. Cladistics. 1985;1:29–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Cock AG. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q Rev Biol. 1966;41:131–90.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson LAB, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Diversity trends and their ontogenetic basis: an exploration of allometric disparity in rodents. Proc R Soc B. 2010;277:1227–34.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson LAB, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Evolution and phylogenetic signal of growth trajectories: the case of chelid turtles. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol). 2011;316B:50–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Adams DC, Nistri A. Ontogenetic convergence and evolution of foot morphology in European cave salamanders (family: Plethodontidae). BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:216.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hugi J, Hutchinson MN, Koyabu D, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Heterochronic shifts in the ossification sequences of surface- and subsurface-dwelling skinks are correlated with the degree of limb reduction. Zoology. 2012;115:188–98.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Esquerré D, Sherratt E, Keogh JS. Evolution of extreme ontogenetic allometric diversity and heterochrony in pythons, a clade of giant and dwarf snakes. Evolution. 2017;71:2829–44.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Klingenberg CP. There's something afoot in the evolution of ontogenies. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:221.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
West GB, Brown JH. Enquist BJ. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science. 1997;276:122–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2002.
Google Scholar
Klingenberg CP, Zimmermann M. Static, ontogenetic and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water striders. Am Nat. 1992;140:601–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Hipsley CA, Müller J. Developmental dynamics of ecomorphological convergence in a transcontinental lizard radiation. Evolution. 2017;71:936–48.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bastir M, Rosas A. Facial heights: evolutionary relevance of postnatal ontogeny for facial orientation and skull morphology in humans and chimpanzees. J Hum Evol. 2004;47:359–81.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Piras P, Colangelo P, Adams DC, Buscalioni A, Cubo J, Kotsakis T, Meloro C, Raia P. The Gavialis–Tomistoma debate: the contribution of skull ontogenetic allometry and growth trajectories to the study of crocodylian relationships. Evol Dev. 2010;12:568–79.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Urošević A, Ljubisavljević K, Ivanović A. Patterns of cranial ontogeny in lacertid lizards: morphological and allometric disparity. J Evol Biol. 2013;26:399–415.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hugall AF, Foster R, Hutchinson M, Lee MSY. Phylogeny of Australian agamid lizards based on nuclear and mitchondrial genes: implications for morphological evolution and biogeography. Biol J Linnean Soc. 2008;93:343–58.
Article
Google Scholar
Melville J, Ritchie EG, Chapple SNJ, Glor RE, Schulte JA. Evolutionary origins and diversification of dragon lizards in Australia's tropical savannas. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011;58:257–70.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Oliver PM, Hugall AF. Phylogenetic evidence for mid-Cenozoic turnover of a diverse continental biota. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1896.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fujioka T, Chappell J. History of Australian aridity: chronology in the evolution of arid landscapes. Geol Soc Spec Publ. 2010;346:121–39.
Article
Google Scholar
Melville J, Schulte JA. Larson a. a molecular phylogenetic study of ecological diversification in the Australian lizard genus Ctenophorus. J Exp Zool. 2001;291:339–53.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Powney GD, Grenyer R, Orne CDL, Owens IPF, Meiri S. Hot, dry and different: Australian lizard richness is unlike that of mammals, amphibians and birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2010;19:386–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Melville J, Harmon LJ, Losos JB. Intercontinental community convergence of ecology and morphology in desert lizards. Proc R Soc B. 2006;273:557–63.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kohlsdorf T, Grizante MB, Navas CA, Herrel A. Head shape evolution in Tropidurinae lizards: does locomotion constrain diet? J Evol Biol. 2008;21:781–90.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bell CJ, Mead JI, Swift SL. Cranial osteology of Moloch horridus (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae). Rec West Aust Mus. 2009;25:201–37.
Article
Google Scholar
Siebenrock F. Das skelett der Agamidae. Sittzungsber Akad Wiss Wien 1895;104.
Stilson KT, Bell CJ, Mead JI. Patterns of variation in the cranial osteology of three species of endemic Australian lizards (Ctenophorus: Squamata: Agamidae): implications for the fossil record and morphological analyses made with limited sample sizes. J Herpetol. 2017;51:316–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Collyer ML, Adams DC. Phenotypic trajectory analysis: comparison of shape change patterns in evolution and ecology. Hystrix. 2013;24:75–83.
Google Scholar
Collyer ML, Sekora DJ. Adams DC. A method for analysis of phenotypic change for phenotypes described by high-dimensional data. Heredity. 2015;115:357–65.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Adams DC. A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high dimensional multivariate data. Syst Biol. 2014;63:685–97.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kluge AG, Strauss RE. Ontogeny and systematics. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1985;16:247–68.
Article
Google Scholar
de Queiroz K. The ontogenetic method for determining character polarity and its relevance to phylogenetic systematics. Syst Zool. 1985;34:280–99.
Article
Google Scholar
Klingenberg CP. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:623–35.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weston EM. Evolution of ontogeny in the hippopotamus skull: using allometry to dissect developmental change. Biol J Linnean Soc. 2003;80:625–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Wilson LAB. The evolution of ontogenetic allometries in mammalian domestication. Evolution. 2018;IN PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13464.
Strelin MM, Benitez-Vieyra S, Fornoni J, Klingenberg CP, Cocucci AA. Exploring the ontogenetic scaling hypothesis during the diversification of pollination syndromes in Caiophora (Loasaceae, subfam. Loasoideae). Ann Bot. 2016;117:937–47.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Piras P, Salvi D, Ferrara G, Maiorino L, Delfino M, Pedde L, Kotsakis T. The role of post-natal ontogeny in the evolution of phenotypic diversity in Podarcis lizards. J Evol Biol. 2011;24:2705–20.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Claude J, Pritchard PCH, Tong H, Paradis E, Auffray J-C. Ecological correlates and evolutionary divergence in the skull of turtles: a geometric morphometric assessment. Syst Biol. 2004;53:933–48.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fuchs M, Geiger M, Stange M, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Growth trajectories in the cave bear and its extant relatives: an examination of ontogenetic patterns in phylogeny. BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15:239.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wilson LAB. The evolution of morphological diversity in rodents: patterns of cranial ontogeny. Doctoral Dissertation. Zurich: University of Zurich; 2010.
Frédérich B, Vandewalle P. Bipartite life cycle of coral reef fishes promotes increasing shape disparity of the head skeleton during ontogeny: an example from damselfishes (Pomacentridae). BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:82.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Herrel A, Joachim R, Vanhooydonck B, Irschick DJ. Ecological consequences of ontogenetic changes in head shape and bite performance in the Jamaican lizard Anolis lineatopus. Biol J Linnean Soc. 2006;89:443–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Hipsley CA, Rentinck M-N, Rödel M-O, Müller J. Ontogenetic allometry constrains cranial shape of the head-first burrowing worm lizard Cynisca leucura (Squamata: Amphisbaenidae). J Morphol. 2016;277:1159–67.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Marcy AE, Hadly EA, Sherratt E, Garland K, Weisbecker V. Getting a head in hard soils: convergent skull evolution and divergent allometric patterns explain shape variation in a highly diverse genus of pocket gophers (Thomomys). BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:207.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Doke D, Morey R, Dahanukar N, Padhye SM, Paripatyadar SV. Ontogenetic trajectory and allometry of Diplonychus rusticus (Fabricius), an oriental aquatic bug (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae) from the Western Ghats of India. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2017;46:297–303.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dial TR, Reznick DN, Brainerd EL. Heterochrony in the evolution of Trinidadian guppy offspring size: maturation along a uniform ontogenetic trajectory. Proc R Soc B. 2017;284. Article number 20171319.
Powder KE, Milch K, Asselin G, Albertson RC. Constraint and diversification of developmental trajectories in cichlid facial morphologies. EvoDevo. 2015;6:25.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wilson LB, Furrer H, Stockar R. Sanchez-Villagra MR. a quantitative evaluation of evolutionary patterns in opercle bone shape in Saurichthys (Actinopterygii: Saurichthyidae). Palaeontology. 2013;56:901–15.
Article
Google Scholar
Badham JA. The Amphibolurus barbatus species-group (Lacertilia: Agamidae). Aust J Zool. 1976;24:423–43.
Article
Google Scholar
Thompson G, Withers P. Size-free shape differences between male and female Western Australian dragon lizards (Agamidae). Amphibia-Reptilia. 2005;26:55–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Skyscan. NRecon. Aartselaar, Belgium. 2011.
Visualization Sciences Group. Avizo. Oregon: FEI Corporate Headquarters; 2013.
Google Scholar
Adams DC. Otárola-Castillo E. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4:393–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool. 1990;39:40–59.
Article
Google Scholar
Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Google Scholar
Adams DC, Collyer ML. A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution. 2009;63:1143–54.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson S. Swan G. a complete guide to reptiles of Australia. 4th edn. Chatswood: new Holland: Publishers; 2013.
Cogger H. Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. 7th ed. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing; 2014.
Google Scholar
Goodall C. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J Royal Stat Soc B. 1991;53:285–339.
Google Scholar
Pyron RA, Burbrink FT, Wiens JJ. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:1–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Blomberg SP, Garland TJ, Ives AR. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioural traits are more labile. Evolution. 2003;57:717–45.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Revell LJ. Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3:217–23.
Article
Google Scholar