Skip to main content

Table 1 Population genetic summaries of N. australis and N. obscura

From: Variation in intraspecific demography drives localised concordance but species-wide discordance in response to past climatic change

Alignment

Species-wide

Individual populations

Species

Pop

N

AR

Hs

Ne

Π

SNPs

N. australis

NauANG

5

1.138 (± 0.339)

0.029 (± 0.106)

 

1.59 × 10–4

2,446

NauALE

5

20

1.354 (± 0.480)

0.062 (± 0.165)

0.179 (± 0.142)

71.3 [35.9–520.9]

1.23 × 10–3

1198

NauGRG

5

1.123 (± 0.313)

0.035 (± 0.108)

 

8.84 × 10–5

5282

NauMRG

5

1.116 (± 0.312)

0.037 (± 0.119)

 

1.62 × 10–4

3835

NauGRF

5

1.092 (± 0.285)

0.027 (± 0.106)

 

7.84 × 10–5

2969

NauBAR

4

1.240 (± 0.428)

0.061 (± 0.145)

 

2.02 × 10–4

5084

NauMG

4

1.216 (± 0.413)

0.056 (± 0.138)

 

1.57 × 10–4

5357

NauGCH

4

1.181 (± 0.387)

0.047 (± 0.136)

 

1.88 × 10–4

4272

 

Total

56

1.241

0.0439

 

2.83 × 10–4

17,389

N. obscura

NobCHI

5

15

1.151 (± 0.347)

0.038 (± 0.117)

0.136 (± 0.108)

14.9 [4.6–652.2]

1.69 × 10–4

721

NobMEC

5

1.030 (± 0.166

0.011 (± 0.069)

 

2.11 × 10–5

1002

NobMCL

4

1.100 (± 0.290)

0.026 (± 0.094)

 

4.18 × 10–5

1633

NobMRG

4

1.058 (± 0.234)

0.020 (± 0.093)

 

3.23 × 10–5

1454

NobGCL

5

1.070 (± 0.250)

0.019 (± 0.088)

 

2.49 × 10–5

1350

 

Total

33

1.168

0.0237

 

5.78 × 10–5

15,715

T-test

  

T = 2.38 (p < 0.04)

T = 2.93 (p = 0.01)

 

W = 56 (p = 0.01)

T = 4.63 (p < 0.01)

  1. N = total number of samples per population. AR = rarefied allelic richness. Hs = rarefied gene diversity. Ne = effective population size, with 95% confidence intervals estimated by jack-knifing in square brackets. π = nucleotide diversity. Species-wide alignment values are reported as means of means across all loci ± standard deviation under rarefaction (n = 4). For Lake Alexandrina populations, gene diversities were also calculated for individual population alignments and rarefaction of n = 15 samples (reported second). Populations means across species were compared using either an unpaired two-samples t-test (T) or Wilcoxon rank test (W)