Widespread positive selection in the photosynthetic Rubisco enzyme

Table 2 LRT summary statistics

						11th class from M8		M7-M8		M8a-M8		Both LRTs
Lineage	N ^c	Tree length ^d	dS ^e	dN ^f	M0 dN/dS ^g	p,%	dN/dS	Np ⁱ	% ^j	Np ^I	% ^j	Np ^I	% ^j
angiosperms	122	0.56 (0.31)	0.55 (0.34)	0.07 (0.04)	0.17 (0.12)	3.4 (2.4)	5.23 (6.56)	96	79	103	84	95	78
gymnosperms	8	0.27 (0.27)	0.26 (0.31)	0.04 (0.02)	0.23 (0.12)	3.2 (2.7)	8.57 (7.13)	7	88	8	100	7	88
ferns and allies ^a	9	0.96 (1.05)	0.95 (1.06)	0.07 (0.05)	0.10 (0.05)	1.4 (1.0)	4.15 (1.68)	9	100	7	78	7	78
mosses	4	0.75 (0.48)	1.35 (0.87)	0.06 (0.04)	0.04 (0.00)	1.6 (2.1)	3.77 (2.56)	4	100	3	75	3	75
algae ^b	7	3.49 (2.94)	6.33 (6.25)	0.15 (0.12)	0.03 (0.03)	0.0	n.a.	2	29	0	0	0	0
cyanobacteria	1	2.65	3.01	0.12	0.04	1.9	1.02	1	100	0	0	0	0
all	151	0.72 (0.95)	0.87 (1.81)	0.07 (0.05)	0.16 (0.12)	3.1 (2.4)	5.21 (6.31)	119	79	121	80	112	74

In the columns three to eight mean values and standard deviations (in brackets) are given.
^a Including Filicophyta, Lycopodiophyta and Equisetophyta.
^b Including Charophyta, Phaeophyta, Bacillariophyta, Rhodophyta and Euglenida.
^c Number of groups analyzed.
^d Estimated using M0 model in PAML.
^e The rate of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site calculated using M0 model in PAML.
^f The rate of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site calculated using M0 model in PAML.
^g The ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions rates (dN/dS) calculated using M0 model in PAML.
ⁱ Number of groups with detected positive selection in rbcL among investigated plant lineages. P < 0.05
^j Proportion of groups with detected positive selection in rbcL among investigated plant lineages. P < 0.05

ISSN: 2730-7182