Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of models on 7 families of the LβH superfamily. Logarithm of the Maximum Likelihood per site obtained with different models for the families studied. Better models lead to larger ML values. The three numbers reported for each case correspond to structural classes i and i+4, considered separately, and to the average over the six structural classes.

From: The structurally constrained protein evolution model accounts for sequence patterns of the LβH superfamily

Family Local score Global score JTT model
LPXA -19.9 -20.0 -23.7
  -21.7 -22.7 -24.9
  -28.0 -28.1 -29.3
SATA -16.2 -16.1 -18.7
  -20.1 -19.2 -20.2
  -25.2 -24.7 -25.9
LACA -35.7 -34.2 -36.3
  -36.4 -35.0 -35.9
  -38.0 -37.0 -37.4
CAT -13.8 -13.7 -16.4
  -15.8 -15.9 -17.4
  -19.3 -19.0 -19.8
DAPD -17.0 -17.1 -19.6
  -22.0 -23.8 -23.2
  -18.7 -20.0 -19.4
CAM -13.9 -14.1 -15.9
  -20.3 -18.5 -18.6
  -23.1 -21.2 -20.4
GLMU -38.1 -38.0 -39.9
  -39.0 -38.1 -38.1
  -49.3 -47.8 -47.9