Skip to main content

Table 5 Evidence for or against dosage sensitivity of ligand and receptors that were possibly the source for or the consequence of block duplication

From: Unusual linkage patterns of ligands and their cognate receptors indicate a novel reason for non-random gene order in the human genome

Gene

Evidence for dose sensitivity

References

HGF

Over-expression in retinal pigment epithelium induces retinal detachment

[58]

MET*

Autosomal dominant Hereditary papillary renal carcinoma is associated with mutations in MET

[59]

MST1

None: mouse knockout is without strong phenotype

[60]

RON

Hemizygous mice (Ron +/-) are highly susceptible to endotoxic shock and are compromised in their ability to downregulate nitric oxide production

[61]

DLL1

No report of heterozygous null phenotype nor of overexpression phentype

 

NOTCH3*

Autosomal dominant disorder CADASIL owing to mutation in NOTCH3

[62]

DLL3

None: the gene is associated with disease (SCDO1/2) in mutant homozygotes but no report of heterozygote phenotype.

 

NOTCH4

Upregulation of NOTCH4 is associated with mammary tumours

See OMIM 164951

FGF1

None: no phenotype in Fgf1 homozygous knockouts

[63]

FGFR3*

Autosomal dominant disorder ACH associated with mutation in FGFR3

See OMIM 134934

FGF2

Over-expression promotes bone growth

[64]

FGFR4

None: knockout homozygotes have no obvious phenotype

[65]

FGF8

Over-expression is associated with carcinogenesis

[66]

FGFR1*

Autosomal dominant Pfeiffer syndrome is owing to mutations in FGFR1

[67]

FGF17

None: heterozygote knockout has no phenotype

[68]

FGFR2*

Numerous autosomal dominant disorders associated with FGFR2

See OMIM 176943

FGF18

Dose sensitive liver and small intestine development

[69]

  1. *Note: These five genes are known to be associated with human autosomal dominant disorders. Searching OMIM [70] for mapped genes with "autosomal dominant" somewhere in the title or the text and not "recessive" in the title, reveals an estimate of 1166 mapped genes which may be associated with autosomal dominant disorders. Assuming 22470 autosomal genes (as in the NC files) we should then have expected from a random sample of 17 autosomal genes less than one dominant, significantly less than observed (Chi-squared, P < 0.0001). However, in some cases the dominance is owing to negative mutations rather than dose per se.