Skip to main content

Table 3 Fertility parameter estimates

From: Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population

Genotyping error   Parameter estimates LRT
Phenotypical trait f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 1 [CI] f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 2 [CI] f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 3 [CI] f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 4 [CI] f ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWGMbGzgaqcaaaa@2E11@ 5 [CI] d.f. K P-value
Without Flowering intensity 0.06 [0.01–1.11] 0.34 [0.04–3.26] 0.91 [0.10–8.02] 0.63 [0.06–6.23] 1.00 4 12.6 < 0.05
  DBH 0 0.21 [0.04–1.02] 0.68 [0.20–2.30] 1.31 [0.44–3.90] 1.00 3 24.2 < 10-3
  Fruiting intensity 0.47 [0.03–8.27] 0.57 [0.05–6.19] 0.30 [0.03–3.02] 0.35 [0.03–3.47] 1.00 4 2.6 0.64
  Gall attacks 1.00 1.56 [0.32–7.65] 1.71 [0.52–5.61] 0.41 [0.07–2.21] 0 3 5.0 0.18
  Sexual type 0 1.00 0.97 [0.13–7.32] 1.14 [0.16–8.33] - 2 1.4 0.51
Low Flowering intensity 0.27 [0.07–1.02] 0.53 [0.19–1.48] 0.92 [0.35–2.43] 1.72 [0.66–4.51] 1.00 4 16.0 < 0.01
  DBH 0 0.28 [0.10–0.78] 0.62 [0.24–1.58] 1.39 [0.61–3.14] 1.00 3 34.4 < 10-5
  Fruiting intensity 0.10 [0.02–0.39] 0.31 [0.12–0.85] 0.16 [0.05–0.48] 0.22 [0.08–0.58] 1.00 4 9.2 0.06
  Gall attacks 1.00 2.21 [0.80–6.15] 2.48 [1.13–5.45] 0.90 [0.29–2.76] 0 3 8.2 < 0.05
  Sexual type 12.01 [1.12–128.30] 1.00 1.14 [0.31–4.20] 0.84 [0.24–2.97] - 3 2.2 0.54
High Flowering intensity 0.18 [0.04–0.79] 0.35 [0.10–1.27] 0.84 [0.26–2.78] 1.67 [0.50–5.63] 1.00 4 35.2 < 10-5
  DBH 0.03 [0.01–0.28] 0.34 [0.15–0.79] 0.84 [0.41–1.75] 1.24 [0.62–2.50] 1.00 4 44.0 < 10-5
  Fruiting intensity 0.28 [0.05–1.54] 0.71 [0.20–2.47] 0.37 [0.11–1.26] 0.49 [0.15–1.62] 1.00 4 7.8 0.10
  Gall attacks 1.00 2.16 [0.76–6.18] 1.71 [0.85–3.47] 1.50 [0.71–3.17] 0.60 [0.07–5.22] 4 4.0 0.43
  Sexual type 12.38 [0.82–186.18] 1.00 1.61 [0.21–12.64] 1.34 [0.17–10.39] - 3 5.4 0.15
  1. Fertility parameters relative to phenotypic traits and gall attacks (f) estimated under complete model (Equation 4) with Exp. Power kernel. The effect of each factor was tested by removing the factor and comparing to the complete model with all factors by a LRT. Indices indicate different levels of each factor (Flowering and Fruiting intensities: 1 = Anecdotal, 2 = Low, 3 = Intermediate, 4 = Abundant, 5 = Massive; DBH: 1 = < 40 cm, 2 = < 80 cm, 3 = < 120 cm, 4 = < 160 cm, 5 = > 200 cm; Gall attacks: 1 = Inexistent, 2 = Low, 3 = Intermediate, 4 = High, 5 = Massive; Sexual type: 1 = Pure males (MM), 2 = Hermaphrodites with a high proportion of male flowers (MH), 3 = Hermaphrodites with a low proportion of male flowers (HM), 4 = Pure hermaphrodites (HH).