Table 1 Predictor and response variables for development of reproductive isolations in the ring species Ensatina eschscholtzii.
Population comparison | N | Response Variable | Predictor Variables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | Degree of Genetic Admixture (%) | Genetic Divergence | Ecological Divergence | ||
| Â | Â | Â | Time since Divergence | Climatic dissimilarity (%) | Vegetation dissimilarity (%) | |
| Â | Â | Â | mtDNA distance (corrected PiXY) | nDNA distance ( DN) | Â | Â |
contacts around the ring: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
plat a vs croc | 9 | 88.9 | 2.9 | 0.11 | 51.9 | 82.9 |
plat a vs plat b | 6 | 100.0 | 8.6 | 0.25 | 82.5 | 16.4 |
plat c vs plat d | 11 | 81.8 | 5.5 | 0.17 | 100.0 | 33.3 |
oreg a vs oreg b | 8 | 87.5 | 6.8 | 0.17 | 71.3 | 36.1 |
oreg b vs pict | 23 | 56.5 | 3.1 | 0.39 | 93.1 | 47.6 |
oreg c vs oreg e | 10 | 100.0 | 1.6 | 0.13 | 100.0 | 39.4 |
oreg d vs oreg e | 8 | 100.0 | 11.0 | 0.16 | 85.3 | 32.0 |
oreg f vs xant a | 6 | 100.0 | 13.8 | 0.31 | 80.2 | 29.3 |
oreg g vs xant b | 8 | 50.0 | 11.0 | 0.21 | 58.0 | 29.0 |
xant a vs xant b | 9 | 75.0 | 5.6 | 0.12 | 100.0 | 13.8 |
mid-ring contact: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
xant c vs plat b | 323 | 35.9 | 12.9 | 0.4 | 86.3 | 4.6 |
contacts at the terminus of the ring: | Â | Â | Â | Â | ||
esch vs klau b | 18 | 11.1 | 10.1 | 0.56 | 94.7 | 60.3 |
esch vs klau a | 88 | 5.7 | 10.5 | 0.6 | 100.0 | 24.0 |