Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine Press; 1972. p. 136–79.
Google Scholar
Reynolds JD. Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:68–72.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Andersson MB. Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1994.
Google Scholar
Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2003;270:653–64.
Article
Google Scholar
Cockburn A. Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2006;273:1375–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Ketterson ED, Nolan Jr V. Male parental behavior in birds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1994;25:601–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Davies NB. Dunnock behaviour and social evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
Google Scholar
Møller AP, Thornhill R. Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim Behav. 1998;55:1507–15.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hoelzer GA. The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav. 1980;38:1067–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Møller AP, Jennions M. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften. 2001;88:401–15.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A. Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J Theor Biol. 1999;200:97–109.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zahavi A. Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975;53:205–14.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jennions MD, Møller AP, Petrie M. Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q Rev Biol. 2001;76:3–36.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hill GE. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature. 1991;350:337–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Palokangas P, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H, Huhta E, Tolonen P, Alatalo RV. Female kestrels gain reproductive success by choosing brightly ornamented males. Anim Behav. 1994;47:443–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Nisbet ICT. Courtship-feeding, egg-size and breeding success in common terns. Nature. 1973;241:141–2.
Article
Google Scholar
Knapp RA, Kovach JT. Courtship as an honest indicator of male parental quality in the bicolor damselfish, Stegastes partitus. Behav Ecol. 1991;2:295–300.
Article
Google Scholar
Moreno J, Soler M, Møller AP, Linden M. The function of stone carrying in the black wheatear, Oenanthe leucura. Anim Behav. 1994;47:1297–309.
Article
Google Scholar
Green DJ, Krebs EA. Courtship feeding in Ospreys Pandion haliaetus: a criterion for mate assessment? Ibis. 1995;137:35–43.
Article
Google Scholar
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Book
Google Scholar
Greig-Smith PW. Song-rates and parental care by individual male stonechats (saxicola torquata). Anim Behav. 1982;30:245–52.
Article
Google Scholar
Hofstad E, Espmark Y, Moksnes A, Haugan T, Ingebrigtsen M. The relationship between song performance and male quality in snow buntings (Plectrophenax nivalis). Can J Zool. 2002;80:524–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Welling PP, Rytkönen SO, Koivula KT, Orell MI. Song rate correlates with paternal care and survival in willow tits: Advertisement of male quality? Behaviour. 1997;134:891–904.
Article
Google Scholar
Halupka K, Borowiec M. Male whitethroats, Sylvia communis, advertise their future contribution to parental care. Behaviour. 2006;143:1–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK. Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2000;267:321–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mountjoy DJ, Lemon RE. Male song complexity and parental care in the European starling. Behaviour. 1997;134:661–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Rinden H, Lampe HM, Slagsvold T, Espmark YO. Song quality does not indicate male parental abilities in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behaviour. 2000;137:809–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Dolby AS, Clarkson CE, Haas ET, Miller JK, Havens LE, Cox BK. Do song-phrase production rate and song versatility honestly communicate male parental quality in the Gray Catbird? J Field Ornithol. 2005;76:287–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Hasselquist D, Bensch S, von Schantz T. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature. 1996;381:229–32.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Nowicki S, Hasselquist D, Bensch S, Peters S. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2000;267:2419–24.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Buchanan KL, Leitner S, Spencer KA, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2004;271:2381–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Horstkotte E. Untersuchungen zur Brutbiologie und Ethologie der Nachtigall (Luscinia megarhynchos Brehm). Berichte des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Bielefeld u. Umgebung. 1965;17:67–145.
Google Scholar
Glutz von Blotzheim UN. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag; 1989.
Google Scholar
Kipper S, Mundry R, Hultsch H, Todt D. Long-term persistence of song performance rules in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): a longitudinal field study on repertoire size and composition. Behaviour. 2004;141:371–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Kipper S, Mundry R, Sommer C, Hultsch H, Todt D. Song repertoire size is correlated with body measures and arrival date in common nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). Anim Behav. 2006;71:211–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Kiefer S, Spiess A, Kipper S, Mundry R, Sommer C, Hultsch H, et al. First-year common nightingales (luscinia megarhynchos) have smaller song-type repertoire sizes than older males. Ethology. 2006;112:1217–24.
Article
Google Scholar
Weiss M, Kiefer S, Kipper S. Buzzwords in females’ ears? The use of buzz songs in the communication of nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). PLoS One. 2012;7:e45057.
Article
CAS
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M. Vocal interactions in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos: more aggressive males have higher pairing success. Anim Behav. 2006;72:25–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Naguib M, Mundry R, Hultsch H, Todt D. Responses to playback of whistle songs and normal songs in male nightingales: effects of song category, whistle pitch, and distance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2002;52:216–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Bartsch C, Hultsch H, Scharff C, Kipper S. What is the whistle all about? A study on whistle songs, related male characteristics, and female song preferences in common nightingales. 2014; accepted manuscript.
Hultsch H, Todt D. Memorization and reproduction of songs in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): evidence for package formation. J Comp Physiol A. 1989;165:197–203.
Article
Google Scholar
Hultsch H. Early experience can modify singing styles: evidence from experiments with nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim Behav. 1991;42:883–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Geberzahn N, Hultsch H, Todt D. Latent song type memories are accessible through auditory stimulation in a hand-reared songbird. Anim Behav. 2002;64:783–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Kiefer S, Sommer C, Scharff C, Kipper S, Mundry R. Tuning towards tomorrow? Common nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos change and increase their song repertoires from the first to the second breeding season. J Avian Biol. 2009;40:231–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Kiefer S, Sommer C, Scharff C, Kipper S. Singing the popular songs? Nightingales share more song types with their breeding population in their second season than in their first. Ethology. 2010;116:619–26.
Google Scholar
Weiss M. From syntax to details: Organisational principles and information encoding in the singing of nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). In: PhD thesis. Berlin: Free University of Berlin, Animal Behavior Group; 2013.
Google Scholar
Weiss M, Hultsch H, Adam I, Scharff C, Kipper S. The use of network analysis to study complex animal communication systems: a study on nightingale song. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2014;281:20140460.
Article
Google Scholar
Hultsch H. Beziehungen zwischen Struktur, zeitlicher Variabilität und sozialem Einsatz des Gesangs der Nachtigall (Luscinia megarhynchos B.). In: PhD thesis. Berlin: Free University of Berlin; 1980.
Google Scholar
Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M. Seasonal variation in dawn song characteristics in the common nightingale. Anim Behav. 2005;70:1265–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M. Acoustic features of song categories and their possible implications for communication in the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behaviour. 2005;142:1083–98.
Article
Google Scholar
Sprau P, Roth T, Schmidt R, Amrhein V, Naguib M. Communication across territory boundaries: distance-dependent responses in nightingales. Behav Ecol. 2010;21:1011–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Sprau P, Schmidt R, Roth T, Amrhein V, Naguib M. Effects of rapid broadband trills on responses to song overlapping in nightingales. Ethology. 2010;116:300–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Kokko H. Cuckoldry and the stability of biparental care. Ecol Lett. 1999;2:247–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Berwick RC, Okanoya K, Beckers GJ, Bolhuis JJ. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:113–21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Okanoya K. The Bengalese finch: a window on the behavioral neurobiology of birdsong syntax. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004;1016:724–35.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Holveck MJ, de Castro ACV, Lachlan RF, ten Cate C, Riebel K. Accuracy of song syntax learning and singing consistency signal early condition in zebra finches. Behav Ecol. 2008;19:1267–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Forslund P, Pärt T. Age and reproduction in birds - hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995;10:374–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bradley RJ, Safran RJ. Conceptual revision and synthesis of proximate factors associated with age-related improvement in reproduction. Ethology. 2014;120:411–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Sasahara K, Ikegami T. Evolution of birdsong syntax by interjection communication. Artif Life. 2007;13:259–77.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reid J, Arcese P, Cassidy AE, Marr A, Smith JM, Keller L. Hamilton and Zuk meet heterozygosity? Song repertoire size indicates inbreeding and immunity in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2005;272:481–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Krebs JR. Song and territory defense in the Great Tit. In: Stonehouse B, Perrins CM, editors. Evolutionary ecology. London: Macmillan; 1977. p. 47–62.
Google Scholar
Catchpole CK. Song repertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1986;19:439–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Lampe HM, Espmark YO. Song structure reflects male quality in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav. 1994;47:869–76.
Article
Google Scholar
Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK, Lewis JW, Lodge A. Song as an indicator of parasitism in the sedge warbler. Anim Behav. 1999;57:307–14.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Biol Lett. 2004;271:121–3.
Google Scholar
Kipper S, Kiefer S. Age-related changes in birds’ singing styles: on fresh tunes and fading voices? Adv Stud Behav. 2010;41:77–118.
Google Scholar
Sakata JT, Vehrencamp SL. Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency. J Exp Biol. 2012;215:201–9.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson DR, Bitton PP, Podos J, Mennill DJ. Uneven sampling and the analysis of vocal performance constraints. Am Nat. 2014;183:214–28.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V, Naguib M. The predictive value of trill performance in a large repertoire songbird, the nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos. J Avian Biol. 2013;44:567–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Drăgănoiu TI, Nagle L, Kreutzer M. Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2002;269:2525–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Botero CA, Rossman RJ, Caro LM, Stenzler LM, Lovette IJ, de Kort SR, et al. Syllable type consistency is related to age, social status and reproductive success in the tropical mockingbird. Anim Behav. 2009;77:701–6.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Geberzahn N, Aubin T. Assessing vocal performance in complex birdsong: a novel approach. BMC Biol. 2014;12:58.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Burley N. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat. 1986;127:415–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Gowaty PA. Reproductive compensation. J Evol Biol. 2008;21:1189–200.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ratikainen II, Kokko H. Differential allocation and compensation: who deserves the silver spoon? Behav Ecol. 2009;21:195–200.
Article
Google Scholar
Pedro D, Ramos DM, Macedo RH. Attractive males are less than adequate dads in a multimodal signalling passerine. Anim Behav. 2015;102:109–17.
Article
Google Scholar
Gibson RM, Langen TA. How do animals choose their mates? Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:468–70.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Candolin U. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev. 2003;78:575–95.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Todt D, Naguib M. Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv Stud Behav. 2000;29:247–95.
Google Scholar
Bartsch C, Wenchel R, Kaiser A, Kipper S. Singing onstage: female and male common nightingales eavesdrop on song type matching. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2014;68:1163–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Amrhein V, Korner P, Naguib M. Nocturnal and diurnal singing activity in the nightingale: correlations with mating status and breeding cycle. Anim Behav. 2002;64:939–44.
Article
Google Scholar
R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2011.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33:1–22.
Wright J, Cuthill I. Biparental care: short-term manipulation of partner contribution and brood size in the starling. Sturnus vulgaris Behav Ecol. 1990;1:116–24.
Article
Google Scholar
Rytkönen S, Koivula K, Orell M. Patterns of per-brood and per-offspring provisioning efforts in the Willow Tit Parus montanus. J Avian Biol. 1996;27:21–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Lyon BE, Montgomerie RD, Hamilton LD. Male parental care and monogamy in snow buntings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1987;20:377–82.
Article
Google Scholar
Weimerskirch H, Mougey T, Hindermeyer X. Foraging and provisioning strategies of black-browed albatrosses in relation to the requirements of the chick: natural variation and experimental study. Behav Ecol. 1997;8:635–43.
Article
Google Scholar
Meyer D. Support Vector Machines: The Interface to libsvm in package e1071. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071/. Technische Universität Wien; 2011.