Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of mip-1 introgressed lines.

From: The genetics of ray pattern variation in Caenorhabditis briggsae

  p values for reciprocal chi-squared tests1
  AF16 PB1060 PB1061 PB1062 PB1065
ray pattern2      
AF16 --- 9.6 × 10-30 3.3 × 10-54 6.5 × 10-32 5.3 × 10-46
PB1060 7.9 × 10-4 --- 0.031 0.093 1.2 × 10-5
PB1061 2.2 × 10-7 0.026 --- 0.367 0.011
PB1062 2.8 × 10-6 0.092 0.293 --- 0.091
PB1065 2.3 × 10-9 1.3 × 10-4 0.038 0.151 ---
ray position3      
AF16 --- 6.9 × 10-4 1.5 × 10-5 3.6 × 10-4 3.2 × 10-4
PB1060 1.32 × 10-29 --- 0.068 0.72 0.67
PB1061 6.4 × 10-53 0.053 --- 0.12 0.14
PB1062 8.3 × 10-30 0.73 0.16 --- 0.95
PB1065 1.65 × 10-36 0.66 0.14 0.95 ---
ray fusion4      
AF16 --- 0.13 5.3 × 10-3 3.1 × 10-3 9.8 × 10-6
PB1060 0.013 --- 0.061 0.033 3.1 × 10-5
PB1061 4.74 × 10-6 0.057 --- 0.80 0.029
PB1062 9.37 × 10-7 0.030 0.80 --- 0.052
PB1065 1.33 × 10-16 1.59 × 10-6 0.013 0.028 ---
  1. 1 Probabilities in each column were determined using frequencies of different ray patterns in each strain (column head) as the null hypothesis.
  2. 2 p values for the complete ray pattern (3 posterior and fused, 3 posterior not fused, 3 anterior).
  3. 3 p values for ray placement (anterior vs posterior).
  4. 4 p values for fusion of rays 3 and 4 when ray 3 is in a posterior position.