Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the relative sugar binding activities of Con-anc mutants, Con-anc-N/C/L5, Con-anc-N/C/L5/L6, and Con-anc-N/C/L5/L6/L3.

From: Protein engineering of conger eel galectins by tracing of molecular evolution using probable ancestral mutants

Compared sugars

Ratio of relative binding activities

Different structure(s) between two compared sugars

 

Con-anc N/C/L5

Con-anc N/C/L5/L6

Con-anc N/C/L5/L6/L3

 

#45/#41

2.48

2.48

0.9

α1,3- fucosyl(GlcNAc)

#43/#42

1.01

1.11

1.29

α1,2- fucosyl(Gal)

#44/#42

6.18

5.27

1.89

α1,4-fucosyl(GlcNAc)

#46/#42

10.7

8.76

2.02

α1,2- fucosyl(Gal)/α1,4- fucosyl(GlcNAc)

#47/#42

1.62

1.55

1.63

α1,2- fucosyl(Gal)/α1,3- GalNAc(Gal)

#48/#42

16.2

11.4

2.71

α1,4-fucosyl(GlcNAc)/α1,2- fucosyl(Gal)/α1,3-GalNAc(Gal)

#46/#43

10.6

7.91

1.57

α1,4-fucosyl(GlcNAc)

#46/#44

1.73

1.66

1.07

α1,2- fucosyl(Gal)

#47/#43

1.61

1.4

1.27

α1,2- fucosyl(Gal)

#48/#43

16.1

10.3

2.1

α1,4-fucosyl(GlcNAc)/α1,3- GalNAc(Gal)

#48/#46

1.52

1.3

1.34

α1,3- GalNAc(Gal)

#48/#47

10

7.34

1.66

α 1,4-fucosyl(GlcNAc)

  1. PA-sugar numbers are provided in Additional File 3: Supplemental Figure S1.