Table 2 Pairwise p-distances among concatenated datasets of the studied specimens
| Â | E.n.n.3 | E.n.n.7 | E.n.n.9 | E.n.n. R10 | E.n.n. R21 | E. andrei | L. rubellus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E.n.n.3 | – | 2.81% | 2.80% | 1.93% | 3.01% | 4.73% | 6.83% |
E.n.n.7 | 1.87% | – | 0.85% | 2.72% | 3.08% | 4.76% | 6.87% |
E.n.n.9 | 1.94% | 0.55% | – | 2.68% | 3.08% | 4.78% | 6.91% |
E.n.n. R10 | 1.27% | 1.82% | 1.82% | – | 3.00% | 4.65% | 6.81% |
E.n.n. R21 | 1.93% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 2.01% | – | 4.83% | 6.94% |
E. andrei | 3.04% | 2.99% | 3.07% | 3.04% | 3.17% | – | 6.84% |
L. rubellus | 4.48% | 4.49% | 4.50% | 4.51% | 4.50% | 4.35% | – |