Skip to main content

Table 1 Nuclear microsatellite F ST and Chloroplast (cpDNA) F ST estimated as G ST in two mangrove species

From: Comparative genetic structure of two mangrove species in Caribbean and Pacific estuaries of Panama

Mangrove species

Microsatellite

 

CpDNA

   
 

F ST

F IS

Outcrossing level

Hamilton & Miller’s method

Ennos ’s method

 

(SE)

(SE)

(t) (SE)

Expected cpDNA F ST

95% CI

Observed cpDNA G ST

95% CI

r = Pollen flow/Seed flow

Avicennia germinans

0.3181

0.1950

0.6736

0.5550

0.4758-0.6342

0.3469

0.1407-0.5531

−0.64

 

(0.0396)

(0.0335)

(0.0597)

     

Rhizophora mangle

0.4001

0.1327

0.7657

0.6485

0.5461-0.7509

0.8504

0.5888-1.1120

7.65

 

(0.0512)

(0.1307)

(0.1885)

     
  1. The estimates of G ST were calculed using the Hamilton and Miller’s method [21, eq. 10] and the Ennos’s method [43, eq. 5aa] in Avicennia germinans (black mangrove) and Rhizophora mangle (red mangrove) across four Panamanian estuaries. The comparison of F ST , F IS and outcrossing level (t) between A. germinans and R. mangle did not show significant differences between species (Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA, P>0.05, N=4).