Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive genetic composition of 27 Populus tremuloides populations in northwestern North America

From: Fine-scale assessment of genetic diversity of trembling aspen in northwestern North America

Population Latitude Longitude N G ARa Na Ne Ho He Fis
Pass 53.603 −101.677 20 9 4.48 4.9 ± 0.69 3.1 ± 0.68 0.58 ± 0.09 0.57 ± 0.07 0.01 ± 0.08
Morin Lake 55.143 −106.072 34 19 4.46 5.8 ± 0.71 3.4 ± 0.56 0.64 ± 0.07 0.65 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.1
Biggar 52.315 −107.768 36 18 4.97 7.2 ± 0.94 3.5 ± 0.6 0.62 ± 0.05 0.64 ± 0.05 0.02 ± 0.06
Peter Pond 55.744 −108.776 14 11 3.94 4.5 ± 0.69 3.0 ± 0.52 0.72 ± 0.07 0.61 ± 0.04 −0.2 ± 0.11
Calling Lake 55.292 −112.970 36 26 5.08 8.5 ± 1.28 4.1 ± 1.09 0.58 ± 0.07 0.63 ± 0.07 0.05 ± 0.04
Red Earth 56.607 −115.308 33 29 4.82 7.9 ± 0.98 3.5 ± 0.61 0.64 ± 0.06 0.66 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.06
High Level 58.338 −117.237 18 10 4.06 4.5 ± 0.48 2.9 ± 0.36 0.65 ± 0.06 0.6 ± 0.05 −0.1 ± 0.09
Ministik 53.276 −112.932 31 14 4.11 5 ± 0.89 3.2 ± 0.54 0.68 ± 0.09 0.59 ± 0.07 −0.18 ± 0.13
Alders Flat 52.602 −114.964 26 16 3.98 5.2 ± 0.76 2.9 ± 0.36 0.76 ± 0.07 0.61 ± 0.04 −0.26 ± 0.13
Hinton 53.429 −117.531 22 22 4.92 7.6 ± 1.15 3.9 ± 0.92 0.62 ± 0.07 0.64 ± 0.05 0.05 ± 0.05
Dunvegan 55.828 −118.263 33 27 4.56 7.3 ± 0.96 3.5 ± 0.92 0.6 ± 0.06 0.61 ± 0.05 0 ± 0.04
Dawson Creek 55.778 −120.816 8 7 4.7 4.7 ± 0.7 2.9 ± 0.59 0.56 ± 0.07 0.57 ± 0.05 0.03 ± 0.05
Fort Nelson 58.111 −122.746 37 20 4.29 6 ± 1.13 3.4 ± 0.93 0.66 ± 0.06 0.6 ± 0.05 −0.11 ± 0.07
Liard Spring 59.355 −125.957 24 24 4.76 7.3 ± 0.98 3.9 ± 0.83 0.63 ± 0.07 0.65 ± 0.06 0.04 ± 0.03
Simpson Lake 60.676 −129.222 12 11 4.81 5.6 ± 0.64 3.3 ± 0.6 0.64 ± 0.06 0.63 ± 0.05 −0.01 ± 0.06
Whitehorse 60.784 −136.025 17 13 4.46 5.7 ± 0.99 3.3 ± 0.74 0.58 ± 0.07 0.59 ± 0.06 −0.01 ± 0.09
Taylor Hwy 63.887 −142.243 15 15 4.79 6.3 ± 1.04 3.7 ± 0.76 0.63 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.06 −0.03 ± 0.07
Tok 63.370 −142.566 26 26 4.51 6.9 ± 0.91 3.6 ± 0.81 0.6 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.05 0.05 ± 0.05
Delta 63.809 −145.094 12 12 4.83 5.8 ± 0.95 3.7 ± 0.99 0.53 ± 0.06 0.63 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.06
Glennallen 62.005 −145.341 29 29 4.87 7.5 ± 1.16 3.8 ± 0.83 0.61 ± 0.06 0.65 ± 0.06 0.06 ± 0.03
Chena Park 65.105 −147.531 15 15 4.82 5.9 ± 0.69 3.7 ± 0.75 0.71 ± 0.07 0.66 ± 0.05 −0.07 ± 0.09
Steese Hwy 65.161 −147.743 58 56 4.89 9.5 ± 1.27 4.1 ± 1.04 0.65 ± 0.05 0.65 ± 0.05 0 ± 0.04
Fairbanks 64.902 −148.277 9 9 4.67 5.1 ± 0.43 3.3 ± 0.56 0.63 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.05 −0.02 ± 0.07
Richardson 64.267 −149.200 10 10 4.47 5.4 ± 0.52 2.9 ± 0.31 0.63 ± 0.05 0.6 ± 0.05 −0.05 ± 0.04
Palmer 61.581 −149.249 27 27 4.81 7.5 ± 1.28 3.9 ± 0.9 0.6 ± 0.06 0.66 ± 0.05 0.08 ± 0.05
Kenai 60.480 −149.724 17 17 5.22 7.3 ± 1.05 4.3 ± 0.96 0.65 ± 0.07 0.65 ± 0.07 −0.01 ± 0.06
Coldfoot 67.425 −150.144 31 31 4.85 8 ± 1.22 3.8 ± 0.91 0.6 ± 0.05 0.65 ± 0.05 0.07 ± 0.04
  1. N number of sampled trees genotyped, G number of unique genotypes used in the analyses, AR allelic richness, N a average number of alleles per locus, N e average number of effective alleles per locus, H o observed heterozygosity, H e expected heterozygosity, F is interbreeding coefficient
  2. aCalculated with rarefaction method based on the minimum number of unique genotypes
\