Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of pairs of population samples—population pairwise Fst (below diagonal), average number of pairwise difference between populations (above diagonal) and average number of pairwise differences within populations (diagonal elements in bold) among the different populations of Himalayan langurs calculated by distance method

From: Geography vs. past climate: the drivers of population genetic structure of the Himalayan langur

 

WMP

EMP

W–S

S–B

B–M

M–Kr

Kr–Kg

Kg–My

My–Bg

Bg–A

A–T

E-T

WMP

 W–S

0.561

1.421

1.118

3.868

13.768

13.368

19.968

15.702

18.368

18.368

 S–B

0.300

1.378

1.374

4.577

14.477

14.077

20.677

16.410

19.077

19.077

 B–M

0.263

0.115

1.056

4.250

14.150

13.750

20.350

16.083

18.750

18.750

 M–Kr

0.721

0.679

0.698

1.579

14.900

15.000

20.700

16.000

21.500

21.500

 Kr–Kg

0.942

0.900

0.917

0.891

1.800

19.200

24.600

21.533

23.200

24.200

EMP

 Kg–My

0.975

0.935

0.948

0.936

0.976

0.000

10.600

2.444

7.000

7.000

 My–Bg

0.876

0.863

0.879

0.841

0.768

0.728

9.600

10.889

16.200

16.800

 Bg–A

0.943

0.919

0.929

0.911

0.937

0.710

0.682

1.255

9.333

9.333

 A–T

0.977

0.943

0.955

0.945

0.969

1.000

0.753

0.903

0.000

4.000

 E-T

0.973

0.934

0.948

0.935

0.951

1.000

0.637

0.884

1.000

0.000

  1. W-S: WestSutlej; S–B: Sutlej_Bhagirathi; B–M: Bhagirathi_Mahakali; M–Kr: Mahakali_Karnal; Kr–Kg: Karnali_KaliGandaki; Kg–My: KaliGandaki_Marsyagandi; My–Bg: Marsyagandi_BudhiGandak; Bg–A: Budhigandaki_Arun; A–T: Arun_Tamor; E-T: EastTamor