Skip to main content

Table 3 Sequence identity analysis

From: GPR50 is the mammalian ortholog of Mel1c: Evidence of rapid evolution in mammals

  

Xenopus Laevis

Gallus gallus

Mododelphis domestica

Mus musculus

Homo sapiens

  

MT1

MT2

Mel1c GPR50

MT1

MT2

Mel1c GPR50

MT1

MT2

Mel1c GPR50

MT1

MT2

Mel1c GPR50

MT1

MT2

Mel1c GPR50

Xenopus laevis

MT1

               
 

MT2

55

              
 

Mel1c GPR50

59

71

             

Gallus gallus

MT1

62

71

70

            
 

MT2

57

82

68

69

           
 

Mel1c GPR50

56

73

79

69

72

          

Monodelphis domestica

MT1

57

65

67

78

68

71

         
 

MT2

38

50

64

67

71

68

61

        
 

Mel1c GPR50

54

72

56

54

53

57

54

53

       

Mus musculus

MT1

58

43

67

78

68

66

75

64

55

      
 

MT2

55

65

62

60

65

61

56

65

48

58

     
 

Mel1c GPR50

38

63

46

52

51

46

48

51

45

53

45

    

Homo sapiens

MT1

59

64

70

80

69

70

77

61

54

83

59

50

   
 

MT2

54

70

64

59

69

61

59

69

49

61

82

48

61

  
 

Mel1c GPR50

39

44

49

50

52

52

49

48

47

52

47

71

51

50

 
  1. Percentages of amino acid identity between MT1, MT2, and Mel1c/GPR50 sequences from five species, Xenopus laevis, Gallus gallus, Monodelphis domestica, Mus Musculus, and Homo sapiens All the sequences were compared with a Smith-Waterman local alignment software [57]. All the results ranged from 38% (Xl-MT1 vs Mm-GPR50) to 83% (Mm-MT1 vs Hs-MT1) of identity. The percentage of identity between protein sequences of paralogous genes ranged from 50% (Hs-MT2 vs Hs-GPR50) to 72% (Gg-MT2 vs Gg-Mel1c). The percentage of identity between protein sequences of orthologous genes ranged from 45% (Md-GPR50 vs Mm-GPR50) to 83% (Mm-MT1 vs Hs-MT1).
  2. Percentages of identity between sequences encoded by orthologous genes are written in bold.
  3. Percentages of identity between sequences encoded by paralogous genes are written in italic.