Skip to main content

Table 4 Clade support obtained with different phylogenetic methods

From: Molecular phylogeny of the subfamily Stevardiinae Gill, 1858 (Characiformes: Characidae): classification and the evolution of reproductive traits

Clades

Concatenation

Species tree

RAxML

Garli

TNT

STAR

(ML)

(ML)

(MP)

Stevardiinae

100

100

99

yesa

Creagrutini

100

99

77

n/o

Diapomini

83

76

61

yes

Diapomini + Lepidocharax

43

97

19

n/o

Eretmobryconini

100

100

94

yes

Glandulocaudini

100

100

95

yes

Hemibryconini

100

99

82

yes

Stevardiini

100

100

98

yes

Xenurobryconini

100

100

99

yes

Bryconacidnus “clade”

99

94

81

yes

Bryconamericus, new circumscription

60

63

49

n/o

Creagrutus

99

98

78

yes

Diapoma, new circumscription

99

92

61

n/o

Eretmobrycon, new circumscription

100

100

86

yes

Hemibrycon, new circumscription

59

52

n/o

yes

Knodus, new circumscription

35

74

38

n/o

Piabarchus, new circumscription

81

80

74

yes

Piabina, new circumscription

100

100

99

yes

  1. Support for clades representing tribes and genera proposed in this study (Fig. 3) obtained on the basis of maximum likelihood (RAxML and Garli), parsimony (TNT), and species-tree (STAR) analyses. Bootstrap values (%) are shown when the clade was obtained with maximum likelihood and parsimony, or indicated otherwise when it was not obtained (n/o). For the STAR analysis presence (yes) or absence (no) of the clade is indicated
  2. aSome gene trees did not support the monophyly of Stevardiinae