Skip to main content

Table 1 Repeated measures ANOVA (a) and two-way ANOVA in 2012 (b) and 2013 (c) for biotype, watering treatment and their interaction on strength of selection as measured by sensitivity of λ to proportional changes in dormancy, emergence, survival-to-non-flowering adult, survival-to-flowering adult, and fecundity

From: Assessing the effects of hybridization and precipitation on invasive weed demography using strength of selection on vital rates

Source of Variation

Dormancy

Emergence

Survival to Non-flowering Adult

Survival to Flowering Adult

Fecundity

(a) Repeated measures ANOVA:

Between subject effects:

 biotype

5.6221,9*

6.2451,9*

1.5561,9

9.5911,9*

0.0181,9

 watering treatment

0.4612,9

0.1092,9

0.8312,9

1.2892,9

0.2522,9

 biotype*watering treatment

.0182,9

0.262,9

0.9222,9

1.9012,9

0.8792,9

Within Subject Effects:

 year

.0491,9

5.0671,9 +

13.8361,9**

5.0611,9 +

15.9551,9**

 year*biotype

.8931,9

0.5261,9

0.81,9

0.1761,9

0.0921,9

 year*watering treatment

0.5562,9

1.8332,9

3.3792,9 +

5.0642,9*

0.3082,9

 year*biotype*watering treatment

0.942,9

0.0072,9

2.9862,9

5.7262,9*

1.5712,9

(b) 2012

 biotype

5.8061,9*

4.5191,9 +

1.7551,9

7.9791,9*

0.0521.9

 watering treatment

0.4752,9

0.8392,9

1.6662,9

2.7882,9

0.1312,9

 biotype*watering treatment

0.172,9

0.0972,9

1.5412,9

3.7962,9

1.1142,9

(c) 2013

 biotype

3.5431,9 +

3.4061,9 +

1.0221,9

7.3881,9*

0.0001,9

 watering treatment

0.4822,9

.5732,9

0.2022,9

1.1372,9

0.4552,9

 biotype*watering treatment

0.1852,9

.2952,9

0.5052,9

1.2912,9

0.8392,9

  1. +indicates p < 0.1, *indicates p < 0.05, and **indicates p < 0.01. Data was natural logarithm transformed; sphericity was assumed