|
Chimpanzee Population
b
|
Two-population model
|
|---|
|
Distance only
c
|
Environment only
d
|
Environment + Distance
e
|
|---|
|
P. t. ellioti
f
|
6
|
20
|
-
|
|
P. t. troglodytes
|
12
|
42
|
48
|
| |
Three-population model
|
| |
Distance only
|
Environment only
|
Environment + Distance
|
|
P. t. ellioti (Rainforest)
|
2
|
91
|
-
|
|
P. t. ellioti (Ecotone)
|
1
|
37
|
-
|
|
P. t. troglodytes
|
12
|
42
|
48
|
-
aIn order to examine genetic diversity within populations, only microsatellite data (F
ST
) was used.
-
bSub-groupings of chimpanzee populations correspond to distinct genetic populations as determined by Mitchell et al. [23]. The P. t. troglodytes group was included in both the two- and three-population model, as only the P. t. ellioti group is sub-divided in the three-population model.
-
cModel includes only geographic distance between sample locations as a predictor variable.
-
dModel only includes environmental data layers as predictor variables.
-
eEntries are blank because geographic distance was not a significant contributor to the final model.
-
fA least cost path layer for the Mbam River was included when running the P. t. ellioti two-population model, but as it was not a significant contributor, was not included in this table.
