Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of mtDNA polymorphism among populations of H. e. chestertonii

From: Deep mitochondrial divergence within a Heliconiusbutterfly species is not explained by cryptic speciation or endosymbiotic bacteria

Species/Population/Clade

(S)

(h)

(Ď€)

(k)

(θw)

H. e. venus

11

6

0.0036

4.13

0.00339

H. e. chestertonii

59

29

0.0121

13.9

0.01028

Marsella (MR)

30

5

0.0136

15.6

0.01145

Trujillo (TR)

31

6

0.00959

11

0.00994

Yotoco (YO)

29

4

0.0127

14.6

0.01378

Buenos Aires (BA)

31

5

0.01516

17.4

0.01296

Carbonero (CR)

33

6

0.01417

16.26

0.01259

Caimital (CA)

26

4

0.0119

13.6

0.00992

Atuncela (AT)

27

5

0.01196

13.73

0.0103

Miravalle (MV)

33

6

0.01045

12

0.01259

Montañitas (MO)

4

4

0.00151

1.73

0.00153

La Cumbre (CU)

33

6

0.01341

15.4

0.01259

Saladito (SA)

24

4

0.01238

14.2

0.01004

Pance (PA)

24

3

0.00697

8

0.00916

Villa Colombia (VC)

3

3

0.00145

1.66

0.00114

Calima River valley (CV)

29

5

0.01096

12.59

0.00822

H. e. chestertonii (CV)

26

2

0.00647

7.42

0.00924

H. e. venus (CV)

20

3

0.00498

5.71

0.00711

North populations

52

21

0.01206

13.829

0.01017

South populations

42

16

0.0077

8.83

0.00889

North Clade

9

9

0.00125

1.43

0.00189

South Clade

23

18

0.00279

3.19

0.00456

  1. The symbols in the table represent: number of segregating sites (S), number of haplotypes (h), nucleotide diversity per site (π), average number of differences between pair of sequences (k) and genetic diversity per site (θw).