Skip to main content

Table 2 Z-scores of the robustness γ 1 m MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaacciGae83SdC2aa0baaSqaaiabigdaXaqaaiabd2gaTbaaaaa@3001@ at threshold level T1. Rates for each real pre-miRNA compared to 1,000 random and four types of shuffled pseudo pre-miRNAs.

From: In silico genetic robustness analysis of microRNA secondary structures: potential evidence of congruent evolution in microRNA

Species

Random

Zero-markov

Mononucleotide

First-markov

Dinucleotide

H. sapiens

-2.11 ± 0.62

-2.14 ± 0.61

-2.14 ± 0.61

-2.17 ± 0.61

-2.17 ± 0.62

C. elegans

-2.18 ± 0.89

-2.17 ± 0.86

-2.16 ± 0.86

-2.20 ± 0.87

-2.18 ± 0.84

D. melanogaster

-2.14 ± 0.74

-2.11 ± 0.71

-2.07 ± 0.80

-2.15 ± 0.72

-2.15 ± 0.72

D. rerio

-2.07 ± 0.61

-2.11 ± 0.56

-2.13 ± 0.67

-2.13 ± 0.56

-2.11 ± 0.55

M. musculus

-1.96 ± 0.77

-2.00 ± 0.74

-2.00 ± 0.75

-2.04 ± 0.75

-2.02 ± 0.73

R. norvegicus

-2.02 ± 0.75

-2.07 ± 0.73

-2.08 ± 0.73

-2.09 ± 0.73

-2.07 ± 0.72

Average

-2.07 ± 0.70

-2.10 ± 0.67

-2.10 ± 0.68

-2.13 ± 0.67

-2.11 ± 0.66