Skip to main content

Table 5 Divergence times and effective migration rates estimated using a coalescent approach from the mitochondrial control region data (MDIV software)

From: Parallel evolution in Ugandan crater lakes: repeated evolution of limnetic body shapes in haplochromine cichlid fish

 

Location

KAZ vs.

T (μ = 0.057)

M

T (μ = 0.0325)

Great lake

Source

EDW

7.0 (0–14.2)

6.312 (1.080)

12.3 (0–25)

Great lake

Source

GEO

4.5 (0–10.2)

7.671 (0.216)

7.9 (0–17.7)

Crater lake

North

BUG

49.0 (42.3 - 55.7)

0.009 (0.006)

85.9 (74.1 - 97.7)

Crater lake

North

CHI

82.6 (79.5 - 85.7)

0.008 (0.006)

144.9 (139.2 - 150.6)

Crater lake

North

KAB

46.6 (41.5 - 51.7)

0.025 (0.034)

81.8 (73–90.6)

Crater lake

Central

KAT

94.3 (90.3 - 98.2)

0.003 (0.001)

165.4 (158.3 - 172.5)

Crater lake

South

KAM

56.8 (53.3 - 60.3)

0.009 (0.006)

99.6 (93.5 - 105.7)

Crater lake

South

KAW

44.5 (37.2 - 51.8)

0.989 (0.076)

78.1 (65.6 - 90.6)

Crater lake

South

MAF

60.5 (51.4 - 69.1)

0.009 (0.007)

106.2 (90.9 - 121.5)

Crater lake

South

RWI

43.1 (34.3 - 51.9)

0.251 (0.018)

75.6 (60.3 - 90.9)

Crater lake

South

NKU

47.6 (39–56.2)

0.004 (0.001)

83.4 (68.3 - 98.5)

Group 1

North

CHI + BUG + KAB

71.5 (62.6 - 80.4)

0.0006 (0.0004)

125.4 (109.8 - 141)

Group 2

Central

KAT + MIR

89.0 (75.8 - 102.2)

0.002 (0.001)

156.1 (133–179.2)

Group 3

South

Southern craters

54.4 (50.5 - 58.3)

0.687 (0.049)

95.4 (88.6 - 102.2)

  1. Estimates are based on four independent runs. T in thousands of years (95% confidence interval), M = 2 Ne m. Group 1, 2 and 3 correspond to the different mitochondrial lineages suggested from Figure 3.