Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of likelihood-based tests of alternative topologies

From: Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades

Constraint Diff -ln L AU KH wSH
Unconstrained (ML tree) <79199.95> 0.855 0.537 0.999
Ctenohystrica at the base of the rodent tree 0.5 0.650 0.463 0.917
Myodonta at the base of the mouse-related clade 1.1 0.604 0.386 0.928
Mouse-related clade at the base of the rodent tree 2.5 0.391 0.296 0.853
Anomaluromorpha at the base of the mouse-related clade 3.0 0.159 0.156 0.733
[Cavioidea+Erethizontoidea] not monophyletic 7.4 0.148 0.087 0.360
[Chinchilloidea+Octodontoidea] not monophyletic 8.0 0.206 0.149 0.471
Paraphyly of the squirrel-related clade 11.9 0.123 0.085 0.293
Caviomorpha at the base of Hystricognathi 12.2 0.128 0.079 0.278
Phiomorpha at the base of Hystricognathi 12.2 0.128 0.079 0.278
Paraphyly of the mouse-related clade 31.4 0.024 0.017 0.050
Paraphyly of Ctenohystrica 51.8 3e-4 < 1e-10 < 1e-10
  1. Diff -ln L: observed log-likelihood difference between the ML topology and the alternative. AU: p-values of the approximately unbiased test. KH: p-values of the Kishino-Hasegawa test. wSH: p-values of the weighted Shimodaira – Hasegawa test. Significant p-values are indicated in bold.