|
Datatype
|
Score type
|
Comparison
|
Estimate (99% CI)
|
|---|
|
AA
|
SP
|
Differs-matches
|
− 0.002 (− 0.011, 0.007)
|
|
AA
|
SP
|
Stable-matches
|
0.014 (0.006, 0.022)
|
|
AA
|
SP
|
Stable-differs
|
0.016 (0.008, 0.024)
|
|
AA
|
TC
|
Differs-matches
|
− 0.007 (− 0.033, 0.018)
|
|
AA
|
TC
|
Stable-matches
|
0.022 (− 0.001, 0.045)
|
|
AA
|
TC
|
Stable-differs
|
0.029 (0.006, 0.052)
|
|
NT
|
SP
|
Differs-matches
|
− 0.003 (− 0.015, 0.01)
|
|
NT
|
SP
|
Stable-matches
|
0.043 (0.031, 0.055)
|
|
NT
|
SP
|
Stable-differs
|
0.046 (0.034, 0.058)
|
|
NT
|
TC
|
Differs-matches
|
− 0.006 (− 0.032, 0.021)
|
|
NT
|
TC
|
Stable-matches
|
0.093 (0.066, 0.119)
|
|
NT
|
TC
|
Stable-differs
|
0.098 (0.071, 0.125)
|
- The “Comparison” column indicates the difference in effect sizes between the given groupings, which were compared in a post-hoc Tukey test with corrected P-values. Rows with adjusted \(P\le 0.01\) are shown in bold. Corresponding results for model selection with BIC and AICc are in Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2, respectively
