Skip to main content

Table 2 Pairwise differences between populations for nuclear microsatellites (FST) above diagonal; and mtDNA (Net mean number of substitutions per site under Jukes-Cantor), below diagonal

From: Integrating phylogeographic patterns of microsatellite and mtDNA divergence to infer the evolutionary history of chamois (genus Rupicapra)

  parva pyrenaica ornata cartusiana rupicapraW rupicapraC rupicapraE tatrica carpatica balcanica asiatica caucasica
parva   14.31 51.43 42.51 33.31   35.65 48.42 45.05 36.41 40.10 42.27
pyrenaica 0.65   50.18 44.22 33.59   35.64 48.36 45.84 37.29 39.83 43.22
ornata 4.42 4.58   70.91 50.41   59.68 77.14 67.21 64.23 93.12 69.46
cartusiana 4.24 4.54 1.15   11.31   20.16 36.58 34.67 18.42 44.31 29.22
rupicapraW 0.52 0.32 4.13 4.01    6.35 24.99 20.38 11.18 17.73 13.85
rupicapraC 4.81 4.98 5.81 5.46 3.94        
rupicapraE 4.67 4.80 5.72 5.37 3.74 0.15   29.06 22.73 12.53 19.21 16.23
tatrica 4.59 4.89 5.42 5.11 3.85 1.11 0.77   25.55 21.81 47.36 38.35
carpatica 4.81 5.11 5.41 5.10 4.06 1.15 0.86 0.86   22.52 31.71 27.23
balcanica 4.17 4.46 5.02 4.87 3.43 0.91 0.85 0.98 0.68   16.38 20.43
asiatica 4.84 4.97 6.01 5.83 4.05 1.47 0.83 1.57 1.32 1.33   20.61
caucasica 4.42 4.72 5.51 5.40 3.71 1.20 0.34 1.05 1.00 0.98 0.51