Skip to main content

Table 1 Parameter estimates under branch, site and branch-site models

From: Adaptive evolution of the chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase gene involved in irregular monoterpene metabolism

Model

p

InL

Estimate of parameters

Models compared

2ΔL

Branch models

M0: ω0 = ω1 = ω2 = ωc

1

−10227.98

ω0 = ω1 = ω2 = ωc = 0.130

  

Mf: ω free

51

−10109.65

ω: 0 ~ 0.941

Mf vs. M0

236.66***

M2a: ω0 = ω2 = ωc, ω1

2

−10227.97

ω0 = ω2 = ωc =0.130, ω1 = 0.150

M2a vs. M0

0.02

M2b: ω0 =ω1 = ωc, ω2

2

−10227.89

ω0 = ω1 = ωc = 0.129, ω2 = 0.190

M2b vs. M0

0.18

M2c: ω0 = ω1 = ω2, ωc

2

−10210.87

ω0 = ω1 = ω2 = 0.122, ωc = 0.951

M2c vs. M0

34.22***

M3a: ω0 = ωc, ω1, ω2

3

−10227.88

ω0 = ωc = 0.129, ω1 = 0.149, ω2 = 0.190

M3a vs. M2a

0.18

M3b: ω0 = ω2, ω1, ωc

3

−10210.85

ω0 = ω2 = 0.122, ω1 = 0.153, ω2 = 0.949

M3b vs. M2c

0.04

M3c: ω0 = ω1, ω2, ωc

3

−10212.06

ω0 = ω1 = 0.121, ω2 = 1.020, ωc = 0.756

M3c vs. M2c

−2.38

M4a: ω0, ω1, ω2, ωc

4

−10210.82

ω0 = 0.122, ω1 = 0.153, ω2 = 0.148, ωc = 0.942

M4a vs. M2c

0.10

Site-specific models

M1: nearly neutral

1

−10152.15

P0 = 0.929, P1 = 0.071 ωO =0.109, ω1 = 1.000

  

M2: PositiveSelection

3

−10152.15

P0 = 0.929, P1 = 0.071, P2 = 0.000 ω0 = 0.109, ω1 = 1.000, ω2 =30.688

M2 vs. M1

0

M3: discrete (k=2)

5

−10064.21

P0 = 0.534, P1 = 0.417, P2 = 0.048 ωO = 0.028, ω1 = 0.223, ω2 = 0.670

M3 vs. M0

327.54***

M7: beta

2

−10064.80

P = 0.580 q = 3.405

  

M8: beta & ω

4

−10061.64

p0 = 0.989, p = 0.646, q = 4.203 (p1 = 0.011) ω = 1.054

M8 vs. M7

6.32*

Branch-site model

model A

3

−10130.51

P0 = 0.353, p1 = 0.026, p2 = 0.621, ω2 = 1.442

MA vs.M1

43.28***

  1. * significant at p <0.05 level, *** significant at p <0.001 level.
  2. p, the number of free parameters for the ω ratio.