Skip to main content

Table 2 Statistical comparisons between the best ML tree and alternative phylogenetic hypotheses within podopean copepods

From: Phylogenomic analysis of Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) reveals unexpected similarities with earlier proposed morphological phylogenies

Hypothetical Affinitiesa References claiming the hypothesis -lnLb P-values
KHc SHd AUe
((SI, HA), CY) Huys and Boxshall (1991) [5], Ho (1994) [12], Huys et al. (2006) [19], Minxiao et al. (2011) [23], and Tung et al. (2014) [21] 177,619.7 0.109 0.479 0.085*
((SI, CY), HA) Kabata (1979) [68], Ho (1990) [11], and Dahms (2004) [14] 177,399.7 0.377 0.750 0.445
((HA, CY), SI) none 177,631 <0.001*** <0.001*** <0.001***
  1. aSI = Siphonostomatoida, CY = Cyclopoida, and HA = Harpacticoida
  2. blnL = Log-likelihood scores
  3. c P-value of the Kishino-Hasegawa (KH) test [51]
  4. d P-value of the Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) test [52]
  5. e P-value of the Approximately Unbiased (AU) test [53]
  6. One (*) and triple (***) asterisks denoted statistical significance at the 0.10 and 0.001 level, respectively