Table 2 Statistical tests of differences in turning angle for habitat vs matrix and FRAG vs AGGREG.
Test I: Uniform vs unimodal distribution with mean m = 0: R (P) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Â | FRAG | AGGREG | Pooled |
Habitat | 0.195 (0.0002) | 0.196 (< 0.0001) | 0.196 (< 0.0001) |
Matrix | 0.509 (< 0.0001) | 0.533 (< 0.0001) | 0.516 (< 0.0001) |
Test II: Symmetrical distribution around 0: W+ (P) | |||
| Â | FRAG | AGGREG | Pooled |
Habitat | -0.207 (0.836) | 1.442 (0.149) | 1.009 (0.313) |
Matrix | 0.295 (0.768) | 0.900 (0.368) | 0.797 (0.425) |
Test III: Goodness-of-fit for von Mises distribution: U2 (P) | |||
| Â | FRAG | AGGREG | Pooled |
Habitat | 0.045 (0.200) | 0.056 (0.100) | 0.039 (0.300) |
Matrix | 0.032 (> 0.500) | 0.094 (0.035) | 0.036 (> 0.500) |
Test IV: von Mises mean m = 0: E n (P) | |||
| Â | FRAG | AGGREG | Pooled |
Habitat | -0.775 (0.438) | -0.605 (0.545) | -0.929 (0.353) |
Matrix | 0.609 (0.542) | -0.652 (0.514) | 0.174 (0.862) |
Test V: Equality of von Mises concentrations K: f r (P) | |||
| Â | FRAG | AGGREG | Pooled |
Habitat | 0.127 (0.722) | 10.821 (< 0.0001) | |
Matrix | 0.132 (0.725) | Â | |