Skip to main content

Table 2 Genetic characterisation and demographic parameters for 20 populations of Tabebuia aurea

From: Recovering species demographic history from multi-model inference: the case of a Neotropical savanna tree species

Pop

N

A

Ar

Ar*

H o

H e

f

θ

θ - 95% interval

N e

θ - 95% interval

g

g - 95% interval

AGE

30

19.2

3.6

6.3

0.860

0.930

0.075

0.023

0.010 - 0.037

0.568

0.250 - 0.934

-207.459

-476.382 - -1.057

ARA

12

10.4

3.5

5.7

0.710

0.898

0.209

0.025

0.006 - 0.062

0.614

0.158 - 1.544

-161.422

-436.258 - -5.331

BAG

26

13.4

3.4

5.6

0.727

0.885

0.178

0.021

0.009 - 0.054

0.515

0.213 - 1.338

-170.238

-473.217 - -43.702

BAR

15

12.2

3.5

5.9

0.710

0.906

0.217

0.030

0.007 - 0.079

0.740

0.186 - 1.972

-270.417

-498.155 - -33.706

BOD

22

16.1

3.6

6.3

0.748

0.928

0.194

0.039

0.008 - 0.109

0.972

0.205 - 2.733

-148.207

-415.330 - -11.316

CAC

30

16.7

3.6

6.3

0.715

0.929

0.230

0.025

0.009 - 0.074

0.617

0.236 - 1.848

-263.149

-491.464 - -45.690

CHG

24

13.9

3.4

5.7

0.680

0.884

0.231

0.022

0.006 - 0.050

0.555

0.149 - 1.260

-197.548

-471.766 - -18.742

FAT

35

17.0

3.6

6.1

0.687

0.917

0.251

0.022

0.007 - 0.045

0.541

0.170 - 1.122

-163.550

-467.321 - -46.328

GSV

8

7.5

3.3

5.3

0.780

0.874

0.107

0.040

0.005 - 0.116

1.001

0.113 - 2.893

-220.179

-468.852 - -41.132

NIQ

28

13.2

3.4

5.6

0.675

0.883

0.236

0.016

0.009 - 0.024

0.405

0.219 - 0.610

-253.793

-486.822 - -1.000

PAN

23

15.2

3.6

6.2

0.669

0.926

0.278

0.036

0.008 - 0.129

0.902

0.210 - 3.218

-157.302

-473.707 - -68.541

PNE

16

14.5

3.6

6.2

0.677

0.929

0.272

0.039

0.008 - 0.101

0.979

0.202 - 2.523

-221.599

-482.206 - -4.158

POT

16

12.1

3.3

5.5

0.744

0.875

0.150

0.021

0.004 - 0.060

0.525

0.097 - 1.500

-202.442

-469.204 - -9.047

PTU

32

15.9

3.4

5.8

0.669

0.896

0.253

0.022

0.012 - 0.036

0.540

0.295 - 0.901

-285.170

-485.482 - -23.824

SCA

29

9.7

3.1

4.7

0.664

0.814

0.185

0.013

0.006 - 0.022

0.323

0.140 - 0.551

-206.995

-489.117 - -1.396

SDO

3

3.9

3.2

-

0.606

0.932

0.350

-

-

-

-

-

-

SEC

4

4.5

3.1

-

0.742

0.852

0.129

-

-

-

-

-

-

STZ

17

11.2

3.4

5.5

0.749

0.885

0.153

0.029

0.007 - 0.095

0.733

0.173 - 2.378

-306.082

-483.282 - -1.000

SUM

14

9.0

3.2

4.9

0.636

0.845

0.247

0.017

0.009 - 0.033

0.437

0.229 - 0.821

-272.212

-489.161 - -19.884

VIB

30

12.3

3.3

5.3

0.660

0.865

0.237

0.015

0.009 - 0.024

0.384

0.216 - 0.600

-173.979

-483.035 - -15.963

Mean

 

36.2

3.7

6.7

0.705

0.893

0.209

-

-

  

-

-

SD

 

9.3

0.1

0.3

0.057

0.033

0.068

-

-

  

-

-

Overall

414

      

7.033

0.858 - 1.000

2,109

1,372 - 38,400

-0.077

-1.706 - 1.244

  1. N - number of individuals sampled; A - mean number of alleles per locus; Ar - allelic richness; Ar* - allelic richness excluding populations SEC and SDO; H o - observed heterozygosity; H e - expected heterozygosity; f - inbreeding coefficient (all values are significant P < 0.01); θ - coalescent parameter; 95% credibility interval around the estimate; N e - effective population size; g - exponential growth parameter (all values are significantly different from zero based on the credibility interval around the estimates).
Back to article page

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us