Skip to main content

Table 3 Mutual information ranking for the prebiotic reduced alphabet

From: Reduced alphabet of prebiotic amino acids optimally encodes the conformational space of diverse extant protein folds

Interaction domain

Fold class [SCOP #]

Unweighted mutual information (I)

Normalized mutual information (Inorm)

\( {\mathbf{\mathfrak{R}}}_{\mathrm{prebiotic}}^{\mathbf{10}} \) rank

\( {\mathfrak{R}}_{\mathrm{prebiotic}}^{10} \) percentile rank (%)

\( {\mathbf{\mathfrak{R}}}_{\mathrm{prebiotic}}^{\mathbf{10}} \) rank

\( {\mathfrak{R}}_{\mathrm{prebiotic}}^{10} \) percentile rank (%)

backbone (Ibb)

all data [1–4, 7]

48

99.97

859

99.54

all-α [1]

3351

98.19

1688

99.09

all-β [2]

2834

98.47

1899

98.97

α/β [3]

13

99.99

124

99.93

α + β [4]

52

99.97

396

99.79

small [7]

270

99.85

878

99.52

backbone + contact (Itotal)

all data [1–4, 7]

7389

96.00

 

all-α [1]

18,289

90.10

all-β [2]

18,333

90.08

α/β [3]

4127

97.77

α + β [4]

5325

97.12

small [7]

104,252

43.57

  1. The table shows the rank of the prebiotic reduced alphabet, in terms of mutual information (for both Ibb and Itotal), among the spectrum of all 184,756 possible 10-amino-acid reduced alphabets. The unweighted mutual information is described in Eq. (7) for Ibb and in Eq. ((2) for Itotal, while the normalized mutual information Ibb,norm is described in Eq. (8)