Skip to main content

Table 2 Evolutionary rates estimates.

From: Molecular evolutionary rates predict both extinction and speciation in temperate angiosperm lineages

Clade

λ

95% C.I. (λ)

μ

95% C.I. (μ)

∑(μ/λ)

mean ITS rate

95% HPD (mean rate)

ITS rate c.v.

95% HPD (c.v. rate)

Antirrhineae

1.070

(0.716, 1.588)

0.989

(0.602, 1.533)

0.924

8.10E-03

(6.24E-03, 1.02E-02)

0.547

(0.367, 0.737)

Artemisia

0.379

(0.275, 0.516)

0.239

(0.106, 0.401)

0.631

1.69E-03

(1.24E-03, 2.20E-03)

0.921

(0.697, 1.180)

Chironiinae

0.456

(0.292, 0.702)

0.350

(0.133, 0.637)

0.769

6.32E-03

(4.45E-03, 8.45E-03)

0.422

(0.245, 0.601)

Ericameria

0.234

(0.170, 0.342)

0

(0, 0.166)

0

2.17E-03

(1.01E-03, 3.82E-03)

0.809

(0.422, 1.214)

Lepidium

0.956

(0.670, 1.350)

0.589

(0.175, 1.086)

0.617

8.26E-03

(5.25E-03, 1.18E-02)

0.753

(0.512, 1.016)

Lotus

0.366

(0.259, 0.515)

0.330

(0.205, 0.492)

0.902

2.78E-03

(1.93E-03, 3.69E-03)

0.722

(0.514, 0.944)

Lupinus

1.547

(1.112, 2.139)

1.388

(0.900, 2.023)

0.898

2.18E-03

(1.26E-03, 3.28E-03)

1.060

(0.554, 1.631)

Lycieae

0.177

(0.136, 0.292)

0

(0, 0.163)

0

2.80E-03

(1.97E-03, 3.70E-03)

0.497

(0.246, 0.758)

Phrymoideae

0.265

(0.185, 0.375)

0.188

(0.079, 0.320)

0.709

6.22E-03

(4.79E-03, 7.72E-03)

0.632

(0.487, 0.790)

Polemoniaceae

0.318

(0.254, 0.396)

0.227

(0.145, 0.321)

0.715

5.15E-03

(4.25E-03, 6.11E-03)

0.551

(0.450, 0.656)

Salvia

1.649

(1.181, 2.282)

1.466

(0.957, 2.134)

0.889

6.56E-03

(5.13E-03, 8.04E-03)

0.614

(0.477, 0.760)

Saniculoideae

0.259

(0.194, 0.345)

0.164

(0.073, 0.269)

0.631

1.78E-03

(1.30E-03, 2.27E-03)

0.611

(0.442, 0.794)

Sidalcea, etc.

0.053

(0.039, 0.095)

0

(0, 0.061)

0

1.21E-03

(9.34E-04, 1.52E-03)

0.667

(0.419, 0.959)

  1. Estimates for speciation rate (λ), extinction rate (μ), relative extinction rate (∑), mean rate of nucleotide substitution at the ITS1 and ITS2 loci (mean rate = number of substitutions per site/age in millions of years. It is calculated for each branch, then summed over all branches), and the coefficient of variation (c.v.) in mean substitution rate (c.v. rate = among-branch variance in ITS rate, scaled by the mean. I.e., for a tree with a c.v. of 0.50, the rate of ITS evolution varies across lineages by 50% of the mean). Confidence intervals (C.I.) for diversification rates were calculated from their likelihood profiles. 95% HPD (Highest Posterior Density) intervals for ITS rates are from BEAST (Tracer) analysis of MCMC output.