Skip to main content

Table 3 Test of the evolutionary association between centromeres and cluster

From: Are ribosomal DNA clusters rearrangement hotspots? A case study in the genus Mus (Rodentia, Muridae)

Chromosomal segment

lLn (Independent)

lLn (Dependent)

ΔlnL

p-value

19

-12.9

-7.4

10.9

0.03

8p

-21.7

-16.3

10.8

0.03

17p

-19.1

-14

10.1

0.04

4

-18.7

-13.5

10.3

0.04

15p

-17.5

-13

8.9

0.06

17d

-14.3

-10

8.5

0.07

2d

-9.7

-5.4

8.5

0.07

6

-19.5

-15.3

8.3

0.08

13p

-21.3

-17.5

7.6

0.11

15d

-7.9

-5.4

5.1

0.28

8d

-7.9

-5.4

5.1

0.28

5p

-16.3

-13.8

5

0.29

5d

-10.7

-8.5

4.4

0.35

10p

-19.4

-17.7

3.4

0.49

5m

-6.9

-5.47

3

0.56

16

-15.1

-13.77

2.8

0.6

13d

-8.9

-7.5

2.8

0.59

1d

-8.9

-7.5

2.8

0.59

11d

-10.6

-9.25

2.7

0.61

18

-16.7

-15.45

2.5

0.64

9

-17.9

-17

1.9

0.76

12

-18.3

-17.4

1.7

0.78

1p

-15.5

-15.1

0.9

0.93

3

-15.9

-15.5

0.8

0.94

2p

-15

-14.6

0.7

0.95

11p

-14.9

-14.5

0.7

0.95

14

-13.9

-13.9

0.1

1

7

-11.1

-10.9

0.3

0.99

  1. For each orthologous segment (p = proximal, d = distal, m = median), the log-likelihood of the models with dependent or independent evolution between centromeres and clusters is provided, along with the difference in log-likelihood between them, and the resulting likelihood ratio test p-value.