Barton NH: Mutation and the evolution of recombination. Philos T R Soc B. 2010, 365 (1544): 1281-1294. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0320.
Article
Google Scholar
Barton NH, Charlesworth B: Why sex and recombination. Science. 1998, 281: 1986-1990.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bell G: The masterpiece of nature. 1982, Berkeley: University of California Press
Google Scholar
Burt A: Sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection - was Weismann right?. Evolution. 2000, 54 (2): 337-351.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maynard Smith J: The Evolution of Sex. 1978, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Google Scholar
Michod RE, Levin BR: The evolution of sex: an examination of current ideas. 1988, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer
Google Scholar
Weismann A: The evolution theory. 1904, London: Edward Arnold
Book
Google Scholar
Weismann A: The significance of sexual reproduction in the theory of natural selection. Essays upon heredity and kindred biological problems. 1887
Google Scholar
de Visser JAGM, Elena SF: The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nature Rev Genet. 2007, 8 (2): 139-149.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goddard MR: Why bother with sex? Answers from experimetns with yeast and other organisms. Sex in Fungi molecular determinations and evolutionary implications. Edited by: Heitman J, Kronstad JW, Taylor JW, Casselton LA. 2007, Washington D.C: American Society for Microbiology, 489-506.
Google Scholar
Fisher RA: The genetical theory of natural selection. 1930, Oxford: Oxford University Press, A complete variorum edition
Book
Google Scholar
Muller HJ: Some genetic aspects of sex. Am Nat. 1932, 66: 118-138. 10.1086/280418.
Article
Google Scholar
Birdsell J, Wills C: Significant competitive advantage conferred by meiosis and syngamy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 908-912. 10.1073/pnas.93.2.908.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Colegrave N, Kaltz O, Bell G: The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. VIII. The dynamics of adaptation to novel environments after a single episode of sex. Evolution. 2002, 56 (1): 14-21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goddard MR, Charles H, Godfray J, Burt A: Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature. 2005, 434 (7033): 636-640. 10.1038/nature03405.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Greig D, Borts RH, Louis EJ: The effect of sex on adaptation to high temperature in heterozygous and homozygous yeast. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 1998, 265: 1017-1023. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0393.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaltz O, Bell G: The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. XII. Repeated sexual episodes increase the rates of adaptation to novel environments. Evolution. 2002, 56 (9): 1743-1753.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Malmberg RL: The evolution of epistasis and the advantage of recombination in populations of bacteriophage T4. Genetics. 1977, 86: 607-621.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Morran LT, Parmenter MD, Phillips PC: Mutation load and rapid adaptation favour outcrossing over self-fertilization. Nature. 2009, 462 (7271): 350-352. 10.1038/nature08496.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rice WR, Chippindale AK: Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection. Science. 2001, 294: 555-559. 10.1126/science.1061380.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Poon A, Chao L: Drift increases the advantage of sex in RNA bacteriophage Phi 6. Genetics. 2004, 166 (1): 19-24. 10.1534/genetics.166.1.19.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Colegrave N: Sex releases the speed limit on evolution. Nature. 2002, 420: 664-666. 10.1038/nature01191.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rice WR: Experimental effects of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination. Nature Rev Genet. 2002, 3: 241-251. 10.1038/nrg760.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cooper TF: Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli. PLoS Biology. 2007, 5 (9): 1899-1905.
Article
Google Scholar
Gould SJ: The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. 2002, Cambridge, Ma: Belknap
Google Scholar
Muller HJ: The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mut Res. 1964, 1 (1): 2-9. 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Chao L: Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet. Nature. 1990, 348: 454-455. 10.1038/348454a0.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kondrashov AS: Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature. 1988, 336: 435-440. 10.1038/336435a0.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A: Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Science. 2000, 290: 331-333. 10.1126/science.290.5490.331.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
de Visser JAGM, Hoekstra RF, VandenEnde H: The effect of sex and deleterious mutations on fitness in Chlamydomonas. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 1996, 263 (1367): 193-200. 10.1098/rspb.1996.0031.
Article
Google Scholar
Whitlock MC, Bourguet D: Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: Synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components. Evolution. 2000, 54 (5): 1654-1660.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Elena SF, Lenski RE: Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature. 1997, 390: 395-398. 10.1038/37108.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zeyl C, Bell G: The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations. Nature. 1997, 388: 465-468. 10.1038/41312.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Renaut S, Replansky T, Heppleston A, Bell G: The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. XIII. Fitness of long-term sexual and asexual populations in benign environments. Evolution. 2006, 60 (11): 2272-2279.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Drake JW: A Constant Rate of Spontaneous Mutation in DNA-Based Microbes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1991, 88 (16): 7160-7164. 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7160.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zeyl C, de Visser JAGM: Estimates of the rate and distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2001, 157: 53-61.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Birky CW, Walsh JB: Effects of linkage on rates of molecular evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1988, 85 (17): 6414-6418. 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6414.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hill WG, Robertson A: The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genetical Research. 1966, 8 (3): 269-294. 10.1017/S0016672300010156.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peck JR: A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics. 1994, 137: 597-606.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Grimberg B, Zeyl C: The effects of sex and mutation rate on adaptation in test tubes and to mouse hosts by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evolution. 2005, 59 (2): 431-438.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goho S, Bell G: Mild environmental stress elicits mutations affecting fitness in Chlamydomonas. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 2000, 267: 123-129. 10.1098/rspb.2000.0976.
Article
Google Scholar
Marini A, Matmati N, Morpurgo G: Starvation in yeast increases non-adaptive mutation. Curr Genet. 1999, 35 (2): 77-81. 10.1007/s002940050435.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Klapholz S, Waddell CS, Esposito RE: The role of the SPO11 gene in meiotic recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1985, 110: 187-216.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Shonn MA, McCarroll R, Murray AW: Spo13 protects meiotic cohesion at centromeres in meiosis I. Genes & Development. 2002, 16: 1659-1671. 10.1101/gad.975802.
Article
Google Scholar
Steele DF, Morris ME, Jinks-Robertson S: Allelic and ectopic interactions in recombination-defective yeast strains. Genetics. 1991, 127: 53-60.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lang GI, Murray AW: Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2008, 178 (1): 67-82. 10.1534/genetics.107.071506.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wloch DM, Szafraniec K, Borts RH, Korona R: Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2001, 159 (2): 441-452.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Joseph SB, Hall DW: Spontaneous Mutations in Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: More Beneficial Than Expected. Genetics. 2004, 168 (4): 1817-1825. 10.1534/genetics.104.033761.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Korona R: Genetic load of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under diverse environmental conditions. Evolution. 1999, 53 (6): 1966-1971. 10.2307/2640455.
Article
Google Scholar
Szafraniec K, Borts RH, Korona R: Environmental stress and mutational load in diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001, 98 (3): 1107-1112. 10.1073/pnas.021390798.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC: Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1996, Pearson: Prentice Hall, 4
Google Scholar
Hartl DL, Clark AG: Principles of population genetics. 1997, Sunderland: Sinauer, 3
Google Scholar
Bolker BM: Ecological Models and Data in R. 2008, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Google Scholar
Paquin CE, Adams J: Relative Fitness Can Decrease in Evolving Asexual Populations of S. cerevisiae. Nature. 1983, 306 (5941): 368-371. 10.1038/306368a0.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
West SA, Lively CM, Read AF: A pluralist approach to sex and recombination. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 1999, 12: 1003-1012. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00119.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Schwander T, Crespi BJ: Twigs on the tree of life? Neutral and selective models for integrating macroevolutionary patterns with microevolutionary processes in the analysis of asexuality. Molecular Ecology. 2009, 18 (1): 28-42. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03992.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sarkar S, Ma WT, Sandri GvH: On fluctuation analysis: a new, simple and efficient method for computing the expected number of mutants. Genetica. 1992, 85 (2): 173-179. 10.1007/BF00120324.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ma WT, Sandri GV, Sarkar S: Analysis of the Luria-Delbruck Distribution Using Discrete Convolution Powers. Journal of Applied Probability. 1992, 29 (2): 255-267. 10.2307/3214564.
Article
Google Scholar
Stewart FM: Fluctuation Tests: How Reliable Are the Estimates of Mutation Rates?. Genetics. 1994, 137 (4): 1139-1146.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Foster PL: Methods for Determining Spontaneous Mutation Rates. Methods in Enzymology. 2006, 409: 195-213.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Knop M: Evolution of the hemiascomycete yeasts: on life styles and the importance of inbreeding. Bioessays. 2006, 28 (7): 696-708. 10.1002/bies.20435.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wahl LM, Gerrish PJ: The Probability that Beneficial Mutations are Lost in Populations with Periodic Bottlenecks. Evolution. 2001, 55 (12): 2606-2610.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2009, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Google Scholar