Skip to main content

Natural variation of outcrossing in the hermaphroditic nematode Pristionchus pacificus



Evolution of selfing can be associated with an increase in fixation of deleterious mutations, which in certain conditions can lead to species extinction. In nematodes, a few species evolved self-fertilization independently, making them excellent model systems to study the evolutionary consequences of this type of mating system.


Here we determine various parameters that influence outcrossing in the hermaphroditic nematode Pristionchus pacificus and compare them to the better known Caenorhabditis elegans. These nematode species are distinct in terms of genetic diversity, which could be explained by differences in outcrossing rates. We find that, similarly to C. elegans, P. pacificus males are generated at low frequencies from self-fertilizing hermaphrodites and are relatively poor mating partners. Furthermore, crosses between different isolates reveal that hybrids have lower brood sizes than the pure strains, which is a sign of outbreeding depression. In contrast to C. elegans, P. pacificus has lower brood sizes and the male X-bearing sperm is able to outcompete the X-nullo sperm.


The results indicate that there is no evidence of any selection acting very strongly on P. pacificus males.


The types of mating systems organisms use have important implications for discerning various aspects of the biology of organisms, including genetic diversity, genome evolution, sexual dimorphism and sex ratios [1]. It is therefore crucial to understand the mechanisms and factors that influence the transition of one type of mating system into another. The evolution of mating systems is best understood in flowering plants [2, 3], mainly because numerous examples of mating types considered transitory are found in these organisms [46]. Hermaphroditism (ie, "cosexuals" or "bisexuals") is considered the ancestral mating system, and selection for outcrossing has been proposed as the main selective force responsible for the evolution of dioecy (male/female) [4, 7].

Two main transitory mating systems have been recognized: gynodioecy (females/hermaphrodites) and androdioecy (males/hermaphrodites). In plants, gynodioecy is more prevalent than androdioecy, a trend predicted from theory [4, 7, 8] and confirmed empirically [9]. According to theoretical predictions, hermaphroditic populations can become gynodioecious when a recessive male-sterility gene spreads in the population [4]. Selection for genetically-fixed gynodioecy is thought to occur as an adaptive response to inbreeding depression of selfing hermaphrodites. The gradual accumulation of subsequent mutations that suppress female functions of hermaphrodites can then result in a dioecious population. Androdioecy is predicted to be a rarer transitory mating system because mutants conferring maleness must achieve at least twice as many outcross fertilizations as hermaphrodites [4, 5]. Only in very specific conditions, namely large male advantage, low male frequencies and self-incompatibility, is androdioecy expected to be maintained [10].

In animals, contrary to plants, androdioecy is more common than gynodioecy [11]. This may indicate that there are fundamental differences in the evolution of mating systems in animals as compared to plants. In fact, in most cases it seems that that androdioecy is derived from dioecy [12, 13]. Very few detailed models specifying intermediate stages between the evolution of dioecy and hermaphroditism have been proposed, although hermaphroditism has arisen multiple times during animal evolution [14, 15]. Selection for reproductive assurance has been invoked as the most plausible explanation for the evolution of hermaphroditism from dioecy.

Nematodes are emerging as a promising model system to understand the conditions and consequences of mating type evolution (eg., [16, 17]). The ease of culturing them in the laboratory and the availability of genetic tools for a number of species allows experimental manipulation of breeding types [1820]. The success of Caenorhabditis elegans as genetic model system for developmental biology encouraged the adoption of other hermaphroditic nematodes for comparative studies that include the rhabditids C. briggsae [2123]and Oscheius tipulae [24, 25], and the more distantly related diplogasterid Pristionchus pacificus [2628].

For rhabditids and diplogasterids androdioecious nematodes, hermaphrodites are basically modified females that produce a limited number of sperm. In contrast to plants, hermaphroditic nematodes cannot fertilize other hermaphrodites. Thus, nematode males are the only outcrossing agents, which give them an advantage over males of androdioecious plant species. Previous models [7, 8], which assumed that hermaphrodites cross-fertilize, are therefore not applicable to nematodes.

Because males are nonessential for reproduction in C. elegans, models have been developed to explain the maintenance of males [18, 29, 30]. C. elegans males are formed either as a result from rare non-disjunction events during hermaphrodite gametogenesis, or as cross-progeny from hermaphrodite/male crosses. Typically, C. elegans males are rarely found in nature and are present as 0.1% of the population in laboratory cultures [31, 32]. According to theoretical models, high inbreeding depression, high male mating ability, and high a rate of production of males by hermaphrodite self-fertilization are factors required for maintenance of androdioecy in C. elegans [18]. Experiments on the C. elegans N2, however, a strain that has been kept in the laboratory for many thousand generations, contradict the theoretical expectations for equilibrium frequency of males [18, 29]. Furthermore, C. elegans isolates derived recently from the wild seem to counterselect males due to outbreeding depression [33], low non-disjunction rates and relatively poor mating ability [32].

The purpose of this study is to characterize life-history traits of P. pacificus, a nematode that evolved androdioecy independently. P. pacificus and C. elegans are cosmopolitan species with overlapping geographic distribution, but different ecological niches. C. elegans has been found mostly in decomposing organic matter (compost piles, farmland and garden soil, and various invertebrates close to decomposing matter) [31, 34], while P. pacificus has been mostly found in soil samples and in association with scarab beetles [35, 36].

Here we characterize a set of variables of life history traits that may influence the maintenance of androdioecy in P. pacificus, such as inbreeding depression, male mating ability, brood size and the frequency of male production by hermaphrodites.



The 23 P. pacificus strains used in this study were isolated from the wild in the period between 1988 and 2007 and were inbred in the laboratory for at least 10 generations (Table 1). Strains were isolated from soil, unidentified beetles and beetles of the genus Phyllophaga and Exomala from the geographical locations described in table 1[3739]. These strains are a subset of strains from around the world to be described in more detail elsewhere (Herrmann, Kienle, Sommer, unpublished).

Table 1 P. pacificus isolates

Determination of the rate of non-disjunction of the X chromosome

For each of 23 inbred strains of P. pacificus, 20 virgin, J4 stage hermaphrodites were placed on several 100-mm plates seeded with E. coli OP50. Worms were allowed to mature and lay eggs at 20°C. Once the worms hatched and were old enough to be sexed, males were counted and removed from each plate. To facilitate counting, the hermaphrodites left on the plate were killed by incubation at 45°C for 30 minutes. Their position in the plate was marked by dotting a sheet of plastic transparency affixed to the bottom of the plate using a fine tipped permanent marker. The transparency was scanned into a computer and dots were counted using the software package ImageJ with the cell counter plug-in. Typically between 300 and 2000 worms were counted for each plate and at least 7,700 progeny were counted for each strain. The same number of worms was counted for a smaller subset of strains to calculate rates of non-disjunction at 15°C and 25°C. The rate of non-disjunction was determined by counting the number of males relative to the total number of individuals in each of the selfing P. pacificus inbred strains. The error for the non-disjunction rates at 20°C was calculated assuming a Poisson distribution.

Embryonic mortality

To determine the percentage of embryonic mortality, 10 J4 stage virgin hermaphrodites of each strain were transferred to single plates. These hermaphrodites were allowed to mature, lay eggs at 20°C and moved to a new plate every day until none of their eggs hatched for two consecutive days. Eggs were counted with the aid of a grid immediately after each hermaphrodite was transferred to a new plate. The embryo mortality was calculated by dividing the number of hatched worms by the number of eggs, and subtracting this ratio from 1.

Mating assays

Male mating ability was assayed by placing three males along with one J4 stage virgin hermaphrodite in a 1.5 cm E. coli OP50 lawn on an agar plate. After 24 hours at 20°C, males were removed. Hermaphrodites were moved to a new plate every day and allowed to lay eggs. Worms of hatched eggs were counted and sexed once they reached maturity. Male mating ability was calculated by dividing the number of male progeny by the total number of progeny (males + hermaphrodites). We performed 10 replicates for each strain. The majority of the male progeny were sired by the parental males.

Inbreeding depression

The hermaphrodites to be used in each cross (RS5207, RS5134 and RS5202) were first allowed to deplete their sperm supply. This was accomplished by transferring each hermaphrodite to a new plate every day until none of the eggs it laid hatched for two consecutive days. The hermaphrodite was then placed on a plate spotted with a small lawn (~1.5 cm) of OP50 with five males of the other strain to be utilized in the cross. Males of the strains RS5202 and JU723 were used and allowed to mate for 24 hours. Subsequently, males were removed and the hermaphrodites were transferred to new plates. The mated hermaphrodites were moved every day until none of their eggs hatched for two consecutive days. During this time period, the progeny from each individual were counted every day, and 50 random F1 individuals were selected and placed each onto their own plate. The selected F1 worms were allowed to mature, and as soon as they began laying eggs, they were transferred to a new plate every day until they yielded no progeny for two consecutive days. Data for brood size had to be square-root-transformed to normalize the residuals. Heterosis, defined as the relative increase in fitness of hybrids, was calculated according to Dolgin et al (2007) [33]. Negative values for heterosis indicate outbreeding depression. The means within the same cross were compared using Student t-tests.

Sperm competition

Crosses were performed on agar in 60-mm Petri dishes spotted with a lawn of Escherichia coli strain OP50 (~1.5 cm in diameter) as food source [40], and kept at 20°C. Three Wild-type P. pacificus males were placed for three hours on the bacterial lawn along with a morphologically marked hermaphrodite. The morphological marker was a recessive mutant that produces a dumpy phenotype. Hermaphrodites of the strain PS312 pdl-9 V (sy372) [41] were mated and transferred to fresh plates at daily intervals until they stopped laying eggs. Eggs were allowed to hatch and worms were grown until body morphology and/or gender could be scored. Cross-progeny could be readily identified because of their Wild-type body morphology. This procedure was performed with 35 replicates.

The percentage graph was generated by first calculating the mean of the counts of each phenotype (dumpy, Wild-type hermaphrodite, Wild-type male) generated each day. The means for each of the three phenotypes were then summed to determine the total number of worms generated on each day. The percentages were then calculated by dividing each of the phenotype counts by the total progeny for that day and multiplying by 100.


In C. elegans, the frequency of XX hermaphrodites and XO males in a population is mainly driven by (1) the rate of non-disjunction events of the X chromosome during gametogenesis in hermaphrodites and (2) the ability of males to produce cross-progeny. P. pacificus also has an XX:XO sex determination system, where males occur at a frequency of 0.1% in standard laboratory cultures [42, 43]. To determine how each of the above mentioned factors contributes to the frequency of males in P. pacificus, genetic variation of male production was determined for inbred lines isolated from various parts of the world (Table 1). On average, P. pacificus male frequency resulting from X chromosome non-disjunction among the 23 lines is 0.42% ± 0.05% SE. One strain (JU150) did not produce any males out of more than 8,000 self progeny. Of the strains that produced males, their percentages relative to total number of progeny ranged between 0.04% (RS5270) and 1.60% (RS5212) (Fig. 1). Rates of non-disjunction of P. pacificus are similar to C. elegans [0.33% ± 0.015% SD (n = 26)], where the lowest and highest non-disjunction rates differ by two orders of magnitude [32]. We compared C. elegans and P. pacificus overall differences in means using a Z-test with hypothesized variants based on observed binomial standard deviation. No statistical difference was detected in rates of X chromosome non-disjunction between these two androdioecious nematodes (P = 0.98).

Figure 1
figure 1

Percentage of males in selfing P. pacificus inbred strains at 20°C. The percentage of males was calculated from about 8,000 selfing progeny for each strain. Error bars indicate standard errors assuming a Poisson distribution.

In C. elegans, temperature has an obvious effect on the rate of X chromosome non-disjunction [32]. To determine if this was also the case for P. pacificus, we allowed a subset of strains to self at two additional temperatures, 15°C and 25°C. Strains were selected according to their rates of non-disjunction at 20°C and geographical location from where they were collected. It is clear that the highest proportion of males is produced at intermediate temperatures (Fig. 2). Strains isolated from geographical locations with similar climatic conditions presented very distinct non-disjunction rates (eg, Japanese strains RS5212 and RS5207) at 20°C, but more similar at lower temperatures. To determine whether there is interaction between environmental and genetic effects, an ANOVA test was performed (Table 2). The results indicate that there is a significant interaction between strain and temperature, which preclude the interpretation of the among strain and temperature differences.

Table 2 Analysis of variance for X chromosome non-disjunction (arcsine-squared transformed) in seven inbred P. pacificus strains in three temperatures.
Figure 2
figure 2

The effect of temperature on the percentage of males in selfing inbred strains of P. pacificus at 15°C, 20°C and 25°C. Non-disjunction rates were calculated by scoring the proportion of males from about 8,000 selfing progeny for each strain. Selfing progeny was counted from 5–10 replicate plates seeded with 20 parental worms each. Only mean values are shown in the graph for clarity.

Rates of non-disjunction could affect brood sizes, since the production of each male generated by non-disjunction results in the production of one unviable or unfertile XXX hermaphrodite [44]. We selected 13 strains that span the range of X-chromosome non-disjunction rates (Fig. 3). The mean brood size of these inbred strains is 107 ± 15 SD progeny/hermaphrodite. There are significant genetic differences in brood size (F12,100 = 2.20, P < 0.05) and embryonic mortality (F12,98 = 5.72, P < 0.001) among different strains. However, no correlation was found between non-disjunction and embryonic mortality (r = 0.19, P = 0.52), or between non-disjunction and brood size (r = 0.10, P = 0.73). We also found no correlation between embryonic mortality and brood size (r = 0.17, P = 0.58).

Figure 3
figure 3

Mean brood size (top) and embryonic mortality (bottom) for selfing inbred hermaphrodites of various P. pacificus strains. Error bars indicate SEM. Strains are organized according to rates of X-chromosome non-disjunction at 20°C, from the highest to the lowest.

In C. elegans, males of some strains are significantly more effective in mating than others [32, 45, 46]. We detected genetic variation in male fertilization ability among P. pacificus inbred lines as well (Fig. 4). Male fertilization ability was measured at two levels. First, we quantified male mating ability by scoring the proportion of matings that resulted in cross-progeny. Successful fertilization rates were equal to or higher than 90% for about half of the strains used for crosses. As an example of poor mating performance, males of strain RS5212 produced cross progeny with only 30% of the mated hermaphrodites. Second, we measured male fecundity by determining the proportion of male cross-progeny that resulted from successful fertilization events. P. pacificus showed significant variation of fecundity among strains (F11,89 = 4.13, P < 0.001). RS5212 males produced some of the highest proportions (30%) of male cross-progeny among the strains analyzed, indicative of high fecundity. Most of the other strains (10/13) produced 10% or less male cross-progeny. We could not find any correlation between rates of X-chromosome non-disjunction and male mating ability (r = -0.47, P = 0.105), or between X-chromosome non-disjunction and male fecundity (r = 0.59, P = 0.08).

Figure 4
figure 4

Mating ability of P. pacificus strains. Strains are ordered according to the rates of X chromosome non-disjunction at 20°C (black bars), from highest to lowest. Shaded bars represent the proportion of males in the progeny of successful crosses. Numbers above bars indicate the percentage of crosses that resulted in cross-progeny out of 10 replicates (except for RS106 and RS5200, which had 9 replicates). Error bars indicate standard errors.

One of the factors that might influence efficient fertilization by males and sex ratios in cross progeny is sperm competition. Two types of sperm competition have been observed in nematodes: (1) between male and hermaphroditic sperm; (2) between X-bearing male sperm and male nullo-sperm. In C. elegans and C. briggsae, male sperm can efficiently outcompete hermaphroditic sperm [4749], while in C. briggsae male X-bearing sperm has precedence over male nullo-sperm [49]. Precedence of X-bearing sperm results in bias towards hermaphroditic cross-progeny in the first days after mating. To identify cross-progeny and clarify the ratio of each sex after cross-fertilization in P. pacificus, we used a morphologically marked strain (see Materials & Methods). Hermaphrodites from strain PS312 pdl-9 (sy372), when mated to males, produced cross-progeny for about 4 days. Cross-progeny percentages peaked around the second to third day, accounting for approximately 65% of the brood (Fig. 5). Most animals died prematurely due to problems in egg-laying around the fifth day. Premature death may have precluded the usage of all male sperm stored in the hermaphrodite spermatheca and therefore the total proportion of male and hermaphrodite cross-progeny differed by 50% (X21 = 11.42; P > 0.05). It is clear, however, that X-bearing sperm of PS312 males has precedence over nullo-sperm: hermaphrodites are produced in higher proportions than male cross-progeny in the first three days (Fig. 5). For PS312 there is approximately equal chance of either hermaphroditic sperm or male sperm to fertilize an oocyte.

Figure 5
figure 5

Proportion of cross- and self-progeny in crosses between PS312 pdl-9 males and hermaphrodites. Proportion of each phenotype for progeny per day. Self-progeny (dumpy): black; hermaphrodite cross-progeny: light grey; male cross-progeny: dark grey.

In the short term, high levels of inbreeding increase the chances for accumulation of detrimental recessive mutations [5052]. The combination of high mutation rates and high level of inbreeding can potentially cause species extinction, making self-fertile organisms evolutionary "dead ends" [50, 51]. Therefore, some self-fertilizing animals maintain high proportions of males in their populations because they show substantial inbreeding depression [53, 54]. C. elegans, however, has no inbreeding depression for life span, brood size and various other life-history traits [29, 33, 55, 56].

To determine if P. pacificus has inbreeding depression, we made four sets of crosses between different strains and determined the brood sizes of the hybrid F1s (Fig. 6). We selected four strains based on the criterion of being genetically divergent from each other, as determined by phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences [37](Sommer, unpublished). Similar to C. elegans, we detected outbreeding depression, where the P. pacificus pure strains outperformed the hybrids [33]. Paired comparisons consistently resulted in negative heterosis values, which reflected the smaller brood sizes of hybrids when compared to the parental pure strains (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

Mean pure-strain (black bars) and hybrid (shaded bars) brood sizes. Mean pure-strain is the midparent value. Numbers above the bars indicate heterosis values. Asterisks indicate significance of difference between pure-strains and hybrids in a Student's t test. ***P < 0.001.


Given that males in androdioecious species are not essential for reproduction, several hypotheses have been proposed for their persistence in some nematode species. Androdioecy is thought to be an intermediate mating system that would be stable only in very specific conditions [57, 58], including high inbreeding depression and high male mating efficiency [18, 30]. Chasnov and Chow [29] suggested that C. elegans males are still maintained because mating is frequent enough to prevent degeneration of male-specific genes by mutations. Extremely low levels of outcrossing and high rates of selfing can result in accumulation of deleterious mutations, which cause extinction [19, 51]. The evolutionary forces responsible for the maintenance of males in C. elegans and the time scale for their persistence are not yet very well understood.

To understand how significant the role of males is in distant relatives of C. elegans, we measured variation of various life-history traits important for outcrossing in strains of the nematode P. pacificus. The genus Pristionchus has at least four species that evolved androdioecy independently, including P. pacificus [39]. Although P. pacificus and C. elegans are distant relatives and have many developmental differences [26], they share some common features: the same type of sex determination (XX:XO), males are relatively rare [42], and the hermaphrodite is a modified female whose gonad first produces sperm and then shifts to produce oocytes [59]. Our results show that 23 P. pacificus strains produce males by X chromosome non-disjunction at comparable rates to C. elegans.

Production of males by non-disjunction comes at a cost, because for every XO male generated one XXX unviable hermaphrodite is produced. However, we did not find a correlation between high non-disjunction rates with lower brood sizes or higher rates of embryonic mortality. The percentage of embryonic mortality seems high for most strains, typically ranging between 10–30%. Similar rates were found for other selfing nematodes [60], but the causes for high mortality are unknown. It is possible that our results are slight overestimates of embryonic mortality, because we could not rule out the possibility that some hatched larvae died at the wall or edge of the plate before being scored. However, we repeated the assays and confirmed that strains scored as having high lethality displayed by many dead embryos.

Brood sizes in P. pacificus are about half of those of C. elegans [46, 61] (this report). Although the difference might be partially explained by the higher embryonic lethality in P. pacificus, additional factors could also play a role. P. pacificus might be producing fewer sperm as an adaptation for earlier reproduction. Because spermatogenesis precedes oogenesis, the fewer sperm are produced, and the hermaphrodite can start reproducing earlier. C. elegans mutants that increase sperm number, for instance, were shown to be of disadvantage under natural conditions because the additional spermatogenesis delays oogenesis and therefore the minimum generation time [62]. Further work would be necessary to test whether the smaller brood size in P. pacificus is due to lesser sperm production.

Male mating is one of the most complex behaviors in nematodes [63, 64], and many factors can influence successful mating: male sexual drive, ability of the male to locate the hermaphrodite, ability of the male to insert its spicules into the vulva, and amount of sperm transferred in each mating. Mating assays are typically performed in agar plates, where hermaphrodites and males are placed in a small spot of bacteria for a few hours or days [6567, 29, 32, 68]. We performed two tests for mating ability. The quantitative assay determined the proportion of hermaphrodites fertilized by 1–3 males in a 24-hour period. The qualitative assay tested male fecundity once they mated with hermaphrodites. Our results show that most hermaphrodites are fertilized by males in the above conditions. However, there is some variability of the number of progeny sired by each male. Some strains are clearly more fecund, such as RS5212 and RS5275. Because there is no standard nematode mating assay, it is not possible to compare our results with the ones performed in C. elegans. Given the benign conditions in which the crosses were performed, it is very likely that in more natural conditions male mating ability would be much lower. Further studies are required to access the effects of male nutritional status [69], habitat surface [70], health status [71] and longevity [72] on mating success.

The higher competitive ability of the male sperm to outperform the hermaphroditic sperm in fertilizing oocytes would be an indication for selection acting on males. This is well documented for C. elegans strain N2 [47], where mated hermaphrodites produce outcross progeny almost exclusively in the first 24 hours after mating. C. elegans male sperm can anchor to the wall of the spermatheca, preventing them from being swept away by the exiting eggs. In our study with P. pacificus PS312, we observed that male sperm is equally likely to fertilize an oocyte as a hermaphrodite sperm (Fig. 5). It is possible that P. pacificus male sperm lost the ability to anchor themselves, or that the shape of the spermatheca does not favor attachment. In fact, it has been observed that the shape of the P. pacificus spermatheca is very different from the one in C. elegans [73]. In C. elegans, the larger size of the male sperm has been reported to give a higher competitive advantage due to their faster crawling and ability to displace smaller sperm [74, 75]. It remains to be determined whether the size of the sperm also plays a role in P. pacificus.

Differences in the competitive ability of P. pacificus X-bearing sperm over nullo-sperm were detected. Precedence in X-bearing sperm provides an advantage to faster reproduction and ability to colonize new habitats [49]. P. pacificus, which feeds on bacteria and fungi that grow on insect carcasses, must clearly rely on early progeny that are self-fertile to grow on such ephemeral habitats [76].

Theoretical models predict that males persist in androdioecious species with high levels of inbreeding depression [18, 30]. Our results suggest that P. pacificus has outbreeding depression, where the hybrid has lower fitness than the pure strains. This might be caused by hybrid breakdown of co-adapted gene complexes, as found for C. elegans [33]. It should be noted, however, that we measured only one fitness trait in our assays for inbreeding depression (brood size). Different results could be produced for other ecologically-relevant traits, such as longevity, pathogen susceptibility [77], and ability to undergo dauer formation [78]. Other selfing species, such as C. briggsae, do not show outbreeding depression [79]. This indicates that this phenomenon is not particular to self-fertilizing nematodes.

The low rates of male production by hermaphrodite selfing, low fecundity rates of males, poor male sperm competition and outbreeding depression suggest that P. pacificus males are being selected against. This could explain the low level of recombination observed between P. pacificus strains, indicating low outcrossing rates [37]. Persistence of males in P. pacificus could be explained as a byproduct of the sex determination system, where males are generated by X chromosome non-disjunction events in hermaphrodite meiosis. It would be useful to study other kinds of evidence for selection acting on males, such as production of pheromones by hermaphrodites [8082], or production of substances by the males that induce immobilization of hermaphrodites during copulation [68].


In summary, this study shows that many life-history traits of P. pacificus are similar to C. elegans, such as spectrum of non-disjunction rates, influence of temperature in non-disjunction, generally poor male mating ability and outbreeding depression. In contrast, P. pacificus has lower brood sizes and poor male sperm competiveness. Additional studies would be necessary to determine whether males in androdioecious species can be evolutionarily stable.


  1. 1.

    Wright S: Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. The American Naturalist. 1922, 56: 330-338. 10.1086/279872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Darwin C: The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. 1877, New York: D. Appleton and company

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Charlesworth D: Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: R726-735. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.068.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D: Model for evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist. 1978, 112: 975-997. 10.1086/283342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Charnov EL, Smith JM, Bull JJ: Why Be an Hermaphrodite. Nature. 1976, 263: 125-126. 10.1038/263125a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Barrett SC: The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet. 2002, 3: 274-284. 10.1038/nrg776.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lloyd DG: Maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in Angiosperms. Genetica. 1975, 45: 325-339. 10.1007/BF01508307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Charlesworth D: Androdioecy and the Evolution of Dioecy. Biol J Linn Soc. 1984, 22: 333-348. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01683.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Webb CJ: Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Edited by: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF. 1999, Heidelberg: Springer, 61-95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG: The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 2005, 36: 47-79. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dunn DF: Gynodioecy in an animal. Nature. 1975, 253: 528-529. 10.1038/253528a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kiontke K, Gavin NP, Raynes Y, Roehrig C, Piano F, Fitch DH: Caenorhabditis phylogeny predicts convergence of hermaphroditism and extensive intron loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9003-9008. 10.1073/pnas.0403094101.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hoeg JT: Sex and the single cirripede: a phylogenetic perspective. New frontiers in barnacle evoluton. Edited by: Shram FR, Hoeg JT. 1995, Rotterdam: Balkema, 195-207.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jarne P, Auld JR: Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution. 2006, 60: 1816-1824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jarne P, Charlesworth D: The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1993, 24: 441-466. 10.1146/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dolgin ES, Charlesworth B, Cutter AD: Population frequencies of transposable elements in selfing and outcrossing Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genet Res. 2008, 90: 317-329. 10.1017/S0016672308009440.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hill RC, Egydio de Carvalho C, Salogiannis J, Schlager B, Pilgrim D, Haag ES: Genetic flexibility in the convergent evolution of hermaphroditism in Caenorhabditis nematodes. Dev Cell. 2006, 10: 531-538. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stewart AD, Phillips PC: Selection and maintenance of androdioecy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2002, 160: 975-982.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cutter AD: Mutation and the experimental evolution of outcrossing in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Evol Biol. 2005, 18: 27-34. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00804.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hodgkin J: Exploring the envelope. Systematic alteration in the sex-determination system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2002, 162: 767-780.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang X, Chamberlin HM: Multiple regulatory changes contribute to the evolution of the Caenorhabditis lin-48 ovo gene. Genes Dev. 2002, 16: 2345-2349. 10.1101/gad.996302.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Félix MA: Cryptic quantitative evolution of the vulva intercellular signaling network in Caenorhabditis. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 103-114. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gupta BP, Johnsen R, Chen N: Genomics and biology of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. WormBook. Edited by: Hodgkin J. 2007, The C.elegans Research Community, 1-16. []

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dichtel-Danjoy ML, Félix MA: The two steps of vulval induction in Oscheius tipulae CEW1 recruit common regulators including a MEK kinase. Dev Biol. 2004, 265: 113-126. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.09.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Félix MA: Oscheius tipulae. WormBook. Edited by: Hodgkin J. 2006, The C. elegans Research Community, 16: 1-8. []

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hong RL, Sommer RJ: Pristionchus pacificus: a well-rounded nematode. Bioessays. 2006, 28: 651-659. 10.1002/bies.20404.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sommer RJ: Pristionchus pacificus. WormBook. Edited by: Hodgkin J. 2006, The C. elegans Research Community, 1-8. []

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dieterich C, Clifton SW, Schuster LN, Chinwalla A, Delehaunty K, Dinkelacker I, Fulton L, Fulton R, Godfrey J, Minx P, et al: The Pristionchus pacificus genome provides a unique perspective on nematode lifestyle and parasitism. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 1193-1198. 10.1038/ng.227.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chasnov JR, Chow KL: Why are there males in the hermaphroditic species Caenorhabditis elegans?. Genetics. 2002, 160: 983-994.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cutter AD, Aviles L, Ward S: The proximate determinants of sex ratio in C. elegans populations. Genetical Research. 2003, 81: 91-102. 10.1017/S001667230300613X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Barrière A, Félix MA: High local genetic diversity and low outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations. Curr Biol. 2005, 15: 1176-1184. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Teotónio H, Manoel D, Phillips PC: Genetic variation for outcrossing among Caenorhabditis elegans isolates. Evolution. 2006, 60 (6): 1300-1305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dolgin ES, Charlesworth B, Baird SE, Cutter AD: Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Caenorhabditis nematodes. Evolution. 2007, 61: 1339-1352. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00118.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Barrière A, Félix MA: Temporal dynamics and linkage disequilibrium in natural Caenorhabditis elegans populations. Genetics. 2007, 176: 999-1011. 10.1534/genetics.106.067223.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Herrmann M, Mayer WE, Hong RL, Kienle S, Minasaki R, Sommer RJ: The nematode Pristionchus pacificus (Nematoda: Diplogastridae) is associated with the oriental beetle Exomala orientalis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Japan. Zoological Science. 2007, 24: 883-889. 10.2108/zsj.24.883.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hong RL, Witte H, Sommer RJ: Natural variation in Pristionchus pacificus insect pheromone attraction involves the protein kinase EGL-4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 7779-7784. 10.1073/pnas.0708406105.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zauner H, Mayer WE, Herrmann M, Weller A, Erwig M, Sommer RJ: Distinct patterns of genetic variation in Pristionchus pacificus and Caenorhabditis elegans, two partially selfing nematodes with cosmopolitan distribution. Mol Ecol. 2007, 16: 1267-1280. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03222.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hong RL, Sommer RJ: Chemoattraction in Pristionchus nematodes and implications for insect recognition. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: 2359-2365. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Herrmann M, Mayer WE, Sommer RJ: Nematodes of the genus Pristionchus are closely associated with scarab beetles and the Colorado potato beetle in Western Europe. Zoology (Jena). 2006, 109: 96-108.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Brenner S: The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974, 77: 71-94.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kenning C, Kipping I, Sommer RJ: Isolation of mutations with dumpy-like phenotypes and of collagen genes in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus. Genesis. 2004, 40: 176-183. 10.1002/gene.20084.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sommer RJ, Carta LK, Kim SY, Sternberg PW: Morphological, genetic and molecular description of Pristionchus pacificus sp (Nematoda: Neodiplogastridae). Fundamental and Applied Nematology. 1996, 19: 511-521.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Pires-daSilva A, Sommer RJ: Conservation of the global sex determination gene tra-1 in distantly related nematodes. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 1198-1208. 10.1101/gad.293504.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hodgkin J: Nondisjuncion mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1979, 91: 67-94.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wegewitz V, Schulenburg H, Streit A: Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda). BMC Ecol. 2008, 8: 12-10.1186/1472-6785-8-12.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hodgkin J, Doniach T: Natural variation and copulatory plug formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1997, 146: 149-164.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ward S, Carrel JS: Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1979, 73: 304-321. 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90069-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    LaMunyon CW, Ward S: Sperm precedence in a hermaphroditic nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) is due to competitive superiority of male sperm. Experientia. 1995, 51: 817-823. 10.1007/BF01922436.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    LaMunyon CW, Ward S: Increased competitiveness of nematode sperm bearing the male X chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 185-189. 10.1073/pnas.94.1.185.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Takebayashi N, Morrell PL: Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. Am J Bot. 2001, 88: 1143-1150. 10.2307/3558325.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Loewe L, Cutter AD: On the potential for extinction by Muller's ratchet in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Evol Biol. 2008, 8: 125-10.1186/1471-2148-8-125.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Charlesworth D: Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003, 358: 1051-1070. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1296.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Weeks SC: Levels of inbreeding depression over seven generations of selfing in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. J Evol Biol. 2004, 17: 475-484. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00712.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Weeks SC, Crosser BR, Bennett R, Gray M, Zucker N: Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: estimates of inbreeding depression in two populations. Evolution. 2000, 54 (3): 878-887.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Johnson TE, Wood WB: Genetic analysis of life-span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982, 79: 6603-6607. 10.1073/pnas.79.21.6603.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Johnson TE, Hutchinson EW: Absence of strong heterosis for life span and other life history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1993, 134: 465-474.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Weeks SC, Benvenuto C, Reed SK: When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2006, 46: 449-464. 10.1093/icb/icj048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Pannell JR: The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 2002, 33: 397-425. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Rudel D, Riebesell M, Sommer RJ: Gonadogenesis in Pristionchus pacificus and organ evolution: development, adult morphology and cell-cell interactions in the hermaphrodite gonad. Dev Biol. 2005, 277: 200-221. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.09.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Dolgin ES, Félix MA, Cutter AD: Hakuna Nematoda: genetic and phenotypic diversity in African isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. Heredity. 2008, 100: 304-315. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801079.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Srinivasan J, Pires-daSilva A, Gutierrez A, Zheng M, Jungblut B, Witte H, Schlak I, Sommer RJ: Microevolutionary analysis of the nematode genus Pristionchus suggests a recent evolution of redundant developmental mechanisms during vulva formation. Evol Dev. 2001, 3: 229-240. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003004229.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hodgkin J, Barnes TM: More is not better: brood size and population growth in a self-fertilizing nematode. Proc Biol Sci. 1991, 246: 19-24. 10.1098/rspb.1991.0119.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Emmons SW: Sexual behavior of the Caenorhabditis elegans male. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006, 69: 99-123. 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)69004-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Garcia LR, Mehta P, Sternberg PW: Regulation of distinct muscle behaviors controls the C. elegans male's copulatory spicules during mating. Cell. 2001, 107: 777-788. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00600-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hodgkin J: Male phenotypes and mating efficiency in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1983, 103: 43-64.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lints R, Emmons SW: Patterning of dopaminergic neurotransmitter identity among Caenorhabditis elegans ray sensory neurons by a TGFbeta family signaling pathway and a Hox gene. Development. 1999, 126: 5819-5831.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Lipton J, Kleemann G, Ghosh R, Lints R, Emmons SW: Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 7427-7434. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1746-04.2004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Garcia LR, LeBoeuf B, Koo P: Diversity in mating behavior of hermaphroditic and male-female Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genetics. 2007, 175: 1761-1771. 10.1534/genetics.106.068304.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Gruninger TR, Gualberto DG, LeBoeuf B, Garcia LR: Integration of male mating and feeding behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 169-179. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3364-05.2006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Lockery SR, Lawton KJ, Doll JC, Faumont S, Coulthard SM, Thiele TR, Chronis N, McCormick KE, Goodman MB, Pruitt BL: Artificial dirt: microfluidic substrates for nematode neurobiology and behavior. J Neurophysiol. 2008, 99: 3136-3143. 10.1152/jn.91327.2007.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    van den Berg MC, Woerlee JZ, Ma H, May RC: Sex-dependent resistance to the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics. 2006, 173: 677-683. 10.1534/genetics.106.056093.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Van Voorhies WA, Fuchs J, Thomas S: The longevity of Caenorhabditis elegans in soil. Biol Lett. 2005, 1: 247-249. 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0278.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Rudel D, Sommer RJ: The evolution of developmental mechanisms. Dev Biol. 2003, 264: 15-37. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00353-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    LaMunyon CW, Ward S: Evolution of sperm size in nematodes: sperm competition favours larger sperm. Proc Biol Sci. 1999, 266: 263-267. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0631.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    LaMunyon CW, Ward S: Larger sperm outcompete smaller sperm in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Biol Sci. 1998, 265: 1997-2002. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0531.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Rae R, Riebesell M, Dinkelacker I, Wang Q, Herrmann M, Weller AM, Dieterich C, Sommer RJ: Isolation of naturally associated bacteria of necromenic Pristionchus nematodes and fitness consequences. J Exp Biol. 2008, 211: 1927-1936. 10.1242/jeb.014944.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Reddy KC, Andersen EC, Kruglyak L, Kim DH: A polymorphism in npr-1 is a behavioral determinant of pathogen susceptibility in C. elegans. Science. 2009, 323: 382-384. 10.1126/science.1166527.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Viney ME, Gardner MP, Jackson JA: Variation in Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva formation. Dev Growth Differ. 2003, 45: 389-396. 10.1046/j.1440-169X.2003.00703.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Cutter AD, Félix MA, Barriere A, Charlesworth D: Patterns of nucleotide polymorphism distinguish temperate and tropical wild isolates of Caenorhabditis briggsae. Genetics. 2006, 173: 2021-2031. 10.1534/genetics.106.058651.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Chasnov JR, So WK, Chan CM, Chow KL: The species, sex, and stage specificity of a Caenorhabditis sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 6730-6735. 10.1073/pnas.0608050104.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Simon JM, Sternberg PW: Evidence of a mate-finding cue in the hermaphrodite nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 1598-1603. 10.1073/pnas.032225799.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Srinivasan J, Kaplan F, Ajredini R, Zachariah C, Alborn HT, Teal PE, Malik RU, Edison AS, Sternberg PW, Schroeder FC: A blend of small molecules regulates both mating and development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2008, 454: 1115-1118. 10.1038/nature07168.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the laboratory of Ralf J. Sommer for providing the strains, Robert Serfling, Georgia Serfling and Jesse M. Meik for statistical advice, undergraduate students (R. Amin, S. Bury, A. Raza, D. van Hoogstraten, D. Mullon, J. Corbin, N. Patel, M. Hanif, S. Ali, J. Laheji, H. Hoang, M. Rao, S. Lopez, S. Rodriguez, M. Varughese, S. Neak), and Lenore Price for technical help. This work was supported by NSF grant IOB#0615996 and UTA start-up funds.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Pires-daSilva.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

SK inbred the strains for 10 generations and provided preliminary data on rates of non-disjunction and brood size. AC, CS and APS participated in experimental design, data collection, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. AC and APS coordinated the project and supervised the practical work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Click, A., Savaliya, C.H., Kienle, S. et al. Natural variation of outcrossing in the hermaphroditic nematode Pristionchus pacificus. BMC Evol Biol 9, 75 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Brood Size
  • Sperm Competition
  • Inbreeding Depression
  • Embryonic Mortality
  • Male Sperm