Ancient DNA reveals genetic connections between early Di-Qiang and Han Chinese

Table 5 Parameter estimates of best supported Model 1

Population	Prior			Distribution	Mean	Mode	95% HPD		Pseudo-observed
Population	Prior			Distribution	Mean	Mode	95% HPD		R²	Bias	RMSE	Coverage	Factor 2
Mogou	1	–	100,000	Uniform	799	824	699	887	0.45	0.18	0.33	85	0.94
Hengbei	1	–	100,000	Uniform	1489	1559	1356	1759	0.84	0	0.11	90	1
Northern Han	1	–	100,000	Uniform	657	600	596	826	0.9	−0.1	0.26	90	1
T1	1	–	20,000	Uniform	5472	5661	5253	6389	0.76	−0.02	0.16	70	1
T2	1	–	20,000	Uniform	3505	3703	3301	3809	0.51	−0.02	0.15	80	1
a	0.01	–	1	Uniform	0.146	0.143	0.127	0.183	0.44	0.94	1.12	79	0.7

Mogou, Hengbei, Northern Han are effective haploids
T1, Divergence time between Mogou and Hengbei (yr BP)
T2, admixture time between Mogou and Hengbei (yr BP)
a, proportion of admixture from Mogou into Northern Han
μ, mtDNA (control region) substitution rate 9.883 × 10⁻⁸ per site per year were used according to ancient DNA-calibrated rates [52]

ISSN: 2730-7182