Table 5 Test statistics of experiments on postmating isolation between microsatellites clusters and microhabitats in Nasonia vitripennis
Response variable | Factors | Chi2 | Df | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F1-female offspring | Ms-cluster (k = 3) | 23.634 | 1 | 0.000*** |
Ms-cluster (k = 5) | 8.905 | 1 | 0.003** | |
Microhabitat | 0.530 | 1 | 0.492 | |
Female strain | 0.112 | 1 | 0.737 | |
Female habitat | 0.155 | 1 | 0.693 | |
F1-male offspring | Ms-cluster (k = 3) | 6.099 | 1 | 0.0135* |
Ms-cluster (k = 5) | 0.052 | 1 | 0.820 | |
Microhabitat | 9.212 | 1 | 0.002** | |
Female strain | 33.905 | 1 | 0.000*** | |
Female habitat | 34.464 | 1 | 0.000*** | |
F1-total offspring | Ms-cluster (k = 3) | 23.023 | 1 | 0.000*** |
Ms-cluster (k = 5) | 6.963 | 1 | 0.009 ** | |
Microhabitat | 1.782 | 1 | 0.185 | |
Female strain | 2.792 | 1 | 0.095 | |
Female habitat | 2.576 | 1 | 0.108 | |
Sexratio | Ms-cluster (k = 3) | 0.426 | 1 | 0.551 |
Ms-cluster (k = 5) | 0.483 | 1 | 0.524 | |
Microhabitat | 0.142 | 1 | 0.720 | |
Female strain | 1.597 | 1 | 0.209 | |
Female habitat | 1.575 | 1 | 0.206 |