Skip to main content

Table 2 AICc and BIC scores for every partitioning scheme selected for each dataset

From: Automatic selection of partitioning schemes for phylogenetic analyses using iterative k-means clustering of site rates

Dataset name No partitioning User Greedy TIGER site rates Likelihood site rates
AICc
Anderson 2014 36721 34972 34972 32584 28681
Cognato 2001 39373 37172 37172 36262 32216
Grande 2013 111819 108501 108501 105300 96616
Kang 2013 34157 33699 33682 30091 19490
Kawahara 2013 32238 29940 29940 28385 23488
Kjer 2007 1120392 1075872 1075749 1059594 1008180
Leavitt 2013 445052 423826 423389 410220 371585
McCormack 2013 972461 963551 961143 828180 690645
Oaks 2011 80550 74814 74686 69278 58947
Sharanowski 2011 218188 213696 213696 211251 198268
BIC
Anderson 2014 38444 36820 36820 34590 30649
Cognato 2001 39890 38067 38056 37168 32701
Grande 2013 112673 109862 109741 107929 100751
Kang 2013 34578 34650 34364 31617 30448
Kawahara 2013 33057 31052 30989 29561 25020
Kjer 2007 1121793 1081392 1079270 1065998 1020447
Leavitt 2013 445625 429638 425574 413343 379692
McCormack 2013 973122 992389 967479 830140 748946
Oaks 2011 81673 77190 76316 71117 58988
Sharanowski 2011 219937 215953 215872 214802 202707