Skip to main content

Table 1 EMMLi output highlighting best supported modularity model(s) for the mandible and pharyngeal jaws in both natural and experimental populations. Additional competing models are presented if within two AICc units of the best supported model

From: Ecomorphological divergence and habitat lability in the context of robust patterns of modularity in the cichlid feeding apparatus

Module Model

Population

Depth

K

AICc

Model Lik.

Post. Prob.

Mandible

 ComplexFunction.sep. Mod + same.between

Natural

Deep

7

− 6722

0.82

0.63

 ComplexFunctionII.sep. Mod + sep.between

Natural

Deep

22

− 6719

0.34

0.20

 ComplexFunctionII.sep. Mod + same.between

Natural

Shallow

8

−11,319

1.00

0.99

 ComplexFunctionII.same. Mod + sep.between

Experimental

Benthic/Shallow

17

−13,989

1.00

0.75

 ComplexFunctionII.sep. Mod + same.between

Experimental

Limnetic/Deep

8

−13,176

1.00

0.97

Lower Pharyngeal Jaw

 MuscleSplit.same. Mod + same.between

Natural

Deep

3

− 1057

1.00

0.94

 MuscleSplit.sep. Mod + same.between

Natural

Shallow

7

− 1729

0.99

0.91

 MuscleSplit.sep. Mod + sep.between

Experimental

Benthic/Shallow

16

− 1820

1.00

0.83

 MuscleSplit.sep. Mod + same.between

Experimental

Limnetic/Deep

7

− 1763

1.00

0.99