|
N
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
---|
1. South-west
|
7
|
_
|
0.235
|
0.183
|
0.212
|
0.219
|
0.256
|
0.217
|
0.245
|
0.239
|
0.222
|
2. Cape Range
|
4
|
0.623
|
_
|
0.201
|
0.246
|
0.254
|
0.289
|
0.255
|
0.264
|
0.262
|
0.267
|
3. Carnarvon
|
10
|
0.359
|
0.456
|
_
|
0.205
|
0.205
|
0.243
|
0.220
|
0.240
|
0.232
|
0.225
|
4. Pilbara
|
10
|
0.505
|
0.709
|
0.494
|
_
|
0.171
|
0.206
|
0.192
|
0.209
|
0.199
|
0.185
|
5. Central Ranges
|
11
|
0.512
|
0.718
|
0.457
|
0.294
|
_
|
0.203
|
0.202
|
0.221
|
0.217
|
0.207
|
6. Kimberley A
|
1
|
0.704
|
1.059
|
0.673
|
0.445
|
0.415
|
_
|
0.191
|
0.174
|
0.153
|
0.153
|
7. Kimberley B
|
1
|
0.557
|
0.872
|
0.577
|
0.421
|
0.443
|
0.347
|
_
|
0.181
|
0.174
|
0.153
|
8. Kimberley C
|
2
|
0.657
|
0.923
|
0.698
|
0.470
|
0.491
|
0.281
|
0.333
|
_
|
0.161
|
0.165
|
9. Kimberley D
|
1
|
0.680
|
0.981
|
0.686
|
0.463
|
0.504
|
0.221
|
0.326
|
0.266
|
_
|
0.139
|
10. Kimberley E
|
7
|
0.615
|
0.997
|
0.636
|
0.405
|
0.479
|
0.248
|
0.281
|
0.281
|
0.227
|
_
|
- Corrected (GTR+I+G) and uncorrected genetic distances between ten candidate species confounded within 'Crenadactylus ocellatus', calculated using 828 bp of ND2 data.