Figure 4

Plots of mtDNA uncorrected distance vs. ML patristic distance. A) Plot from a well-sampled Kikihia COI + COII mtDNA ingroup dataset containing 30 species [1]. B) Plot from the Amphipsalta Notopsalta COI dataset from this study (light green dots), superimposed on the plot from A. The datasets span a nearly identical range of uncorrected distance values, but many corrected pairwise distances are over twice as large for Amphipsalta Notopsalta at uncorrected distances > 6%. The trendline in B was fitted to the Kikihia data points under 4% uncorrected distance