Table 5 Static allometry-corrected (when detected) effect size (ZCR) for the most likely architecture retrieved by EMMLi compared to each other and  to the therian six-module [31] and Macaque phen-gen [30] hypotheses
| Â | MLi | ZCR | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. tetradactyla | VII (7) | − 9.65 | 5.74 × 10–1 | 1.76 × 10–1 | 3.68 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 7.33 × 10–1 |
T. mexicana | VII (7) | − 8.76 | 3.87 × 10–1 | 1.72 × 10–1 | 3.72 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 8.48 × 10–1 |
M. tridactyla | VII (7)* | − 5.92 | 8.70 × 10–1 | 5.87 × 10–1 | 7.77 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 6.35 × 10–1 |
C. didactylus | VII (7) | − 9.04 | 7.02 × 10–1 | 6.61 × 10–1 | 1.83 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 5.21 × 10–1 |
P. maximus | V (6) | − 5.22 | 9.40 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 9.16 × 10–1 | 6.26 × 10–1 | 7.82 × 10–1 |
O. afer | VIII (7) | − 8.47 | 4.85 × 10–1 | 4.82 × 10–1 | 7.74 × 10–1 | 6.48 × 10–1 | 1.00 |
M. javanica | VII (7) | − 8.37 | 6.31 × 10–1 | 8.14 × 10–1 | 8.57 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 8.42 × 10–1 |
M. pentadactyla | VII (7) | − 6.51 | 8.10 × 10–1 | 7.88 × 10–1 | 7.40 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 4.76 × 10–1 |
S. temminckii | V (6) | − 5.85 | 7.90 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 6.87 × 10–1 | 3.46 × 10–1 | 3.43 × 10–1 |
S. gigantea | VIII (7) | − 7.07 | 1.76 × 10–1 | 1.69 × 10–1 | 5.40 × 10–1 | 6.67 × 10–1 | 1.00 |
P. tricuspis | VII (7) | − 8.04 | 7.79 × 10–1 | 8.55 × 10–1 | 7.01 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 9.44 × 10–1 |
P. tetradactyla | VII (7) | − 7.28 | 5.10 × 10–1 | 6.73 × 10–1 | 5.69 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 8.90 × 10–1 |
P. cristatus | VII (7)* | − 7.40 | 6.04 × 10–1 | 7.24 × 10–1 | 3.62 × 10–1 | 1.00 | 9.10 × 10–1 |